Latest news with #OpenLendingCorporation
Associated Press
27-06-2025
- Business
- Associated Press
Open Lending Corporation Class Action: Levi & Korsinsky Reminds Open Lending Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit With a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of June 30, 2025
NEW YORK - June 27, 2025 ( NEWMEDIAWIRE ) - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Open Lending Corporation ('Open Lending Corporation' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: LPRO) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Open Lending Corporation investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between February 24, 2022 and March 31, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: LPRO investors may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500. CASE DETAILS: According to the filed complaint, defendants made false statements and/or concealed that they: (1) misrepresented the capabilities of the Company's risk-based pricing models; (2) issued materially misleading statements regarding the Company's profit share revenue; (3) failed to disclose the Company's 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had become worth significantly less than their corresponding outstanding loan balances; and (4) misrepresented the underperformance of the Company's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans. As a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. WHAT'S NEXT? If you suffered a loss in Open Lending Corporation during the relevant time frame, you have until June 30, 2025 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To learn more about this case, subscribe to the Bulls & Betrayals podcast, which features a dedicated episode unpacking the allegations against Open Lending Corporation. Listen now and find out if you are eligible to join the lawsuit. NO COST TO YOU: If you are a class member, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out-of-pocket costs or fees. There is no cost or obligation to participate. WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, the team at Levi & Korsinsky has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. Our firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. CONTACT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Joseph E. Levi, Esq. Ed Korsinsky, Esq. 33 Whitehall Street, 17th Floor New York, NY 10004 [email protected] Tel: (212) 363-7500 Fax: (212) 363-7171 View the original release on
Malaysian Reserve
20-06-2025
- Business
- Malaysian Reserve
Open Lending Corporation Class Action: Levi & Korsinsky Reminds Open Lending Corporation Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit with a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of June 30, 2025
NEW YORK, June 20, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Open Lending Corporation ('Open Lending Corporation' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: LPRO) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Open Lending Corporation investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between February 24, 2022 and March 31, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: LPRO investors may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at jlevi@ or by telephone at (212) 363-7500. CASE DETAILS: According to the filed complaint, defendants made false statements and/or concealed that they: (1) misrepresented the capabilities of the Company's risk-based pricing models; (2) issued materially misleading statements regarding the Company's profit share revenue; (3) failed to disclose the Company's 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had become worth significantly less than their corresponding outstanding loan balances; and (4) misrepresented the underperformance of the Company's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans. As a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. WHAT'S NEXT? If you suffered a loss in Open Lending Corporation during the relevant time frame, you have until June 30, 2025 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. NO COST TO YOU: If you are a class member, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out-of-pocket costs or fees. There is no cost or obligation to participate. WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, the team at Levi & Korsinsky has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. Our firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. CONTACT:Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Joseph E. Levi, Korsinsky, Esq.33 Whitehall Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10004jlevi@ (212) 363-7500Fax: (212)
Business Upturn
17-06-2025
- Business
- Business Upturn
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors That Class Action Lawsuits Have Been Filed Against Open Lending Corporation, Civitas Resources, and Avis Budget and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm
