Latest news with #JudicialCommission
Hans India
13-07-2025
- Politics
- Hans India
State BJP chief urges lawyers to come forward for a change in TG
Hyderabad: State BJP president N. Ramachandra Rao said that lawyers should again come forward in the state, as the time has come to fight anti-people policies and wage a just agitation. Addressing the felicitation event organised by the BJP legal cell on Saturday, he urged, 'let us work together to bring a BJP government in Telangana.' Lawyers are always leaders in movements. They have the power to change the social and political awareness of society. Therefore, if we want to bring awareness among the people again, lawyers are important. He said the Congress government, which is ruling with anti-people policies, should be thrown out. Asserting that he wants to work hard to bring the BJP government to Telangana, he recalled his association with lawyers. He said, 'I have very close relations with lawyers.' In United AP, once I saw 100 reserve policemen destroying a shop in Tarnaka in 1993. 'I interfered in it, and in response, they lathi-charged me, arrested me, and filed a case. Seriously injured in the police attack, I received treatment in the hospital for almost two months. A major operation took place.' Further, at that time, lawyers in united Andhra Pradesh boycotted the courts for 43 days. 'Even though I was personally against the boycott, another senior lawyer, including me, condemned the police brutality; he called for a boycott among the lawyers. Ultimately, we were able to get the Judicial Commission appointed,' he added. Then the lawyers fought for me. That's why he considers the lawyers' community as his family. If lawyers resolve, anything is possible. He stressed that helping the BJP is an important thing for Telangana. He said that without the BJP's support, Telangana would not have been formed, and it is history. He recalled the key role of lawyers in the process of passing the Telangana Bill in Parliament without legal issues. 'If Telangana is to be transformed into a developed state', it is possible only with the BJP, he said.
Malay Mail
08-07-2025
- Politics
- Malay Mail
Procedural flaw in JAC proceedings? — Hafiz Hassan
JULY 8 — Concerns have been raised about the short-notice urgent meeting allegedly called by the Acting Chief Justice Datuk Seri Hasnah Hashim. Reference has been made to Section 13(2) of the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009, which states that at least ten days' notice in writing or by electronic mail shall be given to the members of the Judicial Appointment Commission (JAC). It may be said that the 10-day notice is procedural in nature. JAC members, who are no ordinary folks, may consent to a shorter notice having regards to attending circumstances. Or they may raise it (the short notice) with the Acting Chief Justice. Chief Justice of Malaya Datuk Seri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim is pictured at the Opening Ceremony of the 2025 Legislative Year at the Putrajaya International Convention Centre (PICC) January 8, 2025. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa Let us not be like the Malay saying: 'lebih sudu dari kuah'. When the short-notice urgent meeting was disclosed to the media, I would respectfully say in Malay: 'ada yang lebih sudu dari kuah'. One has to be mindful of Sections 15 and 16 of the JAC Act. Section 15(c) says that no act done or proceeding taken under the Act shall be questioned on the ground of an omission, a defect or an irregularity not affecting the merits of the case. Section 16 empowers the JAC to determine its own procedure. So, can one say that the alleged short-notice urgent meeting was flawed for non-compliance with Section 13(2) of the Act? * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
07-07-2025
- Politics
- Malay Mail
Secrecy of JAC proceedings must not be compromised — Hafiz Hassan
JULY 7 — Acting Chief Justice Datuk Seri Hasnah Hashim had reportedly called for an urgent meeting of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), according to sources. The unnamed source stated that the meeting was scheduled for 3pm on July 4, despite Section 13(2) of the JAC Act 2009 requiring at least 10 days' written notice to be given to commission members. 'The purpose of the urgent meeting is unclear,' a source said. It is concerning that the sources cited Section 13(2) of the JAC Act but ignored Section 32 of the same Act. Section 32 mandates and obligates every member, officer and servant of the JAC to secrecy in the course of his duties, whether during or after his tenure of office or employment. According to the author, the acting Chief Justice Datuk Seri Hasnah Hashim must act against the sources if they contravene Section 32. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa If the Acting Chief Justice had called for a meeting not in compliance with Section 13(2), then it is members of JAC who must raise it with the Acting Chief Justice. These members are no ordinary folks. They are learned people of the law. It is, again, concerning that the sources should disclose the alleged call for an urgent meeting to the media when Section 32(1) says that no member, officers and servants of JA 'shall disclose any information or document obtained by him in the course of his duties'. Section 34(4) says any person who contravenes the provision 'commits an offence and shall, on conviction, be liable to a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to both.' The Acting Chief Justice must act against the sources if they contravene Section 32. Secrecy of proceedings of JAC must not be compromised. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
