Latest news with #MSDLawyers
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Entertainment
- Express Tribune
Coldplay could be sued after kiss cam stunt drags Andy Byron into spotlight
Former Astronomer CEO Andy Byron may be considering legal action against Coldplay after his kiss cam moment with colleague Kristin Cabot went viral — but legal experts say any such lawsuit would likely fail. During a recent Coldplay concert near Boston, frontman Chris Martin commented on the couple caught on the jumbotron, joking, 'Either they're having an affair or they're just very shy.' The comment, caught on video, ignited public backlash. Byron, who has since resigned, has remained silent, as has Cabot — both of whom are married. Attorney Camron Dowlatshahi of MSD Lawyers told Page Six that Byron might attempt a defamation claim, but he would have to prove Martin's statement was false and made with malice — both unlikely to hold in court. 'None of those elements will be met,' Dowlatshahi said, calling any lawsuit 'frivolous.' Further complicating matters, Massachusetts' two-party consent law does not apply in this context. Legal experts note that Byron had no expectation of privacy at a public event and likely waived related rights by purchasing a concert ticket. Byron also cannot sue TikTok user Grace Springer, whose video of the incident has amassed over 125 million views. Lawyers argue her post is protected under the First Amendment and doesn't commercialize Byron's likeness. However, Kristin Cabot could potentially pursue a workplace harassment claim against Byron, given his senior role at Astronomer. Attorney Craig Weiner noted that the company could be held liable due to Byron's position of power. Astronomer has publicly condemned the incident and accepted Byron's resignation following internal investigation.
Reuters
7 days ago
- Business
- Reuters
Understanding California Employment Laws: Camron Dowlatshahi of MSD Lawyers Offers Expert Insight
LOS ANGELES, CA, July 8, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Camron Dowlatshahi, opens new tab, partner at MSD Lawyers, opens new tab, today shared insights on how to navigate California's employment law landscape, one of the most dynamic and complex in the United States. Staying informed about these regulations is not just a matter of best practice but a legal necessity for employers and employees. Navigating this intricate web requires a comprehensive understanding of state mandates, ranging from wage and hour laws to anti-discrimination statutes. Compliance is paramount for all businesses operating in the Golden State to avoid legal pitfalls and foster a positive work environment. Employees must also know their rights and protections under these laws to ensure rightful and fair treatment so they can advocate for themselves when necessary. Key Aspects of California Employment Law California employment law is unique due to its progressive nature and robust employee protections. Unlike federal law, which sets a baseline, California often goes further to safeguard workers' rights. For example, California's minimum wage consistently exceeds the federal level, and the state provides more expansive leave entitlements. These differences highlight the importance of focusing specifically on California law for anyone working or employing individuals within the state. Employers must be vigilant to ensure their current policies and practices align with these stringent state requirements, as non-compliance or complacency can lead to significant legal, reputational, and financial repercussions. Employees also benefit from understanding these enhanced protections, empowering them to recognize and address workplace violations. Minimum Wage Effective January 1, 2025, the new mandated minimum wage for all employers is $16.50 per hour, opens new tab. Additionally, fast food workers will earn $20.00 per hour, opens new tab starting April 1, 2024, under AB 1228. Certain healthcare workers earn between $18 and $25+ per hour, opens new tab in phases under SB 525. These sector-specific increases underscore the state's ongoing efforts to address wage equity across industries. Employee Protections California offers broad employee protections through the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), which is now enforced by the California Civil Rights Department (CRD), opens new tab. FEHA covers various employment practices, including anti-discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination safeguards, ensuring that workers are treated fairly regardless of their status, background, or identity. Leave Entitlements California provides more generous leave entitlements than those required under federal law. For instance, SB 616 expands paid sick leave, opens new tab to five days or 40 hours annually. Additional leave provisions exist for circumstances such as family care, pregnancy, and issues related to domestic violence. Retaliation Protections Employees in California are legally protected from retaliation when they report workplace misconduct. This includes retaliation for reporting discrimination, harassment, unsafe working conditions, and wage violations or exercising their rights under various leave laws. These protections are critical to ensure employees can speak out without fear or danger of losing their jobs. Wrongful Termination Protections Under FEHA California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), now administered by the Civil Rights Department (CRD), is a cornerstone of employee protection against discrimination, harassment, and