Latest news with #Neanderthals
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Science
- Daily Mail
Look familiar? Scientists reveal what Neanderthals and Denisovans would look like TODAY if they hadn't gone extinct
For the last 40,000 years, Homo sapiens have been the only human species walking the Earth. Our ancient ancestors died out thousands of years ago, leaving behind nothing but fossils, a few scattered artefacts, and lingering traces in our DNA. But what if things had turned out differently? MailOnline has asked the experts to find out what the world might look like if the Neanderthals and Denisovans hadn't gone extinct. Surprisingly, they say that our distant evolutionary cousins might not be all that different to modern humans today. However, they might have had a hard time fitting in with our fast-paced, highly social societies. Dr April Noel, a palaeolithic archaeologist from the University of Victoria, told MailOnline: 'The idea that Neanderthals were hunched over, dim-witted individuals with no thought beyond their next meal is no longer tenable. 'At the same time, the idea that you could just slap a hat on a Neanderthal and you would not think twice about sitting next to him on the tube is also out the window.' What would they look like? Neanderthals and Denisovans are our closest ancient human relatives. The Neanderthals emerged around 400,000 years ago when they branched off from our common ancestors. Denisovans, meanwhile, are a far more elusive species of ancient humans who split from the Neanderthal evolutionary line around 430,000 years ago. If they had remained as separate species rather than going extinct, Neanderthals and Denisovans might look much the same as they did in the distant past. From the abundant fossil records, we know that Neanderthals were a little shorter than us on average, with shorter legs and wider hips. Neanderthals were very muscular and rugged, with large bodies and even larger heads. Their skulls show that they have room for a bigger brain than modern humans and would have been distinguished by a massive brow ridge and small foreheads. Neanderthals are our closest living relatives and share all our features to some degree. However, neanderthals have a stronger brow and a smaller forehead. Their skin tone would have depended on their climate, much like modern humans today (AI-generated impression) What would Neanderthals look like today? If Neanderthals survived until today, they might keep many of their original traits. This means they would be stockier and more heavily built than modern humans, with shorter legs and larger heads. Their faces would be distinguished by heavy brows and small foreheads. However, experts say that humans and Neanderthals would probably keep interbreeding. This means that these traits would become mixed with those of Homo sapiens. However, experts say they still would be clearly recognisable as fellow humans. Professor John Hawks, an anthropologist from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, told MailOnline: 'We don't know of any physiological traits that make Neanderthals distinct, that is, traits that don't overlap. 'Almost every physical trait in Neanderthals overlaps in its variation with ours today, at least to some extent.' That means they wouldn't look like lumbering cavemen or women, but rather like a slightly different variation of humans. Denisovans, meanwhile, are a little more of a mystery. It was only this month that scientists identified the first Denisovan skull, and besides this, there are only small fragments of bone to go on. Based on the newly identified skull, experts believe that Denisovans would have had a wide face with heavy, flat cheeks, a wide mouth, and a large nose. These bones also show that Denisovans would have been exceptionally large and muscular people, much stronger than more slender Homo sapiens. Not all that different However, experts say that Homo sapiens, Denisovans, and Neanderthals might not have remained that distinct for long. These human species interbred widely during the periods they overlapped, and many modern humans carry at least some Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA. If these species hadn't vanished, they might have continued to interbreed and further intermix our genes. Dr Hugo Zeberg, an expert on gene flow from Neanderthals and Denisovans into modern humans from the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden, told MailOnline: 'In a way they never went extinct. We merged!' 'Probably the relatively low amount of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA in present humans reflects the fact that modern humans [Homo sapiens] were more numerous. 'But with more chances of encounters, we might have more archaic DNA present in the gene pool of modern humans.' We're still learning about how ancient genes influence modern humans, so it's hard to say what effects this mixing might produce. Neanderthals and modern humans interbred when we overlapped and would likely continue to into the future. Scientists say that male Neanderthal and Homo sapiens female couples would have had the highest likelihood of producing fertile hybrid offspring (AI-generated impression) Could modern and ancient populations merge? Scientists say it is extremely likely that Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, and Denisovans would eventually merge if no species went extinct. The resulting species would have genetic traits from all three groups. Since modern humans reproduce faster and build larger communities, they would likely represent more of the genetic material. This is essentially what happened to these species in the past. Our modern genome contains traits passed on from breeding with these ancient species before they disappeared. But Dr Zeberg points out that Denisovan genes are responsible for 'high altitude adaptation for Tibetans and some influence on lip shape in Latin American populations.' Similarly, Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens hybrids would likely have a mixture of the traits of both species such as larger heads, longer limbs, and narrower hips. Over time, some scientists believe Denisovans, Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens might have merged into a single human species with a mixture of all the traits. Dr Bence Viola, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Toronto, told MailOnline: 'I think it would have been impossible for Denisovans and Neanderthals to retain sufficient genetic isolation to remain a separate population. 