Latest news with #MYOB
Sydney Morning Herald
4 days ago
- Business
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump tariffs ‘as big an inflation threat as COVID-19'
'Policymakers must act decisively on multiple fronts to ensure price stability and promote sustainable economic growth while preserving economic and financial stability,' he said. There are already signs overseas of the financial hit caused by Trump's tariff agenda. Canada's economy contracted in April as its close trade links to the US were disrupted while data released last week revealed American GDP fell by 0.5 per cent through the first three months of 2025. While the Australian economy grew through the March quarter, this pre-dated Trump's liberation day announcements. But there are signs a rise in American tariffs is already starting to affect local firms. A survey by MYOB to be released this week shows Trump's tariffs have been felt by 17 per cent of small and mid-sized businesses. About 41 per cent of those surveyed said they believed the tariffs would destabilise the global economy, with more than a third expecting the imposts to both lift business costs and inflation. While 45 per cent said they expected the economy to decline this year, 64 per cent said their financial position was either good or excellent. MYOB chief executive officer Paul Robson said the results highlighted the impact of events playing out on the other side of the globe. 'While global policy decisions may feel distant, Australian SMEs are alive to potential local impacts and are pivoting their way around them,' he said. 'The key consideration for impacted SMEs is the cumulative effect of both tariffs and interest rates on the cost of doing business. Supply chain disruption is another concern for this community, given the diverse industry portfolio this sector covers.' The turmoil in supply chains, driven in part by Trump's tariff agenda, has resulted in 17 per cent of surveyed businesses saying they plan to shift where they source their products or services. Just one in 10 expects an increase in customer demand. This impact is not showing up yet in the federal budget, which Treasurer Jim Chalmers forecast in March would show $940 billion in gross debt by the end of the current financial year before climbing to $1.02 billion by the end of 2025-26. Loading But total government debt will end 2024-25 at $928.6 billion due to a better budget bottom line. Chalmers had forecast a deficit $27.6 billion, but in the financial year to the end of May, the deficit was just $5.5 billion due to higher-than-expected company and personal income tax collections. On a pro rata basis, the government had expected the deficit to be at $20.2 billion by the end of May. The government believes the full-year deficit will increase to more than $10 billion as payments, held up in part by the May election, start to flow to states and taxpayers. Even at that level, Chalmers is on track to again fall short of his budget gross government debt forecast. But debt levels are ramping up much quicker among the nation's states and territories. Ratings' agency S&P Global estimates that the states and territories had gross debt of $266.3 billion in 2019 with that on track to reach $900 billion by 2029 – a 238 per cent increase. Over the same period, federal gross debt is forecast to grow by 126 per cent. Victoria is on track to have the highest debt of any state or territory at $274.1 billion, a 397 per cent increase. The largest jump in debt is expected to be endured by Tasmania, climbing by 627 per cent to $23.4 billion. NSW ($252.3 billion) and Queensland ($205.7 billion) will also have high debt levels.
The Age
4 days ago
- Business
- The Age
Trump tariffs ‘as big an inflation threat as COVID-19'
'Policymakers must act decisively on multiple fronts to ensure price stability and promote sustainable economic growth while preserving economic and financial stability,' he said. There are already signs overseas of the financial hit caused by Trump's tariff agenda. Canada's economy contracted in April as its close trade links to the US were disrupted while data released last week revealed American GDP fell by 0.5 per cent through the first three months of 2025. While the Australian economy grew through the March quarter, this pre-dated Trump's liberation day announcements. But there are signs a rise in American tariffs is already starting to affect local firms. A survey by MYOB to be released this week shows Trump's tariffs have been felt by 17 per cent of small and mid-sized businesses. About 41 per cent of those surveyed said they believed the tariffs would destabilise the global economy, with more than a third expecting the imposts to both lift business costs and inflation. While 45 per cent said they expected the economy to decline this year, 64 per cent said their financial position was either good or excellent. MYOB chief executive officer Paul Robson said the results highlighted the impact of events playing out on the other side of the globe. 