logo
#

Latest news with #L'Équipe

Strasbourg set to sign Chelsea's Ishé Samuel-Smith
Strasbourg set to sign Chelsea's Ishé Samuel-Smith

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Sport
  • Yahoo

Strasbourg set to sign Chelsea's Ishé Samuel-Smith

RC Strasbourg Alsace are set to complete the signing of another player from Chelsea, Ishé Samuel-Smith (19), according to . Whilst the deal has not yet been officialised by either club, the transfer has indeed been completed, L'Équipe understands. The England youth international will sign a five-year deal with the Ligue 1 side. The left-back, who is also capable of playing at centre-back, will move for a fee of €7.5m, plus another €500,000 in bonuses. He was signed by Chelsea from Everton back in 2023 for a fee of €4.5m. Samuel-Smith is the third player to make the move from Chelsea to Strasbourg this summer, after Mathis Amougou (permanent) and Mike Penders (loan), but he is not expected to be the last. Kendry Paez is also expected to complete a loan move. Dutch striker Emanuel Emegha, meanwhile, could move in the opposite direction, as per Sports Zone, albeit not this summer. GFFN | Luke Entwistle

Saudi Arabian clubs interested in Marseille's Mason Greenwood
Saudi Arabian clubs interested in Marseille's Mason Greenwood

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Sport
  • Yahoo

Saudi Arabian clubs interested in Marseille's Mason Greenwood

According to a report from L'Équipe, Mason Greenwood (23) has become a target for several Saudi Arabian clubs, who have shown strong interest in the forward after the winger had a successful first season in La Provence, becoming Ligue 1's joint top scorer alongside Ousmane Dembélé (28). It would take a significant offer to convince Marseille to part ways with the former England international (this year, he swapped international allegiances and will now represent Jamaica). As L'Équipe explains, his age, his performances, and his former club Manchester United possessing a 50% sell-on fee, all would contribute to a hefty valuation. Greenwood joined Marseille from his boyhood club last summer for around €30m, including bonuses. The forward had been frozen out of the Manchester United squad after he was charged in 2022 with attempted rape, controlling and coercive behaviour, and assault. All charges have since been dropped, and he has denied all allegations. GFFN | Nick Hartland

Man Utd Set Price for £35M-Rated Man City Target as Option to Pursue PSG Star Emerges
Man Utd Set Price for £35M-Rated Man City Target as Option to Pursue PSG Star Emerges

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Man Utd Set Price for £35M-Rated Man City Target as Option to Pursue PSG Star Emerges

PSG face increasing uncertainty in their goalkeeper position, with Lucas Chevalier emerging as a possible long-term solution. Although Gianluigi Donnarumma is under contract through 2026, extension talks have stalled without reaching an agreement. Moreover, could Manchester United be reshaping their goalkeeping chart with the thought of bringing in the UEFA Champions League winner? Recently, L'Équipe reported that Donnarumma started thinking about leaving PSG before the European season ended, even though he publicly expressed loyalty to the club. The report also says Manchester United and Manchester City have been interested in the Italian goalkeeper since June. PSG hopes to finalize Chevalier's signing before deciding on Donnarumma's future. Are Manchester United keen on adding PSG standout? Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images On Monday, CaughtOffside reported that Manchester United have set a price tag of £35 million to £40 million on Andre Onana. The club is increasingly open to selling him, especially since they could be targeting Donnarumma as his replacement. Teams from major markets like AS Monaco and Saudi Arabia have expressed interest, but Onana's own decision will play a big role in how things unfold. However, Manchester United may not be in a position to make a move. According to the Manchester Evening News, the club doesn't currently have a budget for a new No. 1 goalkeeper. Even so, Onana is not expected to leave. He's reportedly committed to staying at Manchester United and has been assured he won't be sold or replaced.

A Fast Tour de France—No Doping Required
A Fast Tour de France—No Doping Required

