logo
#

Latest news with #LargeHadronCollider

Scientists obtain unstable gold from lead, practical use uncertain
Scientists obtain unstable gold from lead, practical use uncertain

The Mainichi

timea day ago

  • Science
  • The Mainichi

Scientists obtain unstable gold from lead, practical use uncertain

GENEVA (Kyodo) -- A team of scientists including those from Asian countries has successfully transformed lead into gold, though it disappeared in microseconds, with the discovery published in a U.S. physics magazine last month. The team's spokesperson at CERN, a research organization on the Swiss-French border, said that although it was only an experimental finding, it could help advance human knowledge and enable the development of advanced equipment in the future. Four experiments conducted between 2015 and 2018 at CERN, formally known as the European Organization for Nuclear Research, yielded the results. The team, which included scientists from India, South Korea, Japan, China, Indonesia and Thailand, studied what happens when two lead nuclei come very close to each other in a so-called near-miss collision. After the lead nuclei moved at nearly the speed of light, they confirmed that some protons and neutrons were pulled out of the core part of the atoms. During the experiments using the Large Hadron Collider, a particle accelerating machine, lead atoms were observed to lose three of their 82 protons, resulting in atoms of gold with 79 protons. Through such near-miss collisions, the team confirmed the change that produced up to 89,000 gold nuclei per second. The result of the analysis, which involved a total of 167 institutes across the world, was published by Physical Review C of the American Physical Society in May. Marco Van Leeuwen, the research team's spokesperson, said that the gold made in the tests existed only "for a short time, microseconds or even shorter," and weighed a combined 29 picograms. One picogram is a trillionth of one gram. It would take "billions of years to make one gram of gold," he said, but noted that the scientists' work aims to enhance atomic research and may have private sector applications, such as in medical equipment that produces X-ray images. Tatsuya Chujo, a Japanese guest researcher at CERN who participated in the experiments, said, "I was surprised and excited that gold can actually be created from special reactions." "It means that we can basically produce any kinds of elements in the world by this simple and pure reaction using a world class accelerator," said Chujo, a professor at the Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences of the University of Tsukuba.

Dark Matter: The cosmic puzzle that still evades discovery
Dark Matter: The cosmic puzzle that still evades discovery

Hans India

time5 days ago

  • Science
  • Hans India

Dark Matter: The cosmic puzzle that still evades discovery

In 1933, Swiss astrophysicist Fritz Zwicky made a groundbreaking observation while studying the Coma Cluster, a collection of galaxies over 300 million light-years away. He noticed the galaxies were spinning far too quickly to be held together by the visible matter alone. The only explanation? There had to be unseen mass providing the extra gravitational pull. He called it 'dunkle Materie' — dark matter. Nearly 100 years later, dark matter remains one of the greatest mysteries in science. It makes up around 27% of the universe, yet no one has ever seen it. It doesn't emit, reflect, or absorb light, making it completely invisible to telescopes. But without its gravitational influence, galaxies would fall apart, and the structure of the universe itself wouldn't exist. The Gravity We Can't See Evidence for dark matter is overwhelming. Stars on the edges of spiral galaxies rotate at speeds far too fast for visible matter alone to account for. Galaxy clusters move as though they're wrapped in vast, invisible halos. Even the early universe's structure — from galaxies to vast filaments of cosmic webbing — appears to have been shaped by something unseen holding it all together. At one point, scientists suspected neutrinos might be the answer. These ghost-like particles are abundant and barely interact with matter. But they're too light and too fast-moving to form the kind of gravitational scaffolding needed. Where Are the Particles? Physicists turned to more exotic candidates. One popular theory was WIMPs — Weakly Interacting Massive Particles. These theoretical particles could have mass and exert gravity, yet remain undetectable because they barely interact with ordinary matter. Deep underground labs were built with sensitive detectors waiting to catch a WIMP colliding with an atom. But decades have passed, and no clear signal has emerged. Supersymmetry offered another tantalizing idea — every known particle might have a heavier 'partner.' One such partner, the neutralino, seemed perfect for dark matter. Yet even after firing up the Large Hadron Collider, these hypothetical particles have never shown up. Now, physicists are widening the search. Some suspect dark matter might be made of ultra-light particles like axions, or that it resides in a hidden "dark sector" with its own rules and forces. Others are daring to rethink gravity itself — perhaps we don't need dark matter, just a new understanding of how gravity works. A Mystery That Could Rewrite Physics The stakes are massive. Cracking the dark matter code could transform our understanding of matter, forces, and the very origins of the universe. It could lead us to a new physics — one that goes beyond the Standard Model that currently explains everything from atoms to quarks. But for now, we remain in the dark. Dark matter doesn't shine, collide, or leave trails. All we know is that it's out there — shaping galaxies, pulling clusters together, and silently sculpting the universe. Until we find it, the cosmos will remain a place of wonder and unfinished questions — where the most powerful force holding everything together remains hidden in plain sight.

