Latest news with #Omegle
West Australian
3 days ago
- West Australian
'Aggrieved' sextortionist of 49 teens wants out of jail
A pedophile who catfished 49 boys, blackmailing them into sending him lewd images and videos has sought court help to return to the community. Kurtis Whaley, 29, was hit with a maximum jail sentence of almost 10 years in May 2020 after admitting to posing as a 16-year-old Perth girl and persuading his victims to send him explicit material. He chatted with the teenage boys online, covertly saving the material to blackmail the victims later into sending more explicit photos or videos. His non-parole period of six years and four months expired on June 19. But six days earlier, a delegate of Commonwealth Attorney-General Michelle Rowland denied his release. Whaley claims he was "aggrieved" by the decision in a Federal Court case filed earlier in July. "His interests are adversely affected by the decision, having been denied parole," court documents seen by AAP say. The 29-year-old alleges Ms Rowland improperly exercised her powers by denying him parole without considering one of its purposes: reintegration into the community. The Federal Court has been asked to quash the original decision and to send the matter back to the attorney-general to be reconsidered. A spokesman for Ms Rowland declined to explain why parole had been refused or comment on the court case. "The Albanese government is committed to ensuring the safety of the community," he said. When Whaley was sentenced in May 2020, NSW District Court Judge Ian Bourke found he engaged in a "premeditated system of intimidation" to entice his victims to share further explicit material. He clearly and cleverly tricked victims into supplying pictures of their faces "to enslave them ... to satisfy his perverted sexual desires," the judge wrote in his decision. If his blackmailing demands were not met, he then shared what he had with those close to the victims, including their underage friends and siblings. The conduct was "nothing short of cruel and merciless," Judge Bourke wrote. The offending began in 2014 on Skype and video chat site Omegle before Whaley turned to Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram, where he was able to exploit his victims' close relationships. Boys tricked into complying with Whaley's demands came from areas including Victoria, NSW and Queensland, as well as New Zealand and the United States. Whaley's challenge against the parole decision has not been allocated a hearing date. His full jail sentence will expire on August 19, 2028. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25)
Perth Now
3 days ago
- Perth Now
'Aggrieved' sextortionist of 49 teens wants out of jail
A pedophile who catfished 49 boys, blackmailing them into sending him lewd images and videos has sought court help to return to the community. Kurtis Whaley, 29, was hit with a maximum jail sentence of almost 10 years in May 2020 after admitting to posing as a 16-year-old Perth girl and persuading his victims to send him explicit material. He chatted with the teenage boys online, covertly saving the material to blackmail the victims later into sending more explicit photos or videos. His non-parole period of six years and four months expired on June 19. But six days earlier, a delegate of Commonwealth Attorney-General Michelle Rowland denied his release. Whaley claims he was "aggrieved" by the decision in a Federal Court case filed earlier in July. "His interests are adversely affected by the decision, having been denied parole," court documents seen by AAP say. The 29-year-old alleges Ms Rowland improperly exercised her powers by denying him parole without considering one of its purposes: reintegration into the community. The Federal Court has been asked to quash the original decision and to send the matter back to the attorney-general to be reconsidered. A spokesman for Ms Rowland declined to explain why parole had been refused or comment on the court case. "The Albanese government is committed to ensuring the safety of the community," he said. When Whaley was sentenced in May 2020, NSW District Court Judge Ian Bourke found he engaged in a "premeditated system of intimidation" to entice his victims to share further explicit material. He clearly and cleverly tricked victims into supplying pictures of their faces "to enslave them ... to satisfy his perverted sexual desires," the judge wrote in his decision. If his blackmailing demands were not met, he then shared what he had with those close to the victims, including their underage friends and siblings. The conduct was "nothing short of cruel and merciless," Judge Bourke wrote. The offending began in 2014 on Skype and video chat site Omegle before Whaley turned to Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram, where he was able to exploit his victims' close relationships. Boys tricked into complying with Whaley's demands came from areas including Victoria, NSW and Queensland, as well as New Zealand and the United States. Whaley's challenge against the parole decision has not been allocated a hearing date. His full jail sentence will expire on August 19, 2028. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25)
