Latest news with #MichaelLee
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Analyst Says AMD Stock Can ‘At Least Double' in the Next 12 Months
Michael Lee, the founder of Michael Lee Strategy, said in a recent program on Schwab Network that bearish sentiment has impacted AMD, but the stock remains positioned to benefit from AI in the long term. "I think it's, you know, if you have a 12-month time horizon, you're looking at at least a double from here. I really like the stock and the nature of these AI GPU games is that the demand far exceeds supply, and the problems that Advanced Micro Devices Inc (NASDAQ:AMD) has had is just getting that supply up and running to meet that demand. It's not quite in line with where the street is, and so they have hammered this stock and kind of lost all faith, and there's this overwhelming bearish sentiment that's been ongoing for a while, especially since February on everything AI." Lee said the company could face short-term headwinds amid tariffs and volatility, but it remains a key beneficiary of the technology growth trend. Photo by Kaleidico on Unsplash Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) bulls believe the market should stop comparing the company's chips with Nvidia and focus on its data-center growth and its competitive edge over other players like Intel. Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD)'s strong growth in the data center segment is indeed impressive, driven by Instinct GPU shipments and strong sales of EPYC CPUs. Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) will continue to benefit from organic growth catalysts in this segment despite the competition from Nvidia. According to Goldman Sachs Research, global data center demand could surge by 160% by 2030. In the U.S., data centers are projected to use 8% of total power by 2030, up from 3% in 2022. McKinsey estimates that adding the required U.S. capacity will need over $500 billion in infrastructure investment by the decade's end. Artisan Global Opportunities Fund stated the following regarding Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMD) in its Q4 2024 investor letter: 'Among our top detractors were Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMD), Novo Nordisk and Danaher. Shares of AMD declined in Q4, which capped off a frustrating year of stock performance that did not seem to match its fundamental progress. Regarding its AI opportunity, the company accomplished everything we had hoped for over the past 18 months. It successfully entered the market with its MI300 graphic processing unit (GPU) chip and raised its latest 2024 AI-related revenue guidance to $5.0 billion from $4.5 billion. However, its shares have experienced weakness for two primary reasons. First is the emergence of custom AI accelerator chip solutions from Broadcom and Marvell (a Q4 buy) as alternatives to the GPU solutions from NVIDIA and AMD. While this competitive threat is more significant than we had initially anticipated, we continue to be excited about AMD's opportunity moving forward. We believe the AI-related market will grow to $400 billion–$500 billion in the next three years (compared to $100 billion in 2024). We expect that NVIDIA's market share will fall from ~90%in2024to60%–80%overthesameperiodasitcedes market share to AMD (from5%in2024to10%–20%) and custom accelerator solutions (from 5% in 2024 to 10%–20%). Under these assumptions, we expect AI GPUs to double AMD's total 2024 sales. Second is cyclical struggles within other areas of its business. While data center revenues have more than doubled over the past two years, the gaming business is down more than 60%, and embedded (specialized chips found in various industrial and consumer products) is down20%.As its data center business continues to grow and the cyclical areas of its business bounce back, we expect AMD to deliver stronger earnings growth.' While we acknowledge the potential of AMD as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- Sport
- South China Morning Post
Frankie Lor fancies Horsepower down in trip and weight in Class One sprint
