Latest news with #Netanyahu
The National
an hour ago
- Politics
- The National
‘No winners': Iranian Nobel laureate mourns civilian toll of Israel-Iran war
Both Iran and Israel were quick to claim victory after 12 days of war that killed 627 people in Iran and 28 in Israel. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared 'victory over the fallacious Zionist regime' in a message posted on his X account on Thursday. Meanwhile, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed 'a great victory' and praised what he called a valiant fight against Iran. While leaders were eager to issue vitriolic declarations, civilians have been the ones to bear the brunt of the conflict, Iranian Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi told The National. 'In war, there are no winners. Both sides, and especially innocent civilians, lose,' Ms Ebadi said in an interview. Ms Ebadi is a vocal human rights activist and a staunch critic of Iran's Shiite clerical establishment. She was one of the country's first female judges but was dismissed following the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Israel launched unprecedented air strikes on Iran on June 13, declaring its goal was to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. Iran, which was negotiating with the US on a deal to contain its nuclear programme, responded with missile barrages and drones. The tit-for-tat attacks escalated over nearly two weeks until US President Donald Trump declared a ceasefire this week. Amnesty International denounced the conflict as a 'reckless military action' in which civilians paid a 'cruel' price and said both countries had repeatedly shown disregard for international human rights and humanitarian law. 'I'm very sorry that in this war civilians were killed in both countries, Iran and Israel,' Ms Ebadi said. 'And I am also very upset to see that the bombing has destroyed much of Iran's infrastructure because even if this regime is toppled, the cost of rebuilding the country is going to be on the shoulders of the people.' She expressed fear that the conflict might restart in the absence of long-term solution towards peace. 'Unfortunately, I must say that I believe the situation is fragile, and there is a real possibility the war could resume,' she said. Although the ceasefire has held so far, questions about the path forward remain unanswered. Iran's uranium enrichment programme, which Tehran has expanded significantly while insisting it is for civilian purposes only, continues to be a point of contention. Iran has rejected the US and Israel's demand that it hand over its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, a component in nuclear weapons, and stop its enrichment programme. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran had no plans to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States. While both countries managed to save face, with Israel claiming to have set back Iran's nuclear programme by years, and the Iranian regime remaining in power, the core issue remains unresolved. In an opinion article published in the French daily Le Monde during the war, Ms Ebadi and other prominent Iranians called for Iran to immediately stop its enrichment programme, and for a halt to attacks on infrastructure and to the massacre of civilians in both countries. Regime change Some Iranians in opposition groups exiled abroad had hoped Israel's military campaign might weaken Iran enough to trigger mass protests and lead to the regime's overthrow. Israel's Defence Minister, Israel Katz, openly acknowledged on Wednesday that his country sought to target Iran's supreme leader. Ms Ebadi believes that a process leading to the eventual collapse of the Islamic Republic has already begun. But in a region where foreign intervention has often gone wrong, she insists that regime change must come from within Iran – and not through Israeli bombs. 'The fate of the Iranian people must be determined by the Iranian people themselves. Over the years, they organised many protests and stood up to this regime. Unfortunately, they have led to extreme crackdowns by the regime's forces,' she said. The most recent uprising was the Woman, Life, Freedom protests in 2022, during which millions demanded an end to gender-based discrimination. The demonstrations were met with a violent response from the authorities. Ms Ebadi spent months in Tehran's infamous Evin prison in 2000, where many political activists and dissidents are imprisoned. She was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize three years later and has been living in self-imposed exile in London since 2009. 'Only the people of Iran have the right to determine Iran's future,' she said, and called for a free referendum under UN supervision. 'History has shown that governments challenged by their people eventually fall.'