Perth Now
30-06-2025
- Health
- Perth Now
Fresh blow for alleged anti-Semitic nurses
Two nurses charged with threatening to kill Israeli patients in a viral video have been banned from working with NDIS patients. Ahmad Rashad Nadir, and fellow nurse Sarah Abu Lebdeh, both aged 27, made international headlines in February after a video of the pair allegedly bragging about killing Israeli patients at Bankstown Hospital, in Sydney's west, went viral. The pair, who have both been stood down from their jobs by NSW Health, have also been hit with a two-year ban from working with NDIS participants. The order came into effect in May, a listing by the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission read. Rashad Nadir and Sarah Abu Lebdeh have been hit with a two-year NDIS ban. NewsWire Handout Credit: NewsWire It prevents the nurses from working with any NDIS participants or engaging in any work for or on behalf of any NDIS provider, in any Australian state or territory. Ms Abu Lebdeh is charged with threatening violence to a group, using a carriage service to threaten to kill and using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend. Mr Nadir has been charged with using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend and possessing a prohibited drug. The pair remain on bail, and have not yet entered any pleas. However, Mr Nadir's lawyer Zemarai Khatiz told reporters outside the Downing Centre Local Court in March that he would 'intend to argue for the video to be excluded from court'. Mr Khatiz alleges the video was captured 'without the consent and knowledge' of his client. 'We will be challenging the admissibility of the video recording because it was a private conversation which was recorded by the person overseas without my client's consent and without his knowledge,' Mr Khatiz told NewsWire. 'That video recording was made secretly overseas and was unlawfully obtained.' Mr Khatiz also confirmed his client intends to plead not guilty. In the two-and-a-half minute video, recorded by Israeli influencer Max Veifer, the nurses allegedly threaten to kill Israelis who came to the hospital. Mr Veifer often uses Chatruletka and Omegle, online platforms that pair users in random video chats, to expose instances of anti-Semitism and also to learn English. 'Ahh,' Mr Nadir says in the clip. 'I'm gonna be really honest with you, you've actually got really, really beautiful eyes. Sarah Abu Lebdeh will return to court at the end of the month. NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia Ahmad Rashad Nadir's lawyer said his client intends to plead not guilty. NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia 'But I'm so upset that you're Israeli … eventually you're gonna get killed and you're gonna go to Jahannam (hell). But those pretty eyes, they should stay in this world for longer.' The exchange quickly gets heated as Mr Veifer explains he served in the IDF (Israeli Defence Force). A woman's voice can then be heard off camera saying: 'you killed innocent people'. The woman's voice continues: 'So you kill innocent people to protect your country? What kind of soul do you have? You have no soul.' Mr Veifer then asked the pair: 'How are you doctors?' Abu Lebdeh then allegedly told Mr Veifer she wanted him to 'remember my face so you can understand that you will die the most disgusting death'. Mr Veifer then begins to ask 'Let's say an Israeli, God forbid …' 'I won't treat them, I'll kill them,' Ms Abu Lebdeh says. 'Not God forbid, I hope to God.' 'You'll kill them?' Mr Veifer is heard asking. Mr Nadir then said: 'OK you have no idea how many Israeli haram dogs came to this hospital and (makes throat slitting motion) I send them to Jahannam.' 'For real? If just Jewish people comes (sic) there …' Mr Veifer begins before the chat ends. Following the identification of Mr Nadir in February, Strike Force Pearl raided his home and seized a number of items. The pair will return to court at the end of the month.