'We know that they interbred with modern humans whenever they came into contact, and so the more contact there is, the more mixing happens – so they would have become a part of us.' Would they fit in? We don't currently know very much about how Denisovans lived, but research now shows Neanderthals might have struggled to fit in with modern society. One of the leading theories for why Homo sapiens survived while other species dropped off is that modern humans essentially 'tamed' ourselves. Unlike modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans didn't evolve to be so sociable. Scientists say they would find it difficult to integrate into our hyper-social society (AI-generated impression) Could Neanderthals and modern humans coexist? Scientists aren't sure whether Homo sapiens and Neanderthals could have cohabited permanently. There is no evidence of violence between the two species and we know that groups met and interbred frequently. However, Neanderthals are not as pro-social as modern humans and lived in much smaller groups. Homo sapiens also have a long history of violence and discrimination targeted against other human groups. In large, connected modern cities this could lead to conflict between the two species. Modern humans developed genes that allowed us to become more sociable, develop larger social networks, and work with our fellow humans. Dr Noel says: 'Unlike their modern human contemporaries, Neanderthals lived in small, fairly isolated groups. 'If there was an accident that killed a number of their hunters or some other crisis occurred, they did not always have others to reach out to. As a result, their numbers would drop below what you need to be sustainable.' Dr Noel points out that research into Neanderthal genes suggests they were less cognitively flexible, had greater difficulties processing language, and lacked genes related to self-awareness, creativity, and behaviours intended to benefit others. 'In the highly connected world we all live in, I think Neanderthals would have been left behind, or at least, left out,' says Dr Noel. In a world where Neanderthals lived alongside other human species, this could really change the way society was structured. Professor Spikins says that while modern humans became 'tamer, more playful and more friendly to each other,' those changes came alongside 'being a bit easily led'. She adds: 'If Neanderthals were better at not "following the herd" and more of those tendencies were present, I bet much of our world would be different; they might not be easily swayed by social media!' How would the world be different? If Neanderthals and Denisovans hadn't gone extinct thousands of years ago, the world might be a very different place. From the evidence we have of these ancient species, we know that they lived in much smaller communities and had a far more limited impact on the land. In fact, Dr Zeberg points out that modern humans appear to be unique in the way that we modify the world around us through agriculture and large cities. One strange consequence of this is that a world where Homo sapiens are not dominant might mean a world without pets. There is no evidence that Neanderthals and Denisovans attempted to nurture relationships with animals through domestication - that means no horses, cats, dogs or even modern agricultural species like cattle and sheep. But with more of our relative anti-social genes, humanity may also have avoided some of its more destructive tendencies. Professor Spikins says: 'If Neanderthals had been the ones to survive, we might not have the problem we have with climate change, as their tendency to be more isolated within their separate groups might have limited how technology spread and got used, and how much the environment got exploited.' THE DENISOVANS EXPLAINED Who were they? The Denisovans are an extinct species of human that appear to have lived in Siberia and even down as far as southeast Asia. The individuals belonged to a genetically distinct group of humans that were distantly related to Neanderthals but even more distantly related to us. Although remains of these mysterious early humans have mostly been discovered at the Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains in Siberia, DNA analysis has shown the ancient people were widespread across Asia. Scientists were able to analyse DNA from a tooth and from a finger bone excavated in the Denisova cave in southern Siberia. The discovery was described as 'nothing short of sensational.' In 2020, scientists reported Denisovan DNA in the Baishiya Karst Cave in Tibet. This discovery marked the first time Denisovan DNA had been recovered from a location that is outside Denisova Cave. How widespread were they? Researchers are now beginning to find out just how big a part they played in our history. DNA from these early humans has been found in the genomes of modern humans over a wide area of Asia, suggesting they once covered a vast range. They are thought to have been a sister species of the Neanderthals, who lived in western Asia and Europe at around the same time. The two species appear to have separated from a common ancestor around 200,000 years ago, while they split from the modern human Homo sapien lineage around 600,000 years ago. Last year researchers even claimed they could have been the first to reach Australia. Aboriginal people in Australia contain both Neanderthal DNA, as do most humans, and Denisovan DNA. This latter genetic trace is present in Aboriginal people at the present day in much greater quantities than any other people around the world. How advanced were they? Bone and ivory beads found in the Denisova Cave were discovered in the same sediment layers as the Denisovan fossils, leading to suggestions they had sophisticated tools and jewellery. Professor Chris Stringer, an anthropologist at the Natural History Museum in London, said: 'Layer 11 in the cave contained a Denisovan girl's fingerbone near the bottom but worked bone and ivory artefacts higher up, suggesting that the Denisovans could have made the kind of tools normally associated with modern humans. 'However, direct dating work by the Oxford Radiocarbon Unit reported at the ESHE meeting suggests the Denisovan fossil is more than 50,000 years old, while the oldest 'advanced' artefacts are about 45,000 years old, a date which matches the appearance of modern humans elsewhere in Siberia.' Did they breed with other species? Yes. Today, around 5 per cent of the DNA of some Australasians – particularly people from Papua New Guinea – is Denisovans. Now, researchers have found two distinct modern human genomes - one from Oceania and another from East Asia - both have distinct Denisovan ancestry. The genomes are also completely different, suggesting there were at least two separate waves of prehistoric intermingling between 200,000 and 50,000 years ago. But what they did not expect to find was individuals from East Asia carry a uniquely different type.
