Latest news with #LawyersforHumanRights
The Citizen
11-06-2025
- Politics
- The Citizen
Operation New Broom is echo of apartheid past
If Operation New Broom is the new face of immigration enforcement in South Africa, then shame on all of us. In a move that belongs more in the archives of apartheid than in a democratic constitutional state, the department of home affairs has launched 'Operation New Broom', a campaign whose stated aim is to 'combat illegal immigration' through biometric verification and mass raids. Sweeping with a 'broom' is no innocent metaphor, it's drawing a very intentional parallel between illegal migrants and rubbish, a dehumanising tell-tale signal of stripped rights, dignity and humanity. An affront to every value enshrined in our Bill of Rights. If this is the new face of immigration enforcement in South Africa, then shame on all of us. Barely two days after the campaign was launched on 21 May, more than 50 individuals, including children, pregnant women and asylum seekers, were rounded up during an early morning raid at the Plastic View informal settlement in Tshwane. Minister Leon Schreiber called it 'a new era of digital border enforcement'. What followed was hardly innovation; it was humiliation, institutional cruelty dressed up in the vocabulary of tech-enabled governance. Lawyers for Human Rights and 20 other organisations said the operation 'marks a troubling descent into repressive state practices reminiscent of the apartheid past'. That is no exaggeration. Operation New Broom is not a policy, it is abuse of power, a show of force for the sake of political optics, where the primary victims are those least able to defend themselves. Children were taken from schools and homes without due process. Babies were detained at the Lindela Repatriation Centre, a facility unfit to care for them. ALSO READ: Home Affairs launches Operation New Broom to tackle illegal immigration The constitution is clear: the detention of children must be a last resort and for the shortest appropriate period. These events lay bare a troubling trend: the creeping securitisation of SA's borders and the scapegoating of migrants to mask governance failures. This cannot be claimed to be part of an effort to address unlawful entry, it is a campaign showcase masquerading as immigration enforcement, a political theatre dressed as policy. A familiar playbook keeps unfolding: blame the foreigner, distract the public and dress up persecution as patriotism. Ahead of the 2026 municipal elections, politicians like Gayton McKenzie (Patriotic Alliance) have already begun calling 'Abahambe' (let them go) for the removal of migrants along ethnic and racial lines, embracing his xenophobic labelling. Taking centre stage globally and in SA at the same time was the media frenzy surrounding the 59 Afrikaners granted refugee status by the US on the basis of alleged racial and economic persecution. A sad irony that is difficult to ignore, particularly from within the African continent and SA itself, where the principles of Ubuntu, as enshrined in the constitution, call for compassion, shared humanity and the protection of the vulnerable. The Constitutional Court has repeatedly affirmed Ubuntu as a guiding principle not only in private law, but in matters of state conduct. ALSO READ: Big changes coming for ID, passport applications and birth registrations – Home Affairs It is meant to embody dignity, empathy and social solidarity – all of which are absent from Operation New Broom. Though the department has framed its action as lawful and measured and Cabinet has publicly praised it, nothing about the manner in which these raids were conducted passes constitutional muster. This is not a crisis that ends at the border. Migrants may be the primary targets today, but the machinery of arbitrary enforcement rarely limits itself to one category of individuals. Even SA citizens without access to proper documentation already encounter a contrarian bureaucracy on many levels. In August last year, 700 000 IDs were automatically unilaterally blocked by the department, some merely on the suspicion of fraud or due to duplicate IDs reflecting in the systems, with no prior warning or due diligence. The courts confirmed this to be unconstitutional because it lacked fair procedures, such as notice, investigation and an opportunity for appeal. The dysfunction is systemic and it does not discriminate as neatly as the policies claim to. Without constitutional watchdogs and public scrutiny, no-one is immune. Today's raid is tomorrow's precedent. Some have pointed to the use of biometric verification as a sign of progress and, indeed, it can significantly streamline processes and increase efficiencies on multiple levels. ALSO READ: EFF calls for treason charges against corrupt Home Affairs officials But in the hands of untrained officials and opaque institutions, such tools carry significant risk. Mismanagement is not a technical glitch, it is a gateway. Without safeguards, digital enforcement quickly slides into digital authoritarianism. Deploying facial scans and fingerprint readers without legal safeguards or oversight is not governance, it is surveillance. When the state uses such tools in vulnerable communities already suffering from economic exclusion and neglect, it amounts to profiling at scale. This is not a moment for silence or bureaucratic indifference. It is a moment to remember that democracy is measured not by how we treat the powerful, but by how we treat the most vulnerable. State-led roundups, data-driven profiling and the slow bleed of constitutional values is a recipe for instability. Amnesty is not capitulation; it is legal realism. It is an invitation to build a functioning migration system that does not rely on repression to operate. It is time for a new broom, yes, but one that sweeps away injustice, not people. One that restores rights, not just order. NOW READ: Trump-Musk breakup: Will 49 'refugees' return to South Africa?