Time Business News
15-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Time Business News
Omegle: Anonymity, Connection, and the Internet's Digital Wild West
In a world dominated by social media platforms that prioritize curated content, verified profiles, and friend-based networks, Omegle stands as a stark contrast — a space where anonymity rules, strangers connect at random, and anything can happen. Since its inception in 2009, Omegle has attracted millions of users across the globe, seeking everything from casual conversations and cultural exchange to spontaneous fun and unpredictable interactions. But what lies beneath the surface of this curious website? And why has it remained so relevant in an age of ever-evolving online communication? This article takes an in-depth look at Omegle: how it works, why people use it, the controversies surrounding it, and how it fits into the broader narrative of digital connection in the 21st century. Omegle is a free online chat website that pairs users with strangers from around the world. Its key selling point is simplicity: no registration, no profile, no need for usernames. With a click of a button, you're connected to someone you've never met, and the conversation begins — either through text or video. Originally launched as a text-only platform, Omegle soon added video chat functionality, followed by features like interest tags, moderation options, and language filters. At its core, however, the platform remains the same: a place where two anonymous users meet and talk — and then move on. Why would someone choose to talk to a stranger online, especially without any form of identity verification? The answer lies in psychological freedom. Anonymity removes the pressure to perform or conform. Users often feel freer to express their thoughts, share secrets, or behave playfully in a way they wouldn't on Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok. Omegle creates a digital space where users can: Be themselves without fear of judgment Explore different perspectives and cultures Fight loneliness through spontaneous interaction Laugh, vent, flirt, or roleplay without consequences In many ways, Omegle serves as a digital confessional booth, comedy stage, and global living room all in one. Omegle's user base is surprisingly diverse. While it's particularly popular among teens and college students, users span all age groups, professions, and regions. Some common reasons people log on include: Curiosity: First-time users often log on just to see what the hype is about. First-time users often log on just to see what the hype is about. Boredom: Many users hop on Omegle when they have free time or can't sleep. Many users hop on Omegle when they have free time or can't sleep. Entertainment: Watching strangers react to jokes, music, costumes, or pranks is a popular trend. Watching strangers react to jokes, music, costumes, or pranks is a popular trend. Social Interaction: For people isolated geographically or socially, Omegle offers a quick connection to another human being. For people isolated geographically or socially, Omegle offers a quick connection to another human being. Language Practice: Non-native English speakers often use Omegle to improve their conversation skills. Using Omegle is easy: Visit the Website: Go to Choose Your Chat Type: Select between text or video chat. Add Interests (Optional): Enter keywords that represent your interests to be matched with similar users. Start Chatting: Omegle connects you to a random user. If you don't like the conversation, disconnect and start again. Moderated or Unmoderated: Video chats can be moderated or unmoderated. Moderated sections attempt to filter inappropriate behavior, though not always effectively. No accounts. No downloads. No names. Few platforms have influenced internet culture as much as Omegle. It has been featured in: YouTube videos showing musical performances or comedic interactions showing musical performances or comedic interactions TikTok compilations of funny or heartfelt moments with strangers of funny or heartfelt moments with strangers Memes and forums that reference the bizarre or hilarious nature of Omegle conversations Omegle has become a kind of performance space for aspiring musicians, comedians, and pranksters. Its unpredictable nature means no two interactions are the same, and that spontaneity has become a valuable form of entertainment. Despite its charm and popularity, Omegle has faced intense criticism — particularly for failing to protect its users, especially minors. The platform has been under fire for the following issues: Omegle's unmoderated video chat is rife with explicit content. Despite warning messages and reporting tools, users — including underage ones — can be exposed to nudity, sexual behavior, and adult conversations. While Omegle states users must be 18+ (or 13+ with parental permission), there is no actual mechanism to verify this. This loophole allows minors to use the platform unsupervised. Numerous reports and investigations have exposed instances of predatory behavior on Omegle. Some predators exploit the anonymous nature of the platform to groom or exploit vulnerable users. Verbal abuse, racist comments, misogyny, and cyberbullying are prevalent on Omegle, especially due to the anonymity factor. With no accountability, some users behave maliciously. While Omegle claims not to store conversations