01-07-2025
Former DAC deputy director-general fights dismissal linked to whistle-blower case
The Labour Court has confirmed the dismissal of a former Department of Arts and Culture deputy director-general who tried to reveal the identity of a whistle-blower.
Image: File
A former deputy director-general at the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture (DAC), who was fired after she tried to reveal the identity of a whistle-blower within the National Arts Council (NAC), turned to the Johannesburg Labour Court to get her job back.
Kelebogile Sethibelo was dismissed in her absence in July 2019 after she failed to attend the disciplinary inquiry against her.
Her dismissal followed two allegations of misconduct against her related to attempts to reveal the identity of a whistle-blower and insubordination.
Aggrieved with the dismissal, she referred a dispute to the bargaining council. Following unsuccessful attempts at conciliation, the matter came before an arbitrator, who ruled her dismissal to be fair.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
Unhappy with this finding, Sethibelo now turned to the Labour Court. In an investigation conducted by law firm Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc. at the time, it had emerged that Sethibelo had instructed the CEO of the NAC to investigate and reveal the identity of the person within the NAC who had leaked information about alleged corruption and misadministration within the department to the media.
The arbitrator found that Sethibelo's actions breached the Protective Disclosures Act and the DAC's whistleblowing policy, rendering her dismissal substantially fair.
The applicant challenged the findings of the arbitrator on the procedural and substantive fairness of her dismissal.
She contended that the arbitrator failed to apply his mind to the evidence before him, including that she was deprived of a fair opportunity to state her case at the internal disciplinary hearing.
The Labour Court had to assess whether Sethibelo's email to the NAC's CEO amounted to an instruction to uncover the identity of the whistle-blower.
Her defence that she was merely overseeing the NAC's operations was rejected as the email went beyond routine oversight and targeted the whistle-blower's identity.
Her contention that the whistle-blower was not a member of the DAC was also rejected as the NAC's staff fell under the DAC's oversight and thus protected by its whistle-blower policy.
The fact remains that the applicant sought to have the identity of the whistle-blower revealed, rather than have the nature of the allegations investigated, the court stated.
