Latest news with #Nava

2025 National Bank Open Presented by Rogers: Nava [114th] vs. Humbert [23rd] Prediction, Odds and Match Preview

USA Today

2 days ago

Sport
USA Today

2025 National Bank Open Presented by Rogers: Nava [114th] vs. Humbert [23rd] Prediction, Odds and Match Preview

On Tuesday, Ugo Humbert (No. 23 in the world) takes on Emilio Nava (No. 114) in the Round of 64 at the National Bank Open Presented by Rogers. Humbert is the favorite against Nava for this match, with -325 odds against the the underdog's +240. Interested in this match? Go to Tennis Channel to watch, and for coverage throughout the National Bank Open Presented by Rogers. Tennis odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Monday at 10:35 PM ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub. Emilio Nava vs. Ugo Humbert matchup info Watch the Tennis Channel and more sports on Fubo! Nava vs. Humbert Prediction Based on the implied probility from the moneyline, Nava has a 76.5% to win. Nava vs. Humbert Betting Odds Nava vs. Humbert matchup performance & stats

2025 Mifel Open: Nava [123rd] vs. Yunchaokete [73rd] Prediction, Odds and Match Preview

USA Today

16-07-2025

Sport
USA Today

2025 Mifel Open: Nava [123rd] vs. Yunchaokete [73rd] Prediction, Odds and Match Preview

Bu Yunchaokete (No. 73) will take on Emilio Nava (No. 123) in the Round of 16 at the Mifel Open on Wednesday, July 16. Yunchaokete has -140 odds to win this match against Nava (+110). Tennis odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Wednesday at 10:35 AM ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub. Emilio Nava vs. Bu Yunchaokete matchup info Nava vs. Yunchaokete Prediction Based on the implied probility from the moneyline, Nava has a 58.3% to win. Nava vs. Yunchaokete Betting Odds Nava vs. Yunchaokete matchup performance & stats Our team of savvy editors independently handpicks all recommendations. If you purchase through our links, the USA Today Network may earn a commission. Prices were accurate at the time of publication but may change. Gambling involves risk. Please only gamble with funds that you can comfortably afford to lose. While we do our utmost to offer good advice and information we cannot be held responsible for any loss that may be incurred as a result of gambling. We do our best to make sure all the information that we provide on this site is correct. However, from time to time mistakes will be made and we will not be held liable. Please check any stats or information if you are unsure how accurate they are. No guarantees are made with regards to results or financial gain. All forms of betting carry financial risk and it is up to the individual to make bets with or without the assistance of information provided on this site and we cannot be held responsible for any loss that may be incurred as a result of following the betting tips provided on this site. Past performances do not guarantee success in the future and betting odds fluctuate from one minute to the next. The material contained on this site is intended to inform, entertain and educate the reader and in no way represents an inducement to gamble legally or illegally or any sort of professional advice. Gannett may earn revenue from sports betting operators for audience referrals to betting services. Sports betting operators have no influence over nor are any such revenues in any way dependent on or linked to the newsrooms or news coverage. Terms apply, see operator site for Terms and Conditions. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, help is available. Call the National Council on Problem Gambling 24/7 at 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ, OH), 1-800-522-4700 (CO), 1-800-BETS-OFF (IA), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN). Must be 21 or older to gamble. Sports betting and gambling are not legal in all locations. Be sure to comply with laws applicable where you reside. It is your sole responsibility to act in accordance with your local laws.

