Latest news with #NeilHeslop
Korea Herald
21-07-2025
- General
- Korea Herald
New Charities Aid Foundation study finds people in wealthy countries donate significantly less than low-income countries
LONDON, July 21, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- People in low-income countries are twice as generous as those in high-income countries when it comes to supporting people in need and charities, according to new research by the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF). CAF's new World Giving Report uses insights gathered from more than 50,000 people to explore what drives giving at a global level and across 101 countries. The research introduces a generosity measure to compare countries, assessing the amount of money donated as a proportion of income. People in low-income countries give away an average of 1.45% of their income to good causes, compared to 0.7% in high-income countries. In Africa, people donate an average of 1.54% of their income to good causes, compared to 0.64% in Europe. Nigeria is the most generous country, where people give an average of 2.83% of their income to charities, religiously or to people in need. However, three G7 countries have some of the lowest levels of donations as a proportion of income (France 0.45%, Germany 0.39%, and Japan 0.16%). Across the world, those aged 35-44 donated almost 1.5 times as much of their income as those over 65-years (1.18% vs 0.83%). Worldwide, the most popular cause is children and young people, supported by 29% of people, and a top cause in every continent. One in four (26%) donors supported humanitarian aid and disaster relief efforts and people in Asia (16%) were the most likely to support environmental causes. Most people donate to make a difference to a cause they care about (65%). Nearly a fifth (18%) are inspired by something they saw on the news, and social media is the top way people discover new charities (14%). Globally, people tend to trust and value local charities the most, followed by national and then international charities. The research also finds that people are more generous when their government encourages giving. When a government encourages giving, people are also more likely to trust and think of them as more important to society. Neil Heslop, CAF's Chief Executive, said: "Around the world, social purpose organisations are facing severe financial headwinds. Traditional funding models need to change as patterns of behaviour evolve and governments cut back on their aid and development spending with philanthropy seeking to respond. "Individual giving remains the cornerstone of generosity. Yet there is wide disparity, with the most dynamic cultures of giving often in countries where the populations are also much in need. "It is notable that giving does not necessarily correlate with wealth or even security, but rather on the perception of necessity – and very often we perceive those closest to us to be most in need. During these challenging times, there is much we can learn about the power of connection, and the nature of compassion for our fellow citizens, whether they be across the street or around the world."
Cision Canada
20-07-2025
- General
- Cision Canada
New Charities Aid Foundation study finds people in wealthy countries donate significantly less than low-income countries
LONDON, July 21, 2025 /CNW/ -- People in low-income countries are twice as generous as those in high-income countries when it comes to supporting people in need and charities, according to new research by the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF). CAF's new World Giving Report uses insights gathered from more than 50,000 people to explore what drives giving at a global level and across 101 countries. The research introduces a generosity measure to compare countries, assessing the amount of money donated as a proportion of income. People in low-income countries give away an average of 1.45% of their income to good causes, compared to 0.7% in high-income countries. In Africa, people donate an average of 1.54% of their income to good causes, compared to 0.64% in Europe. Nigeria is the most generous country, where people give an average of 2.83% of their income to charities, religiously or to people in need. However, three G7 countries have some of the lowest levels of donations as a proportion of income (France 0.45%, Germany 0.39%, and Japan 0.16%). Across the world, those aged 35-44 donated almost 1.5 times as much of their income as those over 65-years (1.18% vs 0.83%). Worldwide, the most popular cause is children and young people, supported by 29% of people, and a top cause in every continent. One in four (26%) donors supported humanitarian aid and disaster relief efforts and people in Asia (16%) were the most likely to support environmental causes. Most people donate to make a difference to a cause they care about (65%). Nearly a fifth (18%) are inspired by something they saw on the news, and social media is the top way people discover new charities (14%). Globally, people tend to trust and value local charities the most, followed by national and then international charities. The research also finds that people are more generous when their government encourages giving. When a government encourages giving, people are also more likely to trust and think of them as more important to society. Neil Heslop, CAF's Chief Executive, said: "Around the world, social purpose organisations are facing severe financial headwinds. Traditional funding models need to change as patterns of behaviour evolve and governments cut back on their aid and development spending with philanthropy seeking to respond. "Individual giving remains the cornerstone of generosity. Yet there is wide disparity, with the most dynamic cultures of giving often in countries where the populations are also much in need. "It is notable that giving does not necessarily correlate with wealth or even security, but rather on the perception of necessity – and very often we perceive those closest to us to be most in need. During these challenging times, there is much we can learn about the power of connection, and the nature of compassion for our fellow citizens, whether they be across the street or around the world."