Horsepower steams home under Zac Purton to score at the Valley in April. Photos: Kenneth Chan Frankie Lor Fu-chuen is confident Horsepower will relish a return to 1,000m and a light weight when the talented sprinter tackles Saturday's Class One Pearce Memorial Challenge Cup at Sha Tin. A three-time winner from five starts in his first Hong Kong season, the former Australian galloper drops back to the minimum trip after failing on his first attempt at 1,200m last start. Champion jockey Zac Purton told stewards that Horsepower raced too keenly in the early and middle stages and refused to settle when ninth to Kaholo Angel at Happy Valley. While Lor hasn't given up on the Harry Angel gelding running a strong six furlongs in the future, he has high hopes that the return to the course and distance of his victory in February will work the oracle. 'I asked Zac to just jump and relax. They were going quick early and he asked the horse to go with them and then he pulled,' Lor said of Horsepower's recent defeat. Horsepower has an engine! 🤯 Owned by HKJC Chairman Michael Lee and his family, Horsepower rockets clear in the straight at Happy Valley for a third win at his fourth start... @zpurton #HappyWednesday | #HKracing — HKJC Racing (@HKJC_Racing) April 23, 2025 'Maybe later on we can try 1,200m at Sha Tin – they might go quicker there. This time, he goes back to 1,000m at Sha Tin and Zac can ride him 2lb over [his allotted weight of 118lb]. 'I think he'll be OK and his form's OK. Hopefully we can have a good result for his last run of the season.' A winner at his final two Australian starts when known as Fire Follower, Horsepower made a spectacular start to his Hong Kong career when he stormed home to win first up at the Valley in October. HK Racing News Get updates direct to your inbox Sign up Best Bets Racing News By registering you agree to our T&Cs & Privacy Policy Error: Please enter a valid email. The email address is already in use. Please login to subscribe. Error, please try again later. THANK YOU You are one the list. The four-year-old was then scratched at the barriers for another Valley race when he was found to be lame. Lor gave him a short break and he returned to triumph down the Sha Tin straight in February. He has drawn barrier three in Saturday's eight-runner contest, which is headlined by Cody Mo Wai-kit's straight-track specialist Magic Control and John Size's quality sprinter Wunderbar, who is fresh from bouncing back to winning form last start. Hugh Bowman boots Wunderbar home last start. Group Three National Day Cup (1,000m) winner Beauty Waves will make his stable debut for Tony Cruz after transferring from Pierre Ng Pang-chi's yard, while Aurora Lady, Full Credit, Red Elegance and Stellar Express round out the field. Mark Newnham admits he is guarded about Full Credit's first run since undergoing throat surgery in March to correct a breathing problem. 'You don't find out until you put them under race pressure,' Newnham said of the four-time winner, who comfortably won a dirt trial last week. 'He's been a really consistent horse at each of the tracks, including the all-weather, but Saturday will be a test for him.' With regular rider Lyle Hewitson sidelined with wrist and ankle injuries sustained in a Valley fall on Wednesday night, Full Credit will be ridden by Matthew Chadwick on Saturday. Jockey Andrea Atzeni and trainer Mark Newnham with Mojave Desert after his recent dirt victory. Newnham has more confidence in his two-pronged attack on Saturday's Class Three Shek Sheung River Handicap (1,650m), with Mojave Desert and New Forest both chasing back-to-back victories on the dirt. 'Mojave Desert looks like he'll run out 1,650m. He's just got to be ridden quietly,' Newnham said. 'The other horse will be up front, so we've got two irons in the fire there with two different racing styles. Hopefully it works out and they run one-two.' Mojave Desert has drawn barrier one with Derek Leung Ka-chun on board, while Harry Bentley replaces Hewitson on New Forest, who jumps from barrier seven.