'While global policy decisions may feel distant, Australian SMEs are alive to potential local impacts and are pivoting their way around them,' he said. 'The key consideration for impacted SMEs is the cumulative effect of both tariffs and interest rates on the cost of doing business. Supply chain disruption is another concern for this community, given the diverse industry portfolio this sector covers.' The turmoil in supply chains, driven in part by Trump's tariff agenda, has resulted in 17 per cent of surveyed businesses saying they plan to shift where they source their products or services. Just one in 10 expects an increase in customer demand. This impact is not showing up yet in the federal budget, which Treasurer Jim Chalmers forecast in March would show $940 billion in gross debt by the end of the current financial year before climbing to $1.02 billion by the end of 2025-26. Loading But total government debt will end 2024-25 at $928.6 billion due to a better budget bottom line. Chalmers had forecast a deficit $27.6 billion, but in the financial year to the end of May, the deficit was just $5.5 billion due to higher-than-expected company and personal income tax collections. On a pro rata basis, the government had expected the deficit to be at $20.2 billion by the end of May. The government believes the full-year deficit will increase to more than $10 billion as payments, held up in part by the May election, start to flow to states and taxpayers. Even at that level, Chalmers is on track to again fall short of his budget gross government debt forecast. But debt levels are ramping up much quicker among the nation's states and territories. Ratings' agency S&P Global estimates that the states and territories had gross debt of $266.3 billion in 2019 with that on track to reach $900 billion by 2029 – a 238 per cent increase. Over the same period, federal gross debt is forecast to grow by 126 per cent. Victoria is on track to have the highest debt of any state or territory at $274.1 billion, a 397 per cent increase. The largest jump in debt is expected to be endured by Tasmania, climbing by 627 per cent to $23.4 billion. NSW ($252.3 billion) and Queensland ($205.7 billion) will also have high debt levels.
RNZ News
12-06-2025
- Business
- RNZ News
Many small businesses plan to buy new asset as result of Investment Boost
New Zealand banknotes, pen and calculator on background with rising trend green line Photo: 123RF Many small businesses plan to invest in new assets as a result of the government's Investment Boost programme . A MYOB survey of more than 500 small and medium sized businesses (SMEs) indicates nearly half (45 percent) plan to make an asset purchase over the next six months, while one-in-five were planning to invest in the next three months. Topping the list of new assets to purchase were passenger vehicles, including cars, vans, and utes (31 percent), followed by new office technology (28 percent), digital devices (22 percent), furniture (18 percent) and tools of their trade (15 percent). Just over one-in-10 planned to invest in smaller scale machinery or equipment. About a third (35 percent) of businesses estimated their investments would improve productivity. The survey found the other half of businesses considered changing their plans around investing in new assets because of the new policy, while about one-in-10 (12 percent) thought the Investment Boost had changed their plans considerably, though 7 percent were unsure. Just 28 percent said their spending plans had not changed, with 5 percent saying their planned spending was ineligible for the government's programme. MYOB chief customer officer Dean Chadwick said the survey findings demonstrated a strong appetite for government support, given the sluggish pace of economic recovery. "The Investment Boost delivers timely support to New Zealand's SMEs as they weigh up current economic challenges with the opportunity to invest in growing their business, and it will go some way to shoring up and accelerating their own performance," he said. "This latest survey also shows that spending by local businesses on eligible new assets will continue into 2026." The median planned asset spend of those surveyed was $37,700. One-in-10 businesses expected to spend between $80,000 to $100,000, while 12 percent expected to spend between $100,000 to $200,000. The agriculture sector has one of the highest median spends ($56,670), along with manufacturing ($53,300), behind the finance and insurance sector ($60,000 median).
