logo
#

Latest news with #JournalofArchaeologicalScience

What Motivates People To Move Megaliths?
What Motivates People To Move Megaliths?

Scoop

time17-06-2025

  • Science
  • Scoop

What Motivates People To Move Megaliths?

How humans moved large rocks to construct monuments has fueled many theories, even though it is a matter of physics and coordinated efforts by a large workforce. A more interesting concept to explore for prehistoric cultures is what made people care so much about certain rocks, or more specifically, what made them move these rocks for miles. Stone artifacts are valued to this day. In 2023, a 335-pound rock (152 kg) called the Stone of Scone was brought to Westminster Abbey for the coronation of King Charles III. Legends suggest it has a biblical origin, being used as Jacob's pillow in Palestine, but archaeologists and historians postulate that it originally came from Scotland because it is made out of sandstone, as opposed to the limestone bedrock of the Holy Land. This notable stone was part of Scotland's history until England 'stole' it in 1296. It was finally returned to Scotland in 1996, and now only makes brief trips to England. Advertisement - scroll to continue reading Seizing the Stone of Scone represented an assertion of power, and this reasoning for transporting artifacts is common throughout history. In the 19th century, the Luxor Obelisk was taken from the banks of the Nile and now stands in central Paris. Claiming an artifact, however, is different from quarrying stones and moving them long distances to erect menhirs and dolmens in a seemingly nondescript location. People were moving larger stones with minimal use of technology during prehistory. Megaliths are monuments comprising large stones, as opposed to a monumental feat of architecture made by carving blocks. One of the biggest questions about these mysterious sites is where the raw material was dug out of the earth. Excavations at quarrying sites for the most famous megaliths have led to surprising discoveries in the past 10 to 20 years. Stonehenge comprises two types of rock, the more iconic and larger sarsen stones having only traveled approximately 20 miles to Salisbury Plain. The smaller menhirs in the circle, called bluestones, traveled more than 200 miles from southwest Wales, which makes 'the distance from quarry to eventual destination… the maximum known for megalithic monuments anywhere in the world,' according to a 2022 study published in the Journal of Archaeological Science. According to a recent theory, the stones weren't quarried specifically for Stonehenge. In 2010, a smaller stone circle named Waun Mawn was discovered adjacent to the bluestone quarry in Wales. Excavations at this site dated it to be older than Stonehenge by a few centuries, and holes where missing bluestones once stood led to early theories that they were taken to build Stonehenge. Further research has yet to prove this, and more studies are still emerging, some debunking that theory. 'There is nothing at Waun Mawn to link this site in any way to Stonehenge… It is concluded that at Waun Mawn and elsewhere in West Wales there has been substantial 'interpretative inflation' driven by the desire to demonstrate a Stonehenge connection,' stated a 2024 study published in the Holocene. Meanwhile, if a 900-year-old legend is to be believed, Stonehenge was 'moved' from Ireland to its current location by giants under the orders of the wizard Merlin. These findings only raise more questions about the dynamics behind such an impressive mobilization of resources. The construction of megaliths, in some instances, likely involved materials traveling long distances, resulting from resource necessity and ceremonial importance. The monuments made of rocks lasted longer than others over the centuries and have been intentionally placed in areas where they were visible in the landscape. Visibility, placement, and arrangement are important aspects of how experts theorize prehistoric symbolism. Prestige and sacred importance are assumed to directly influence the effort undertaken during a prehistoric project, and this applies to the motivation people felt while erecting megaliths. The Korean Peninsula has the largest concentration of megaliths in the world, and has 40 percent of the world's dolmens, according to the Asia Society.. The Korean dolmen tombs typically contain the remains of one individual and are associated with the Bronze Age due to the types of