long-term, temporary logs are kept for monitoring. Additionally, IP addresses can be used to approximate a user's location, which raises privacy issues. If you choose to use Omegle, safety must come first. Here are tips to protect yourself: Don't Share Personal Info : Never give out your full name, phone number, social media, or location. : Never give out your full name, phone number, social media, or location. Use a VPN : A VPN hides your IP address, making it harder for others to track your location. : A VPN hides your IP address, making it harder for others to track your location. Stick to Text Chat : If you're concerned about inappropriate content, text chat is generally safer. : If you're concerned about inappropriate content, text chat is generally safer. Report and Block : Use Omegle's report feature to flag abusive or inappropriate users. : Use Omegle's report feature to flag abusive or inappropriate users. Log Off When Uncomfortable : If a chat turns toxic or threatening, disconnect immediately. : If a chat turns toxic or threatening, disconnect immediately. Parental Supervision: Parents should closely monitor their child's activity if they access platforms like Omegle. As Omegle's problems have become more widely known, several alternative platforms have emerged: A pioneer in random video chatting, Chatroulette focuses on visual interaction and has added stronger moderation over time. A modern take on Omegle, Emerald Chat emphasizes user safety and has implemented reputation systems to discourage bad behavior. Offers random video chatting with optional gender filters and more advanced moderation tools. A female-focused video chat platform that aims to reduce explicit content and abuse by limiting access to verified users. Designed with Gen Z in mind, Monkey allows short video calls with matched users and includes gamified elements. Despite the rise of social networking giants and stricter digital laws, Omegle continues to maintain a loyal user base. Why? Novelty : The randomness of who you'll meet keeps it fresh. : The randomness of who you'll meet keeps it fresh. Anonymity : Unlike social media, Omegle doesn't demand your identity. : Unlike social media, Omegle doesn't demand your identity. Accessibility : No downloads, logins, or credit cards required. : No downloads, logins, or credit cards required. Low Commitment: Conversations can last seconds or hours, entirely at your discretion. But relevance comes with responsibility. If Omegle wants to thrive in an era of increasing digital accountability, it must adapt — implementing AI moderation, enforcing real age restrictions, and providing more transparency. Omegle is a fascinating platform — part social experiment, part entertainment venue, and part cautionary tale. It opens the door to raw, human interaction without filters or expectations. That's a rare thing in our polished, profile-based world. But Omegle is also a digital wild west, where freedom comes with serious risk. Whether you view it as a fun chatroom or a dangerous platform depends on your age, intentions, and online experience. For adults who understand the risks and use the platform wisely, Omegle can be a place of surprising connection and amusement. For younger users or those seeking a safer experience, Omegle is best approached with caution or avoided altogether. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Daily Maverick
05-06-2025
- Daily Maverick
Online danger — social media predator targets and traffics SA teen
The advent of the internet has put predators into children's pockets, and many use a classic child sexual abuse playbook. With ease of access to children online, anonymity, the speed and intensity at which online relationships progress, secrecy, careful grooming and vicious, prolonged attacks on children's identity and belonging, the question is not how this crime occurred, but rather how many other children are affected whose stories we will never know? It's a parent's worst nightmare: the phone call warning that the 16-year-old boy who befriended your daughter online, who told her he was en route from the UK to visit her, is an adult man with international warrants out for his arrest. Worse, he was already in the country. The story reads like the script of a Hollywood movie – a teenage girl rescued minutes before she was sexually abused and trafficked out of the country. It's a narrative made more shocking because it didn't happen to a high-risk child from a vulnerable family. The victim was a normal South African teen from a middle-class home with loving and involved parents who had done everything possible to keep her safe. It isn't fiction. The advent of the internet has put predators into children's pockets, and many use an archetypal child sexual abuse playbook. Through ease of access to children online, the anonymity of online contact, the speed and intensity at which online relationships progress combined with secrecy, careful grooming, vicious and prolonged attacks on children's self-esteem while they are desperate for identity and belonging, and often with the support and financial backing of organised crime, 10 cases of online child sexual abuse and exploitation are reported to occur globally every second. Multinational investigation In September 2022, a combined team of homeland security, the Hawks and Interpol, along with anti-trafficking organisation Hope Risen were frantically