Latest news with #Mazhar
Time of India
15-07-2025
- General
- Time of India
Waste-d Wetland: How a Vital Jharoda Pond Is Buried Under Municipal Waste
New Delhi: Once a large, functional wetland in the Jharoda area near Wazirabad—home to a diverse range of aquatic flora and fauna—is now lost. Over the past two years, the pond has been filled with municipal soil waste, transforming the flattened wetland into a large plot of land. Earlier in 2023, TOI reported that garbage from the Bhalswa landfill site was being used to fill some wetlands in the Wazirabad and Timarpur areas, parts of which historically belonged to the Yamuna catchment. The pond next to the upcoming Jharoda Majra Metro Station is located about a kilometre from the Yamuna Biodiversity Park. When TOI first reported the issue, the pond was only partially filled. However, on a recent visit, the entire area had been dumped and levelled, with no visible signs of the wetland except for a few patches of Kusha grass. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Local residents said the pond, which had existed for decades, was being filled over the last two years. "Most of the dumping happened overnight. The entire waterbody has now been consumed and is being levelled," said Mazhar, a resident of a neighbouring village. During the previous visit, part of the pond still supported an active aquatic ecosystem, with water, plants, and wildlife. Until Aug 2023, grass species like Phragmites australis, Phragmites karka, Typha latifolia, Typha angustifolia, and Paspalum were observed around the wetlands, along with bird species such as Indian Moorhen, little grebe, and spot-billed ducks. Despite the Wetland Rules coming into force in 2020, not a single wetland in Delhi has been officially notified. Ironically, various city departments are mandated to rejuvenate over 1,045 wetlands listed two years ago, yet none of these have undergone legal vetting. According to documents from the Delhi Wetland Authority, only two wetlands named Jharoda Majra Burari—located within the Yamuna Biodiversity Park—are listed in the Jharoda region. No wetlands from Gopalpur have been listed. Nevertheless, many sites in the region with natural indicators such as riverine grasses and wet sub-sediment qualify as wetlands and must be protected. Reports of ponds and waterbodies being polluted or filled have surfaced regularly. In a similar case, a village johad (pond) in west Delhi's Budhela was filled, and a community centre was being constructed by the Delhi govt. The matter is currently sub-judice in the high court, and construction has been halted. Separately, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) recently stopped the construction of a bus depot on a village pond by the Delhi Transport Corporation in Najafgarh. "Wetlands are nature's kidneys—filtering water, sustaining biodiversity, and protecting against floods—yet across Delhi, they are systematically choked and erased by the very govt agencies sworn to protect them. From the Delhi govt to the DDA under the Govt of India, this exploitation reveals a shocking disregard for ecological heritage and environmental law," said Paras Tyagi, president of the Centre for Youth Culture Law and Environment (CYCLE), an organisation advocating for environmental and rural issues in Delhi. TOI reached out to officials at the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Delhi Development Authority (DDA)—the land-owning agency—and the Delhi govt, but received no response. However, when MCD trucks were still dumping waste, the MCD stated that the sites were "not designated as wetlands or water bodies" and that inert construction and demolition (C&D) waste, bio-mined from legacy waste, was being dumped there at DDA's request. "It is to be clarified that no garbage is being dumped; rather, inert and segregated C&D waste from bio-mining of legacy waste at the Bhalswa landfill site is being used to level DDA's low-lying areas on their request. These low-lying areas are not designated wetlands or water bodies. The material is dumped only after proper testing of its components. The material is safe for filling and levelling vacant and low-lying areas," an earlier MCD response said.
Express Tribune
16-06-2025
- Politics
- Express Tribune
Judge transfer needs full consensus: CB
Head of a constitutional bench (CB) of the apex court has observed that transfer of a judge from one high court to another is a process, which cannot be completed without the consent of all involved. "The president has the authority to transfer a judge but the process can end if the concerned judge or the chief justice of his own high court or the chief justice of the high court where he is being transferred or the chief justice of Pakistan does not agree with it," Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar noted. Justice Mazhar was heading a five-member CB, hearing the petitions filed against transfer of three judges of provincial high courts to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in February this year and the subsequent change in the capital's high court's seniority list. Barrister Salahuddin, counsel for the five IHC judges who have challenged the transfer, continued his rebuttal arguments, asserting that Article 200 of the Constitution applies only to sub-section 3. He argued that in civil service, a transfer from one department to another affects seniority, unlike in the judiciary where no deputation or merger of judges of two high courts takes place. Punjab Advocate General Amjad Pervez also filed a miscellaneous application during the hearing. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar inquired about the application, to which Pervez responded that he had submitted historical record of judicial transfers from 1947 to 1976 and acknowledged that while they weren not a party to the case, a notice under Rule 27-A had been issued to them. Justice Mazhar noted that the 27-A notice is specifically for becoming a party, and the advocate general should have followed the Attorney-General for Pakistan in presenting arguments. After the completion of the rebuttal, the court directed other counsels representing the petitioners to conclude their arguments by Tuesday. The hearing was then adjourned until today.
