logo
#

Latest news with #MarkTadeson

Hamilton will continue to hold urban boundary despite pitches for big housing projects
Hamilton will continue to hold urban boundary despite pitches for big housing projects

CBC

time5 days ago

  • Business
  • CBC

Hamilton will continue to hold urban boundary despite pitches for big housing projects

Hamilton's urban boundary will hold after council blocked two development requests that would've seen tens of thousands of homes eventually built on farmland. Planning committee considered applications Wednesday from two landowner groups to expand the city's official urban area for their proposed projects. Developers of the White Church Lands near the Hamilton airport have proposed building 7,600 homes, while the developers of the Elfrida Lands in Upper Stoney Creek are looking to build 40,000 homes, said Dave Heyworth, the city's acing director and senior advisor of strategic growth at the meeting. There would be a mix of detached, semi-detached and town houses to come in the next decades. Staff recommended councillors deny both applications because they would encroach on agricultural land and require more infrastructure than the city is able to provide or pay for in the coming years, said a report. That infrastructure would include bigger roads and sewers in and out of the development, for example. Allowing the developments, said staff, would also contradict what council, with support from the public, has said its plan is for Hamilton: to grow up, not out. "I think it will thwart our goal of increasing density inside the urban boundary as the city does have limited service capacity and this development would compete for those services," said Coun. Mark Tadeson, of the White Church proposal, which would be in his ward. Residents there, he said, are "overwhelmingly" against the development. 'We are a collaborative partner' The Elfrida development would be in both Tadeson and Coun. Brad Clark's wards. Clark said he's long been opposed to it and to "jump start" the development now, without first building up infrastructure, "puts the city in peril." In November 2021, the last term of council voted against expanding the urban boundary — the area developers would be allowed to build on. Elected officials made the decision after hearing from thousands of residents opposed to growth at the expense of farmland. Since then, the city has been focused on encouraging developers to build on underused urban land, such as on surface parking lots. In about five years, the city and council will review the urban boundary freeze to see if there's a need for more land to accommodate a growing population. Patrick Harrington, a lawyer for the White Church landowners, told planning committee Wednesday that it's only a matter of time before Hamilton would have to expand, so why not start now. "What we're asking you to do now is start the process with us," said Harrington. "We are a collaborative partner that can bear the cost of looking at these lands holistically, scientifically ... to provide information the city needs to make an informed decision." Housing for families needed The Elfrida group's lawyer Joe Hoffman made a similar pitch. "Hamilton needs both significant intensification and an urban boundary expansion," he said. "We're planning for the next 20 years, so we need to start the detailed planning process now." Expanding the urban boundary for these kinds of single family homes was supported by the Hamilton Chamber of Commerce CEO Greg Dunnett. He told the committee Hamilton is missing "workforce housing" for middle-income families, and downtown condos aren't what they're looking for. But both Coun. Cameron Kroetsch and Coun. Craig Cassar pushed back on the idea that the only way to ensure there's more housing for families is to allow suburban sprawl. Kroetsch noted the many vacant lots across downtown where housing could be built. Cassar added that strip malls with unused parking lots would also work. "Keep the urban boundary firm," he said. Council unanimously voted to deny the development applications, although those decisions will likely be appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal, staff said.

Hamilton Bike Share receives boost from city as councillors support increase in funding
Hamilton Bike Share receives boost from city as councillors support increase in funding

CBC

time10-04-2025

  • Business
  • CBC

Hamilton Bike Share receives boost from city as councillors support increase in funding

Social Sharing Hamilton city councillors have voted to continue supporting Hamilton Bike Share and consider a funding increase in the 2026 and 2027 budget process. The vote at council's General Issues Committee passed 13-0 Wednesday. Members voted in favour of a city staff report recommending an increase next year of $258,000 for a total contribution of $744,000 to Hamilton Bike Share Inc. — the non-profit that operates the service. Bike share users pay to rent bicycles parked at hubs spread throughout much of the city. Using an app, they can unlock a bike and ride it, then return it elsewhere. According to city staff, the program has 32,000 active members and logged 500,000 rides in 2024. Hamilton Bike Share expects about 700,000 rides this year, staff said. In the meeting, Coun. Mark Tadeson (Ward 11) said that while many in his rural and suburban ward may not immediately benefit from bike share — which operates primarily in the lower city — he hopes it can one day expand, helping people access trails and potential future recreation facilities. "I can see that happening and am willing to invest and build now," he said. "I'm hoping this will be a spark that gets us to make sure our cycling network is better," Coun. Cameron Kroetch (Ward 2) said, adding bike share was something he was excited about when he moved to Hamilton. Funding to support about 1,000 bikes Wednesday's vote came after councillors deferred a decision in December, asking staff to come back with more data on the service. In a presentation Wednesday, Hamilton's manager of active transportation and mobility Peter Topalovic said the staff recommendation would support the addition of 100 bikes, bringing the total to about 1,000. Hamilton Bike Share pays about 67 per cent of the cost to run the service, with the city pitching in the remaining 33 per cent, Topalovic said. Following the funding increase, the city will pay about $62 per bike, per month. The non-profit, which took over from Uber in 2020, is in "good financial standing and sustainable" based on projected financial information, Topalovic said. The bike share program celebrated its 10-year anniversary in March. Since its launch, Topalovic said, the program has seen 3 million trips, totalling over 6.5 million kilometres. He added that 23 per cent of bike share users report replacing car trips with their bikes, and 41 per cent use the service en route to public transit. The program is "designed to feed [Hamilton Street Railway] and GO stops," he said. McMaster grad students to receive bike share pass In March, McMaster University graduate students voted in a referendum, approving a discounted bike share pass for full-time students. As a result, next academic year, 5,000 students will gain access to the service for $24.50 annually, down from the usual price of $192 plus tax. This follows a referendum in 2024 which established a similar pass for 30,000 undergraduate students at the west Hamilton institution. WATCH | How McMaster undergrads got a discounted bike share pass: McMaster students can soon access a discounted Hamilton Bike Share pass 1 year ago Duration 2:19 Paris Liu and Sarah Gonder, two members of McMaster Students for Bike Share, delegated to the committee on Wednesday, telling councillors the undergraduate pass — which their group advocated for — has led to much more cycling on campus. As a student commuting to class before the pass existed, Gonder experienced cat calls and felt unsafe waiting "alone in the dark" for buses, she said. Bike share, Gonder said, is a "safety lifeline for many people," allowing them to travel more conveniently and independently. Liu told councillors she plans to move to Europe, where cycling infrastructure is better, and said she hopes improvements can happen here. "If Hamilton wants to keep young people here, it needs to invest in the infrastructure that makes cities livable," she said. Another delegate, downtown resident Nicole Smith, told councillors she would use bike share more if she felt safer riding on city streets. "This is a problem and so I would really, really urge you all to continue to do the great work that you're doing. Continue to build infrastructure. Continue to support bike share," she said. About 45 people registered to speak or wrote in to share their thoughts on bike share and the staff recommendation. Everyone who spoke was supportive of the city continuing to fund the program. On Thursday morning, Hamilton Bike Share posted a statement on Instagram, saying city support will ensure the system can continue to be "affordable, accessible, and convenient." "Thank you to everyone in the community who came forward to share their stories and advocate for continuing to fund the system. We are so touched to hear of all the different ways Hamilton Bike Share has impacted people's lives over the past 10 years, and proud to be a part of this community," it said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store