working behind the scenes to keep UK citizen Adam Qasim Lucas Habib from abducting, raping and trafficking 15-year-old Sam*, the South African girl he had been corresponding with on Omegle, Snapchat and WhatsApp for more than a year, and who he was due to visit within days. Unbeknown to them though, Habib was already in the country. Always one step ahead, he booked into his hotel two days before the due date on the fake ticket he had sent to her parents. Without luggage, he warned the hotel staff not to disturb him and requested no room service. That night, he allegedly purchased the services of a 13-year-old prostitute, sold to him by her parents. On the other side of town, Sam, the only one who knew that he had arrived in the country early, began to implement her boyfriend's carefully constructed plan. For months she had sat with her parents practising drawing a beard and moustache on her face with make-up, covering her hair with a hoodie and expertly transforming herself into a young man. It was done in plain sight of her family, a seemingly innocent pastime to which they imbued no sinister meaning. Sam had also established a regular habit of going to the gym beneath the luxury apartment block where she lived with her parents and older brother. She'd usually be there for about an hour, more than enough time to meet the boy she was desperately in love with and disappear without a trace. On that fateful Thursday evening, she planned to meet Habib at the gym. It was the day before Habib's 'mother', a fake persona he had created to appease Sam's parents, had told them he was arriving in South Africa. When Sam's mom collected her from school, Sam asked if she would be home by 5pm because that was when she would be going to gym. None the wiser, it would have been an hour and a half before her parents realised she was missing, and by then she would have been long gone. But at the last minute the plan began to unravel. The catalyst was a chance conversation at an anti-trafficking convention held by South African authorities with their foreign counterparts the week that Habib arrived in the country. During supper on the final night of the conference, a South African agent mentioned that they had a live case in play where the suspect was a UK citizen. Alert to the potential threat, the UK agent did some digging on his return to the UK. It was he who discovered that Habib was not a child but an adult male in his late twenties, that he had been in juvenile detention in the UK, that he was wanted in both the UK and the US and, most concerningly, that he was already in South Africa. What followed was a frantic attempt to keep Sam safe, made harder because Sam did not think she was in danger. At the point at which her parents were notifying her school of a possible kidnap situation, staging an intervention with the senior Family Violence, Child Protection and Sexual Offences (FCS) investigating officer who threatened to arrest Sam for possession of child pornography if she did not hand over her device and passwords, and authorities were putting in plans to arrest Habib, Sam still believed that he was her 16-year-old boyfriend and that they were in love. Textbook grooming It was an illusion that Habib had carefully cultivated for more than a year. Sam was just 14 years old when she first tried Omegle. Like many others her age, her life had been railroaded by Covid, forcing her online and devolving her friendship groups and quest for belonging into the microcosms of online communities. She'd done the safety talk at school warning that Omegle, the now-defunct (but resurrected in multiple other applications) online video chat site that randomly paired users with other users from across the world was dangerous, attracting predators, and infamous for close-ups of masturbating men and couples having sex on camera. But her friends were all on Omegle and peer pressure and curiosity finally won over caution. Given all the warnings, she felt like she had hit the jackpot when Omegle paired her with Adam Habib, a handsome 16-year-old boy from the UK. Nevertheless, she felt uncomfortable on the site and begged him to move across to Snapchat instead. When he was finally persuaded, the price he extracted was for her to stick out her tongue on camera. Innocent as she was, she had no idea that he had a tongue fetish or that after his camera suddenly went dark, the sound she could hear was him masturbating. Little is known about the first six months of their relationship but it seems that he was initially very attentive and romantic. He used affirmation and gifts to break down her barriers, including the airtime that enabled her to speak to him late at night, concealing her activities by placing a bathroom towel at the threshold of her door to block the light, and listening closely to the footsteps down the hall. As her parents attest, she became an expert at hiding her secret online habit and at identifying which parent was coming down the passage while she was speaking to Habib. But slowly the relationship began to deteriorate. Using a textbook grooming playbook, Habib moved from meeting an important need in Sam's life, and flooding her with gifts and compliments, to control, isolation and abuse. He alienated her from her family, keeping her up until all hours so she was perpetually exhausted, tearful and not coping at school. He gained access to all of her social