Techday NZ
04-05-2025
- Business
- Techday NZ
Why multi-subsidiary management is where accounting software breaks
It's not always obvious when a business has outgrown its accounting software – until the subsidiaries start stacking up. At first, things are mostly manageable. One legal entity becomes two, maybe three. Each one gets its own chart of accounts, or often a new, separate instance of Xero or MYOB. The finance team adjusts – adding manual workarounds, stitching together reports at month-end, handling intercompany transactions in spreadsheets. That means manually tracking intercompany invoices, recharges for shared services, or journal entries for cross-entity costs – all of which must be reversed or eliminated at group level. But as the business grows, those "temporary fixes" become full-time problems. Suddenly, the system that supported your team so well is only adding confusion. Your team is constantly switching tabs, toggling currencies, reformatting data and questioning which numbers to trust. Add time zones, tax jurisdictions and internal transactions to the mix and you've got a setup that can't scale – no matter how wily your finance team is. For many businesses, multi-subsidiary management is the tipping point – it's the moment when basic accounting software quietly stops being fit for purpose. The hidden cost of disconnected entities Each entity brings its own general ledger, tax obligations, currencies and reporting requirements. Without a centralised system, finance teams are stuck reconciling intercompany transactions manually, logging into multiple platforms and juggling inconsistent processes just to get a basic group-level view. The consequences compound quickly. Month-end drags out as finance teams manually consolidate numbers across entities. Audit risk increases as entries are posted inconsistently across systems, with duplicated records and limited traceability. Without proper controls, intercompany mismatches and timing discrepancies can go unnoticed until year-end. Cash flow visibility becomes opaque, with no real-time view across the group. And strategic planning slows down entirely, as leadership struggles to access timely, accurate insights across the business. Businesses will often reach a tipping point where adding a new entity inevitably creates more noise – not more value. Why add-ons don't solve the problem When the cracks start to show, the first instinct is often to patch things up. Add-ons, consolidation tools and middleware integrations seem like a logical step – especially if they promise to sync data between systems or generate consolidated reports. But these tools often introduce just as many problems as they solve. The reality is that most small business accounting platforms were never designed to handle multi-entity complexity. Add-ons tend to work at the surface level, pulling static data from different systems after the fact – meaning finance can't drill down into real-time numbers or trace issues back to the source system. Reports are delayed or partial, intercompany eliminations still need to be handled manually and audit trails remain fragmented. Finally, because the underlying architecture is still built for single-entity management, any workaround becomes a point of fragility as the business grows. Any business that's serious about growth can't run with a set of disconnected ledgers. It needs a system designed for multi – multi-entity, multi-currency, multi-country, multi-channel. One that can at once handle the complexity and simplify it. What scalable looks like A scalable financial system like a cloud ERP is the next natural step. It delivers structure without slowing you down – bringing consistency to the chart of accounts while still allowing entity-level flexibility. In a true multi-entity cloud ERP like NetSuite, all subsidiaries can share a master chart of accounts with entity-specific customisation. This means reporting stays consistent, clean and real-time, no matter how complex the structure becomes. Adding a new subsidiary doesn't require the team to spin up another system or rework your entire chart. In NetSuite, that might mean configuring a new subsidiary record, assigning local tax codes, currency rounding rules and role-based access – while inheriting the group-wide chart of accounts and reporting structure by default. Everything lives in one environment. Intercompany transactions – like billing, eliminations and allocations – can be automated rather than manually reconciled. And when the board wants a group-level view, there's no cross-checking needed. It's already there. At the same time, the right system provides role-based access and local controls, allowing teams across different countries or business lines to operate within one unified environment. Each team works with tailored permissions – a local finance manager sees only their subsidiary's P&L, while group finance retains full access and oversight. Importantly, tax rules, currencies and compliance obligations are built into the platform. The pressure of multi-entity operations has a way of exposing the limits of legacy tools. Entities multiply. Processes diverge. Reporting gets harder to trust. The rudimentary accounting systems and spreadsheets that served you well in the early days simply can't keep pace with growing complexity. At that point, only a system built for multi-everything scale will support what comes next.