Daily Telegraph
an hour ago
- Politics
- Daily Telegraph
Psychologists break down what is going on with Donald Trump
Don't miss out on the headlines from World. Followed categories will be added to My News. President Donald Trump happily dropped the F-bomb. So what does this say about his willingness to use the A-bomb? He's mercurial. He's unpredictable. He's inconsistent. And he's proud of it. The 79-year-old billionaire property developer and former game show host believes it's what sets him apart from America's governing 'elite'. A clearly exasperated Trump took to the White House lawn to blurt: 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f**k they're doing.' He was referring to Israel and Iran breaching the deadline for his unilaterally declared ceasefire. It seems to work. At least sometimes. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was quick to back down. He thanked the President for his 'immense appreciation for Israel' and decided to 'refrain from further attacks'. But Russian President Vladimir Putin was not so cowed when he was pommeled with similar bluster. The Don's outburst over a breached ceasefire was dismissed as 'emotional overstrain'. So, who is right? President Donald Trump's outburst shocked the world. Picture: AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein That's a matter of personal politics. But Professor of Psychology Geoff Beattie believes such outbursts present a window into Trump's thought processes. 'Trump was clearly furious, and his language showed it,' the Edge Hill University academic writes. 'This was not a verbal slip – there was no immediate correction, no apology, no nonverbal indication of embarrassment. He just stormed off, clearly angry.' It's not what voters generally expect from their elected representatives. Statesmanship may have gone out of vogue decades ago. Along with transparency and accountability. Despite this, President Theodore Roosevelt's mantra of 'speak softly but carry a big stick' has largely remained an unwritten law of Western diplomacy since World War II. 'But Trump showed frustration, barely contained,' Professor Beattie states. 'His furious, aggressive response was like something straight out of an old psychology textbook.' Mind games Human beings have big opinions of themselves. They're supposed to be smart. To be cool, calm, collected. Civilised. After all, that's what's supposed to set them apart from mere animals. 'They find other ways of dealing with their frustrations,' Professor Beattie writes. 'They use their rational system of thought to find solutions… 'Perhaps, that's why many people feel shocked when they watch this US president in certain situations. To many of us, it all seems so basic, so unsophisticated, so frightening.' But Trump's MAGA followers believe it's all part of a mind game. They insist the President employs a sophisticated 'Mad Man' strategy when it comes to his politics, business and personal relationships. President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump. Picture: (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson Put simply, it keeps his opponents off balance. They never know what to expect. But critics argue the tactic has a critical flaw: the 'Mad Man' card can easily back a player into a corner, where they must either go through with a bluff or lose face. It comes down to what's behind the poker face. Does Trump think fast, automatically - or unconsciously? Professor Beattie says this is evolution's basic, rapid-reaction system. 'It is an intuitive system designed to work in a world full of approach and avoidance, scary animals and friendly animals. It is heavily reliant on affect (emotion) to guide decision-making.' Or is everything Trump does the result of constant calculation? Professor Beattie says this second method of thinking is 'slower, more deliberative. It requires conscious effort and is used for complex thinking, solving difficult problems, or making careful decisions.' Good decisions, he argues, depend upon system two checking the advice of system one. 'But system one often jumps quickly and unconsciously to certain conclusions,' he adds. 'System two should check them, but often doesn't. Even when it would be easy.' Psychologists have broken down his actions. Picture: Remko de Waal / ANP / AFP / Netherlands OUT Action or reaction? 'It was a startling moment, even coming from a president who has publicly used that word, and other crude language, in the past,' states Tom Jones of the Poynter Institute for Media Studies. Mainstream media was all over the unprecedented action taken over Iran's attempt to build an A-bomb. But it couldn't make up its mind on how to cover Trump's F-bomb. Some ran unedited video clips. Others used a dash or dot dot dot to mask what everybody already knew. Poynter's senior vice president, Kelly McBride, argues the truth should be presented unvarnished. 'When you're covering the President, there are very few moments that are completely unpredictable and unscripted — many more with this President than most, but still — and that was one of them. And I think the record should reflect the entire moment.' His swearing is not something commonly done by presidents. Picture: NICOLAS TUCAT / AFP Few dispute Trump's decision-making style emphasises immediacy and emotional conviction. This has proven effective in rallying supporters and generating an air of decisiveness. Especially when nobody dares to disagree with him. Prime Minister Netanyahu immediately complied with Trump's 'Do not drop those bombs' demand. But his office put a positive spin on things. 'President Trump expressed his immense appreciation for Israel — which achieved all of its war goals. The President also expressed his confidence in the stability of the ceasefire… (So) Israel refrained from further attacks.' But President Putin's mouthpiece was more barbed when his boss was labelled 'absolutely CRAZY!'. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov declared: 'We are really grateful to the Americans and to President Trump personally for their assistance in organising and launching this negotiation process. Of course, at the same time, this is a very crucial moment, which is associated, of course, with the emotional overstrain and emotional reactions.' Professor Beattie has made up his own mind. 'His decisions seem to be driven by strong emotions,' he observes. 