artifacts in the burials. One conundrum for archaeologists is that fewer valuable grave goods were found in the more complex dolmens, which is counterintuitive to perceptions of what denotes prestige in archaeological theory. Europe, meanwhile, is home to 35,000 distinct stone orientations. Most of these megaliths date from 4,500 to 2,500 BC, according to an article in Discover magazine. Most of them are rings of menhirs like the Ring of Brodgar in Orkney, Scotland, or are dolmen grave markers like the Dolmen de Sa Coveccada on the coast of northeast Sardinia. A majority of dolmen grave markers and the rings of menhirs usually face the rising sun or have some sort of astronomical alignment, and are found in coastal parts of Europe. This is linked to a theory from 2019 that the practice of erecting such monuments originated in northwest France before spreading to other parts of Europe in waves, according to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. This theory was developed as more research and comprehensive radiocarbon dates consistently indicated that megalith sites in northwestern France, like the Carnac stones, were among the oldest at approximately 6,000 years old. A notable exception to this trend is the tallest single upright stone on the Iberian Peninsula, the Menir da Meada in Portugal, estimated to be 6,000 to 7,000 years old based on carbon-dated charcoal from the base of the stone. While the culture of certain megalith phenotypes may have spread through travel and exchange, it is also a mix of divergent and convergent development. Most of these European megaliths used raw materials from sources located between 10 and 20 miles from the site, and some were erected just adjacent to where they were quarried. In the case of these sites, compared to Stonehenge, resource availability seems to have played a larger role in placement than specific symbolism. This is difficult to discern since a short journey also involves a serious undertaking, but the coastal placement of many dolmens and menhirs likely has more clues to the underlying symbolism in construction. Sacred importance is generally the key to understanding megaliths in any cultural context, because they were used for cultic or ceremonial practices. One of the most significant megaliths for understanding ancient cultic practices is the Göbekli-Tepe complex in Turkey. It has T-shaped stone pillars erected and carved with animal motifs surrounding a central altar. It is more than 11,000 years old and only just predates agricultural developments for Upper Mesopotamia. The site is the only ceremonial center of such a high caliber for a prehistoric hunter-gatherer population. Possibly the oldest temple in the world, excavation work has continued to yield discoveries as of 2025 since it was first surveyed in 1963. Despite being so important for ceremony and belief traditions, the limestone slabs at Göbekli-Tepe were quarried just at the bottom of the hill from where the shrine was erected. The hunter-gatherers at the time were using stone flints to carve out the blocks 6,000 years before Stonehenge was built, and the process would have required a lot of effort, even though the blocks didn't need to be transported for long distances. There are multiple categories for megaliths. Stonehenge is a combination of menhirs, which are erected stones, and dolmens, which have one stone flat like a tabletop on two other stones. The well-known carved heads on Easter Island, Chile, are worked menhirs, along with the intricately-etched deer stones dotting the central Mongolian steppe, dated to the Bronze Age. Other types of megaliths are cairns, which are massive piles of rocks and boulders of varying sizes but are typically much smaller than any component of Stonehenge. These are usually associated with burials, like the phenotype linked to Mongolia's deer stones— Khirigsuurs. These massive stone mound burials indicate how many people gathered for and built a burial. The largest is more than a square kilometer. Many of these burial mounds also have rings or fences of smaller stone mounds containing horse remains. There are different subdivisions of cairns depending on styles and other architectural elements—similar to the ones in Mongolia—usually containing a burial chamber. This subgroup of megaliths is frequently linked with prestige since they are associated with burials. Cists usually have cairn traits with a more systematic structure, but specifically