Techday NZ
24-04-2025
- Business
- Techday NZ
ERP success or ERP chaos: Why SMB manufacturers win or lose in implementation
In the race toward digital transformation, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are increasingly seen by manufacturers as vital engines for growth, efficiency, and competitiveness. In Australia and New Zealand, many small and mid-sized manufacturing businesses (SMBs) are still heavily reliant on manual processes. According to MYOB's Digital Disconnection Challenge report, nearly one in five businesses have little to no digitisation—often relying on spreadsheets to manage everything from inventory to production schedules. This digital gap presents both a challenge and an opportunity: those who modernise with ERP systems are better positioned to improve efficiency, reduce errors, and compete in a rapidly evolving market. However, for those SMBs adopting modern digitisation, the road to ERP implementation is riddled with pitfalls. While success can unlock streamlined operations and real-time decision-making, failure can bring costly disruptions, spiralling budgets, and underwhelming returns. According to Panorama Consulting's 2024 ERP Report, 97% of organisations report improved business processes after implementing ERP systems. However, Gartner estimates that more than 70% of these implementations fall short of their original business objectives. The contrast is stark: ERP can either be a springboard for strategic growth or a costly misstep that takes years to correct. Unlocking the potential For manufacturers, the promise of ERP remains compelling. When successfully executed, organisations report sweeping improvements across their operations. Panorama's data reveals that 95% of businesses experience enhanced customer experience, while 91% see improved standardisation and lower IT maintenance costs. Productivity gains, better supplier interactions, and access to real-time data are among the most widely reported benefits, and this operational coherence leads to more than just internal efficiency. With silos eliminated, compliance improved, and inventory levels optimised, manufacturers find themselves better equipped to respond to market demands, support customer needs, and pursue growth initiatives. Understanding the risks Despite these benefits, ERP implementation remains one of the most complex IT undertakings a company can pursue. The challenges are multidimensional, involving not just technology, but people, processes, and culture. Common risk areas include poorly defined project scopes, integration complications with legacy systems, and cybersecurity concerns. Operational disruptions during implementation and resistance to change among staff are also frequent hurdles. When these issues are not managed proactively, the result can be missed deadlines, budget overruns, and underutilised systems. A robust implementation strategy begins with realistic planning, supported by strong governance and risk mitigation. Flexibility, clear communication, and a willingness to adapt are just as crucial as selecting the right technology. Where implementations go wrong One of the most common and costly mistakes in manufacturing ERP projects is inadequate planning. Businesses often move forward without a clear vision of their operational model or measurable goals. Without these guideposts, it becomes difficult to align the project with business needs, leading to missteps in vendor selection and system configuration. Budget overruns also plague many implementations. Nearly one in four ERP projects exceed budget, driven by unanticipated technology requirements, underestimated staffing needs, and unexpected data challenges. Often, organisations fail to account for the full scope of costs - including training, process redesign, and post-go-live support - leading to fiscal strain and, at times, project abandonment. Training deficiencies further compound these issues. New systems often entail significant shifts in how employees do their jobs. But with compressed timelines and limited resources, training is often rushed or insufficient. Poor user adoption follows, undermining the system's value and productivity benefits. Another technical pitfall lies in data migration. Transferring data from legacy systems can expose long-standing quality issues. Errors in data mapping or insufficient validation testing can ripple through the entire ERP platform, compromising operational accuracy from the start. Best practices for success Lead from the top. Avoiding these pitfalls begins with leadership. Executive support must be visible and sustained throughout the entire implementation process. Setting up a dedicated steering committee and maintaining clear governance helps keep the project aligned with strategic priorities. Also, timelines should be realistic and account for all project phases, including thorough testing and validation. Plan for the people, Not just for the tech. Adequate time for training, particularly role-specific instruction, is vital to ensure smooth adoption. This includes refresher sessions and ongoing support even after go-live. Appointing internal champions with both technical and interpersonal skills can help bridge communication between teams and provide a single point of accountability. These champions should be empowered with decision-making authority and the resources necessary to lead change effectively. Don't underestimate data readiness. Equally important is data readiness. Early audits of existing data quality, followed by strict governance over cleaning and migration processes, can prevent post-launch issues. Manufacturers should collaborate closely with vendors to establish robust procedures for validation and testing. Pick a partner, not just a vendor. Vendor selection itself is also critical. Manufacturers should seek partners with proven experience in their specific industry and with similar-sized organizations. A good vendor will not only deliver the software but act as a strategic partner throughout the implementation lifecycle. Change is a process. Finally, change management should not be an afterthought. Structured communication, employee involvement, and recognition of success milestones help keep morale high and resistance low. Implementation is as much about people as it is about technology. Looking ahead ERP implementation is not merely a technology upgrade: it's a transformative business initiative. When approached thoughtfully, with a clear strategy and stakeholder engagement, ERP systems can unlock dramatic improvements in efficiency, insight, and customer experience. For SMB manufacturers, the risks are real, but so are the rewards. The firms that thrive in this space are those that understand implementation as a journey: one that blends technical rigor with empathetic leadership and meticulous planning. ERP isn't just software — it's a future operating model. And for SMB manufacturers in Australia and New Zealand, getting it right means planning like it's business-critical. Because it is.
