2 days ago
Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill has safeguards to prevent misuse, critics haven't read it: CM Fadnavis
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis asserted on Sunday that critics of the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, which according to him would curb 'urban Naxalism', had not read it thoroughly.
'Those opposing the legislation have not studied it. And Those who have read are supporting it,' Fadnavis told reporters in Nagpur.
Reiterating that the stated objective of the legislation was to prevent unlawful activities of left-wing extremist organisations with a focus on 'urban Naxalism', Fadnavis said, 'The safeguards in the legislation are so strong leaving no scope for its misuse.'
Passed in the Legislative Assembly and Council, the Bill will now be referred to Governor C P Radhakrishnan for his consent, paving the way for its enforcement.
'I have repeatedly stated that the objective of the Bill is to combat Naxalism and banned Maoist extremist outfits. And take action against those organisations that are systematically operating to create anarchy. They are challenging the Indian Constitution, Parliament and institutions…' Fadnavis said.
More than 12,000 suggestions received from various organisations and the public were taken into consideration while making the final draft of the Bill, the chief minister said. Fadnavis did not mention any individual leader or organisation.
'This legislation is not directed at any political parties or agitation or critics. All those working within the framework of the Indian Constitution and democracy have no reason to fear. Their rights and freedom remain intact,' he added.
On Friday, Shiv Sena (UBT) president Uddhav Thackeray voiced strong opposition to the legislation. 'If the legislation is to combat Naxalism and terror, why are these terms not mentioned? Simply say the Bill is to fight Naxals and terrorism, ' he said while speaking to reporters on Vidhan Bhawan premises.
Fadnavis further said that under the Bill, action cannot be taken against an individual but an organisation first. 'It would require consent from an advisory board headed by the chief justice of the high court or a retired judge,' he added.
The advisory board will include district magistrates or government pleaders in the high court, and investigating officers will be of the rank of superintendent of police.
