Latest news with #NationalEndowmentForTheHumanities
CNN
3 days ago
- Business
- CNN
Why the GOP doesn't want you biking to work but will spend millions on a ‘heroes' sculpture garden
The Republican tax and spending bill is 900 pages of barely readable text full of complicated proposals that would, among many other things, slash the social safety net in America and lavish wealthy households with tax cuts. It is reviled on the left for hurting poor people and reviled on the far-right for not going far enough to cut spending. It's a hard pill to swallow for lawmakers across the political spectrum, which is why it's loaded up with super niche provisions that reflect some of the ideological contradictions within the Trump coalition. Like, killing the $2 billion 'qualified bicycle commuting reimbursement,' a relatively cheap incentive that, at least in theory, would align with the 'Make American Healthy Again' sect of Trump loyalists. The benefit was suspended in Trump's first term, but before then it allowed employers to offer workers a $20 a month tax-free reimbursement for biking to work. (Healthy! Good for the environment!) The GOP package in Congress would eliminate it for good. There's also $40 million earmarked for a 'National Garden of American Heroes' — 250 life-size sculptures that Trump wants completed in the next 12 months ahead of the nation's 250th anniversary. The ambitious project is a longtime Trump vision that, according to Politico, will be almost impossible to pull off in time without the help of foundries in China. Incidentally, the money for the sculpture garden would be directed to the National Endowment for the Humanities, a government agency that Trump has been trying to eliminate since his first term. The NEH recently laid off 2/3 of its staff, canceled more than 1,000 grants and is marshaling its remaining resources to focus on next year's anniversary. These seemingly arbitrary small items are essentially sweeteners to win over lawmakers who might quibble with the broader thrust of the legislation. 'Now that we essentially do policy-making at a large scale, through these huge mega-bills in reconciliation… you have to stuff everything that you possibly can to try to get your entire coalition on board, particularly within the margins,' said Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, a progressive think tank. 'So that's where you see a lot of these, 'huh, where did that come from?' items.' The clearest example of that is the litany of carve-outs for the state of Alaska and its 740,000 residents, known by some critics as the Kodiak Kickback. (Fun fact: 'Alaska' shows up in the text of the Senate bill more than 20 times; other states, if they're mentioned at all, show up fewer than four times.) The reason for all the Alaska love is simple: As GOP leaders drummed up support, it became clear that Sen. Lisa Murkowski would be a holdout because of the bill's expanded Medicaid work restrictions and changes to federal food assistance programs. Over the weekend, staffers scrambled to rewrite key pieces of the bill to win her support, my CNN colleagues reported. As a result, Murkowski locked in several Alaska-specific breaks, including a tax deduction for meals served on fishing vessels, a special tax exemption for fishing villages in the western part of the state, and a five-fold expansion of a deduction for whaling boat captains. Like the commuter cycling reimbursement that the bill would eliminate, these aren't big-ticket items. But they illustrate the haphazard and at times punitive way government spending decisions get made. On the cycling benefit, Jacquez says it is likely just a target for Republicans who see it as a culture war issue — a 'green' activity that largely benefits people in cities who tend to vote for Democrats. You can see that dynamic play out in other provisions, too. Republicans have tried to shield some of their rural constituencies from the worst effects of the bill, Jacquez notes. There is a rural hospital bailout fund designed to blunt the impact of Medicaid cuts, for example. But that doesn't do anything to help urban hospitals in New York City, where some 4 million residents, nearly half the population, are enrolled in Medicaid. In the grand scheme of a $3.3 trillion spending package, $150 million for America's birthday might seem fine. 'But that's $150 million that's not going to be spent on food assistance,' Jacquez said. 'Or it's a billion dollars that's not going to be spent on Medicaid. When every cent allegedly matters, these things do add up.'