retaliatory termination. FEHA prohibits employers from wrongfully terminating employees based on several protected characteristics, ensuring a workplace free from bias. Protected categories include race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, medical condition, genetic information, pregnancy, religion, age (over 40), marital status, and more. California is an at-will employment state; hence, employers can terminate employees without cause, provided the reason is not illegal. However, FEHA offers essential limits for this doctrine. Discriminatory or retaliatory terminations are unlawful, and protections also extend to employees engaging in protected activities such as filing complaints or participating in lawful investigations. California law further recognizes "implied contracts," meaning that employer actions or assurances may create a reasonable expectation of continued employment, even absent a written contract. Additionally, the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) allows employees to rightfully file lawsuits on behalf of themselves and others for Labor Code violations, which may arise after reporting wrongful termination, opens new tab or other workplace misconduct, reflecting the state's strong commitment to labor rights enforcement. Expanded Protections: Cannabis, Intersectionality, and Safety As of January 1, 2024, under AB 2188, California prohibits employers from discriminating against their employees for off-duty cannabis use, opens new tab, provided it does not impair performance or safety-sensitive duties. Exceptions apply to federal contractors and safety-related roles. FEHA already protects against discrimination based on multiple overlapping characteristics (intersectionality), and recent CRD enforcement emphasizes this. Meanwhile, SB 553 (2023) requires California employers to implement written workplace violence prevention, opens new tab plans by July 1, 2024, highlighting a new era of proactive safety in employment law. Reimbursement and Remote Work California Labor Code §2802 requires all the state's employers to reimburse their employees for incurred necessary business expenses. For remote workers, this includes partial reimbursement of internet and phone expenses if essential for work. Resources for Employers and Employees Employers can access compliance resources from the California Chamber of Commerce and use HR management software like Gusto to automate payroll, track labor law updates, and maintain accurate employee records. The Society for Human Resource Management's (SHRM's) study notes that integrating HR tech can reduce compliance violations by up to 20 percent. For up-to-date guidance, employees should consult the official channels of the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) websites. Legal aid organizations provide support to workers facing wrongful termination or wage violations. Employees facing discrimination or retaliation should consult employment law attorneys early to understand their options. Stay Compliant and Empowered: Your Next Steps in California Employment Law California's employment laws are comprehensive and strongly favor employee protection, requiring careful attention from employers and workers. Understanding key factors such as wrongful termination protections under FEHA, minimum wage obligations, leave entitlements, expense reimbursements, and new safety mandates is essential to maintaining compliance. Now is the time to assess your workplace policies, update your employee handbooks, and consult with qualified legal counsel to ensure you're compliant and prepared for what's ahead. You can foster a compliant, equitable, and safe workplace by utilizing available tools and staying informed on legislative changes. Staying proactive is the best strategy to thrive in California's dynamic legal environment. About MSD Lawyers MSD Lawyers, based in downtown Los Angeles, is a litigation-focused law firm representing clients across the city's most dynamic industries. Our attorneys handle matters involving business litigation, employment disputes, real estate, and intellectual property. With experience representing everyone from Fortune 500 companies to individuals, we combine the resources of a high-level litigation team with the personalized service of a boutique firm. From case inception to trial, we aggressively protect our clients' interests at every stage. For more information, visit opens new tab. Media Contact Camron Dowlatshahi camron@ ### SOURCE: MSD Lawyers Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire
Fox News
20-02-2025
- Entertainment
- Fox News
Blake Lively claims Justin Baldoni legal battle left her with ‘extreme anxiety,' her kids ‘traumatized': docs
Blake Lively's amended complaint highlighted the ongoing legal battle with Justin Baldoni, claiming it has left the actress with "extreme anxiety" and "traumatized" her children. Lively filed the complaint on Feb. 18, over a month after she initially accused her "It Ends With Us" co-star of sexual harassment. "The emotional impact on Ms. Lively has been extreme, not only affecting her, but her family, including her husband and four children. There are days when she has struggled to get out of bed, and she frequently chooses not to venture outside in public," the amended complaint, obtained by Fox News Digital, reads. "While she has fought to maintain her personal life and business interests, behind closed doors she has suffered from grief, fear, trauma, and extreme anxiety. She also has been experiencing repeated and painful physical symptoms as a