04-07-2025
- Politics
- Malay Mail
Federal Court judge Zabariah Mohd Yusof steps in as acting Court of Appeal president
PUTRAJAYA, July 4 — Federal Court Judge Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof will assume the powers and responsibilities of the Court of Appeal president following Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim's retirement yesterday. In a letter dated yesterday, Chief Justice of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim, who is assuming the powers and duties of the Chief Justice, said Zabariah's appointment, effective yesterday, is made under Section 9 (3) (a) of the Court of Judicature Act 1964. According to the letter, she is to exercise the powers and duties of the Court of Appeal president until the position is permanently filled. A copy of the letter was also sent to the Chief Justice of Sabah and Sarawak, Tan Sri Abdul Rahman Sebli, Federal Court Chief Registrar Datuk Zamri Bakar and Court of Appeal Registrar Jumirah Marjuki. Zabariah was appointed as a Judicial Commissioner and later served at the Kuala Lumpur High Court on January 5, 2009. She was confirmed as a High Court judge on August 9, 2010, and on Jan 2, 2013, was assigned to the Seremban High Court. In 2016, she returned to serve as a High Court judge at the Kuala Lumpur High Court. Zabariah was appointed as a Court of Appeal Judge on March 21, 2016, and as a Federal Court judge on Dec 5, 2019. She turned 66 last April 10, but was given a six-month extension. In March, Zabariah was appointed as a member of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC). The President of the Court of Appeal of Malaysia is the second-highest position in the Malaysian judiciary after the Chief Justice. — Bernama
CBS News
07-06-2025
- Politics
- CBS News
Formal complaint accuses Metro Detroit judge of mistreating court employees
A Michigan district court judge is accused of refusing to provide a psychological evaluation to the Judicial Tenure Commission and creating a "climate of fear among court personnel" in a new formal complaint. A complaint was filed on Wednesday against Judge Kristen Hartig, who served in the 52-4 District Court in Troy, Michigan. In a statement, Chief Judge Travis Reed said he requested that Hartig be temporarily removed from the docket. Hartig has 14 days to respond to the complaint. "The Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission plays a key role in maintaining the integrity of our courts. While due process is vital, accountability helps preserve public trust in the judiciary,' Reed said. "Based on the limited information available to me at the time, I removed Judge Hartig from the most serious cases within the authority I had as chief judge. Now that a formal complaint has been filed, further action may be appropriate. I believe temporarily removing her from her full docket would be in the best interest of the court and the communities we serve." According to the complaint, the commission began investigating misconduct allegations before April 2024. The commission concluded that mental health was an issue and ordered Hartig to undergo a psychological evaluation. After receiving her results, Hartig was ordered by the commission to provide the documents; however, she refused despite the commission extending the deadline to provide them. The complaint says that Hartig eventually submitted the documents six months after the commission requested them. The complaint included the findings from the exam, but it was blacked out as requested by Hartig, "pending a determination by presiding authorities as to whether it should be kept sealed during the pendency of the proceedings." The complaint claims that Hartig required a court administrator to be available during scheduled absences and scolded the administrator for not answering emails when she attended a funeral. Hartig allegedly told the administrator that she must be in contact with her every day unless she was "unconscious," according to the complaint. The commission accused Hartig of ordering the court administrator to find a substitute for a clerk, although that was not part of the administrator's duties. Additionally, Hartig was accused of directing a pregnant probation officer to stand up and show her belly during a Zoom meeting without the officer's consent. According to the complaint, Hartig is accused of improperly dismissing felony cases with prejudice to punish Oakland County prosecutors over scheduling issues and for prosecutors opposing hearings during the COVID-19 pandemic. The commission says Hartig only had the authority to dismiss cases without prejudice. In one of those cases, the commission says Hartig's dismissal "was not made in good faith and/or with due diligence." Hartig became a district court judge in 2010, according to her bio on the court's website. She currently oversees the Recovery Treatment Court, which works to rehabilitate people, and has conducted town halls to educate residents on the opioid epidemic.