refer to the square stone structure in the middle of the monument. These are usually thought to be used for mortuary purposes, but some notable examples have no signs of human remains. Like Stonehenge, most megaliths have a combination of these features. Rujm el-Hiri, or 'Israel's Stonehenge,' has a central cist but is surrounded by expanding rings of concentric circles. There are lines of rocks connecting the outer rings in some sections that look like spokes, partly inspiring its Hebrew name, which translates to 'Wheel of Ghosts.' Even though artifacts, including gold jewelry were found here, the lack of human remains is part of the reason experts have made several speculations about its intended use, including a platform for sky burials, a sacrificial altar, and an astronomical observatory. The observatory theory was countered by an article published in November 2024 by Remote Sensing, arguing that due to tectonic activity and the movement of celestial bodies, the sides and spokes of Rujm el-Hiri would not be aligned like they are now when the megalith was constructed approximately 6,000 years ago. The question surrounding how megaliths were constructed has resulted in various theories despite a wide range of feasible and plausible solutions. Log rollers helped transport large stones well before a wheel or cart was devised. Using simple physics, it is theorized that holes were dug and then an A-frame of two timbers called a shearleg was set up to place a high fulcrum so people could pull ropes attached to the stone slab, erecting it into an upright position. Another take has been ethnographically documented on Easter Island. The people of Rapa-Nui lifted fallen carved heads using levers. They lifted the head slightly with log levers and propped it at that position with wedges or ropes, and repeated this until it was vertical. Excavations from the bluestone quarry in Wales found that stone wedges were used to extract the stones for the construction of Stonehenge. Even though cists, cairns, and other monuments were made from a collection of boulders and smaller rocks, that doesn't mean they didn't require extensive manpower. These archaeological structures usually provide extensive data on prehistoric cultures, especially if associated with grave goods and symbolism. They show how important a deceased individual was, and hint at the sort of collective event a burial and cairn construction may have entailed at the time. Many different cultures around the globe worked and carved artifacts out of rock, producing isolated or unique megaliths not too different from the iconic faces at Easter Island. Bada Valley on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi is home to more than 400 megalithic sculptures fashioned with humanoid, animalistic, or geometric features. A few of the humanoid menhirs even have names and stories in contemporary and local pantheons. In Mexico during the Bronze Age, the Olmec culture is credited with carving massive heads, the largest of which weighs up to approximately 50 tons. It's speculated they were made in the likeness of Olmec rulers. Similar to the pyramids and other monuments, megaliths required organized coordination among a large number of people. Despite this, early and flawed archaeological theories on linear development have postulated that monuments are a hallmark of civilizations, while megaliths are mysteries and archaic in nature. In Latin America, architectural practices followed by the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas utilized stone blocks that seamlessly fit together (although regularly nonuniform) to build walls, temples, pyramids, and fortresses. A notable example of megalithic construction is Tiwanaku, located almost 4,000 meters above sea level in Bolivia. The temple complex has impressive artefacts, including the monolithic Gate of the Sun. It is established that Egyptians and people in Micronesia were transporting megaliths and building materials by boat. The technology and proof of it are there, but now many researchers are using new technologies and novel approaches to better understand what exactly prompted people to move boulders and mountains in the first place. Author Bio: Andrew Califf is an archaeologist and anthropologist interested in how people interact with the natural world. He has covered environmental conservation and Indigenous rights stories and conducted archaeological topographic analysis research in remote regions.