CNN
3 days ago
- Business
- CNN
Why the GOP doesn't want you biking to work but will spend millions on a ‘heroes' sculpture garden
The Republican tax and spending bill is 900 pages of barely readable text full of complicated proposals that would, among many other things, slash the social safety net in America and lavish wealthy households with tax cuts. It is reviled on the left for hurting poor people and reviled on the far-right for not going far enough to cut spending. It's a hard pill to swallow for lawmakers across the political spectrum, which is why it's loaded up with super niche provisions that reflect some of the ideological contradictions within the Trump coalition. Like, killing the $2 billion 'qualified bicycle commuting reimbursement,' a relatively cheap incentive that, at least in theory, would align with the 'Make American Healthy Again' sect of Trump loyalists. The benefit was suspended in Trump's first term, but before then it allowed employers to offer workers a $20 a month tax-free reimbursement for biking to work. (Healthy! Good for the environment!) The GOP package in Congress would eliminate it for good. There's also $40 million earmarked for a 'National Garden of American Heroes' — 250 life-size sculptures that Trump wants completed in the next 12 months ahead of the nation's 250th anniversary. The ambitious project is a longtime Trump vision that, according to Politico, will be almost impossible to pull off in time without the help of foundries in China. Incidentally, the money for the sculpture garden would be directed to the National Endowment for the Humanities, a government agency that Trump has been trying to eliminate since his first term. The NEH recently laid off 2/3 of its staff, canceled more than 1,000 grants and is marshaling its remaining resources to focus on next year's anniversary. These seemingly arbitrary small items are essentially sweeteners to win over lawmakers who might quibble with the broader thrust of the legislation. 'Now that we essentially do policy-making at a large scale, through these huge mega-bills in reconciliation… you have to stuff everything that you possibly can to try to get your entire coalition on board, particularly within the margins,' said Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, a progressive think tank. 'So that's where you see a lot of these, 'huh, where did that come from?' items.' The clearest example of that is the litany of carve-outs for the state of Alaska and its 740,000 residents, known by some critics as the Kodiak Kickback. (Fun fact: 'Alaska' shows up in the text of the Senate bill more than 20 times; other states, if they're mentioned at all, show up fewer than four times.) The reason for all the Alaska love is simple: As GOP leaders drummed up support, it became clear that Sen. Lisa Murkowski would be a holdout because of the bill's expanded Medicaid work restrictions and changes to federal food assistance programs. Over the weekend, staffers scrambled to rewrite key pieces of the bill to win her support, my CNN colleagues reported. As a result, Murkowski locked in several Alaska-specific breaks, including a tax deduction for meals served on fishing vessels, a special tax exemption for fishing villages in the western part of the state, and a five-fold expansion of a deduction for whaling boat captains. Like the commuter cycling reimbursement that the bill would eliminate, these aren't big-ticket items. But they illustrate the haphazard and at times punitive way government spending decisions get made. On the cycling benefit, Jacquez says it is likely just a target for Republicans who see it as a culture war issue — a 'green' activity that largely benefits people in cities who tend to vote for Democrats. You can see that dynamic play out in other provisions, too. Republicans have tried to shield some of their rural constituencies from the worst effects of the bill, Jacquez notes. There is a rural hospital bailout fund designed to blunt the impact of Medicaid cuts, for example. But that doesn't do anything to help urban hospitals in New York City, where some 4 million residents, nearly half the population, are enrolled in Medicaid. In the grand scheme of a $3.3 trillion spending package, $150 million for America's birthday might seem fine. 'But that's $150 million that's not going to be spent on food assistance,' Jacquez said. 'Or it's a billion dollars that's not going to be spent on Medicaid. When every cent allegedly matters, these things do add up.'
New York Times
4 days ago
- Politics
- New York Times
Will Politics Derail America's 250th Birthday Bash?
This Thursday, on the eve of July 4, President Trump will touch down at the Iowa State Fairgrounds. The fair itself, with its butter cows and pie-eating contests, doesn't start until August. But the president will be promoting an even bigger all-American spectacle: the nation's 250th birthday party. Thursday's event is being billed as the start of the countdown to next summer's Semiquincentennial, as the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence is known. 'A monumental celebration, kicking off a new era of American greatness,' according to the organizers, it will feature 'patriotism, excitement, inspiration, and a glimpse into the grand festivities' to come — including the Great American State Fair and national Patriot Games for high school athletes, which Mr. Trump first teased on the campaign trail. For many 250th planners across the country, it will throw a welcome spotlight, after years of struggling to get the public's attention. But Mr. Trump's embrace of the anniversary has also intensified a growing question: Will today's hyper-polarized politics derail the Semiquincentennial? Concerns have mounted in recent months as the Trump administration slashed funding or ousted leadership at federal cultural institutions like the Smithsonian, the Library of Congress and the National Endowment for the Humanities. At the same time, it has moved to put Mr. Trump's stamp on the little-known bipartisan group charged with coordinating the national commemoration, installing Fox News and Trump campaign veterans in key positions, while dropping some contractors with ties to Democrats. Those worries spiked during last month's military parade commemorating the 250th anniversary of the founding of the Army, held on Mr. Trump's birthday, which spurred anti-Trump 'No Kings' protests across the country that were rich in their own 1776-inflected symbolism. Still, some are hoping the Semiquincentennial will bring the country together, without papering over deep political differences that go all the way back to the founding. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Washington Post
20-05-2025
- Politics
- Washington Post
Will federal funding cuts spell the end for history documentaries?
