4 days ago
- Politics
- Days of Palestine
Delay in Suspending Partnership with Israel Exposes European Double Standards
DaysofPal — The European Council's continued delay in suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement has drawn widespread criticism and serves as a stark illustration of the European Union's double standards when it comes to addressing human rights violations, particularly in light of the ongoing Israeli campaign in the Gaza Strip, widely described as genocidal.
After last Thursday's EU summit, the final statement made no mention of sanctions or concrete actions against Israel, despite growing demands from several member states. Instead, EU foreign ministers were tasked with merely 'continuing to assess Israeli compliance' with the terms of the agreement. The EU-Israel Association Agreement, signed in 2000, is explicitly based on mutual respect for human rights and democratic values—principles that many argue are being flagrantly violated in Gaza.
Internal Divisions Undermine Accountability
According to political affairs analyst Dr. Lina Al-Tabbal, internal divisions within the EU remain a significant obstacle to any unified stance on Israel's actions. In an interview with Palestine Online, Al-Tabbal noted that some member states—most notably Germany, Hungary, Austria, and the Netherlands—either oppose sanctions outright or adopt cautious, non-committal positions, effectively shielding Israel from serious European reproach.
Germany, she explained, frames its unwavering support for Israel as a moral imperative rooted in its historical responsibility for the Holocaust. Hungary, under Viktor Orbán, has repeatedly blocked EU measures perceived as critical of the Israeli government, aligning itself closely with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Austria and the Netherlands, while less vocal, continue to act as moderating forces, resisting calls for punitive action.
In contrast, member states such as Ireland, Spain, Belgium, and Slovenia have advocated for stronger measures, including recognition of Palestinian statehood and targeted sanctions. France and Italy occupy a middle ground, hesitant to lead but unwilling to fully back Israel uncritically.
A Case Study in Double Standards
Fatima Al-Zahraa Saad Al-Din, an expert in European affairs, described the summit's outcome as a 'case study in European double standards.' She noted the contradiction between the EU's swift imposition of sanctions against Russia for its war in Ukraine and its silence in the face of widespread atrocities in Gaza, despite well-documented evidence of mass civilian casualties, forced displacement, and starvation.
'If international agreements and human rights clauses are not enforced in times of clear violations, then what purpose do they serve?' she asked.
Al-Din further explained that geopolitical considerations, strategic alliances, and historical guilt have created an environment where many EU countries treat Israel as an exception, willing to overlook even the most egregious human rights abuses to maintain diplomatic and economic ties.
Disappointment with Predictable Inaction
'We didn't expect groundbreaking decisions from the EU summit,' Al-Din concluded. 'But at the very least, we hoped for a clear condemnation of a genocide that has inflicted unimaginable suffering on over 2.3 million Palestinians.'
This inaction in Europe unfolds amid mounting international calls for accountability and humanitarian intervention. As the crisis in Gaza enters its twentieth month, more than 54,000 Palestinians—mostly women and children—have been killed or injured. The blockade, famine, and unrelenting airstrikes continue unabated.
By continuing to uphold its partnership with Israel while ignoring clear violations of the Association Agreement's human rights provisions, the EU risks eroding its credibility as a champion of international law and human dignity. The silence, critics say, is not just disappointing—it is complicit.