India.com
09-06-2025
- Entertainment
- India.com
Meet superstar from 80s who won Miss Asia contest, rebelled against her mother, had an affair during her pregnancy with..., she is…
This legendary actress lit up the silver screen with her elegance and power, delivering iconic performances alongside stalwarts like Amitabh Bachchan, Shatrughan Sinha, Sanjeev Kumar and Dharmendra. While her on-screen journey was marked by applause and admiration, her personal life painted a far more complex picture, filled with unspoken emotions, heartbreaks, and unresolved ties. Yet through it all, she carried herself with unmatched poise, becoming not just a cinematic legend but symbol of strength amid life's unpredictable script. The Iconic Superstar Of Indian Cinema… Here we are talking about veteran actress Zeenat Aman , who is considered as most iconic actress from the industry. She gained recognition for challenging societal norms in Bollywood during her era, yet her private life was not as glitzy as she had hoped. At the height of her success, she entered into a marriage with actor-producer Mazhar Khan , despite it being against her wishes. Unfortunately, this union turned out to be one of the most distressing chapters in Zeenat Aman's life. Personal Challenges Of Zeenat Aman Before establishing in Bollywood, Zeenat was crowned Miss Asia Pacific in 1970, becoming the first Indian to earn this honor. Additionally, she finished as the runner-up in the Miss India pageant and received the title of First Princess. In the same year she began acting and appeared in films like The Evil Within (1970), Hungama (1971) and Hulchul (1971) . By the 80s, Zeenat became prominent figure in the industry. For her, establishing career was secondary to her desire to settle down and become a mother. She candidly expressed her wish for marriage and children. This longing prompted her to marry Mazhar Khan, as she thought he would help her achieve the family life she had always dreamed of. However, her mother disapproved of their relationship, which created strain between them until arrival of Zeenat's first son, who helped mend their differences. It was also reported that during pregnancy Zeenat was involved in an alleged relationship with actor-director Sanjay Khan . During an interview with Simi Garewal on her chat show Rendezvous with Simi Garewal , she shared, 'In the initial year of my marriage, I came to the realization that I had made a mistake. However, since I had made this choice against everyone's advice, I chose to make it work. Within that first year, I became pregnant with my first child, and Mazhar was not present during that time. Around then, Stardust magazine reported on Mazhar's involvement with another woman; this is the truth.' As per reports, Mazhar was involved with Dilip Kumar's niece Rubaina whom he had already divorced before Zeenat. Mazhar Khan passed away in 1998 as result of kidney failure, yet Zeenat's challenges persisted beyond that. She disclosed that Mazhar's mother and sister wholly turned their backs on her and her children. Following his death, Zeenat received no financial support whatsoever.