Atlantic

time6 days ago

  • Sport
  • Atlantic

A Fast Tour de France—No Doping Required

For fans of the Tour de France, the word extraterrestrial has a special resonance—and not a fun, Spielbergian one. In 1999 the French sports newspaper L'Équipe ran a photo of Lance Armstrong on its front page, accompanied by the headline 'On Another Planet.' This was not, in fact, complimenting the American athlete for an out-of-this-world performance in cycling's premier race, but was code for 'he's cheating.' At that point, L'Équipe 's dog-whistling accusation of doping was based on mere rumor. More than a decade passed before the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency declared Armstrong guilty of doping. His remarkable streak of seven Tour wins was wiped from the record, but misgivings about extraterrestrial performances have never left the event. L'Équipe was back at it in 2023 when it used the headline 'From Another Planet,' this time for the Danish cyclist Jonas Vingegaard, who won that year's Tour. And earlier this year, the U.S. magazine Velo reported on the 'other worldly' performances of Tadej Pogačar, the Slovenian favorite to win this year's race, which will wind up in Paris on Sunday. Despite the astronomical language, no evidence at all suggests that Vingegaard and Pogačar are doping—which makes their recent dominance of the Tour all the more striking. This year Pogačar is in a class of his own: Earlier this week, he surpassed his 100th career win and could be on target to beat his astonishing 2024 record of winning nearly half the races he started in. 'The conversations I hear are: How is Tadej Pogačar better than rocket-fueled Lance Armstrong? ' Alex Hutchinson, the 'Sweat Science' columnist for Outside magazine, told me. ' What is it that has changed? ' This was precisely my curiosity because—by all the available data, and there are a lot—the current crop of contestants for the Tour de France podium are faster and better than ever before, and that includes the bad old days of systematic doping. Travis T. Tygart: Bad regimes are winning at sport's expense The sport's problem was once so endemic that it reached beyond the pro peloton and down even to the humble amateur ranks in which I used to compete. We would shake our heads when occasionally someone got busted for taking an illegal substance— just to try to win 50 bucks in a park race. Yet the story of the past decade has been a reversal of the old vicious cycle. That alone was notable enough, but what's truly remarkable is the sport's virtuous cycle, which I wanted to understand better: not just being clean but having attained an entirely new level of human performance. For a century, the sheer rigor of a bicycle race lasting three weeks and covering thousands of kilometers, up and down mountain passes, lent itself to artificial stimulants. Riders were always looking for a little help, but the big change came in the 1990s with abuse of a medical drug named erythropoietin, which increases red-blood-cell production. That led to years of extraterrestrial performances, fueled—as Armstrong confessed to Oprah Winfrey —by a sophisticated blood-doping scheme. Travis T. Tygart, the chief executive of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, led the investigation of Armstrong and his co-conspirators, which was crucial to ending that dire era and setting the sport on a better path. 'What we're hearing—and we have good sources in the peloton and the community—is that the bias is in favor of clean athletes: that you can be clean and win,' he told me. This was a strong statement from the ultimate clean-sport cop. 'In anti-doping, my job is to be skeptical but not cynical,' he went on. 'All athletes deserve sports fans' trust and belief in them, even if they're doing amazing things that we've never before seen.' No one I spoke with for this article, including riders past and present, dissented from this view or raised suspicions about performance-enhancing drug use. The gold standard of cycling performance—which boils down to a rider's ability to push against the wind and go uphill fast—is a high power-to-weight ratio, given in watts per kilogram. The benchmark figure is how many watts per kilo a cyclist can sustain for a one-hour effort. Every rider now has a power meter fitted to their bike, so they know their numbers in a constant, real-time way (together with heart rate, speed, and other measurements). 'Cycling is more quantifiable than any other sport,' said Hutchinson, who is also the author of Endure: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance. 'The power meter really gives you a window into the soul of the cyclist.' The riders now train with the data, they race with the data, they publish their data on Strava and similar training apps, they probably dream about their data. So we know that during a crucial mountain stage in last year's Tour de France—won convincingly by Pogačar on his way to overall victory—he produced approximately 7 watts per kilo for nearly 40 minutes. His main rival, Vingegaard again, actually tried an attack that failed, despite an estimated output of more than 7 watts per kilo for nearly 15 minutes. These were efforts in the Pyrenees; at sea level, the numbers would be even higher. (This all gets geeky quickly.) Within living memory, a figure of 5 watts per kilo would have been enough to make a professional rider competitive in a multistage race such as the Tour; and at his blood-doped peak, two decades ago, Armstrong was averaging an estimated 6 watts per kilo. In 2004, on that same climb in the Pyrenees, he took nearly six minutes longer than Pogačar did last year. In other words, Armstrong on dope then would be an also-ran next to Pogačar today. From the May 2018 issue: The man who brought down Lance Armstrong For Hutchinson, this realization of human potential is a triumph of sports science. 'Pogačar's getting better every year because the technology, the ability to control his training and racing, is getting better,' he told me. His hypothesis is that all of these data, gathered and processed, are helping an athlete not only maximize their output but also optimize it. Data are 'allowing people to live on the edge of their capacities more effectively than they used to,' he said. To make a mechanical analogy—endurance athletes love to talk about their 'engine'—a pro cyclist knows exactly where their red line is and how to live right on it. 'Every sport sees evolution to a certain extent,' Sean Quinn, a professional cyclist who was the 2024 U.S. national road-race champion, told me from his altitude-training camp in Europe. 