Eyewitness News
25-05-2025
- Politics
- Eyewitness News
Africa Day: Calls for unity and solidarity across continent grow louder
JOHANNESBURG - As we commemorate Africa Day, calls for unity and solidarity across the continent are growing louder. In Johannesburg, civil society groups and unions took to the streets to mark the occasion. Dozens of organisations, including Cosatu, Lawyers for Human Rights, and the Palestine Solidarity Alliance, marched from Mary Fitzgerald Square in Newtown to Constitution Hill in Braamfontein on Saturday. The demonstration called for stronger African cooperation and an end to growing xenophobia on the continent. Africa Day, celebrated annually on 25 May, marks the formation of the organisation of African Unity, later succeeded by the African Union, and the liberation of African nations from colonial rule. In South Africa, it also serves as a reminder of the country's fight against apartheid. Mining union leader Mametlwe Sebei says the day is a reminder of how far the continent has come, and how much more must still be done. "To emphasise the oneness of the continent and its people and that is much more important today than before in the context of a surge in rising populism and xenophobic scapegoating of African migrants and others who have been scapegoated of all the problems faced by the working class as a result of the crisis of capitalism and imperialism." More commemorative events are expected across the country today.
Eyewitness News
24-05-2025
- Politics
- Eyewitness News
Call for unity on Africa Day
JOHANNESBURG - Various unions, civil society groups and organisations are calling for African unity and cooperation ahead of Africa Day. On Saturday, the group embarked on a solidarity march from Mary Fitzgerald Square, Newtown, to Constitutional Hill in Braamfontein. The march began this morning at Mary Fitzgerald Square. Groups such as the Lawyers for Human Rights, Palestine Solidarity Alliance and the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU), among others. Africa Day is celebrated on 25 May each year to commemorate the formation of the Organisation of African Union and the independence of African countries. In South Africa, the day also celebrates the success of the fight against colonialism and apartheid mining trade union leader, Mametlwe Sebei, said that the celebrations are important for reflecting on how far we have come as a country and what still needs to be done. "To realise the oneness of the continent and its people and that is much more important today than before in the context of a surge in rising populism and xenophobic scapegoating of African migrants and others who have been scapegoated of all the problems faced by the working class as a result of crisis of capitalism and imperialism."
IOL News
19-05-2025
- Politics
- IOL News
Granny on final path to claim her family home in historic legal battle
Mary Rahube earlier leaving the high court in Pretoria. She won the legal battle for women to be able to own their family homes after apartheid laws had forbidden this. She will now return to court to have her family home registered in her name. Image: Picture: Oupa Mokoena A Mabopane, north of Pretoria granny hailed as a hero to many women as she is the first black woman to pave the way for others who were in the past denied the right to own land to now rightfully claim what is theirs, will now ask the court to officially register her family home in her name. In recognising the rights of all women to own land, the Constitutional Court in 2018 spoke the final word and declared that a piece of legislation created by the racist and sexist apartheid era could not pass constitutional muster. In an unanimous judgment at the time, the apex court declared a section of the Upgrading of Land Tenure Rights Act unconstitutional, due to Mary Rahube and Louise du Plessis of Lawyers for Human Rights, who had been at her side from the onset. Rahube initially approached the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, which in a first step, paved the way for this elderly woman, who is in her 70s, to in future apply for the house she had called home for more than 40 years, to be hers. Rahube never owned her family house in Mabopane, as apartheid legislation prohibited black women from owning land. But, after the court declared a section of the act unconstitutional, Rahube will soon embark on her last legal journey - this time to ask the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, to register her family home in her own name. As things stand, the family home is registered in the name of her brother, Hendsrine Rahube, as in terms of the apartheid law, she was not allowed to own it as a female. Her brother is, however, set on opposing this final battle. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'This will be the first application in this regard after she won the Concourt case and the subsequent amendments made by Parliament to the law,' Du Plessis said. She affirmed that in terms of the amendments to the act, women who ought to get houses still needed to go to court to ask for an order to that effect. Rahube, her brother and other siblings have lived in the Mabopane property since the 1970s following their forced eviction from Lady Selbourne. Their grandmother 'owned' the property, but not in the legal sense, as the family was by law precluded from doing so as she was a woman. When she died, the children remained living there. The brother was in 1987 nominated by the family to be the holder of a certificate of occupation regarding the property. The following year, he was issued a deed of grant regarding the property. Some years later, he turned to court to have his family evicted from 'his home'. This was the start of Mary's long and drawn-out battle to have the apartheid era legislation overturned and declared unconstitutional. In the high court judgment, Judge Patricia Goliath earlier said African women under apartheid were systemically disenfranchised in a number of ways. The pervasive effects of patriarchy meant that women were often excluded from seemingly gender-neutral spaces. She said under apartheid, the effects of patriarchy were compounded by legislation that codified the position of African women as subservient to their husbands and male relatives. This will be the first application in this regard after she won the Concourt case and the subsequent amendments made by Parliament to the law. In her plight to have the house registered in her name, Rahube said due to the pervasive effects of patriarchy and the apartheid system and laws which compounded this, she was all these years excluded from owning the only place she has known as home. She said it is precisely because of this history that she should now be afforded the title deeds to the house.
eNCA
05-05-2025
- Politics
- eNCA
New project to shield journalists, rights defenders
JOHANNESBURG - Freedom of expression may be enshrined in South Africa's constitution, but for many journalists and human rights defenders, their daily reality is anything but free. From online harassment to physical threats, intimidation, and even assassination, those who speak truth to power are increasingly under attack. A coalition led by the SA National Editors Forum, Lawyers for Human Rights and Amnesty International South Africa is fighting back. They have launched the Create Project, designed to keep truth-tellers safe from violence and intimidation.