Tracie Holder thought her production grant might be spared. After President Donald Trump returned to office, the filmmaker heard rumors about the National Endowment for the Humanities potentially terminating grants awarded during the Biden administration, but she had been promised $485,000 in the final months of Trump's first term. Surely this meant her documentary — about the Astor Place Riot, a deadly 1849 incident that started out as a squabble between competing performances of 'Macbeth' — wouldn't be targeted as objectionable, right?
The Guardian
20-05-2025
- Business
- The Guardian
Trump can complain all he wants – but he can't stop his own economic mess
With his usual threats, Donald Trump is trying to ward off the dire reality that he has created and is bearing down on him. He can clamp migrants in foreign gulags, coerce white-shoe law firms into becoming his pro bono serfs and try to simply erase the National Endowment for the Humanities, but he can't rescind his harm to the economy. Trump can slash the National Weather Service, but he can't stop the storm he's whipped up. He's shouting into the wind at his twister. No matter how much he might lower his draconian tariffs after his 90-day breathing spell, the velocity of damage is just building. It's not a mistake that can be rectified. There's no do-over. It's not a golf game at one of his clubs where he gets endless mulligans and is declared the champion. Nor does Trump really want to draw back completely from his tariffs as if he never had proudly displayed his 'Liberation Day' idiot board. When the Walmart CEO inevitably announced that prices would have to be raised as a result of Trump's tariffs, Trump warned: 'Between Walmart and China they should, as is said 'EAT THE TARIFFS,' and not charge valued customers ANYTHING. I'll be watching, and so will your customers!' Trump has falsely insisted that tariffs are levied on foreign importers. But Walmart demonstrated the indisputable fact that tariffs are price increases passed on to consumers. They are a tax. Trump is furious at the early indication of the renewed inflation and price rises that are coming. His natural response, of course, is an attempt at intimidation. The tariffs are a shakedown by which Trump could exercise his control over corporations that must scrape and bow before him, asking for targeted relief in exchange for, perhaps, payments to his personal political action committee, or, perhaps, throwing money into the kitty of his various financial endeavors, his crypto firm and meme-coin scheme. According to his wishful thinking, businesses should 'eat the tariffs' to cover up his falsehood and maintain his popularity. For his sake, shut up and 'eat' it. Trump is at war with the corporations' bottom line. He can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but he can't fool the bond market any of the time. When Moody's Ratings downgraded the US credit rating, the Trump White House put out a statement attacking Moody's 'credibility' while blaming 'Biden's mess'. Moody's reasons were an oblique criticism of Trump's pending 'big, beautiful bill' for massive regressive tax cuts in addition to his tariffs, which have led to the suspension of any further cuts in interest rates from the Federal Reserve. Blaming Biden, in any case, hasn't been cutting it with public opinion. Only 21% of Americans attributed the state of the economy to Biden's policies in a poll in early April conducted by CBS News/YouGov. In Trump's first hundred days alone, he denigrated Biden at least 580 times, according to NBC News. Trump sought to make him the scapegoat for his own policies. But the public is certain that Trump and nobody else owns the economy as he desperately tries to restore it to where Biden bequeathed it to him, with inflation and interest rates falling. And, now, very ill, Biden can no longer serve as a convenient target. Even if, after Trump's 90-day pause on tariffs, he cuts them in half, the result will be devastating to small businesses, family farms and many large corporations. Nearly 90% of American small businesses rely on imported goods. More than 20% of the US agricultural sector depends upon exporting its products, according to the US Department of Agriculture. US manufacturers rely on imports for more than 20% of machinery, products and components. More than 41m American jobs are linked to imports and exports, one in five, according to the Business Roundtable. That does not include the multiplier effect of millions, if not tens of millions, of additional jobs created as a result. The supply chain has been severely distorted. For 12 hours on 9 May, zero cargo ships – none – not one – departed from China to the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the two major US ports for Asian imported goods. The more than $906bn trucking industry, which had finally regained stability after the Covid disruption, faces another shock. 