Mysterious particle pierces earth, hinting at possible first direct dark matter detection
Mysterious particle pierces earth, hinting at possible first direct dark matter detection

Hans India

time15-06-2025

  • Science
  • Hans India

Mysterious particle pierces earth, hinting at possible first direct dark matter detection

In February 2023, an underwater telescope anchored deep in the Mediterranean Sea—known as KM3NeT—recorded the brightest particle event ever seen. A stunning flash of light pierced through the detector's sensor network, revealing an object carrying a staggering 220 peta-electronvolts (PeV) of energy—nearly 100 times more powerful than anything produced by the Large Hadron Collider. Initially believed to be an ultra-energetic neutrino, this high-energy particle earned the nickname 'impossible muon' because of how unusually bright it was—35 times brighter than any prior detection. But soon, scientists hit a snag: its cousin observatory, IceCube in Antarctica—larger and operational for over a decade—had no record of a similar event, even though it had clear access to the same region of the sky. This anomaly led researchers to entertain a revolutionary idea: the flash could be humanity's first direct evidence of dark matter—the mysterious, invisible material believed to make up five times more mass than ordinary matter in the universe. Their theory suggests that the particle may have originated from a blazar—a galaxy with a supermassive black hole ejecting high-speed jets of particles. If those jets contain dark matter particles, they could survive billion-year journeys through space. The particle that struck KM3NeT came from a direction populated by known blazars, lending weight to the hypothesis. As the beam traveled sideways through Earth, it pierced 93 miles (150 km) of rock before reaching KM3NeT. Scientists theorize that during this underground trek, a dark matter particle might have collided with a nucleus, briefly becoming an 'excited' state that quickly decayed into two tightly aligned muons. KM3NeT's detectors, unable to distinguish the twin paths, saw a single blazing track. In contrast, IceCube—due to its South Pole location—would have seen the particle pass through only 9 miles (15 km) of crust. With less matter in its path, a collision (and thus detection) was far less likely. Not all physicists are convinced. Some argue the simplest explanation is still a record-breaking neutrino. Others, like Shirley Li of UC Irvine, note that while the dark matter model predicts a pair of overlapping muons, current instruments can't resolve such fine detail at these extreme energies—yet. Regardless of the outcome, the discovery has reignited the global pursuit to uncover what dark matter is made of. As KM3NeT expands and IceCube undergoes planned upgrades, scientists will continue watching the skies—and seas—for answers. Whether this was a neutrino anomaly or the long-sought dark matter breakthrough, one underwater flash may have just opened a new chapter in modern physics.

'Rachel Reeves needs to go back to school - her spending review doesn't add up'
'Rachel Reeves needs to go back to school - her spending review doesn't add up'

Daily Mirror

time13-06-2025

  • Business
  • Daily Mirror

'Rachel Reeves needs to go back to school - her spending review doesn't add up'