Yahoo
31-03-2025
- General
- Yahoo
How Britain stopped giving
Go Beyond – a small, dedicated charity giving disadvantaged children the chance to visit the countryside and enjoy outdoor exercise – had an entirely different business model 10 years ago. Then, donations came from multiple sources – from thriving charity stores in cities across the South West, from bucket collections outside supermarkets, from sponsored events and a quarterly email appeal. Now, the stores are all closed, the buckets are largely empty, the events are sparsely attended and email donations have dropped 20 per cent. 'The cost-of-living crisis has really affected the way people support charities,' says Sara Shearman, the director of fundraising at Go Beyond. 'It used to be something people did quite naturally; now, it is seen as a luxury.' Sadly, it is far from alone in its struggles. Last week, the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) released its latest UK Giving Report, which backed up what floundering charities have been saying for months – that the number of people donating has dropped to critical levels, as the wider British public becomes significantly less generous. The figures are stark: 55 per cent of the nearly 14,000 people surveyed said they had donated to a charity in the previous year – a drop of 10 per cent from 2019. At a national level, that means 5.2 million fewer people reaching into their pockets. Donation rates were down across the board but particularly among young adults: less than a third of under-25s now support any charity. The CAF's findings also revealed a reduction in volunteering. In 2023, 7.1 million people helped out in some capacity. Last year, that figure had fallen to 5.6 million. Overall, the number of people supporting charities – whether through donations, sponsorship or time – has fallen to the lowest levels recorded since the CAF began tracking such trends in 2016. 'We are living through a time of real income pressure with budgets needing to go much further, so you'd naturally expect charitable giving to be constrained a little,' says Neil Heslop, the chief executive of the CAF. 'What is concerning is that this trend seems to go beyond this specific economic situation, with people now simply getting out of the habit of giving up their time or money, and the proportion of the public that donates to charity in steady decline.' Lauren Weymouth, the editor of Charity Times, believes we are in an era of giving fatigue. 'There was a huge fundraising surge during the pandemic, and people did donate generously,' she says, 'but five years on, it has gotten to the point where they are looking at the increase in costs in everything and thinking, 'Well, I have done a lot recently, so I am going to pause on that.'' For Shearman, there are more profound factors at play too. Traditionally, she notes, charities would collect money outside supermarkets – something that has been all but destroyed by our increasingly cashless society. 'Fundraising is mostly online now,' she says, 'but charities have suffered from this. Most of them have invested in technology to accept card payments via the internet, but it is tough on the very small charities that don't have the infrastructure.' Similarly, there are fewer ways to give money casually than there were before, which is why Shearman has introduced a button on her website allowing people to donate £3.50 to buy a child an ice cream – something she likens to throwing a few coins in a bucket. These trends have coincided with the rise of the subscription economy, which has spelt trouble for organisations historically reliant themselves on consistent contributions from supporters. 'We think that charities' biggest competitors are other charities but because they rely on subscriptions, it is actually companies like Netflix or Spotify,' says Weymouth. 'People are looking at the money coming out of their accounts each month additionally and thinking, 'Well, Spotify has gone up, but I need that, so I'll cut back on Oxfam.'' Time, too, appears to be more of a premium than ever before. 'We organised a zip wire event but found it really difficult to get people to enter,' says Shearman. 'The money just isn't there and people are much more particular with their time now, which means we have to work so much harder to get the same income.' And then there is the rise of second-hand-clothing apps, which has proved disastrous for charity shops. Stephanie Moore is the founder and CEO of Reach Out to the Community, an independent charity shop in Chorlton-cum-Hardy, Manchester, which aims to combat homelessness and food poverty. Since founding the organisation in 2016, she has seen donations drop in quality and quantity as people have turned to online marketplaces such as Vinted. 'Times have changed and people are selling much more online,' she says. Her shop survives only thanks to donations from older people, who give far more generously than younger generations. Annie Dodd, a volunteer at Reach Out, echoes this. 'Older people are more conscious of not wanting to waste things,' she says. 