Ministry told to tackle steel output glut

Bangkok Post

29-06-2025

Business
Bangkok Post

Ministry told to tackle steel output glut

The Industry Ministry must take serious action to curb manufacturing of rolled steel in Thailand in order to prevent oversupply, in addition to bracing for higher US tariffs on steel and aluminium, says the Federation of Thai Industries (FTI). The glut is attributed to various factors, including an influx of low-cost steel products into the Thai market, while steel and aluminium duties affect the international trade of Thai manufacturers. Authorities should not permit the construction of new factories and production capacity expansion for hot and cold rolled steel for at least five years to help local manufacturers maintain their businesses, said Nava Chantanasurakon, vice-chariman of the FTI. "The steel industry is slowing as demand declines due to weaker construction and automotive industries, as well as a stagnant global economy," he said. Hot rolled steel, which is renowned for its strength, durability and cost-effectiveness, is used in construction, car manufacturing, and the manufacturing of heavy machinery. Cold rolled steel is a key component in household appliances, metal furniture and auto parts. The cabinet resolved earlier for the Industry Ministry to extend a ban on the establishment or expansion of factories producing steel bars and small steel bars used for concrete reinforcement for a further five years until 2030 to address the glut. The FTI wants the cabinet to draw up a similar resolution to strengthen protections for local steel manufacturing. Local manufacturers are struggling to deal with steel imports from China, reducing capacity utilisation in the Thai steel industry to less than 30%. Mr Nava said Thailand's steel con- sumption this year is projected at 16 million tonnes, the same as last year, thanks to state and private investment projects. Up to 60% of steel products are used in the construction sector, with 30% going to the automotive industry. The remaining 10% is utilised by other industries. On the international front, Thailand is the 11st-largest exporter of aluminium to the US. The country sold 65,204 tonnes to the US last year.

To make government more efficient, we must first make it more effective

Technical.ly

24-06-2025

Business
Technical.ly

To make government more efficient, we must first make it more effective

In 2013, when a scrappy group of Silicon Valley technologists was brought in to help fix they were taking part in a paradigm shift. The service's public failure helped expose the government's need for modern development methods supported by vendors who use them. Eventually, the successful effort to stabilize and rebuild empowered innovators within government to advance much-needed changes. Nava, a public benefit corporation aiming to make government services simple and effective, emerged from the effort to rebuild Our founders, who were among those Silicon Valley technologists, officially formed Nava in 2015 after working with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for nearly two years. They recognized that a modern, human-centered approach to technology could help public institutions operate more effectively and efficiently, which in turn could restore people's trust in government. We're celebrating 10 years as a company this year, and we're still helping governments at all levels build simple and effective services. This experience demonstrated that often, the government has the technology and capabilities to provide excellent services, but complex procedures hinder modernization. Government efficiency is ultimately a byproduct of effective systems, structures and processes. So, to get efficient, we first have to get effective. This means prioritizing outcomes over procedures, holding vendors accountable, and reforming government funding. Prioritizing outcomes over procedures Whether it's getting money in the hands of unemployed workers or ensuring veterans can file claims for disability benefits, outcomes are unequivocally the foundation of restoring public trust. Yet more often than not, government procedures prevent civil servants from delivering effective services. When starting up a new project, it's not uncommon for government agencies to mandate complex, years-long requirements-gathering exercises with immovable deadlines. This can make it impossible to rapidly adapt to new challenges or opportunities. Jen Pahlka, founder of Code for America and the United States' former deputy CTO, writes about this in her book, 'Recoding America.' 'Requirements are the foundation of software development processes in government, and the source of many of its failures.' The results of such procedures are Kafkaesque services that check all the boxes except the most important — working well for the public. To operate more efficiently, we must prioritize outcomes over procedures. This means forming tighter feedback loops between policymakers and those implementing the policy, as well as simplifying bureaucratic requirements. It means allowing implementors to be flexible and accountable in achieving the 'what' without upfront prescriptions from higher-ups on the 'how.' It means acknowledging the layered complexities of government modernization rather than designing processes that ignore them. Unnecessary complexity is the biggest driver of government costs in the long term. Meeting the public's needs from the start, mainly by crafting outcome-driven policy and practicing rapid human-centered implementation, is the most effective way of keeping costs low and sustainable. Holding vendors accountable through true competition Frequently, this accountability comes down to how agencies procure services from vendors. If they solicit services solely based on whether the provider has done similar work in the past, then winning bids will always come from the same vendors. Knowing they virtually can't lose, these vendors have little incentive to bring innovation and new perspectives to delivery. Time and time again, we've seen the harm of vendors who dominate contracts or markets by locking government into their products or services. Reforming government procurement can help set a level competitive playing field. Crisp procurements that ask vendors to demonstrate their capabilities are much more effective than complex procurements that require several-hundred-page bids. Not only does this ensure that the winner can actually perform the work, it also gives opportunities to others who have the delivery chops but maybe lack the same on-paper experience as a massive firm. If a vendor is under-performing, the government must be empowered to fire them. Government contracts have option years — essentially, elective contract extensions — for this very reason. Reforming government funding We cannot seriously discuss reform and efficiency without talking about the money. As of now, Congress allocates funds to federal agencies per fiscal year. Funds don't roll over year-to-year, encouraging agencies to construct budgets around these individual timeframes — not value or multi-year outcomes. The annual funding cycle also inhibits effective modernization. Frequently, government frontloads project spending and then rapidly shrinks the budget as the project enters maintenance. The problem is that the system will eventually need to be modernized, demanding even more resources than it took to build in the first place. By contrast, most modern software projects ramp up slowly as teams conduct discovery research, engage with users, and prototype and test solutions. Working this way promotes continuous improvement and greater adaptability to people's changing needs while avoiding costly modernization spikes. It also ensures that the software evolves daily and maintains stability. Annual funding cycles favor the former way of working. To enable the latter way, Congress must increase funding slowly and incrementally. Changing how our government allocates funds is a massive structural undertaking, but it's also essential if we are serious about using software to operate more efficiently. Looking inward In 2024, over three-quarters of Americans said they did not trust government to do what's right. Despite modest improvements over the past few years, the vast majority still do not feel supported by our institutions. As civic technologists, we must continuously evaluate our successes and, more importantly, our failures, and leverage those insights to work more effectively. The stakes have never been higher.