Buzz Feed
12 hours ago
- Entertainment
- Buzz Feed
"Friends" Characters Zombie Apocalypse Ranking
Monica Geller – 10/10. The survival queen. This woman runs kitchens like military ops. She has label makers, food prep skills, zero tolerance for sloppiness, and the stamina of a caffeinated build a quarantine zone, ration snacks, AND scrub the zombies out of of choice: Kitchen knives, Might organize the zombies by height before killing them. Ross Geller – 8/10. Surprisingly useful, unfortunately, Ross. He knows ancient survival tactics. Has weird knowledge of diseases. Might bore the zombies with dino facts till they he'd definitely date a zombie 'for science.'Weapon of choice: Fossil hammer and aggressive Gets bitten while monologuing about Neanderthals. Rachel Green – 7/10. Evolves like a Pokémon. Started as a spoiled latte princess. Ends as an independent queen who can run in probably start looting luxury stores, but by day 20, she's a crossbow legend in Gucci of choice: Credit cards turned into ninja Screams when she breaks a nail… or when Chandler gets eaten. Joey Tribbiani – 6/10. Accidentally survives. Too dumb to die. Zombies get confused by his charm and spare him out of raids every kitchen and still finds pizza in a of choice: A meatball sub and pure himbo Trusts a zombie because 'she seemed nice.' Chandler Bing – 3/10. First to die, but makes it funny. Sarcastic until the bitter end. Uses jokes as a defense. Zombies don't trips over his own shoelaces while making fun of Ross and becomes undead of choice: Bad puns and emotional Too emotionally detached to care about barricades. Phoebe Buffay – 2/10. Chaos incarnate, but delusional. Thinks zombies are just misunderstood spirits. Tries to befriend them. Name them. Writes songs about in the first 10 minutes but shows up later riding a zombie like a horse, singing 'Smelly Undead Cat.'Weapon of choice: Vibes and a Doesn't believe in antibiotics. Bonus Round: Gunther – 11/10 That man has seen too much. He's been emotionally dead for years. The zombies don't even want him. He is the apocalypse.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Science
- Time of India
Meet this 5,00,000 years old predator: The real king of the Ice Age before the modern lions ruled
Present-day Lions are called the king of the jungle with proud tan-yellow fur and a huge mane that rules over the animal kingdom, but could one ever imagine who used to rule over the animal kingdom during the ice age, when the world was covered under the ice thousands of years ago? Long before kings wore crowns and lions roared across African savannas, another ruler walked the frozen plains of Ice Age Europe. Lions, too, had a predecessor. A massive, silent, and powerful king known as the cave lion and it was a true monarch of the mammoth steppe. These were larger than today's African lion variety, built to survive glacial winds and snow-covered landscapes, and this is not science fiction; some real proof of these ice age beasts has been found in the ancient caves of the icy landscapes of the Earth. A relic- fossil is kept in this museum During the ice age, the cave lion ruled over the mammoth steppes as the apex predator; genetic studies confirm it was a distinct species, different from today's African lion, and existed around 5,00,000 years ago. And a beautifully preserved skull displayed at France's Muséum de Toulouse, a skull from Montmaurin's Grotte de Coupe-Gorge, part of a nearly complete skeleton found in clay bed 3S. The Toulouse time capsule Digitally scanned in 2015, the skull was transformed into a 3D reconstruction, letting visitors virtually see the extinct lion in interactive museum exhibits, according to reports by ima-solutions. A Beast of Epic Proportions Standing up to 1.2 m at the shoulder and measuring over 2 m in body length, cave lions were larger than most modern lions, though slightly smaller than the earlier Panthera fossilis. Fossils show they had yellowish-grey coats, thick underfur for icy climates, and crucially, lacked manes, as confirmed by cave art in Lascaux and Chauvet. These formidable felines hunted giant Ice Age herbivores such as reindeer, bison, and even young mammoths. They often clashed with other carnivores like cave hyenas, wolves, and cave bears, who were all vying for limited resources. Multiple cave paintings also suggest that these predators interacted with humans, dating back thousands of years. Neanderthals and later Upper Paleolithic humans hunted them for meat and pelts, as shown by prehistoric skinning marks and cave paintings Carvings and paintings found in ancient caves Ancient carvings and cave paintings of cave lions have been found in the famous Lascaux and Chauvet Caves in France, dating