'I think a lot of young people use [apps such as Facebook Marketplace].' Similarly, the quality of donations has fallen off a cliff as people increasingly drop off items they cannot sell. 'At the moment, we're getting a lot of stuff we're having to dispose of – cracked plates or broken games consoles, stuff like that; stuff that really shouldn't come to a charity shop,' says Moore. 'Generally I'll only bring stuff in [to charity shops] when I'm moving – I don't know if that's bad, it's just a thing,' says Felix Woods, 22. 'I sell the odd thing, and I know people who do – it's a good way to recycle clothes.' For Go Beyond, this shift meant it became too difficult to keep its stores open. 'The charity shop is dying,' says Shearman. 'There is a huge amount of competition to attract the dwindling number of good donations left out there, so we decided to close the shops and invest more in fundraising.' Another issue affecting donations is the damaging perception that charity executives are overpaid. Many such roles come with six-figure salaries, and the median annual salary for those heading the UK's 100 largest charities now stands at just shy of £200,000, according to industry research. 'People feel like they are giving to an organisation that is paying executives more money than they will ever make and it really bothers them,' says Weymouth. For Nick Connolly, the chief executive of homelessness charity EveryYouth, getting donations from the general public is now too arduous. 'The amount of money you need to invest to make individual giving work is beyond our capability, because to make it worthwhile you need people to give regular gifts – and for that you need to advertise, which costs a lot.' Instead, Connolly is sourcing money from corporations and fundraisers – but that is not without its own issues. 'Whereas in the past, I would be competing against 20 or 30 other charity organisations, now the number is usually over 100,' he says, noting that Labour's tax raid on employers has only worsened an already dire situation. 'Add to that national insurance increases from the Government and you get a very difficult environment indeed.' As pressure on the sector (which employs approximately a million people) increases, certain types of organisations are faring better than others. The CAF survey found that people favoured health charities, which scooped up an estimated £2.22 billion of donations last year. 'Health charities are the ones doing the best because people can see the effect Covid had on the health sector and because they can relate to them – everyone knows someone who has been affected by cancer or Alzheimer's,' says Weymouth. 'Meanwhile, environmental charities are really struggling, because while people know that climate change is happening, they're not as closely linked to the cause.' Weymouth notes that any charities focusing on diversity or inclusion are also suffering more than most – this might be because, statistically, the donors who are still giving a significant amount are more likely to be white and middle class, and may have been put off by overt identity politics. Similarly, homelessness charities are having a difficult time. 'Homelessness is becoming more prevalent but unfortunately no less stigmatised, so people can be unsure how to respond – if at all,' says Laura Herring, the director of fundraising and communications at St Mungo's. 'The cost-of-living crisis also means that people aren't able to give as much, or as often, as they would like to.' All in all, it is a bleak situation – except for one area. Charity bequests are up by a significant amount, as people donate less in life but more in death. In the past 20 years, money bequeathed to charity in people's wills has risen from £1.7 billion a year to £4 billion, totalling about 15 per cent of all donations. 'It is a brilliant way of giving because it costs you nothing now,' says Richard Radcliffe, the founder of Radcliffe Consulting, which specialises in legacy fundraising. 'This is an ageing society and so it makes sense. It's incredibly convenient, there are inheritance tax benefits, and it makes you feel really happy because you can choose a charity close to your heart. 'We call it life-driven, death-activated. Honestly, I think it is the future of the sector – and increasingly the only way for many charities to survive.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Telegraph
31-03-2025
- General
- Telegraph
How Britain stopped giving