media accounts and passwords to keep track of her relationships and movements, and began grooming her friends. Then, after he had extracted a promise that she 'would never speak to other boys', he hacked one of her male friend's accounts. When she innocently messaged the friend, Habib revealed that it was him using the account and accused her of cheating. He began punishing her. The conversations became more and more abusive. Gone were the romantic words. Instead he bullied and body-shamed her, mocking her body and face and calling her a slut, a whore and 'only good for the streets', gradually chipping away at her self-esteem. Months later when her anxious father hacked her Snapchat account he came across a tirade of misogynistic abuse. When he asked Sam why she allowed Habib to speak to her like that, she said that she deserved it because of her unfaithfulness. At the same time, the exchanges became more and more sexual. Habib explained in explicit detail what he would like to do with her when they finally met, sent her pornographic images and made her masturbate and perform oral sex and anal sex on herself using a hairbrush while he watched and masturbated. His conversations with this 14-year-old-child, which included references to oral and anal sex, orgasms, his tongue fetish, tying her up, raping her like 'a bad little slut' and taking her virginity whether she consented or not, were so graphic and so vulgar that his advocate refused to read them into record during the trial. He also manipulated her into sexting and sending him nudes. It was at this point that Sam finally confessed to her mother that she had 'done something' and that she was worried. 'I met a boy' Sam's parents, Rob and Linda*, had been concerned about Sam's behaviour for months, as she had become more withdrawn, anxious and angry. Arguments with her mom, who had previously been her confidant, had increased, and she was tearful and exhausted. But, they had attributed her changed behaviour to her being a teen, so her confession took Linda by surprise. Trying to remain calm, Linda asked her what she had done and how bad she thought it was. She ascertained that Sam had met 'a boy' online and sent him naked pics of her torso. Sam said that they were in love but also that he was being nasty and had made her cry. When Sam's parents asked her why she accepted the belittling, she told them that 'relationships online are different'. They tried to prove it wasn't normal, but she'd push them out of her room when she was talking to Habib, and wouldn't let them speak to him. Nevertheless, she'd often end conversations in tears and then regret her transparency. When Habib chatted to Sam live he used an emoji filter to mask his identity so Rob and Linda were increasingly convinced that he was a 'catfish'. Worried that he may be a jihadist or an extortionist, Rob began digging, but could find nothing on him. Then in Easter 2022, when the family planned a trip away, Sam insisted she wouldn't go. At the last minute, one of Sam's friends tipped off Rob and Linda that Habib was in the country and Sam was planning to travel to meet him at his hotel while they were away. Horrified, Rob drove her to Montecasino to find him. When his accommodation details proved to be false, they took it as proof that he didn't exist and that their nightmare was over. Their euphoria was short-lived though. Hours later he sent Sam a picture of himself standing next to the Easter Bunny at the Pick n Pay downstairs from their apartment. Suddenly, he was not only real but a stone's throw away from their daughter. Defying the advice of a top social media attorney to 'lock her up for six months and take away her phone', and in a bid to not lose Sam, the family staked him out and then let Habib and Sam meet in public places under supervision. It was clear almost immediately that something wasn't right. On two occasions when Habib (who concealed his age) was with Sam, older patrons flagged his behaviour, confronting him about the way he spoke to her and his unwillingness to accept her turning down his advances. Frustrated at not being alone with Sam, Habib extended his trip, explaining that his family was waiting for him in Cape Town. Before he left, he begged Sam's mom to let the two of them spend time on their own. It was a request Sam's parents adamantly refused. In the months that followed, Habib redoubled his efforts to meet Sam alone. He even created a mother persona who did her best to persuade Rob and Linda that the children were in love and that they would be bad parents if they stood in the way. Habib's 'mother' had a 30-minute video call with Rob and Linda, begging them to allow Habib to visit again. They finally agreed to let him come in September 2022. It was here that Habib's plan went wrong. His 'mother' inadvertently disclosed to Linda that she had never been to Cape Town, undermining his story that his parents had been with him in South Africa. 