result of this experience." "Mr. Reynolds, too, has been affected mentally, physically, and professionally by his wife's and children's pain," the complaint continues. "Worst of all, however, has been the impact on their young children, who have been traumatized and emotionally uprooted in ways that have substantially impacted their well-being." The decision to highlight "the emotional impact" of the case on Lively days after the "Gossip Girl" star appeared at the star-studded celebration of "Saturday Night Live's" 50th anniversary was "poorly timed," entertainment lawyer Camron Dowlatshahi told Fox News Digital. "It seems a bit poorly timed to lodge this amended complaint just days after a very public appearance, especially when there is a focus on Ryan Reynolds' apparent emotional distress," Dowlatshahi, a partner at MSD Lawyers, added. "He was the one joking around on 'SNL.'" Lively and Reynolds were given a deadline of Feb. 18 to file an amended complaint against Baldoni by Judge Lewis Liman. "This makes even more clear that the public appearance was not a good idea," Dowlatshahi said. "The attorneys included the phrase 'behind closed doors' in an attempt to explain the appearances, but typically, you don't want to be in a position to have to qualify and contextualize your client's actions – you simply advise them not to do certain things." However, Lively's mention of how the case involving sexual harassment has affected her family and "traumatized" her children could indicate that the lawsuit "must be worth fighting for," Ryan McCormick, a Reputation Management Expert & Managing Partner at Goldman McCormick PR, explained to Fox News Digital. "One can say it's an attempt to maximize public empathy but, at the same time, if these allegations are proven true, it's Lively just expressing how she really feels," the branding expert said. "Sometimes we think that celebrities have a magical, wonderful life, but they're a lot like the average person – they have families to take care of. People like Reynolds and Lively are under scrutiny 24-7 and the emotional toll from legal situations like this can hit a lot harder because everything is public knowledge. Lively admitting how devastating this has been for her family and yet, upping the ante in the battle, indicates that it must be worth fighting for." McCormick noted Lively and Reynolds "have to be seen and stay relevant." "For the negative reaction surrounding their SNL50 joke, I didn't think it was that bad. Self-deprecating humor can go a long way." "Also, for the power couple to show vulnerability by admitting how deep their anguish is, is actually positive for their image," McCormick explained. "When this lawsuit first kicked off in such a public manner, I was surprised. One may have assumed it was due to bruised egos. However, now because Blake Lively has amended her complaint to include other women who alleged wrongdoing by Justin Baldoni, I think it's an indication that the matter is more serious than originally perceived." Days before filing the amended complaint, Lively attended the 50th celebration of "Saturday Night Live" on Feb. 16 with her husband. Reynolds seemingly poked fun at his and his wife's legal situation and the surrounding media frenzy as Tina Fey and Amy Poehler took the stage. The "SNL" alums spotted Reynolds in the crowd and asked, "How's it going?" Reynolds quickly responded, "Great, why? What have you heard?" The reference to the lawsuits and "It Ends With Us" drama with Baldoni appeared to catch Lively off guard as she looked at her husband with a confused look on her face. Legal experts agreed that Reynolds' joke at "SNL50" was mostly harmless. "Reynolds does not have an analogous emotional distress claim against Baldoni, so his public appearances are not as harmful," Dowlatshahi told Fox News Digital. "Lively being out in public and accepting invites to various events shows that she's not as emotionally distressed and that the impact to her career in terms of earnings and job prospects isn't necessarily as severe, as warranting hundreds of millions of dollars. Although Lively didn't say anything publicly, her presence and participation at the 'SNL' event potentially mitigates her emotional distress damages for her sexual harassment claim." "So the more events she and Reynolds attend, the weaker her claims may become, which might ultimately help Baldoni," Dowlatshahi added. Another expert noted Reynolds' statements on both "SNL50" and "The Voice" were "somewhat benign" and likely wouldn't "make a difference" in the courtroom. "They didn't amount to admissions, and really wouldn't have much of an effect on the merits of the case or damages," entertainment and media law attorney Tre Lovell said. However, the appearances could be "very damaging" in the court of public opinion. "Clearly, both Lively and Reynolds' images have taken a hit from these lawsuits, injecting a lot of negativity and animus against them into the public arena. They need to be out there rehabilitating themselves and their persona," the lawyer at The Lovell Firm explained. "They do this by being friendly and likable before the public. In other words, showing the personalities that got them favor from their fans in the first place. However, at the same time, they need to stay completely away from the lawsuit and never mock, demean, make fun of or comment on any of the facts. All references to the lawsuit should be made through their attorneys, and as far as they are concerned, they take the legal proceedings very seriously and intend on proving their case in court. Any