Go Beyond – a small, dedicated charity giving disadvantaged children the chance to visit the countryside and enjoy outdoor exercise – had an entirely different business model 10 years ago. Then, donations came from multiple sources – from thriving charity stores in cities across the South West, from bucket collections outside supermarkets, from sponsored events and a quarterly email appeal. Now, the stores are all closed, the buckets are largely empty, the events are sparsely attended and email donations have dropped 20 per cent. 'The cost-of-living crisis has really affected the way people support charities,' says Sara Shearman, the director of fundraising at Go Beyond. 'It used to be something people did quite naturally; now, it is seen as a luxury.' Sadly, it is far from alone in its struggles. Last week, the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) released its latest UK Giving Report, which backed up what floundering charities have been saying for months – that the number of people donating has dropped to critical levels, as the wider British public becomes significantly less generous. The figures are stark: 55 per cent of the nearly 14,000 people surveyed said they had donated to a charity in the previous year – a drop of 10 per cent from 2019. At a national level, that means 5.2 million fewer people reaching into their pockets. Donation rates were down across the board but particularly among young adults: less than a third of under-25s now support any charity. The CAF's findings also revealed a reduction in volunteering. In 2023, 7.1 million people helped out in some capacity. Last year, that figure had fallen to 5.6 million. Overall, the number of people supporting charities – whether through donations, sponsorship or time – has fallen to the lowest levels recorded since the CAF began tracking such trends in 2016. 'We are living through a time of real income pressure with budgets needing to go much further, so you'd naturally expect charitable giving to be constrained a little,' says Neil Heslop, the chief executive of the CAF. 'What is concerning is that this trend seems to go beyond this specific economic situation, with people now simply getting out of the habit of giving up their time or money, and the proportion of the public that donates to charity in steady decline.' Giving fatigue Lauren Weymouth, the editor of Charity Times, believes we are in an era of giving fatigue. 'There was a huge fundraising surge during the pandemic, and people did donate generously,' she says, 'but five years on, it has gotten to the point where they are looking at the increase in costs in everything and thinking, 'Well, I have done a lot recently, so I am going to pause on that.'' For Shearman, there are more profound factors at play too. Traditionally, she notes, charities would collect money outside supermarkets – something that has been all but destroyed by our increasingly cashless society. 'Fundraising is mostly online now,' she says, 'but charities have suffered from this. Most of them have invested in technology to accept card payments via the internet, but it is tough on the very small charities that don't have the infrastructure.' Similarly, there are fewer ways to give money casually than there were before, which is why Shearman has introduced a button on her website allowing people to donate £3.50 to buy a child an ice cream – something she likens to throwing a few coins in a bucket. These trends have coincided with the rise of the subscription economy, which has spelt trouble for organisations historically reliant themselves on consistent contributions from supporters. 'We think that charities' biggest competitors are other charities but because they rely on subscriptions, it is actually companies like Netflix or Spotify,' says Weymouth. 'People are looking at the money coming out of their accounts each month additionally and thinking, 'Well, Spotify has gone up, but I need that, so I'll cut back on Oxfam.'' Time, too, appears to be more of a premium than ever before. 'We organised a zip wire event but found it really difficult to get people to enter,' says Shearman. 'The money just isn't there and people are much more particular with their time now, which means we have to work so much harder to get the same income.' 'The charity shop is dying' And then there is the rise of second-hand-clothing apps, which has proved disastrous for charity shops. Stephanie Moore is the founder and CEO of Reach Out to the Community, an independent charity shop in Chorlton-cum-Hardy, Manchester, which aims to combat homelessness and food poverty. Since founding the organisation in 2016, she has seen donations drop in quality and quantity as people have turned to online marketplaces such as Vinted. 'Times have changed and people are selling much more online,' she says. Her shop survives only thanks to donations from older people, who give far more generously than younger generations. Annie Dodd, a volunteer at Reach Out, echoes this. 'Older people are more conscious of not wanting to waste things,' she says. 'I think a lot of young people use [apps such as Facebook Marketplace].' Similarly, the quality of donations has fallen off a cliff as people increasingly drop off items they cannot sell. 'At the moment, we're getting a lot of stuff we're having to dispose of – cracked plates or broken games consoles, stuff like that; stuff that really shouldn't come to a charity shop,' says Moore. 'Generally I'll only bring stuff in [to charity shops] when I'm moving – I don't know if that's bad, it's just a thing,' says Felix Woods, 22. 'I sell the odd thing, and I know people who do – it's a good way to recycle clothes.' For Go Beyond, this shift meant it became too difficult to keep its stores open. 'The charity shop is dying,' says Shearman. 