Associated Press
3 days ago
- Business
- Associated Press
Lee Partners Law Launches to Fight for Injured Workers Using Insider Defense Knowledge
Lee Partners Law: Injury Attorneys LLP brings a family-owned, client-first approach backed by decades of inside insurance defense experience. A new California law firm is opening its doors with a bold mission: to protect injured workers using the same insider strategies once used against them. Lee Partners Law: Injury Attorneys LLP, founded by brothers David A. Lee and Michael Lee, launches today with a statewide focus on workers' compensation cases—and a deep commitment to fighting for working families. What sets the firm apart is the background of its founders. Both attorneys spent over two decades combined defending insurance companies and major employers. Now, the brothers are putting that knowledge to use on the other side—helping injured workers navigate a system that's often confusing, unfair, and stacked against them. 'We're brothers, business partners, and former defense attorneys who've sat inside insurance war rooms,' said David Lee, Founding Attorney. 'We know exactly how those companies try to reduce or deny claims. And now we're using everything we learned to protect the people they overlook—injured workers.' Headquartered in Los Angeles and serving all of California, Lee Partners Law is a family-run practice built on trust, integrity, and aggressive legal representation. The firm's focus is 100% workers' compensation law, handling everything from denied claims and delayed treatment to serious injuries and maximum-value settlements. The Lees say their approach combines hard-hitting strategy with personalized, compassionate service—something they believe only a small, family-led firm can provide. 'We're not a giant corporate office. We're two brothers who grew up together, work side by side, and care deeply about every client who walks through our doors,' added Michael Lee, Partner. 'This firm is personal to us—and that makes us fight even harder.' Lee Partners Law is proud to represent the workers who keep cities running. These are the people who power California every day, and they deserve someone in their corner when they get hurt on the job. For more information or to schedule a free case evaluation, visit: Media Contact Company Name: Lee Partners Law: Work Injury Attorneys Contact Person: David A Lee Email: Send Email Phone: 3102950822 Address:PO Box 3869 City: Valley Village State: CA 91617 Country: United States Website: Source: Brand Push
Fast Company
20-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Fast Company
MAHA is betting on whole milk. Oatly is betting on coffee and punk
Dairy is having a moment. Influencers on social media are drinking raw milk, consumers are going back to cow's milk, and Republicans are pushing for whole milk's return to school cafeterias. But, while the plant-based milk world might appear in the rearview mirror, Oatly is leaning into coffee culture—and making some truly bizarre ads in the process. As part of a recent campaign called Blind Love, Oatly invited consumers to blind test whole milk and Oatly in coffee in a bizarre how-to video. In the accompanying ad, voiced by SNL alum Chris Parnell, the brand spoofed typical American pharmaceutical commercials, and presents a made up condition dubbed DOMP (Dormant Oatmilk Preference), to help viewers to 'diagnose themselves' and discover their oat milk preference in coffee. Oatly knows what it is doing. Studies show that Gen-Z is more responsive to 'absurd' tactics, and 72% of Gen Zers and millennials prefer humorous ads. It comes to no surprise then that oddball advertising is becoming increasingly common for Oatly (and other brands, too). Nutter Butter fills its TikTok with obscure brain rot content; Duolingo's owl faked his own death; and Wendy's irreverent comments have started a feud with Katy Perry. Yes, advertising is stranger than ever, but it's effective. 'We always do it in a strange way,' executive creative director at Oatly Michael Lee says. Late last year, the brand hired 31 professional Santas for a taste test switching milk and cookies with oat milk and croquembouche. Before that, another campaign featured ' auditions ' for an Oatly cooking show (spoiler: the casting tapes were the show). Oatly is very much in on the joke: on its website, the advertisement tab reads 'brainwashing.' The ad campaigns track with Oatly's marketing evolution. While the Swedish brand was born in 1994 targeting those with dairy allergies, it wasn't until 2013 when they shifted strategies to appeal to wider audiences, including a major redesign. The brand originally boasted muted packaging, but opted for a more rebellious rebrand as it entered the American market. Now Oatly's carton, covered with playful typography and quotes like 'wow no cow,' and 'it's like milk but made for humans,' is a staple in grocery store aisles and coffee shops. 'We had a very solid mission to convert dairy drinkers to plant based. But we were also human about it, and we had fun with it,' Lee says. 'We did a lot of stuff that was very provocative that other brands wouldn't have done, and so we had this kind of fearless, kind of punk quality.' The plant-based revolution is declining Just a few years ago, almond and oat lattes dominated orders, and recently more niche plant-based alternatives like pistachio milk have peaked consumer's interest, yet there is no denying alt-milk is taking a hit. From 2023 to 2024, whole milk saw a 1.6% increase in sales, while plant-based milks sales declined by 4.4%. For Oatly, its first quarter financial report revealed a 0.8% revenue decline compared to the same period the year prior, although it still expects to meet its first full year of profitable growth. While consumers with dietary restrictions will remain loyal to nondairy products, most of the time, picking between whole milk and alt-milk is a choice. 