'Trump trade war is wrecking hope for 2025 US trucking rebound,' reads the headline on a Reuters story. The uncertainty factor that Trump has introduced has frozen all planning. The auto companies, among others, have given up issuing any guidance to investors. Their earnings are plunging, their suppliers in chaos. Nobody can predictably produce, order or hire, and so businesses are in a state of suspension. The prospect of a slowdown has already depressed oil prices to the point where it will soon not be profitable to drill at all. In April, Trump called critics of his tariffs 'scoundrels and frauds', but retailers do not know how to price goods, how much to raise them to sustain often razor-thin profit margins. They face a Hobson's choice of pricing themselves out of their markets or absorbing the costs and going bust. The head of Trump's council of economic advisers, Kevin Hassett, cheerfully announced on 12 April that he expected the gross national product to grow by 2% to 2.5% in the first quarter of this year. On 30 April, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that GDP had fallen by 0.3% in the quarter. Even after Trump agreed to drop his 145% tariff on China to 30%, Paul Krugman points out that 'we're still looking at a shock to the economy seven or eight times as big as Smoot-Hawley, the previous poster child for destructive tariff policy'. Krugman states that on the optimistic lower end, 'we'd expect Trump's tariffs after last weekend's retreat on China to cut overall US trade by roughly 50%. Trade with China, which would have been virtually eliminated with a 145% tariff rate, would fall by 'only' around 65% with a 30% tariff.' The result will be devastating, with rising inflation, higher unemployment, shortages, and lower growth and investment. In short, the economy will plunge into stagflation for the first time since the 1970s. Then, the phenomenon was the outcome of the Opec oil shock. This is the Trump shock, not the consequence of an external factor, but entirely self-induced through a delusion. Does he care? 'Well,' Trump said, 'maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls. So maybe the two dolls will cost a couple bucks more than they would normally.' All of what's coming was foreseeable. This is not a case in which unintended consequences suddenly emerged without advance warning, like in the 1970s. Here the red lights flashed; Trump raced through them. The uncertainty he's injected is not a byproduct of happenstance. Uncertainty is the aspiring dictator's pre-eminent prerogative. Trump resents any limitation on his ability to act however he wishes. The ultimate privilege of a dictator is to be at liberty to be impulsive. The more unpredictable he is, the more he is regarded as omnipotent. Trump has no real policies. There is no actual analysis, no expertise, no peer review. He brandishes atavistic symbols as primitive representations of his unrestrained power. Lowering or raising the tariffs are functionally equivalent if they are perceived as enhancing the perception of his potency. The merits are of no interest. Policies, such as they are, are measured by how well they gild his lily. The more unpredictable he is, the more he thinks of himself and thinks others think of him as almighty. For Trump, experience is meaningless. He never learns. Even his existential moments are forgotten, like his near-death from Covid. He deduces no lessons. It doesn't inform his health policies, for example, which he's turned over to oddballs and snake-oil salesmen led by the chief crank with roadkill in his freezer and a worm in his brain, Robert F Kennedy Jr. Trump's learning curve is a hamster's wheel. He goes 'round and 'round, repeating belligerent ignorance unaltered over decades. He's the hamster who thinks he's making progress if he receives attention. His solipsism is epistemological. Jared Kushner grasped its essence when he surfed on Amazon to find the one discredited economist, Peter Navarro, to provide sham formulas to justify Trump's preconceived tariff obsession. Trump's psychological equilibrium requires the constant rejection of his responsibility for the abrasive reality he churns up. Confronting reality exacts fortitude, both politically and intellectually. He considers that a mug's game he must resist. His inner fragility is shielded by projecting images of muscular strength, now AI generated videos and pictures of himself produced by the White House communications team as a Jedi, a guitar hero (after Bruce Springsteen called him 'treasonous') and the Pope (the new Pope Leo IX does not much care for the social Darwinism of JD Vance). Meanwhile, there must be a conspiracy theory to deliver up a scapegoat. That opens the door of the Oval Office for malicious fabulists to whom Trump is particularly