There are two things I learned in maths at school: the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the square on the other two sides, and how to write my name in numerals on a calculator. You may think that's not much to show for 11 years of effort in trying to put numbers into a brain that only ate words. But knowing how triangles work is a damned useful thing when looking at the world and working out where it's gone wrong. And the more I see of her, the more it looks like Rachel Reeves' triangle expertise starts and ends with knowing it'll go 'ting' if you hit it with a teaspoon. For those who read only headlines, the first Chancellor to not have the same colour hair from one day to the next has announced £113bn of investment, building back what's been destroyed, restoring people's faith in Labour, and blah de blah blah. Few headlines have reported the Tory view, but that's understandable: it's hard to hear what they say when people have their head that far up their own rancid fundament. At this point a columnist might attempt to pick apart a Chancellor's sums, perhaps quote a great economist. But to me Keynes is what you call interns from Buckinghamshire, and my calculator always seems to spell 315005. The brutal truth is she hasn't bothered with any sums. She's just drawn a lovely picture of an inexplicable future, and she might as well have told us there'd be marmalade custard and sausage ice cream too. A chancellor's spending review doesn't have the same restraints as a Budget, so she's managed to get away with the fiscal equivalent of an architect's drawing of how the town centre will look after it's pedestrianised, all springtime pavement cafes and leafy trees and children playing. But in reality, it's still West Bromwich, the business died for lack of traffic, and everyone grew up living too close to the paint factory. So when Rachel's sunny little plan says HM Revenue and Customs will save 13.1% of its budget through "AI and automation", what will happen is that even less effort will be made to go after tax dodgers, and the process of small business owners and the self-employed getting shafted annually will be commentated by a chatbot. The sort of blithely dysfunctional customer service that will leave you actually pining for a keypad options menu, and a recipe for cock-ups. Rachel said departmental budgets will grow by an average of 2.3%, aside from all those which will be cut. The NHS will get an extra £29billion, and she'll promptly take a chunk back in employer National Insurance contributions for 1.3m staff, which she'll then say she's 'reinvesting' in the NHS. Even spotting some of that cash as it whizzes around in theoretical space and time will be like trying to catch a quark in your hands in the Large Hadron Collider. Then she had the brass neck to call it "a record cash investment in our NHS, increasing real-terms, day-to-day spending by 3%". Except under Tony Blair it increased by £60bn, over the entire lifetime of the NHS it's been 4% a year, and in those days we could actually see it. No mention of dentists, not a sniff of social care. Defence spending has squeaked up merely by changing what you count as 'defence', and is already too low for what the rest of NATO wants. Disabled people rendered more disabled, and less able to work, by a programme of punishing them into work rather than giving bosses an incentive to hire them. A huge £39bn for 'affordable' housing that probably won't be, with a construction industry 250,000 people short of actually being able to build them. A u-turn on winter fuel payments because of a changed economic outlook when the economic outlook has actually got worse. And hooray, a triumph for the Mirror's campaign to extend free school meals to every family on Universal Credit. Except - have you seen a school meal recently? We're talking damp pizza, cold gravy, the cheapest of miserable chickens that even Donald Trump would feel guilty about selling to us. All this hoo-hah about how a hot meal improves learning and life chances, and nary a thought about how reheated, reformed offcuts from the cheapest bidder for the off-site catering contract can possibly qualify as food. You'd get more nutrition from licking the playground. If it weren't so far beneath her, school catering could be Michelle Mone's next big wheeze. And the asylum seekers. The ones who can't work, because that right was taken away last time Labour were in power and saw votes in naked racism. The homeless who can't have social housing, because the Tories sold it all and Angela Rayner bought as much as she could. The people who get £49 a week to feed, heat, and clothe themselves, while living in 'hotels' six to a room or detention centres crawling with cockroaches, while the owners bill the taxpayer five star rates. Well, no more hotels for them! Can it be coincidence, I wonder, that on the same day it was announced rough sleeping would be decriminalised? No need to house them, and no need to sweep them up and put them in the jails we don't have. Heaven forfend anyone'd have a good idea, like allowing them to work and pay taxes, so they could house themselves, integrate, and everyone benefits. In Rachelworld, all the asylum seekers are going to just disappear - pouf - as the world plummets headfirst into climate crisis and authoritarianism. I can't even bear to discuss the environmental unfriendliness of nuclear waste, or the carbon footprint of a modular reactor and everything that goes into it. Suffice it to say, even Swampy might be converted to burn coal instead, and by the time that idea's toxic half-life has decayed to a bearable level we won't have those pavement cafes. The one good bit of news in the spending review is that we can all rejoice, for the only way Rachel could square all this is by locating and stripping the fabled magic money tree. But all she has to show for it is promises that don't add up, and won't be enough to save her from being a convenient firee for a Prime Minister who, not long from now, will want to blame someone else for the economy that tanked for two reasons he wouldn't admit. Now class, what do you get if you triangulate all the above, and add up the squares of Brexit and employers National Insurance contributions? 707. Put that upside down in your calculator and smoke it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store