Latest news with #MikeLevin
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Opinion - Congress can't just hand over the checkbook to the executive branch
At a recent House Appropriations Committee markup, something happened that should alarm every American, especially those who believe in accountability. I introduced a simple amendment. All it said was that Congress, not the president, decides how taxpayer money is spent. That is not a radical idea. It is in the Constitution. It is our job. So I asked my Republican colleagues: Are we a co-equal branch of government? Do we still control how money gets spent? Their answer was no. They voted against the amendment. Just imagine that. Members of Congress voting to give up the very job they were elected to do. The Appropriations Committee exists to decide how your tax dollars are used. That has been the job of Congress since the beginning of the republic. It is written into Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution. Since 1974, federal law has made it even clearer. Congress decides where the money goes. Not the president. Not unelected officials. Congress. Past presidents, even when they disagreed with Congress, recognized that spending decisions had to come from lawmakers. They did not always like it, but they respected it. What we are seeing now is different. President Trump's team is saying they can simply cancel funding that Congress already approved. That is new. That is dangerous. That is illegal. That is why I offered the amendment. It was not a stunt. It was not partisan. It was a reminder of what we were sent here to do. If Congress does not stand up now, we may never get this responsibility back. We manage $2 trillion a year. If we do not do our jobs, someone else will. And that someone will not be elected or accountable to the people. So I ask my Republican colleagues. What are you afraid of? When you vote to give up your job, you are not just weakening Congress. You are letting down the roughly 750,000 people you swore to represent. And for what? Political loyalty? Fear? I think about the generations of lawmakers who served on the House Appropriations Committee. Republicans and Democrats alike understood the weight of their responsibility. They did not walk away from it. They defended it. That is what I am doing now. Because this is not about party. It is about whether the House of Representatives still represents the people. Or whether we have become irrelevant. We must remember our role before it's too late. Mike Levin represents California's 49th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
17 hours ago
- Politics
- The Hill
Congress can't just hand over the checkbook to the executive branch
At a recent House Appropriations Committee markup, something happened that should alarm every American, especially those who believe in accountability. I introduced a simple amendment. All it said was that Congress, not the president, decides how taxpayer money is spent. That is not a radical idea. It is in the Constitution. It is our job. So I asked my Republican colleagues: Are we a co-equal branch of government? Do we still control how money gets spent? Their answer was no. They voted against the amendment. Just imagine that. Members of Congress voting to give up the very job they were elected to do. The Appropriations Committee exists to decide how your tax dollars are used. That has been the job of Congress since the beginning of the republic. It is written into Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution. Since 1974, federal law has made it even clearer. Congress decides where the money goes. Not the president. Not unelected officials. Congress. Past presidents, even when they disagreed with Congress, recognized that spending decisions had to come from lawmakers. They did not always like it, but they respected it. What we are seeing now is different. President Trump's team is saying they can simply cancel funding that Congress already approved. That is new. That is dangerous. That is illegal. That is why I offered the amendment. It was not a stunt. It was not partisan. It was a reminder of what we were sent here to do. If Congress does not stand up now, we may never get this responsibility back. We manage $2 trillion a year. If we do not do our jobs, someone else will. And that someone will not be elected or accountable to the people. So I ask my Republican colleagues. What are you afraid of? When you vote to give up your job, you are not just weakening Congress. You are letting down the roughly 750,000 people you swore to represent. And for what? Political loyalty? Fear? I think about the generations of lawmakers who served on the House Appropriations Committee. Republicans and Democrats alike understood the weight of their responsibility. They did not walk away from it. They defended it. That is what I am doing now. Because this is not about party. It is about whether the House of Representatives still represents the people. Or whether we have become irrelevant. We must remember our role before it's too late. Mike Levin represents California's 49th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Forbes
13-06-2025
- Politics
- Forbes
Mike Levin: ‘I Was Shocked' When Republicans Voted Against Respect America's Constitution Amendment
On "Forbes Newsroom," Rep. Mike Levin (D-CA) spoke about his amendment, the Respect America's Constitution Amendment, which reaffirms that only Congress has the power to spend or not spend taxpayer dollars, and was unanimously voted against in the House Appropriations Committee by Republicans. Watch the full interview above.
E&E News
10-06-2025
- Politics
- E&E News
California sewage crisis bubbles up in key House race
A cross-border sewage crisis affecting Southern California could play a role in a prominent congressional race, where a Republican challenger has become a national figure on the issue. Jim Desmond, a San Diego County supervisor, has been sounding the alarm recently on Fox News and other conservative outlets about the untreated sewage that's been flowing from the Tijuana River in Mexico to the Pacific Ocean, contaminating the water and sickening residents. At the same time, he's seeking to unseat Rep. Mike Levin, accusing the Democratic incumbent of not doing enough to protect residents. 'We need to put more leverage on Mexico,' Desmond said in a recent interview. Advertisement Levin counters that Desmond is a Johnny-come-lately on the matter, though he has praised the Trump administration for taking action.
Forbes
30-05-2025
- Business
- Forbes
'People Will Die': Mike Levin Sounds The Alarm On Trump's 'Deeply Irresponsible' Big Beautiful Bill
On "Forbes Newsroom," Congressman Mike Levin (D-CA) explained why he voted against President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," as well as what changes he hopes the Senate makes to the legislation. Watch the full interview above.