'But the reason cycling has seen such an accelerated evolution in the last 20 years is because of the evolution of science across so many different dimensions.' Measuring riders' wattage is only the beginning of optimizing their performance. Inevitably, there's an app for that: A premium subscription to VeloViewer means that 'nine out of 10 guys in the peloton have seen a large part of the course before riding it,' Quinn explained. Highly accurate long-range weather forecasting can predict the wind speed and direction for a given race and course, Quinn said. That information helps cycling teams decide when to use aerodynamic but heavier wheels over lighter ones that produce more wind resistance. The improvement in equipment is relentless. A bike is limited to a minimum weight (about 15 pounds), but as long as it meets certain regulations of dimension and geometry, its drag coefficient can be wind tunnel–tested to the nth degree. And not just the bike itself—everything is subject to this aerodynamic imperative: the rider's helmet, jersey, shoes, even socks. Less drag means more speed, and fewer wasted watts maintaining that speed. Much of this technological advance can be attributed to the philosophy of 'marginal gains,' pioneered by the British Olympic cycling team in the early 2000s. At the time, short-distance events held in the Olympics' velodrome were regarded as a sideshow by the pro peloton, whose riders mostly showed up only for the more prestigious road races. By that happenstance, the Olympic velodrome became an arena for clean sport—and a laboratory for technical innovation. 'They made incremental improvements,' Phil Gaimon, a former U.S. pro, now an author and podcaster, told me. 'You make 100 of them and they add up in a big way.' As the doping culture waned, steady advances in equipment and training ultimately led U.K. riders to a string of Tour de France victories in the 2010s. Soon, the whole peloton had to get with the program: Everyone is an incrementalist now. 'Equipment's improved,' Gaimon said, but 'probably the main thing in the last couple of years would just be nutrition.' Tygart, the anti-doping chief, agreed: 'The nutrition is significantly different. Riders are fueling way more and in different ways from what they did in the past.' Eating more marks a big change from past custom, which Gaimon summed up as: 'Here's your apple, go ride for six hours.' Cyclists have always responded to the obvious logic that when the road goes uphill, the lighter you are, the better. In the years before he turned professional, Quinn was aware of a 'big movement toward weight loss and high-volume training, a lot of hours on the bike, and being as skinny as possible.' Until the 2020s, many riders still believed that fasted training—or, as Quinn says, 'functional starvation'—was the way to go. 'Especially in the past five years, it's become public knowledge that that is the opposite of what you want to do.' Racers are now constantly replenishing calories as they ride, in a highly calibrated way: They know exactly how many grams of food to eat and how often. This all adds up to an awful lot of energy bars and gels, as another former pro rider, George Hincapie, a co-host (with Armstrong and others) of the cycling podcast The Move, attested. Although he retired in 2012, his 17-year-old son Enzo now races on a development squad affiliated with Quinn's team. 'The amount of nutrition that shows up at my house for his training rides is mind-boggling,' Hincapie told me. 'It drives my wife nuts: boxes and boxes of nutrition.' But in the race to eat, not all calories are equal. Off the bike, quality meals are now a priority at all times—during training periods, in hotels at races, in the off-season. I spoke with Hannah Grant, a Danish TV chef and author who spent several seasons preparing food for the Saxo Bank pro-cycling team in the 2010s. At first, she encountered stiff resistance to the dietary changes she was trying to introduce: more vegetables, whole grains, no white pasta, no refined sugars when not on the bike. 'I was called 'the spawn of Satan' for taking the ketchup off the table,' she told me. A turning point came when one rider on the team was found to be gluten-intolerant, and Grant was able to change his diet in a way that hugely helped his performance. 'He was, like, 'This is working!'' she said. 'And then the other riders were, like, 'What's he doing that we need to do?'' Grant follows the latest practices because she now provides recipes to Vingegaard's team. 'Each rider will have the day's menu on their app,' she said, 'and it will tell the rider: You can have 37.5 grams of lentils; you can have 92.8 grams of chicken; and so on. You see them standing with their phones at the buffet.' Fueling the engine properly might seem blindingly obvious for participation in a race that will require a cyclist to burn 4,000 to 8,000 calories a day. But because riders tend to be conservative, even superstitious, in their loyalty to tried routines, shifting the culture took some time. Today's generation of rising stars are digital natives for whom ignoring the data and the apps is unthinkable: You can't win without them. To those of us who love the sport of cycling, the notion that intelligence has proved stronger than even the most fiendish cheating is terribly appealing. In today's Tour de France, I'm tempted to see not just a redemption narrative but an arc toward human perfectibility—and need to remind myself that, back in the worst doping years, fans were routinely fed supposedly technical reasons for the extraterrestrial performances: For instance, Armstrong was said to be more efficient because he pedaled at a higher cadence than other riders and had great 'ankling' technique in his pedal stroke. So that history does make one legitimately skeptical of claims about magical technical gains. No one I spoke with would rule out that doping still exists in the sport. Occasionally, athletes are still caught at it—but that now seems to happen more at lower levels of competition where the monitoring is less comprehensive. One permitted practice that offers some performance benefit is sodium-bicarbonate loading. You read that right: Chowing down baking soda helps aerobic performance in some circumstances by buffering lactic acid, a by-product of intense exercise. But eating an extra muffin won't do it, and the gastric distress associated with eating a lot seems a natural limiter. Another, more alarming method involves microdosing with carbon monoxide—a deadly gas—to mimic the effect of altitude training. Cycling's governing body has moved to ban the practice. But these are small matters compared with the rampant cheating that used to pervade the sport. Tygart's dictum—'be skeptical but not cynical'—makes ample sense. Assuming that Pogačar rolls over the finish line on the Champs-Élysées on Sunday with his lead intact and claims a fourth Tour victory, cycling fans seem safe to celebrate a clean, fair win for him and a victory for applied science. True, the Slovenian's preeminence has turned this year's race into something of a formality—a spectacle that can encourage a nostalgia for when the competition seemed to turn on other human factors such as race craft and guile, a capacity to suffer, and the will to overcome, rather than on data analysis and physiological optimization. Yet cycling never truly had a golden age. From a clean-sport perspective, it was bad old days all the way.