efforts to diminish or ridicule the legal proceedings could have a profoundly negative impact on both Lively and Reynolds in the publicity fight." In December, Lively detailed allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, intentional affliction of emotional distress, negligence and more against Baldoni and film producer Jamey Heath in a complaint first filed with the California Civil Rights department and later in federal court. Baldoni, in his own lawsuit filed in January, insisted that Lively had "falsely" accused him in an attempt to repair her reputation after the fallout of the movie's press tour after the actress took control of the film. Baldoni's legal team claimed Lively had no evidence of a deliberate smear campaign and instead worked to repair her reputation by accusing the actor and others of sexual harassment. In Lively's amended complaint, she claimed two female cast members were willing to testify to the "unwelcome behavior" Baldoni exhibited on set. "Wayfarer, Mr. Baldoni, and Mr. Heath received or were aware of a number of HR grievances regarding their conduct," Blake's legal team wrote in the news filing. "They admitted as much from day one. For example, on the first day of filming, while attempting to hug Ms. Lively's employee, Mr. Heath said 'I don't even know if we're allowed to do this. It's day one and we have an HR report already.'" In response, Baldoni's attorney, Bryan Freedman, told Fox News Digital the claim is "heresay." "Our clients have been transparent in providing receipts, real-time documents and video showing a completely different story than what has been manipulated and cherry-picked to the media," Freedman said in a statement. "Our clients have taken this matter and these issues very seriously, notwithstanding the jokes made publicly by the plaintiff and her husband. Her underwhelming amended complaint is filled with unsubstantial hearsay of unnamed persons who are clearly no longer willing to come forward or publicly support her claims." "Since documents do not lie and people do, the upcoming depositions of those who initially supported Ms. Lively's false claims and those who are witnesses to her own behavior will be enlightening," Freedman concluded. "What is truly uncomfortable here is Ms. Lively's lack of actual evidence."
Fox News
18-02-2025
- Entertainment
- Fox News
Justin Baldoni's lawyer slams Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds' 'SNL50' joke amid sexual harassment lawsuit
Justin Baldoni's lawyer slammed Ryan Reynolds' decision to joke about the "It Ends With Us" star's ongoing legal battle with Blake Lively. Reynolds and Lively appeared at "SNL50" on Feb. 16, where the "Deadpool" star made a cameo. Lively sued Baldoni for sexual harassment, retaliation and more in December, months after the film premiered. The actress claimed Baldoni's behavior caused emotional distress in a federal lawsuit filed in January. Baldoni has denied the allegations against him. "I'm unaware of anybody, frankly, whose wife has been sexually harassed and has made jokes about that type of situation," Baldoni's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, said during an appearance on "Hot Mics with Billy Bush." "I can't think of anyone who's done anything like that. So it surprised me." Reynolds seemingly poked fun at his and his wife's legal situation and the surrounding media frenzy as Tina Fey and Amy Poehler took the stage at Sunday's 50th anniversary celebration. The "SNL" alums spotted Reynolds in the crowd and asked, "How's it going?" Reynolds quickly responded, "Great, why? What have you heard?" The seeming reference to the lawsuits and "It Ends With Us" drama with Baldoni appeared to catch Lively off guard as she looked at her husband with a confused look on her face. "I'm unaware of anybody, frankly, whose wife has been sexually harassed and has made jokes about that type of situation. I can't think of anyone who's done anything like that. So it surprised me." The couple's appearance on "Saturday Night Live" could hurt and help them, a legal expert told Fox News Digital. "It could potentially affect them in the sense that they are out in public and clearly enjoying themselves, which would undercut any claim for emotional distress damages related to Blake's sexual harassment claim," Camron Dowlatshahi, a partner at MSD Lawyers, said. "Typically, people who are severely distressed from sexual harassment are in therapy and trying to avoid publicly discussing and making light of their pending legal matter." While the couple received some hate online, accusing them of trying to manipulate "the public into buying the 'I'm just a nice, funny guy' act" and saying the "SNL" moment was "cringe," Dowlatshahi explained to Fox News Digital that the move "humanizes" the Hollywood couple. "It certainly humanizes Reynolds and Lively to have them out, showing their personalities that for years endeared them to fans. This is yet another indication that the couple (and Baldoni, of course) care more about their image and how the public views them, than underlying legal claims." It seems neither Lively nor Baldoni plan on settling the legal back-and-forth anytime soon. Legal teams for both sides told Judge Lewis Liman that "settlement discussions would be premature," according to a joint letter filed in court and obtained by Fox News Digital. The letter also noted that "the parties agree that mediation and the Discovery Protocols… are inappropriate for this case." The federal judge agreed with the "It Ends With Us" stars and granted the order on Feb. 13.