'Worst possible way to die' found as archaeologists unearth sinister skeleton
'Worst possible way to die' found as archaeologists unearth sinister skeleton

Daily Record

time07-06-2025

  • Daily Record

'Worst possible way to die' found as archaeologists unearth sinister skeleton

A skeleton unearthed by archaeologists shows the brutal and agonising torture that was inflicted upon the man before he was 'clumsily' beheaded in a horrifying discovery History is littered with horrific deaths that would undoubtedly disturb most individuals today. Yet, from all the brutal and bizarre ways to die, one of the most excruciating has come to light through a recent archaeological discovery. Published in the Journal of Archaeological Science, archaeologists at the University of Milan have uncovered the Medieval remains of a young man who appears to have succumbed after suffering a notoriously painful torture technique followed by an unsuccessful execution by beheading. ‌ The unfortunate youth met his demise between the ages of 17 and 20 during the 13th century and was buried in proximity to a cathedral in Milan, Italy. ‌ Initial examination of his remains indicated that he had sustained injuries across his arms and legs that were symmetrically inflicted, indicating intentional harm. Based on historical accounts, the researchers propose that the man underwent a form of torture known as "the wheel," identified also as the "breaking wheel" or "Catharine wheel". The wheel was a ghastly method of capital punishment employed broadly throughout Europe into the beginning of the early modern era, around the 16th century, reports the Irish Star. Accounts on the execution of this device differ according to period and place but commonly involved the progressive smashing and fracturing of a person's limbs, concluded by additional injury caused by the wheel itself. In some accounts, torturers would start by dropping the heavy wooden wheel onto people's limbs, beginning with the shin bones and working their way up. Once the body was sufficiently battered, the broken limbs would be woven in and out of the wheel spokes or tightly fastened to it using a rope. Further injuries were then inflicted – using either blades, blunt objects, fire, whips, or red-hot pincers – after which the wheel was mounted on a pole and displayed like a flag. The nearly dead victim would hang here for some time, perhaps days or weeks, until they eventually died or were mercifully executed. ‌ This brutal torture technique was most often used against those accused of heinous crimes, but in northern Italy, where this body was found, this kind of torture was usually reserved for persons suspected of spreading the plague. "The victim of the wheel could have been considered as different by his contemporaries, and possibly this discrimination may have been the cause of his final conviction, as he could have been sacrificed, being a "freak", by an angry crowd, as a plague spreader," the researchers write. As if this wasn't enough, forensic analysis of his skeleton also revealed unusual linear fractures at the base of his skull. This was most likely, the researchers say, the result of a sharp force trauma from a heavy weapon during a "clumsy decapitation." If this theory of wheel torture is accurate, the researchers will have documented the first archaeological evidence of a human being tortured by the wheel, certainly in medieval northern Italy, if not the world. One thing is for certain, this unfortunate individual did not have a pleasant last few days on Earth.

Unearthed skeleton shows 'worst possible way to die' after gruesome torture
Unearthed skeleton shows 'worst possible way to die' after gruesome torture

Daily Mirror

time07-06-2025

  • Science
  • Daily Mirror

Unearthed skeleton shows 'worst possible way to die' after gruesome torture

Archaeologists in Italy have discovered the skeleton of a man who suffered a brutal and agonising death sometime during the 13th century, after being tortured and beheaded The annals of history are filled with gruesome deaths that would send shivers down the spines of most people today. However, among the numerous brutal and unusual ways to meet one's demise, few are as excruciating as the one discovered in a recently unearthed skeleton. As reported in the Journal of Archaeological Science, archaeologists from the University of Milan have uncovered the Medieval remains of a young man who appears to have succumbed to a notoriously agonizing torture method and a botched beheading. ‌ The individual met his untimely end between the ages of 17 and 20, sometime during the 13th century, and was laid to rest near a cathedral in Milan, northern Italy. ‌ Initial examination of his skeleton revealed symmetrically placed wounds on his arms and legs, indicating deliberate injury. Drawing on historical records, the researchers hypothesized that the man had been subjected to torture using "the wheel," also known as the "breaking wheel" or the "Catharine wheel". The wheel was a torture device employed for public executions throughout much of European history until the dawn of the early modern era (c. 1500), reports the Irish Star. Accounts of how this device was used vary depending on time and place, but it typically involved the systematic crushing and breaking of limbs, followed by inflicting additional wheel-based trauma. In some accounts, tormentors would start by dropping the hefty wooden wheel onto people's limbs, beginning with the shin bones and gradually moving upwards. Once the body was sufficiently battered, the shattered limbs would be threaded through the wheel spokes or tightly bound to it using a rope. Further injuries were then inflicted – utilising either blades, blunt objects, fire, whips, or red-hot pincers – after which the wheel was hoisted on a pole and displayed like a flag. The nearly dead victim would hang here for an extended period, possibly days or weeks, until they eventually succumbed or were mercifully put to death. ‌ This brutal torture technique was most often employed against those accused of heinous crimes, but in northern Italy, where this body was discovered, this type of torture was typically reserved for individuals suspected of spreading the plague. "The victim of the wheel could have been viewed as different by his contemporaries, and possibly this discrimination may have led to his final conviction, as he could have been sacrificed, being a "freak", by an irate crowd, as a plague spreader," the researchers write. As if this wasn't enough, forensic examination of his skeleton also revealed unusual linear fractures at the base of his skull. This was most likely, the researchers suggest, the result of a sharp force trauma from a heavy weapon during a "clumsy decapitation." If this theory of wheel torture is accurate, the researchers will have documented the first archaeological evidence of a human being tortured by the wheel, certainly in medieval northern Italy, if not the world. One thing is for sure, this unfortunate individual did not have a pleasant last few days on Earth.