Time of India
03-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Time of India
When Zeenat Aman spoke about being by husband Mazhar Khan's side despite him cheating on her, she nursed him through his illness but finally left as he got addicted to prescription drugs
Zeenat Aman isn't just an inspiration for women because she broke stereotypes on screen or showed how to be confident, but the actress has gone through immense struggles in her personal life. Yet, she continued to remain resilient and is quite positive today about life, with no bitterness. The actress went through a bad marriage with Mazhar Khan and she realised it was a mistake just in the first year of marriage. But she decided to stick by her decision as it was against everyone's will. She had opened up on the turbulent times in her personal life in an interview with Simi Garewal. Zeenat had said, "The first year of marriage, I realised I had made a mistake but since I had made the decision against everybody's will, I decided to make it work. I'm not necessarily saying that it was the best thing for him either. It was a difficult time since the first year because I was pregnant with my first child and Mazhar was not there. There was a big article in Stardust magazine at that time about the woman that Mazhar was seeing. It's reality.' Despite Mazhar's reality, she wanted to stick by the commitment which she made. Mazhar later also fell really ill and she was just by his side to take care of him. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cost Of Amusement Park Equipment From Mexico Might Surprise You - See Tips Amusement Park Equipment | search ads Click Here Undo "I tried everything under the sun. We were in and out of every hospital in Mumbai. I learned how to give injections, to do dressing. He was living with a bag outside his body for 18 months, I learned how to change that bag. I did everything there was to do. I flew overseas and found the best doctor. When that thing was over and the problem was sorted, it had taken a toll on me. I was very close to a nervous breakdown.' However, later Zeenat left only because he was addicted to his prescription drugs. She said, "He had stopped helping himself and was inflicting further damage on himself and I couldn't stay there and watch him do that. He was taking seven painkillers a day. At the end, his kidneys did pack up and this was after I had opted out. When I left, I still cared. I have no guilt because I am sure 99 percent women wouldn't have lasted as long and as honestly as I did. ' Mazhar Khan passed away in 1998 due to kidney failure. After his death, Mazhar's mother and sister completely cut her and the children out. They were not given a single penny after his death and didn't even allow the actress to attend his funeral. Zeenat has two sons - Zahaan Khan, Azaan Khan. The actress was last seen in 'The Royals'. Check out our list of the latest Hindi , English , Tamil , Telugu , Malayalam , and Kannada movies . Don't miss our picks for the best Hindi movies , best Tamil movies, and best Telugu films .
Express Tribune
30-05-2025
- Politics
- Express Tribune
Transfer case first of its kind: CB head
The head of a constitutional bench (CB) hearing petitions filed against the transfer of three judges to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and a subsequent change in the judges' seniority list has noted that the case under review is first of its kind. During hearing of the case, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar agreed with counsel for one of the petitioners, Barrister Salahuddin, that there is no precedent in the past for a permanent transfer of a judge from one high court to another. "This is the first case of its kind involving such a transfer," he said. Earlier, Barrister Salahuddin argued that a judge's seat cannot be vacated through a transfer, and a permanent transfer would render Article 175-A of the Constitution ineffective. Article 175A establishes the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), which is responsible for appointing judges of the Supreme Court, high courts, and the Federal Shariat Court. He stated that under Article 200, only temporary transfers are permissible, and permanent appointments can only be made by the JCP. Justice Mazhar noted that under Article 175-A, new appointments can be made, adding that "appointment" and "transfer" have different meanings. Salahuddin said a meaningful consultation is essential in any judge's transfer, and without it, the entire process is a mere formality. He alleged that information was concealed and inaccurate details were provided during the transfer of three judges to the IHC in February this year. Justice Mazhar said the case involves interpretation of constitutional and legal points. He noted that three chief justices were involved in the transfer process and not everything was in the hands of the executive. Consent of the transferred judge is also obtained, he added. Salahuddin referred to civil service rules, stating that when two individuals are appointed on the same day, seniority is determined by date of birtha principle the SC has upheld in a previous reference. He also cited the Aslam Awan case, which called for clear rules on judicial seniority. Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Awan stated that once the SC defines a principle, the rules will follow. Salahuddin requested that the Supreme Court decide the case based on civil service rules, past precedents, and the principle of equality. Justice Mazhar asked what becomes of a judge's previous service if he takes a new oath after his transfer from one high court to the another. "In India, even if a judge takes five oaths upon transfer, their determined seniority remains unaffected" but Pakistan does not have an "All Pakistan Cadre". He said the court is raising questions for the sake of clarity and informed judgment, noting that when a high court judge is elevated to the SC, their final pay certificate reflects 11 or 12 years of service. Salahuddin responded that while benefits and pension would be retained, the judge's seniority would be reset. He urged the court to consider the impact on the sitting judges of the court receiving the transferred judge. It would be unjust, he said, for a judge ranked 16th in one court to become the senior-most judge in another, ahead of those who were previously more senior. IHC Acting Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, one of the judges transferred to the IHC in February, ranked 16th in the Lahore High Court. Justice Mazhar reiterated that no such objections were raised by judges of the Lahore High Court and instructed the lawyer to stick to issues related to IHC. He added that if arguments conclude by June 16, the court may issue a short order after consultation with judges on the same day. Barrister Salahuddin requested the case be heard until the next day. Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan noted that some judges on the bench would not be available. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar commented that rebuttal arguments can include questions. The hearing was adjourned until 9:30am on June 16.