'She' further agreed to send through a copy of his passport. Although the date of birth and ID number were blanked out, the barcode was still visible, which was how authorities were finally able to uncover his age, record and movements. The family were also given the contact details of Tabitha Lage from Hope Risen. Lage described how during her first meeting with Sam, the two of them sat in silence for a whole hour as Sam angrily refused to speak to her. But then the floodgates opened. At Lage's behest, Sam persuaded Habib to move their conversation to WhatsApp which allowed the family to capture evidence (the final three months of their relationship alone produced 2,596 pages of WhatsApps). This had been impossible on Snapchat because of the disappearing messages, and because Habib received notifications when their messages were screenshotted, sending him into an apoplectic rage. No remorse By the time September and the planned second visit arrived, Sam was exhausted from sleepless nights, overwrought from the ongoing barrage of vitriol and abuse, failing at school, and worn down, with her self-esteem in tatters. She would later confess that she felt like it was too late to turn back. Everything was poised for what could have been the day she was trafficked. But then came the police breakthrough, the confiscation of her phone and the intervention that had her in a conference room with the FCS unit of the police, rather than at the gym ready to meet Habib. Instead of feeling grateful though, Sam was devastated. The following day, as she sat with her relieved parents in a restaurant downstairs from their apartment watching the Springboks play rugby, she became more and more anxious until at half-time Rob decided they should leave. Minutes later, his phone began to ping as the restaurant manager, who knew the family well, and who had been given Habib's picture, alerted him that Habib was metres away from their apartment, retracing his steps from the March visit in a frenzied attempt to find Sam. Although he came terrifyingly close to tracking her down, it proved to be his undoing. Even after his arrest, he still had a hold over Sam. Managing to contact her while in prison, he threatened to punish Lage and Sam's parents. She was so certain that he would harm them that she begged him to rather kill her than hurt them. At trial, he showed no remorse or recognition that he had done anything wrong. Finally, more than two years after his arrest, Adam Qasim Lucas Habib was found guilty of human trafficking, production and possession of child pornography, grooming, compelled self-sexual assault, compelling a child to witness sexual offences, flashing and sexual assault. On 4 March 2025, he was sentenced to an effective 40 years in prison. Having already served three, he is facing another 13 years of incarceration. The Johannesburg High Court judgment was landmark because it reinforced that the Trafficking in Persons (TiP) Act doesn't require children to be moved in order for them to be trafficked. Judge Coertse provided a thorough breakdown of the Act, showing that if any of the following criteria were fulfilled, it would constitute trafficking: 'any person who delivers, recruits, transports, transfers, harbours, sells, exchanges, leases or receives another person.' He agreed that the prosecutor had proven that Sam was recruited for sexual exploitation. The judge further explained that Habib had used an 'abuse of vulnerability' to recruit her, leading her to believe that she had no other option than to submit to exploitation. But despite the victory in court, Sam, just months away from becoming an adult, has been significantly scarred by her experience. Captain Botha from the FCS unit testified at Habib's trial that Sam had suffered from child sexual abuse syndrome, presenting with the five classic signs of secrecy, helplessness, entrapment and accommodation, delayed, conflicting and unconvincing disclosure, and retraction. Habib's grooming, which isolated her, met a felt need, created a shared secret, sexualised their relationship and then wore her down through cruelty and control, had altered her self-perception, evident in the way she continued to love and support him despite what he had done – according to Lage, a form of Stockholm syndrome. Educating children While Sam's experience is unique, it is not uncommon. According to Childlight, more than 300 million children are victims of online child sexual abuse and exploitation every year. Prevention requires tech companies to place children's wellbeing over profit and for governments to use legislation to prohibit or at least delay children from accessing harmful platforms including social media and gaming platforms where predators can access them. For worried parents, the changes are coming too slowly. In response, many are delaying access to devices, something Sam endorses for her future children. In addition, educating children about grooming and online exploitation, and keeping open lines of communication wherever possible, are key to safety because even when authorities and families successfully collaborate to protect a child, there are no fairytale endings in child sexual abuse cases. For Sam and her family, healing and recovery may be a long and painful journey. One in eight children has been affected by online solicitation. If you or a family member have been affected by online child sexual abuse and exploitation, contact Childline for assistance on 116. If you want to report an electronic crime, contact Crime Stop on 086 000 10111 and ask to speak to the Serial Electronic Crime (SECI) Unit. Concerned parents who want to delay access to smart devices can join the Smartphone Free Childhood movement. For more information about how this crime affects South African children and the legislative reforms needed to keep our children safer, read ''. DM
