Latest news with #ManjariSingh


Hindustan Times
09-07-2025
- Hindustan Times
Microcations are the new big thing in travel
Once a convenient stopgap, microcations are the new big thing in travel. Because who has the time (or the budget) for longer vacations? Travellers are now choosing destinations that are closer and lighter on the wallet for higher-impact trips that last three to five days(Photo: Adobe Stock) Whether it's brought on by weather-related disruptions, or a desire for frequent breaks, travellers are now choosing destinations that are closer and lighter on the wallet for higher-impact trips that last three to five days. Why the interest in microcations? 'Recent airspace disruptions, geopolitical tensions, and unexpected heatwaves across popular destinations in Europe have made microcations more relevant,' says Manjari Singh, chief growth and business officer at Cleartrip, adding, 'These short getaways are easy on the wallet, require little planning, and offer the perfect balance.' 'An interesting shift' Karan Agarwal, director at Cox & Kings, notes that outbound travel to Southeast Asia grew by over 50% in early 2024 alone. 'What's interesting is that, it isn't just metros. First-time international travellers from Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities are booking spontaneous getaways for long weekends,' he shares. With visa-free access, direct flights and the fact that Indians often travel last-minute, travel destinations like Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam offer the flexibility that makes spontaneous plans possible. 'There's a clear behavioural shift among Indian travellers; short-haul overseas trips are no longer just stop-gap holidays, but the preferred choice,' Karan adds. Vacationing with intention? But this isn't just about convenience. As Hari Ganapathy, co-founder of Pickyourtrail, puts it: 'We're definitely seeing travellers lean into flexibility and proximity.' He states, 'Travellers aren't just looking for 'breaks', particularly around long weekends, they're looking for experiences that feel rewarding, even in a short span.' And when curated well, Hari says, 'These mini-holidays can deliver surprising depth, whether that's through local food, culture, or simply time well spent together.' Where to jet off to for a micro escape These destinations tick all the boxes — easy flights, quick visas and ideal for microcations that double as workcations. Flights under three hours Colombo, Galle - Sri Lanka Dubai, Abu Dhabi - UAE Kathmandu, Pokhara - Nepal Paro - Bhutan Four to five hour flights Bangkok, Krabi, Phuket - Thailand Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City - Vietnam Kuala Lumpur, Langkawi - Malaysia Bali - Indonesia Domestic spots worth the trip Kashmir or Ladakh for Nature therapy Coorg or Ooty for slow living Jaipur or Udaipur for heritage Andamans for tropical unplugging


Time of India
29-04-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Pahalgam attack: Why India needs a three-pronged approach to fight Pakistani info war
Dr. Manjari Singh focuses on contemporary Middle Eastern affairs and is the author of 'India and the Gulf: A Security Perspective' In a commendable and much-needed move, India has banned several Pakistani YouTube-based news channels — such as Dawn News, Geo TV, ARY News, and Samaa TV—from broadcasting or disseminating their content within Indian digital and media spaces. This step comes in the wake of the tragic Pahalgam killings that targeted innocent civilians mostly tourists, further exposing Pakistan's relentless information warfare strategy against India. The government's action underscores an important realisation that narratives, if left unchecked, can be as dangerous as bullets. The decision to crack down on propaganda channels is not about limiting press freedom; it is about defending national stability against hostile disinformation. The Pakistani military's media wing, the Directorate General of Inter-Services Public Relations (DGISPR), has long turned information warfare into an institutionalised weapon. Several studies, including one by the Oxford Internet Institute in 2020, have documented that Pakistan runs one of the most organised state-sponsored disinformation campaigns in South Asia, targeting India consistently. Whether it was during the 2019 Pulwama-Balakot crisis, the Nupur Sharma controversy, the farmers' protests, or even the CAA-NRC demonstrations, DGISPR's digital machinery pumped a steady stream of fabricated content into Indian social media spaces, amplifying discord. During the farmers' protest (2020–21), data from EU DisinfoLab revealed that over 750 fake news outlets were used to portray India negatively, many operating out of Pakistan. Similarly, after the Nupur Sharma episode in 2022, more than 300 fake accounts were traced by Indian intelligence agencies to Pakistan, which were involved in fuelling communal sentiments and mobilising protests across the Arab world against India. Today, amidst tensions following the Pahalgam attack, the same toolkit is active again. Fabricated reports have emerged, including claims that The Resistance Front (TRF), a Pakistan-backed proxy, had its communication systems 'hacked' by Indian security forces and was thus 'framed' for the attack. Shockingly, some Indian electronic media channels and social media accounts picked up these falsehoods without verifying the sources, thereby lending inadvertent credibility to Pakistan's narrative. Recognizing the risks posed by such information