'The plant based group is really kind of a story of overlap,' Darren Seifer, executive director and industry advisor for consumer goods and food service at Circana, says. '90% of [alt-milk users] are also using traditional dairy items.' Like the perfect storm that allowed alt-milks to boom in the first place, a similar one is brewing elevating whole milk to cult status. Buzzwords like 'high protein,' 'low-sugar,' and 'gut healthy' can be naturally occurring features in dairy, making it an attractive choice for users. 'We've seen so far in the last year in traditional dairy, there's been a strong emphasis around health claims,' Seifer says. 'Aligning with the health trends that we see popping up, that's been helping to drive some of its growth. And again, because there is an overlap among those who use plant based it feels like it's drawing them away from it.' Additionally, financial factors like the higher price of alt-milk at a time of economic uncertainty might also be driving consumers away, Seifer explained, and cultural trends are also at play. 'We started to see people tell us that they're trying to get away from artificiality again,' Seifer says. From the rise of tradwives, Make America Healthy Again, and a disdain for oils, many consumers are now opting away from ultra-processed foods, artificial colors and sweeteners, and more. 'Define that as you wish, but that's just the terminology that was thrown out there,' he adds. 'And they might look at something like almond milk and say, well, that doesn't occur naturally, so it's processed.' Brewing culture In the midst of shifting trends, Oatly is doubling down on humor and culture. Specifically, it's tapping into coffee culture and baristas' expertise, going where consumers might first meet their product: in a coffee shop. 'We want it to be easy for people to engage with us. So it has to be fun, it has to be cool. It has to be part of culture. So, coffee kind of plays that role for us,' Lee says. Traveling from New York and Chicago, to London and Berlin, the over 60 baristas on staff spend time at coffee shops around the world, informing Oatly not only where culture is going, but how coffee fits into the mix. 'Every barista is not just a barista. They are tattoo artists. They're in a band, they're artists, they're designers. And so that was a perfect way for us to follow coffee into culture,' Lee added. 'Coffee culture is moving into fashion. It's moving into nightlife. It's moving into music. And since we have such a strong relationship with coffee, there's kind of a license for our brand to do that.' Leveraging the intersection of fashion and coffee, the brand recently released a ' global lookbook,' presenting various summer recipes like an Ube matcha latte and a cherry bakewell dirty soda recipe, both featuring colorful editorial visuals. 'The company has been around for 30 years, and from our perspective, trends come and go,' Lee added. 'We're staying the course.' The final deadline for Fast Company's Next Big Things in Tech Awards is Friday, June 20, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
The Advertiser
21-05-2025
- Business
- The Advertiser
Qantas makes mercy plea for illegal sackings 'mistake'
Qantas did not deliberately break the law when it illegally sacked 1820 workers and its "mistake" warrants a "mid-range" penalty, a court has been told. Federal Court Justice Michael Lee has heard final submissions on the penalty to be imposed on Qantas for the biggest case of illegal sackings in Australian history. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay $120 million to the ground staff as compensation for their economic loss, pain and suffering since their jobs were outsourced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Transport Workers Union is seeking the maximum penalty of $121 million and an order that the money be paid to the union, while Qantas has urged Justice Lee to impose a "mid-range" penalty between $40 million and $80 million. The airline's "failure was in the territory of mistake, rather than deliberate breach of the law," Qantas counsel Justin Gleeson SC told the court. "The failure has now been exposed and recognised by the contravener, and the contravener has put in place appropriate steps to minimise the risk of the failure occurring again," he said on Wednesday. Qantas argued that its actions were driven by "business calamities" caused by the pandemic, not exploitation, and the illegal sackings were the result of a single decision and therefore only one breach of the law. It also pointed to the $120 million compensation deal and and its expression of contrition for its actions. On Monday, Qantas chief people officer Catherine Walsh told the court the airline was "deeply sorry" for the impact on the workers, their family and friends and the union. Mr Gleeson argued the court should not infer negatively from the failure to call Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson as a witness, and emphasised concrete steps she had taken, including rebuilding relationships, creating an inclusive culture and public apologies. "There's a recognition that a change needed