F&O Strategy: Indus Towers to CDSL— Rupak De suggests buy or sell strategy for THESE stocks

Mint

23-06-2025

Business
Mint

F&O Strategy: Indus Towers to CDSL— Rupak De suggests buy or sell strategy for THESE stocks

Stock market today: The domestic benchmark indices, Nifty 50 and Sensex, started off lower on Monday, mirroring trends in Asia, as the US launched strikes on significant Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend, increasing concerns about global trade activities. The US's military action against key Iranian nuclear sites represents the largest Western strike against the Islamic Republic since the 1979 revolution, in collaboration with Israel. As of 9:15 IST, the Nifty 50 had decreased by 0.69% to 24,939.75, while the Sensex dropped by 0.85% to 81,704.07. According to Rupak De of LKP Securities, as long as the index stays above 24,850, it remains a 'buy on dips' market. On the upside, Nifty 50 could head towards 25,350. De recommends buying Indus Towers, Nava, and Central Depository Services (India) amidst Israel-Iran War. After three days of consolidation, Nifty 50 saw a sharp bounce, signaling a resumption of its short-term uptrend. It has also reclaimed the 21-day EMA, which adds strength to the current momentum. As long as the index stays above 24,850, it remains a 'buy on dips' market. On the upside, Nifty 50 could head towards 25,350 and possibly even higher. Open Interest Analysis: Significant open interest additions were observed in 25,000 and 25,100 Puts and while some OI addition seen at 25,400 Calls; however, Call writings were relatively muted on Friday. Maximum OI buildup was seen at 25,500 CE. Meanwhile, substantial put writing at the 25,000 strike. Strategy: Strength might increase if Nifty 50 sustains above 25,100. Trade: Buy Nifty June 25,200CE Above 110 TGT 180 SL 69. Indus Towers share price has moved up sharply following a period of sideways consolidation on the daily chart, indicating rising optimism. Moreover, the 21EMA and 50EMA have given a bullish crossover, supporting the positive view. The RSI is in a bullish crossover and rising. The current setup aligns well with a bullish outlook, with the price likely to rise towards ₹ 430. On the lower end, support is placed at ₹ 389. Nava share price has given a rounding bottom breakout on the daily chart, suggesting bullishness. In addition, the 21EMA and 50EMA have given a bullish crossover, reinforcing the positive view. The RSI is in a bullish crossover and rising on the hourly chart. The current setup supports a bullish outlook, with the price expected to move towards ₹ 600. On the lower end, support is placed at ₹ 539. After a brief correction, the stock looks poised to rise again. The price found support at the 21EMA before moving higher, signalling positive sentiment. The RSI is in a bullish crossover and rising on the hourly chart, indicating early signs of strengthening momentum. The current setup supports a bullish view, with the price likely to move towards ₹ 1,900. On the lower end, support is placed at ₹ 1,629. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts, experts and broking companies, not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decision.