'There is a huge amount of competition to attract the dwindling number of good donations left out there, so we decided to close the shops and invest more in fundraising.' 'Overpaid' executives Another issue affecting donations is the damaging perception that charity executives are overpaid. Many such roles come with six-figure salaries, and the median annual salary for those heading the UK's 100 largest charities now stands at just shy of £200,000, according to industry research. 'People feel like they are giving to an organisation that is paying executives more money than they will ever make and it really bothers them,' says Weymouth. For Nick Connolly, the chief executive of homelessness charity EveryYouth, getting donations from the general public is now too arduous. 'The amount of money you need to invest to make individual giving work is beyond our capability, because to make it worthwhile you need people to give regular gifts – and for that you need to advertise, which costs a lot.' Instead, Connolly is sourcing money from corporations and fundraisers – but that is not without its own issues. 'Whereas in the past, I would be competing against 20 or 30 other charity organisations, now the number is usually over 100,' he says, noting that Labour's tax raid on employers has only worsened an already dire situation. 'Add to that national insurance increases from the Government and you get a very difficult environment indeed.' As pressure on the sector (which employs approximately a million people) increases, certain types of organisations are faring better than others. The CAF survey found that people favoured health charities, which scooped up an estimated £2.22 billion of donations last year. 'Health charities are the ones doing the best because people can see the effect Covid had on the health sector and because they can relate to them – everyone knows someone who has been affected by cancer or Alzheimer's,' says Weymouth. 'Meanwhile, environmental charities are really struggling, because while people know that climate change is happening, they're not as closely linked to the cause.' Weymouth notes that any charities focusing on diversity or inclusion are also suffering more than most – this might be because, statistically, the donors who are still giving a significant amount are more likely to be white and middle class, and may have been put off by overt identity politics. Similarly, homelessness charities are having a difficult time. 'Homelessness is becoming more prevalent but unfortunately no less stigmatised, so people can be unsure how to respond – if at all,' says Laura Herring, the director of fundraising and communications at St Mungo's. 'The cost-of-living crisis also means that people aren't able to give as much, or as often, as they would like to.' A ray of hope All in all, it is a bleak situation – except for one area. Charity bequests are up by a significant amount, as people donate less in life but more in death. In the past 20 years, money bequeathed to charity in people's wills has risen from £1.7 billion a year to £4 billion, totalling about 15 per cent of all donations. 'It is a brilliant way of giving because it costs you nothing now,' says Richard Radcliffe, the founder of Radcliffe Consulting, which specialises in legacy fundraising. 'This is an ageing society and so it makes sense. It's incredibly convenient, there are inheritance tax benefits, and it makes you feel really happy because you can choose a charity close to your heart. 'We call it life-driven, death-activated. Honestly, I think it is the future of the sector – and increasingly the only way for many charities to survive.'
Telegraph
31-03-2025
- Business
- Telegraph
Gen Z stop donating to charity... to go travelling instead
Young people are turning their backs on giving to charities in favour of travel and experiences. Nearly two thirds (65 per cent) of Gen Z – those aged 13 to 28 – are instead prioritising travel, food, arts and live music, according to a survey. The research, carried out by Mastercard, found six in ten (61 per cent) plan to tick off a bucket-list experience this year. It comes as as data reveals the proportion of people in Britain making charitable donations has fallen to a near-decade low. The Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) reported that just half (50 per cent) of people in the UK made any kind of donation. In 2024, 36 per cent of 16- to 24-year-olds donated or sponsored a person for charity, a significant decline from 55 per cent in 2017. People aged 65 or older remain the most likely to donate. The CAF's findings are based on a YouGov policy survey of 13,459 people aged 16 and over. Neil Heslop, CAF's chief executive, said: 'This research starkly demonstrates that we need to do much more to build our culture of giving. We are relying on an ever smaller group of people to give. For the first time, the number who have donated or sponsored someone for charity in the past year has fallen to just half. 'While this is across all age groups, the decline is especially pronounced among young people. We need to write a new chapter in Britain's giving story. One that sees us encourage giving across all age groups and in every part of the country.'