to be made ... there was a top down culture which impacted empowerment and a willingness to challenge or speak up on issues or decisions of concern," he said. "There's been a significant refresh of the group leadership team. Seventy per cent are either new to Qantas or to their role or to the (team)" Most of the submissions at Wednesday's hearing focused on meetings between senior managers at Qantas, a group management committee meeting and a board meeting. After initially saying he would aim to deliver a judgment on Friday, Justice Lee reserved his decision. At a protest at Brisbane Airport on Wednesday, the TWU called on airlines, airports, governments and regulators to ensure fair standards at companies like Swissport, which took over much of the work done by the sacked Qantas workers. "That work has been shoved off to operators like Swissport, who have a horrific international reputation for maiming workers, for underpaying workers, for wage theft," TWU national secretary Michael Kaine said. Recent safety visits revealed that in Brisbane, Swissport has more than 400 safety reports a month, he said. "The Albanese government must put in place a Safe and Secure Skies Commission to stop the spiral of dangerously low standards and ensure there's oversight in such a vital industry to our island nation." Qantas did not deliberately break the law when it illegally sacked 1820 workers and its "mistake" warrants a "mid-range" penalty, a court has been told. Federal Court Justice Michael Lee has heard final submissions on the penalty to be imposed on Qantas for the biggest case of illegal sackings in Australian history. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay $120 million to the ground staff as compensation for their economic loss, pain and suffering since their jobs were outsourced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Transport Workers Union is seeking the maximum penalty of $121 million and an order that the money be paid to the union, while Qantas has urged Justice Lee to impose a "mid-range" penalty between $40 million and $80 million. The airline's "failure was in the territory of mistake, rather than deliberate breach of the law," Qantas counsel Justin Gleeson SC told the court. "The failure has now been exposed and recognised by the contravener, and the contravener has put in place appropriate steps to minimise the risk of the failure occurring again," he said on Wednesday. Qantas argued that its actions were driven by "business calamities" caused by the pandemic, not exploitation, and the illegal sackings were the result of a single decision and therefore only one breach of the law. It also pointed to the $120 million compensation deal and and its expression of contrition for its actions. On Monday, Qantas chief people officer Catherine Walsh told the court the airline was "deeply sorry" for the impact on the workers, their family and friends and the union. Mr Gleeson argued the court should not infer negatively from the failure to call Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson as a witness, and emphasised concrete steps she had taken, including rebuilding relationships, creating an inclusive culture and public apologies. "There's a recognition that a change needed to be made ... there was a top down culture which impacted empowerment and a willingness to challenge or speak up on issues or decisions of concern," he said. "There's been a significant refresh of the group leadership team. Seventy per cent are either new to Qantas or to their role or to the (team)" Most of the submissions at Wednesday's hearing focused on meetings between senior managers at Qantas, a group management committee meeting and a board meeting. After initially saying he would aim to deliver a judgment on Friday, Justice Lee reserved his decision. At a protest at Brisbane Airport on Wednesday, the TWU called on airlines, airports, governments and regulators to ensure fair standards at companies like Swissport, which took over much of the work done by the sacked Qantas workers. "That work has been shoved off to operators like Swissport, who have a horrific international reputation for maiming workers, for underpaying workers, for wage theft," TWU national secretary Michael Kaine said. Recent safety visits revealed that in Brisbane, Swissport has more than 400 safety reports a month, he said. "The Albanese government must put in place a Safe and Secure Skies Commission to stop the spiral of dangerously low standards and ensure there's oversight in such a vital industry to our island nation." Qantas did not deliberately break the law when it illegally sacked 1820 workers and its "mistake" warrants a "mid-range" penalty, a court has been told. Federal Court Justice Michael Lee has heard final submissions on the penalty to be imposed on Qantas for the biggest case of illegal sackings in Australian history. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay $120 million to the ground staff as compensation for their economic loss, pain and suffering since their jobs were outsourced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Transport Workers Union is seeking the maximum penalty of $121 million and an order that the money be paid to the union, while Qantas has urged Justice Lee to impose a "mid-range" penalty between $40 million and $80 million. The airline's "failure was in the territory of mistake, rather than deliberate breach of the law," Qantas counsel Justin Gleeson SC told the court. "The failure has now been exposed and recognised by the contravener, and the contravener has put in place appropriate steps to minimise the risk of the failure occurring again," he said on Wednesday. Qantas argued that its actions were driven by "business calamities" caused by the pandemic, not exploitation, and the illegal sackings were the result of a single decision and therefore only one breach of the law. It also pointed to the $120 million compensation deal and and its expression of contrition for its actions. On Monday, Qantas chief people officer Catherine Walsh told the court the airline was "deeply sorry" for the impact on the workers, their family and friends and the union. Mr Gleeson argued the court should not infer negatively from the failure to call Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson as a witness, and emphasised concrete steps she had taken, including rebuilding relationships, creating an inclusive culture and public apologies. "There's a recognition that a change needed to be made ... there was a top down culture which impacted empowerment and a willingness to challenge or speak up on issues or decisions of concern," he said. "There's been a significant refresh of the group leadership team. Seventy per cent are either new to Qantas or to their role or to the (team)" Most of the submissions at Wednesday's hearing focused on meetings between senior managers at Qantas, a group management committee meeting and a board meeting. After initially saying he would aim to deliver a judgment on Friday, Justice Lee reserved his decision. At a protest at Brisbane Airport on Wednesday, the TWU called on airlines, airports, governments and regulators to ensure fair standards at companies like Swissport, which took over much of the work done by the sacked Qantas workers. "That work has been shoved off to operators like Swissport, who have a horrific international reputation for maiming workers, for underpaying workers, for wage theft," TWU national secretary Michael Kaine said. Recent safety visits revealed that in Brisbane, Swissport has more than 400 safety reports a month, he said. "The Albanese government must put in place a Safe and Secure Skies Commission to stop the spiral of dangerously low standards and ensure there's oversight in such a vital industry to our island nation." Qantas did not deliberately break the law when it illegally sacked 1820 workers and its "mistake" warrants a "mid-range" penalty, a court has been told. Federal Court Justice Michael Lee has heard final submissions on the penalty to be imposed on Qantas for the biggest case of illegal sackings in Australian history. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay $120 million to the ground staff as compensation for their economic loss, pain and suffering since their jobs were outsourced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Transport Workers Union is seeking the maximum penalty of $121 million and an order that the money be paid to the union, while Qantas has urged Justice Lee to impose a "mid-range" penalty between $40 million and $80 million. The airline's "failure was in the territory of mistake, rather than deliberate breach of the law," Qantas counsel Justin Gleeson SC told the court. "The failure has now been exposed and recognised by the contravener, and the contravener has put in place appropriate steps to minimise the risk of the failure occurring again," he said on Wednesday. Qantas argued that its actions were driven by "business calamities" caused by the pandemic, not exploitation, and the illegal sackings were the result of a single decision and therefore only one breach of the law. It also pointed to the $120 million compensation deal and and its expression of contrition for its actions. On Monday, Qantas chief people officer Catherine Walsh told the court the airline was "deeply sorry" for the impact on the workers, their family and friends and the union. Mr Gleeson argued the court should not infer negatively from the failure to call Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson as a witness, and emphasised concrete steps she had taken, including rebuilding relationships, creating an inclusive culture and public apologies. "There's a recognition that a change needed to be made ... there was a top down culture which impacted empowerment and a willingness to challenge or speak up on issues or decisions of concern," he said. "There's been a significant refresh of the group leadership team. Seventy per cent are either new to Qantas or to their role or to the (team)" Most of the submissions at Wednesday's hearing focused on meetings between senior managers at Qantas, a group management committee meeting and a board meeting. After initially saying he would aim to deliver a judgment on Friday, Justice Lee reserved his decision. At a protest at Brisbane Airport on Wednesday, the TWU called on airlines, airports, governments and regulators to ensure fair standards at companies like Swissport, which took over much of the work done by the sacked Qantas workers. "That work has been shoved off to operators like Swissport, who have a horrific international reputation for maiming workers, for underpaying workers, for wage theft," TWU national secretary Michael Kaine said. Recent safety visits revealed that in Brisbane, Swissport has more than 400 safety reports a month, he said. "The Albanese government must put in place a Safe and Secure Skies Commission to stop the spiral of dangerously low standards and ensure there's oversight in such a vital industry to our island nation."