leaks, India's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has issued strict advisories to Indian media houses to refrain from sharing sensitive operational details, avoid real-time coverage during terror incidents, and prevent any broadcast that could assist the adversary. This corrective action is a vital lesson learned from painful past experiences. During the 2008 Mumbai attacks, live coverage by certain Indian TV channels inadvertently provided tactical information to handlers operating from Pakistan, allowing them to adjust terrorist movements accordingly. Instances like the live telecast of NSG commandos' movements at the Taj Hotel, or the real-time reporting of security positions, significantly compromised operational security. More recently, during the 2016 Pathankot airbase attack, media outlets were found broadcasting strategic information that could have jeopardized military operations. Similarly, during the Pulwama attack aftermath, premature, speculative reporting without verification created panic and confusion. Today, the need for media restraint is even greater as information warfare tactics grow more sophisticated. This highlights a dangerous vulnerability in a democracy where freedom of speech is sacrosanct, misinformation can seep in and get legitimised domestically if not properly countered. Therefore, India must develop a three-pronged approach to tackle this multidimensional information warfare. First, in strategically addressing external containment. India must continue to identify and ban Pakistani propaganda channels, websites, and social media handles that manufacture and amplify false narratives. For instance, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting recently blocked 16 YouTube-based news channels, many operating from Pakistan, to counter anti-India fake content. Second, in efficiently handling internal vigilance. Indian media houses and social media users must adopt a culture of verification before amplification. Whether it is in the case of TRF's dubious denial or claims regarding the Indian government's 'hidden role' in the recent violence, unchecked spreading of false narratives within India serves the enemy's purpose. Media literacy and accountability must be enhanced—media regulatory bodies like the Press Council of India should penalise reckless dissemination of unverified news, and major newsrooms must set up dedicated fact-checking units. Third, India must actively invest in nurturing and strengthening communal resilience to safeguard its social fabric against divisive narratives. Information Warfare thrives on exploiting societal divisions, particularly communal ones. Efforts must be made at every level—political, educational, and civil society—to reinforce India's pluralistic ethos. Hate speech and communal rumour-mongering should be treated with zero tolerance. Meta's Threat Report 2023 highlights that a substantial percentage of misinformation targeted at India had communal overtones, underlining the urgency of addressing this internal threat. It is worth noting that the anatomy of information warfare is no longer linear—it is decentralized, fast-moving, and increasingly psychological. In this context, data is the new oil, and narrative is the new weapon. Therefore, strengthening cognitive resilience among citizens is crucial. Media literacy must become a part of school and college curricula, teaching young Indians how to discern fact from fiction, how to verify sources, and how not to become unwitting carriers of enemy propaganda. While it exists as a specialised segment in few universities in the country, it is important to make the subject compulsory for all. Moreover, initiatives like public awareness campaigns, mandatory fact-checking workshops for journalists, state-sponsored counter-narrative content promoting unity in diversity, and community-based digital literacy drives can bolster India's societal immunity against such hybrid threats. Workshops conducted by Google News Initiative and Meta Journalism Project and educational campaigns by Media Matters for Democracy and Boom FactCheck are necessary and commendable steps taken towards this direction. An interesting case that underscores this necessity is the recent false report aired by some Pakistani outlets claiming that India 'engineered' floods in Pakistan's Punjab region by 'releasing excess water from dams.' However, hydrological data from the Pakistan Meteorological Department and the Indus River System Authority (IRSA) showed no evidence of India's deliberate action. The monsoon overflow and Pakistan's own mismanagement of its water resources, particularly aging canal systems and poor flood management infrastructure, were identified as the primary causes. While the Indian government can—and must—exercise its tools of regulation, the larger responsibility lies with us, the netizens. Consuming information cautiously, verifying before forwarding, and resisting the emotional pull of provocative but dubious content is the civic duty of every connected citizen. Understanding the anatomy of information warfare means recognizing that wars are no longer only fought on battlefields but also on newsfeeds and WhatsApp groups. Every click, share, and comment shapes public perception and, ultimately, national security. India must rise to this challenge with wisdom and unity. As the Pahalgam killings tragically remind us, the threats are real and present—not only at our borders but also within our digital walls. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.