'His response to events, opponents and issues are often passionate and visceral. This could lead to decisions being unduly influenced by personal feelings, first impressions based on arbitrary cues, and interpersonal perceptions, rather than anything more substantial.' Experts have said he is overrun by emotions. Picture: AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein The wisdom of The Don Trump rose to the US Presidency out of the knockdown world of real estate and reality television. 'Many suggest that Trump's decision-making style reflects his background in the high-pressure and high-stakes world of business, where quick judgments and gut instinct can be advantageous in these sorts of competitive winner-takes-all environments,' Professor Beattie states. 'But the world at war is a more precarious place, where system one (reactionary thought) needs to be kept more firmly in check. 'Gut instincts may have a role to play, but that old lazy system two (considered thought) needs to be more vigilant. Especially, it would seem, in Trump's case.' Such personalities have other commonly associated traits. 'Commentators have described Trump as both narcissistic and authoritarian,' state John Moores University workplace relations researchers Neil Beasley and Madeleine Pickles. Many do not know what to think of it. Picture: ANGELA WEISS / AFP 'Yet, running parallel to these factors, one character trait is glaringly common among Trump supporters: sycophancy.' Yes-men (and women): They're in every office, busily 'kissing up' and 'kicking down'. 'When leaders are surrounded by 'yes-men', they're deprived of critical input that could challenge assumptions or highlight potential flaws,' Beasley adds. 'This can lead to cognitive entrenchment where decision-makers become overconfident and resistant to change. Bad decisions then proceed unchecked, often escalating into systemic failures.' But the brains behind Trump insist this is all just sour grapes. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said after US forces bombed Iran's nuclear facilities: 'Past presidents wanted to take this action, but they didn't have the guts to make the decision.' Columnist Debra Saunders points out for the Heritage Foundation think-tank that, despite all the hostility between Trump and Europe, 'NATO leaders are praising Trump for pushing for them to increase their contribution to NATO's defence spending'. 'At the time, Trump's remarks seemed a shocking breach of decorum,' she added. 'Now they have the ring of an alarm that needed to be sounded.' Jamie Seidel is a freelance writer | @ Originally published as 'Driven by strong emotions': Psychologists break down Trump's latest bizarre act
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Politics
- Al Jazeera
Trump says Gaza ceasefire possible ‘within the next week', gives no details
United States President Donald Trump said he believes a ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas could be reached within a week. Trump came out with the surprise comment while speaking to reporters on Friday, saying he was hopeful after speaking to some of the people involved in trying to get a truce. 'I think it's close. I just spoke to some of the people involved,' Trump said. 'We think within the next week we're going to get a ceasefire,' the president said, without revealing who he had been in contact with. Al Jazeera's Nour Odeh, reporting from Amman in Jordan, said Trump's comment will be 'welcome news' to the starved and bombed population of Gaza, but she also cautioned that there are 'no negotiations at this moment happening anywhere in the region'. 'What we do know is that talk of a ceasefire increased exponentially after the ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Israel does not want to talk about ending the war. In fact, the Israeli prime minister would be risking a lot if he did,' Odeh said. But, she added, there is an understanding, according to many reports, that Netanyahu would have to agree to some sort of ceasefire in exchange for normalisation deals with Arab states, which the Trump administration has promoted. Hamas, on the other hand, requires that Israel stop its war on Gaza and for the Israeli military to withdraw from areas it seized in Gaza after breaking the last ceasefire in March. 'Hamas also wants US guarantees that negotiations would continue and that Israel wouldn't break the ceasefire again if more time was needed for negotiations,' Odeh added. Trump's ceasefire prediction comes at a time of mounting killings by Israeli forces in Gaza and growing international condemnation of Israel's war amid the latest revelation that soldiers said they were ordered to shoot unarmed Palestinian civilians seeking humanitarian aid in the territory. Authorities in Gaza said the report by the Haaretz media outlet that Israeli commanders ordered the deliberate shooting of starving Palestinians was further proof of Israel's 'war crimes' in the war-torn territory. While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz have rejected the report of commanders targeting civilians, Gaza's Health Ministry has reported that almost 550 Palestinians have been killed near US- and Israel-backed aid distribution points in Gaza since late May. 'People are being killed simply trying to feed themselves and their families,' United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Friday. 'The search for food must never be a death sentence,' he said. Medical charity Doctors Without Borders (also known by its French acronym MSF) branded the situation in Gaza as 'slaughter masquerading as humanitarian aid'. A spokesperson for the office of Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said they had no information to share about a possible ceasefire breakthrough in Gaza. Witkoff helped former US President Joe Biden's aides broker a ceasefire and captive release agreement in Gaza shortly before Trump took office in January. But the truce was broken by Israel in March when it launched a wave of surprise bombing attacks across the territory. Israeli officials said that only military action would result in the return of captives held in Gaza, and imposed a blockade on food, water, medicine and fuel entering the territory that led to widespread starvation among the 2.1 million population. Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer is scheduled to visit Washington next week for talks with Trump administration officials on Gaza, Iran and a possible White House visit by Netanyahu, according to a source familiar with the matter.