susceptible and finds useful as his instruments to terrorize even his own staff. Enter loony Laura Loomer as his virtual national security personnel director with a portfolio in hand identifying six officials on the national security council to be purged, soon to be followed by the defenestration of the national security adviser Michael Waltz, who, rather than the thoroughly incompetent secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, served as the scapegoat for the Signal chat group that invited in Jeffrey Goldberg, editor of the Atlantic. A 9/11 truther, Loomer claimed the terrorist attack was 'an inside job.' During the 2024 campaign, Trump brought her to the 9/11 memorial service. Loomer said that if Kamala Harris won the White House it 'will smell of curry'. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the far-right member of the House from Georgia, assailed Loomer as an 'appalling and extremist racist'. 'You don't want to be Loomered,' Trump said. 'If you're Loomered, you're in deep trouble. That's the end of your career in a sense. Thanks, Laura.' Trump famously can't accept the slightest criticism. He is armored against learning in any case. He is incapable of engaging in any self-examination for both emotional and cognitive reasons. It would be too upsetting even to contemplate. His whole being would become paralyzed if he were ever to suffer a bout of introspection. His system couldn't tolerate it. His brittle peace of mind requires his fabricated self-image to be constantly apple-polished and worshipped. The split between Trump's anxious need for his cosseted appearance and the terrible reality he's making is his ultimate credibility gap. He must sustain a completely self-contained inner world or the walls start to close in. Information must therefore be suppressed. When the intelligence community assesses that the Tren de Aragua gang is not being manipulated by the Maduro regime of Venezuela, which is the invented excuse for Trump's migrant round-up emergency, then fire the intelligence analysts or tell them to redo their report. When the Democrats in the House attempted to bring up a bill to remove Trump's claim of a national security emergency for his tariffs – another mythical emergency – Republicans moved to block it in the rules committee. No vote, no debate. It's a disappearing act. If the lying doesn't work, try intimidation. That is the rhyme or reason behind Trump's success in imposing his malignancy. But now he's created a reality he can't disguise or bully. The planets are hurdling into collision. He's done it to himself by himself. The passage of his 'Big Beautiful Bill', with its extravagant tax cuts for the wealthy and deep cuts to Medicaid, wounding his white rural base, of which, depending on the county, are 25% to 40% dependent on the federal healthcare program, will spike the inflationary effect of his tariffs as well as the deficit. Republicans no longer uphold the pretense that their tax cut redistribution of wealth upward will actually lower the deficit by reducing revenue. Ronald Reagan's supply-side economics claims, originally dubbed voodoo economics by George HW Bush, in fact proved Bush prescient. Reagan's budget director, David Stockman, confessed that the supply side charade was a 'Trojan horse' for lowing the upper rate and was just a 'horse-and-sparrow' theory of 'trickle down.' Thus, Trump's potential legislative success will only deepen his crisis. Donald turns his lonely eyes to the Federal Reserve to bail him out, like his father, Fred Trump, who always arrived in the nick of time to rescue him from his messes. Trump lies in capital letters: 'THE CONSENSUS OF ALMOST EVERYBODY IS THAT, 'THE FED SHOULD CUT RATES SOONER, RATHER THAN LATER.' There is no such consensus. The consensus is to the contrary. Trump's begging shifts to threats. If Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, doesn't do what Trump says he will be turned into the scapegoat: 'Too Late Powell, a man legendary for being Too Late, will probably blow it again – But who knows???' But Powell is imperturbable. 'Higher real rates may also reflect the possibility that inflation could be more volatile going forward than in the inter-crisis period of the 2010s,' he said in his most measured tone on 15 May. 'We may be entering a period of more frequent, and potentially more persistent, supply shocks – a difficult challenge for the economy and for central banks.' It's not Powell who is 'too late.' It's Trump. As Evelyn Waugh wrote in his novel Decline and Fall: 'Too late, old boy, too late. The saddest words in the English language.' Sidney Blumenthal, a former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, has published three books of a projected five-volume political life of Abraham Lincoln: A Self-Made Man, Wrestling With His Angel and All the Powers of Earth