Archaeologists discover 'worst possible way to die' with horrifying find
Archaeologists discover 'worst possible way to die' with horrifying find

Irish Daily Mirror

time07-06-2025

  • Science
  • Irish Daily Mirror

Archaeologists discover 'worst possible way to die' with horrifying find

History is littered with gruesome deaths that would make the hardiest of modern-day individuals wince, but among the myriad of brutal and bizarre ways to die, few are as excruciating as the fate of a man whose skeleton was recently unearthed. Published in the Journal of Archaeological Science, researchers from the University of Milan have stumbled upon the Medieval remains of a young man who appears to have succumbed after suffering through a notoriously agonising torture technique and an unsuccessful beheading attempt. The unfortunate soul met his demise at the tender age of between 17 and 20, during the 13th century, and was buried near a cathedral in Milan, in the north of Italy. An initial examination of his bones indicated he had sustained injuries that were symmetrically distributed on his arms and legs, hinting at some sort of intentional harm. Based on historical accounts, the team postulated that the man had been subjected to torture by "the wheel," also known as the "breaking wheel" or the "Catharine wheel". This wheel was a method of public execution used extensively across Europe until the early modern period began around 1500, reports the Irish Star. The exact procedure for employing this apparatus varied by time and region, but it typically involved the systematic shattering and fracturing of a person's limbs, followed by additional trauma inflicted with the wheel itself. In some accounts, torturers would start by dropping the hefty wooden wheel onto people's limbs, beginning with the shin bones and gradually moving upwards. Once the body was sufficiently battered, the broken limbs would be threaded through the wheel spokes or tightly bound to it using a rope. Further injuries were then inflicted – utilising either blades, blunt objects, fire, whips, or red-hot pincers – after which the wheel was hoisted on a pole and displayed like a flag. The nearly dead victim would hang here for an extended period, possibly days or weeks, until they eventually died or were mercifully executed. This brutal torture technique was most often used against those accused of heinous crimes, but in northern Italy, where this body was discovered, this kind of torture was typically reserved for individuals suspected of spreading the plague. "The victim of the wheel could have been viewed as different by his contemporaries, and possibly this discrimination may have led to his final conviction, as he could have been sacrificed, being a "freak", by an irate crowd, as a plague spreader," the researchers write. As if this wasn't enough, forensic analysis of his skeleton also revealed unusual linear fractures at the base of his skull. This was most likely, the researchers say, the result of a sharp force trauma from a heavy weapon during a "clumsy decapitation." If this theory of wheel torture is accurate, the researchers will have documented the first archaeological evidence of a human being tortured by the wheel, certainly in medieval northern Italy, if not the world. One thing is for sure, this unfortunate individual did not have a pleasant last few days on Earth.