Fox News
18-02-2025
- Entertainment
- Fox News
Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds' 'SNL50' appearance could 'undercut any claim for emotional distress': expert
Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds' public appearance at "SNL50" could "undercut any claim for emotional distress damages" in their ongoing legal battle against Justin Baldoni. Lively sued her "It Ends With Us" co-star for sexual harassment, retaliation and more in December, months after the film premiered. The actress claimed Baldoni's behavior caused emotional distress in a federal lawsuit filed in January. The couple's appearance on "Saturday Night Live" could hurt and help them, legal experts told Fox News Digital. "It could potentially affect them in the sense that they are out in public and clearly enjoying themselves, which would undercut any claim for emotional distress damages related to Blake's sexual harassment claim," Camron Dowlatshahi, a partner at MSD Lawyers said. "Typically, people who are severely distressed from sexual harassment are in therapy and trying to avoid publicly discussing and making light of their pending legal matter." Reynolds seemingly poked fun at his and his wife's legal situation and the surrounding media frenzy as Tina Fey and Amy Poehler took the stage at Sunday's 50th anniversary celebration. The "SNL" alums spotted Reynolds in the crowd and asked, "How's it going?" Reynolds quickly responded, "Great, why? What have you heard?" The seeming reference to the lawsuits and "It Ends With Us" drama with Baldoni appeared to catch Lively off guard as she looked at her husband with a confused look on her face. Fox News Digital reached out to representatives for Lively and Reynolds for comment. While the couple received some hate online, accusing them of trying to manipulate "the public into buying the 'I'm just a nice, funny guy' act" and saying the "SNL" moment was "cringe," Dowlatshahi explained to Fox News Digital that the move "humanizes" the Hollywood couple. "It certainly humanizes Reynolds and Lively to have them out, showing their personalities that for years endeared them to fans. This is yet another indication that the couple (and Baldoni, of course) care more about their image and how the public views them, than underlying legal claims." Doug Eldridge, founder of Achilles PR, told Fox News Digital the "presumption" is that the couple is doing damage control. "Anytime you have this sort of divisive, public falling out—especially when one or both parties have a devoted following and a high Q-score—you often see a two-pronged, tactical approach… it's really the 'hokey pokey' of manipulating the court of public opinion: make yourself the victim, make someone else the bad guy, and in a near-simultaneous step, double down on how/why the public should like you. It's playing to both sides of the public sentiment and conscience: empathy and relatability," Eldridge said. "That's not to say the couple are following this script, but it's certainly been followed by others and there are some data points to indicate a similar trend line in this case." Eldridge said Lively and Reynolds likely attended the "SNL" event because it was "a star-studded, who's who of Hollywood dignitaries and celebrated iconic show alums from various decades. It was bound to get wall-to-wall coverage—and presumably positive reviews—so, on the surface, it seemed like a safe calculation." However, he said Reynolds' one-liner during the show "might prove to be another question all together." "Their PR team might have been in favor of the move, but their legal team probably had a white-knuckled, four-lettered, response to the decision – much less, the subsequent public response," he said. In December, Lively detailed allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, intentional affliction of emotional distress, negligence and more against Baldoni and film producer Jamey Heath in a complaint first filed with the California Civil Rights department and later in federal court. Baldoni, in his own lawsuit filed in January, insisted that Lively had "falsely" accused him in an attempt to repair her reputation after the fallout of the movie's press tour after the actress took control of the film. Baldoni's legal team claimed Lively had no evidence of a deliberate smear campaign and instead worked to repair her reputation by accusing the actor and others of sexual harassment. Amid the legal back-and-forth, Lively and Reynolds "need to be visible and likable." The "best thing" the A-list celebrity couple can do is "continue pursuing their careers." "The legal case will continue until it's eventually resolved, but their brands have already been damaged by all the press surrounding the lawsuit, so they do need to be visible and likable because hiding and avoiding the public is not a good option," entertainment and media law attorney Tre Lovell told Fox News Digital. "Attending SNL50 was a good idea and they both should make more appearances like that," the founder of The Lovell Firm explained. "The most important thing is to be humble, respond to any questions about the lawsuit in the vein of they respect the process and are letting it play out. In the meantime, they want people to know that their fans have not been forgotten, and the duo looks forward to many more years of moviemaking and entertaining the public." The legal battle continued last week as Lively and Baldoni showed no signs of settling their respective lawsuits. Legal teams for both sides told Judge Lewis Liman that "settlement discussions would be premature," according to a joint letter filed in court and obtained by Fox News Digital. The letter also noted that "the parties agree that mediation and the Discovery Protocols… are inappropriate for this case." The federal judge agreed with the "It Ends With Us" stars and granted the order on Feb. 13. Lively and Reynolds are also planning to file a motion to dismiss Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit. The deadline for the couple's legal team to file the dismissal motion is March 20.