back roughly 15,000 to 17,000 years. One particularly interesting drawing in the Chauvet cave shows two lions walking side by side. The larger one in the background appears to be male as it is drawn with a visible scrotum but no mane. This kind of detail has led researchers to believe that male cave lions likely didn't have manes at all, or if they did, they were very small, nothing like the thick manes we see on modern African lions. Mystery of Disappearance Cave lions vanished around 13,000 to 14,000 years ago. Theories suggest a combination of a warming climate, shrinking open habitats, diminishing prey, increasing competition with wolves, and human hunting pressure. Genetic studies even show a population bottleneck between 47,000–18,000 years ago. Their disappearance is also an indication of the collapse of the mammoth steppe ecosystem. Photos: Wikimedia commons
The Independent
2 days ago
- Science
- The Independent
Why our chins remain an evolutionary mystery
Scientists are still trying to understand the evolutionary reasons behind unique human features, such as the chin and the relative size of testicles. The concept of convergent evolution, where a feature evolves multiple times independently, serves as a natural experiment to determine the purpose of body parts. Analysis of testicle size across various mammals, including monkeys, gorillas, chimps, and dolphins, reveals a consistent correlation between larger testicles and promiscuous mating behaviors. This correlation suggests that larger testicles evolved to facilitate sperm competition in species with multiple partners, with human testicle size falling in the middle. The human chin remains an evolutionary mystery because its uniqueness among mammals, including Neanderthals, prevents the use of convergent evolution to test hypotheses about its purpose.
The National
2 days ago
- Science
- The National
Indians' ancient ancestry lies with Iranian farmers
A genetic study of modern-day Indians has revealed their ancestry can be traced back to Neolithic Iranian farmers, Eurasian Steppe pastoralists and South Asian hunter-gatherers. Researchers analysed data from 2,700 people from across India, capturing genetic variation based on geography, linguistic groups and communities. The results could help inform health strategies for the country. 'This study fills a critical gap and reshapes our understanding of how ancient migrations, archaic admixture, and social structures have shaped Indian genetic variation,' said senior author Priya Moorjani of the University of California, Berkeley, who pointed out that even though India's population is one of the most diverse in the world, it is underrepresented in global data sets. 'Studying these subpopulations allows us to explore how ancient ancestry, geography, language, and social practices interacted to shape genetic variation.' They used this data to reconstruct the evolutionary history of India at fine scale, showing how history affects adaptation and disease in present-day Indians. The UC Berkeley team found that most of the genetic variation in India can be explained by a single migration of humans out of Africa about 50,000 years ago. These populations interbred with now-extinct relatives – Neanderthals and Denisovans – and then spread throughout Europe and Asia, including India. As a result, Indians and Europeans both carry roughly equal amounts of Neanderthal genes – between 1 per cent and 2 per cent of the entire genome. 'Potentially, there were earlier waves out of Africa to India, but it's likely that those groups either did not survive or left little genetic impact on today's populations,' said Elise Kerdoncuff, a former UC Berkeley postdoctoral fellow and one of two lead authors of the paper. One of the main goals of the study, published in the journal Cell, was to understand how India's complex population history has shaped genetic variation related to disease. In India, many subpopulations have an increased risk of recessive genetic disorders, which is due largely to historical isolation and marrying within communities. Another focus was on how Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry could make people susceptible to certain diseases. Surprisingly, Indians have a greater variety of Neanderthal DNA segments than other populations around the world. 'One of the most striking and unexpected findings was that India harbours the highest variation in Neanderthal ancestry among non-Africans,' says co-lead author Laurits Skov, also of UC-Berkeley. 'This allowed us to reconstruct around 50 per cent of the Neanderthal genome and 20 per cent of the Denisovan genome from Indian individuals, more than any other previous archaic ancestry study.'