David Squires' extended universe: buy an exclusive cartoon
David Squires' extended universe: buy an exclusive cartoon

The Guardian

time6 days ago

  • Entertainment
  • The Guardian

David Squires' extended universe: buy an exclusive cartoon

David Squires is an Australia-based cartoonist and illustrator best known for his weekly football cartoons in The Guardian in the UK and Australia. David has also had four books published and provides regular cartoons for L'Équipe magazine in France and 11Freunde in Germany. David is uncomfortable about referring to himself in the third person, but will make an exception for the purposes of this format. A tribute to the famous old stadium, published when Everton's men's team moved out after 133 eventful years. The illustration commemorates the cast of characters to have graced its pitch, corridors and terraces. Buy your print here Compiled from readers' suggestions, this cartoon collection celebrates the quirky and beloved architectural elements of football stadiums from around the world. Buy your print here Published on the eve of the 2024-25 season, this illustration shows the troupe of figures predicted to play a prominent role over the coming campaign. Buy your print here A cartoon homage to LS Lowry's masterpiece, 'Going to the Match' (1953), updated to reflect the experience of attending a game in the modern era. Buy your print here Created exclusively for this print drop, here's a compilation of real and fictional characters who have regularly appeared in my cartoons since I started working for the Guardian in 2014. Includes a guide sheet to serve as a reminder of some of the more obscure figures. Buy your print here Prices: exclusive of taxes and shippingSmall unframed​ (30​x45​cm​). Edition​ number: 50. Net price: £110. Small framed, black (30​x45​cm​). Edition number: 50. Net price: £190. Medium unframed (40​x60​cm​). Edition number: 40. Net price: £140. Medium framed, black (40​x60​cm​). Edition number: 40. Net price. £290. Global Express ShippingUK 8.5 Europe 13.15 US/Canada 15 ROW 39 PrintsPrints are presented on museum-grade, fine-art paper stocks, with archival standards guaranteeing quality for 100-plus years. All editions are printed and quality checked by experts at theprintspace, the UK's leading photo and fine art print provider. DeliveryCarbon-neutral, sustainable production, packaging and shipping. Global delivery with tracked and insured shipping. Theprintspace takes great care in packaging your artwork, with a no-quibble satisfaction guarantee should you be unhappy in any way. Contactguardianprintsales@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store