Advanced weapons built 80,000 years ago, unearthed in Russia, has no human connection
Advanced weapons built 80,000 years ago, unearthed in Russia, has no human connection

Time of India

time13-05-2025

  • Science
  • Time of India

Advanced weapons built 80,000 years ago, unearthed in Russia, has no human connection

An 80,000-year-old bone spear tip, unearthed in Russia, challenges previous assumptions about Neanderthal capabilities. This discovery suggests they independently developed sophisticated hunting weapons, predating similar innovations by Homo sapiens. The artifact's advanced craftsmanship and well-preserved condition provide compelling evidence of Neanderthal resourcefulness and technological prowess, reshaping our understanding of their cognitive abilities. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs The world is witnessing the use of advanced and hi-tech weaponry in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, the military conflict between Israel on one side and a host of terror groups on the other, as well as the recent confrontation between India and Pakistan that came to an end just a couple of days advanced weapons and modern warfare techniques, including drones, UAVs , and cyberattacks, have been used in these military between all this, a unique weapon has been uncovered beneath the ground in Russia , one that was not even made by a human. While the weapon is a masterpiece, it has no human connection, and that has baffled the has revealed that this ancient weapon is approximately 80,000 years old and was unearthed from a cave in Russia. While the weapon, a spear tip made of bone, seems to be a simple object in the first instance, its age, dated to be nearly 80,000 years old has shocked the had till now believed that these sophisticated early tools, especially those made of materials other than stone, were the hallmark of our species, Homo sapiens But this remarkable spear tip, discovered in Russia's Mezmaiskaya Cave back in 2003, throws a fascinating curveball into that of its age, it's clear that modern humans couldn't have been the ones who painstakingly carved and shaped spotlight now turns to the Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis), our close evolutionary cousins who roamed Europe for hundreds of thousands of years before eventually fading Liubov Golovanova, an archaeologist at the Laboratory of Prehistory in Russia and the lead researcher behind the new study published in the Journal of Archaeological Science, explains the significance of this discovery. "This specimen suggests that at least some groups of late Middle Paleolithic Neanderthals in Europe had begun to develop bone-tipped hunting weapons," she and her team state in their makes this even more intriguing is the implication that the Neanderthals likely came up with this innovation on their own, "independently and without influence from early Upper Paleolithic modern humans that started to arrive on the continent much later."For years, these skills were largely attributed to Homo sapiens. However, this spear tip joins a growing body of evidence suggesting that Neanderthals were far more resourceful and technologically capable than we previously gave them credit discoveries of other bone tools crafted by Neanderthals, such as a 50,000-year-old collection from Siberia and 40,000-year-old tools possibly used for softening leather found in Europe, further support this evolving older bone tools, dating back as far as 400,000 years and potentially predating Neanderthals, have been found in Italy, hinting at a long history of bone tool use among early human researchers like Dr. Golovanova point out that the craftsmanship seen in this 80,000-year-old spear tip appears more advanced than some of these earlier fact that we don't find as many Neanderthal bone tools compared to their stone tools might simply be a matter of is more fragile than stone and requires specific environmental conditions to survive the relentless march of Cave, where the spear tip was found nestled amongst animal remains, stone tools, and traces of ancient campfires, seems to have provided that perfect researchers noted the "exceptional" preservation of the bone, with no signs of weathering or damage that would typically occur over such a long carefully examining the spear tip, Dr. Golovanova and her team even found cracks that suggest it was used to strike something soon after it was made and attached to a wooden shaft with tar. The bone itself likely came from a bison, a common prey animal of the discovery suggests that Neanderthals were not simply brutish cave dwellers but possessed a capacity for innovation and complex toolmaking that rivals our early bone tools are relatively rare compared to stone tools. However, this may be because bone decomposes more easily unless preserved in ideal conditions. Recent discoveries show Neanderthals used bone more often and more skillfully than once a mix of climate change, competition with Homo sapiens, small populations, and interbreeding. Some of their genes live on in us todayNeanderthals were shorter and stockier than modern humans, with large brow ridges, wide nostrils, and a robust, muscular build. Their faces were broad with a prominent nose, and they likely had pale skin and possibly red or light brown hair.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store