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- Politics
- News.com.au
‘Driven by strong emotions': Psychologists break down Trump's latest bizarre act
President Donald Trump happily dropped the F-bomb. So what does this say about his willingness to use the A-bomb? He's mercurial. He's unpredictable. He's inconsistent. And he's proud of it. The 79-year-old billionaire property developer and former game show host believes it's what sets him apart from America's governing 'elite'. A clearly exasperated Trump took to the White House lawn to blurt: 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f**k they're doing.' He was referring to Israel and Iran breaching the deadline for his unilaterally declared ceasefire. It seems to work. At least sometimes. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was quick to back down. He thanked the President for his 'immense appreciation for Israel' and decided to 'refrain from further attacks'. But Russian President Vladimir Putin was not so cowed when he was pommeled with similar bluster. The Don's outburst over a breached ceasefire was dismissed as 'emotional overstrain'. That's a matter of personal politics. But Professor of Psychology Geoff Beattie believes such outbursts present a window into Trump's thought processes. 'Trump was clearly furious, and his language showed it,' the Edge Hill University academic writes. 'This was not a verbal slip – there was no immediate correction, no apology, no nonverbal indication of embarrassment. He just stormed off, clearly angry.' It's not what voters generally expect from their elected representatives. Statesmanship may have gone out of vogue decades ago. Along with transparency and accountability. Despite this, President Theodore Roosevelt's mantra of 'speak softly but carry a big stick' has largely remained an unwritten law of Western diplomacy since World War II. 'But Trump showed frustration, barely contained,' Professor Beattie states. 'His furious, aggressive response was like something straight out of an old psychology textbook.' Mind games Human beings have big opinions of themselves. They're supposed to be smart. To be cool, calm, collected. Civilised. After all, that's what's supposed to set them apart from mere animals. 'They find other ways of dealing with their frustrations,' Professor Beattie writes. 'They use their rational system of thought to find solutions… 'Perhaps, that's why many people feel shocked when they watch this US president in certain situations. To many of us, it all seems so basic, so unsophisticated, so frightening.' But Trump's MAGA followers believe it's all part of a mind game. They insist the President employs a sophisticated 'Mad Man' strategy when it comes to his politics, business and personal relationships. Put simply, it keeps his opponents off balance. They never know what to expect. But critics argue the tactic has a critical flaw: the 'Mad Man' card can easily back a player into a corner, where they must either go through with a bluff or lose face. It comes down to what's behind the poker face. Does Trump think fast, automatically - or unconsciously? Professor Beattie says this is evolution's basic, rapid-reaction system. 'It is an intuitive system designed to work in a world full of approach and avoidance, scary animals and friendly animals. It is heavily reliant on affect (emotion) to guide decision-making.' Or is everything Trump does the result of constant calculation? Professor Beattie says this second method of thinking is 'slower, more deliberative. It requires conscious effort and is used for complex thinking, solving difficult problems, or making careful decisions.' Good decisions, he argues, depend upon system two checking the advice of system one. 'But system one often jumps quickly and unconsciously to certain conclusions,' he adds. 'System two should check them, but often doesn't. Even when it would be easy.' Action or reaction? 'It was a startling moment, even coming from a president who has publicly used that word, and other crude language, in the past,' states Tom Jones of the Poynter Institute for Media Studies. Mainstream media was all over the unprecedented action taken over Iran's attempt to build an A-bomb. But it couldn't make up its mind on how to cover Trump's F-bomb. Some ran unedited video clips. Others used a dash or dot dot dot to mask what everybody already knew. Poynter's senior vice president, Kelly McBride, argues the truth should be presented unvarnished. 'When you're covering the President, there are very few moments that are completely unpredictable and unscripted — many more with this President than most, but still — and that was one of them. And I think the record should reflect the entire moment.' Few dispute Trump's decision-making style emphasises immediacy and emotional conviction. This has proven effective in rallying supporters and generating an air of decisiveness. Especially when nobody dares to disagree with him. Prime Minister Netanyahu immediately complied with Trump's 'Do not drop those bombs' demand. But his office put a positive spin on things. 'President Trump expressed his immense appreciation for Israel — which achieved all of its war goals. The President also expressed his confidence in the stability of the ceasefire… (So) Israel refrained from further attacks.' But President Putin's mouthpiece was more barbed when his boss was labelled 'absolutely CRAZY!'. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov declared: 'We are really grateful to the Americans and to President Trump personally for their assistance in organising and launching this negotiation process. Of course, at the same time, this is a very crucial moment, which is associated, of course, with the emotional overstrain and emotional reactions.' Professor Beattie has made up his own mind. 'His decisions seem to be driven by strong emotions,' he observes. 'His response to events, opponents and issues are often passionate and visceral. This could lead to decisions being unduly influenced by personal feelings, first impressions based on arbitrary cues, and interpersonal perceptions, rather than anything more substantial.' The wisdom of The Don Trump rose to the US Presidency out of the knockdown world of real estate and reality television. 'Many suggest that Trump's decision-making style reflects his background in the high-pressure and high-stakes world of business, where quick judgments and gut instinct can be advantageous in these sorts of competitive winner-takes-all environments,' Professor Beattie states. 'But the world at war is a more precarious place, where system one (reactionary thought) needs to be kept more firmly in check. 'Gut instincts may have a role to play, but that old lazy system two (considered thought) needs to be more vigilant. Especially, it would seem, in Trump's case.' Such personalities have other commonly associated traits. 'Commentators have described Trump as both narcissistic and authoritarian,' state John Moores University workplace relations researchers Neil Beasley and Madeleine Pickles. 'Yet, running parallel to these factors, one character trait is glaringly common among Trump supporters: sycophancy.' Yes-men (and women): They're in every office, busily 'kissing up' and 'kicking down'. 'When leaders are surrounded by 'yes-men', they're deprived of critical input that could challenge assumptions or highlight potential flaws,' Beasley adds. 'This can lead to cognitive entrenchment where decision-makers become overconfident and resistant to change. Bad decisions then proceed unchecked, often escalating into systemic failures.' But the brains behind Trump insist this is all just sour grapes. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said after US forces bombed Iran's nuclear facilities: 'Past presidents wanted to take this action, but they didn't have the guts to make the decision.' Columnist Debra Saunders points out for the Heritage Foundation think-tank that, despite all the hostility between Trump and Europe, 'NATO leaders are praising Trump for pushing for them to increase their contribution to NATO's defence spending'. 'At the time, Trump's remarks seemed a shocking breach of decorum,' she added. 'Now they have the ring of an alarm that needed to be sounded.'
West Australian
4 hours ago
- Politics
- West Australian
Donald Trump news: US President predicts Gaza ceasefire ‘within a week', talks with Israel and Hamas intensify
US President Donald Trump has expressed optimism that a ceasefire in the Gaza conflict between Israel and Iran-backed Hamas militants could be achieved within the next week. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Trump said a deal between Israel and Hamas may be imminent. He added that he had recently spoken with individuals involved in the ongoing negotiations to halt hostilities in the region. Hamas has said it is willing to free remaining hostages in Gaza under any deal to end the war, while Israel says it can only end if Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms. The war in Gaza was triggered when Hamas-led militants attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Gaza's health ministry says Israel's post-October 7 military assault has killed over 56,000 Palestinians. The assault has also caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and prompted accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations. Interest in resolving the Gaza conflict has picked up steam in the wake of the US and Israeli bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities. A ceasefire to the 12-day Israel-Iran conflict went into effect early this week. 'I think it's close. I just spoke to some of the people involved,' Mr Trump said. 'We think within the next week we're going to get a ceasefire.' He did not say who he has been talking to, but he has told reporters he was in near-daily contact with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the Israel-Iran conflict. Mr Trump's surprise prediction of a possible ceasefire deal in coming days came at a time when there have been few signs that the warring parties were ready to restart serious negotiations or budge from entrenched positions. A spokesperson for US special envoy Steve Witkoff's office said they had no information to share beyond Mr Trump's comments. Witkoff helped former President Joe Biden's aides broker a ceasefire and hostage release agreement shortly before Mr Trump took office in January but the deal soon unravelled. The Israeli embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer plans to visit Washington starting on Monday for talks with Trump administration officials about Gaza, Iran and a possible White House visit by Netanyahu, according to a source familiar with the matter. Netanyahu said on Thursday the outcome of Israel's war with Iran presented opportunities for peace that his country must not waste. - with Reuters