NEW YORK, June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, reminds investors that class actions have been commenced on behalf of stockholders of Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ:LPRO), NET Power, Inc. (NYSE:NPWR), Civitas Resources, Inc. (NYSE: CIVI), and Avis Budget Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:CAR). Stockholders have until the deadlines below to petition the court to serve as lead plaintiff. Additional information about each case can be found at the link provided. Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ:LPRO) Class Period: February 24, 2022 – March 31, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: June 30, 2025 The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants: (1) misrepresented the capabilities of the Company's risk-based pricing models; (2) issued materially misleading statements regarding the Company's profit share revenue; (3) failed to disclose the Company's 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had become worth significantly less than their corresponding outstanding loan balances; (4) misrepresented the underperformance of the Company's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. For more information on the Open Lending class action go to: NET Power, Inc. (NYSE:NPWR) Class Period: June 9, 2023 – March 7, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: June 17, 2025 Net Power is a clean energy technology company. Its business is centered around its so-called 'Net Power Cycle' technology, which is a purported novel power generation system designed to produce reliable and affordable electricity from natural gas while capturing virtually all atmospheric emissions. Net Power has a facility located in La Porte, Texas, which it uses to demonstrate the viability of the NET Power Cycle, referred to as 'La Porte' or the 'Demonstration Plant.' Net Power conducts research and equipment validation testing campaigns at the Demonstration Plant as part of its efforts to develop its first utility-scale plant, which it variably refers to as 'SN1' or 'Project Permian.' Project Permian is located at a site in the Permian Basin of West Texas. Since before the start of the Class Period, Defendants had represented that they anticipated SN1 to be operational in 2026. In 2023, Net Power's cost estimate for Project Permian was roughly $950 million, which increased to $1.1 billion in 2024. Net Power's commencement of commercial operations and, accordingly, its business and financial prospects, rely on its completion of Project Permian. As such, Defendants' projected timelines and cost estimates for Project Permian are of particular importance to investors and analysts. The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Net Power was unlikely to complete Project Permian on schedule, and the project was likely to be significantly more expensive than Defendants had represented, because of, inter alia, supply chain issues and numerous site- and region-specific challenges; (ii) accordingly, Defendants' projections regarding the time and capital needed to complete Project Permian were unrealistic; (iii) the increased time and capital needed to complete Project Permian were likely to have a significant negative impact on the Company's business and financial results; and (iv) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. For more information on the NET Power class action go to: Civitas Resources, Inc. (NYSE: CIVI) Class Period: February 27, 2024 – February 24, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: July 1, 2025 The Civitas Resources class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Civitas Resources was highly likely to significantly reduce its oil production in 2025 as a result of, among other things, declines following the production peak at the DJ Basin in the fourth quarter of 2024 and a low TIL count at the end of 2024; (ii) increasing its oil production would require Civitas Resources to acquire additional acreage and development locations, thereby incurring significant debt and causing Civitas Resources to sell corporate assets to offset its acquisition costs; (iii) Civitas Resources' financial condition would require it to implement disruptive cost reduction measures including a significant workforce reduction; and (iv) accordingly, Civitas Resources' business and/or financial prospects, as well as its operational capabilities, were overstated. The Civitas Resources class action lawsuit further alleges that on February 24, 2025, Civitas Resources announced its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2024, reporting revenue of $1.29 billion, missing consensus estimates by $3.44 million, and non-GAAP earnings per share of $1.78 for the quarter, missing consensus estimates by $0.21 per share. According to the complaint, also on February 24, 2025, Civitas Resources revealed several 2025 outlook highlights, including '[d]elivering oil production between 150 and 155 thousand barrels per day ('MBbl/d') on average,' – a year-over-year decline of approximately 4% –'[e]xpanding [its] Permian Basin position with a $300 million bolt-on transaction that adds 19,000 net acres and approximately 130 future development locations in the Midland Basin,' and '[e]xecuting on [a] new divestment target of $300 million' meant to offset the foregoing transaction. Civitas Resources explained that '[a]s compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, lower volumes are primarily driven by the DJ Basin, due to natural declines following peak production in the fourth quarter, a low TIL count exiting 2024 and in the first quarter of 2025,' as well as severe winter weather and unplanned third-party processing downtime in the first quarter, the Civitas Resources class action lawsuit alleges. Civitas Resources additionally announced a 10% reduction in its workforce across all levels and the termination of its Chief Operating Officer and Chief Transformation Officer, according to the complaint. On this news, the price of Civitas Resources stock fell more than 18%, according to the Civitas Resources class action lawsuit. For more information on the Civitas class action go to: Avis Budget Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:CAR) Class Period: February 16, 2024 – February 10, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: June 24, 2025 The lawsuit alleges that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse information regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects, including allegations that: (i) Avis Budget crafted and implemented a plan to significantly accelerate its fleet rotation in the fourth quarter of 2024; (ii) the foregoing acceleration shortened the useful life of the majority of the Company's vehicles in the Americas segment, thereby reducing their recoverable value; (iii) as a result, Avis Budget would be forced to recognize billions of dollars in impairment charges and incur substantial losses; (iv) all the foregoing was likely to, and did, have a significant negative impact on the Company's financial results; and (v) accordingly, Avis Budget's financial and/or business prospects were overstated. For more information on the Avis Budget class action go to: About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit . Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Contact Information: Bragar Eagel & Squire, Walker, Esq. Marion Passmore, Esq.(212) 355-4648 [email protected]
Business Upturn
30-05-2025
- Business
- Business Upturn
Investors who lost money on Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) should contact Levi & Korsinsky about pending Class Action
NEW YORK, May 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Open Lending Corporation ('Open Lending Corporation' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: LPRO) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Open Lending Corporation investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between February 24, 2022 and March 31, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: Open Lending Corporation Lawsuit Submission Form LPRO investors may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500. CASE DETAILS: According to the filed complaint, defendants made false statements and/or concealed that they: (1) misrepresented the capabilities of the Company's risk-based pricing models; (2) issued materially misleading statements regarding the Company's profit share revenue; (3) failed to disclose the Company's 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had become worth significantly less than their corresponding outstanding loan balances; and (4) misrepresented the underperformance of the Company's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans. As a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. WHAT'S NEXT? If you suffered a loss in Open Lending Corporation during the relevant time frame, you have until June 30, 2025 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. NO COST TO YOU: If you are a class member, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out-of-pocket costs or fees. There is no cost or obligation to participate. WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, the team at Levi & Korsinsky has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. Our firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. CONTACT:Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Joseph E. Levi, Korsinsky, Esq.33 Whitehall Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10004 [email protected] Tel: (212) 363-7500Fax: (212) 363-7171
Malaysian Reserve
25-05-2025
- Business
- Malaysian Reserve
LPRO INVESTOR ALERT: Open Lending Corporation Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO, May 25, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ: LPRO) securities between February 24, 2022 and March 31, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), have until Monday, June 30, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Open Lending class action lawsuit. Captioned Bradley v. Open Lending Corporation, No. 25-cv-00650 (W.D. Tex.), the Open Lending class action lawsuit charges Open Lending and certain of Open Lending's current and former top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Open Lending class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at info@ CASE ALLEGATIONS: Open Lending provides lending enablement and risk analytics solutions to credit unions, regional banks, finance companies, and captive finance companies of automakers. The Open Lending class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) defendants misrepresented the capabilities of Open Lending's risk-based pricing model; (ii) defendants issued materially misleading statements regarding Open Lending's profit share revenue; (iii) defendants failed to disclose Open Lending's 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had become worth significantly less than their corresponding outstanding loan balances; and (iv) defendants misrepresented the underperformance of Open Lending's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans. The Open Lending class action lawsuit further alleges that on March 17, 2025, Open Lending disclosed that it would be unable to timely file its Annual Report for 2024 as it 'require[d] additional time to finalize its accounting and review processes specifically related to its profit share revenue and related contract assets.' On this news, the price of Open Lending stock fell more than 9%, according to the complaint. Then, on March 31, 2025, the Open Lending class action lawsuit alleges that Open Lending released its fourth quarter and full year 2024 financial results, revealing quarterly revenue of negative $56.9 million due in part to 'a $81.3 million reduction in estimated profit share revenues related to business in historic vintages' 'primarily due to heightened delinquencies and corresponding defaults associated with loans originated in 2021 through 2024.' Open Lending also disclosed a net loss of $144 million, due to Open Lending being 'negatively impacted by the recording of a valuation allowance on [its] deferred tax assets of $86.1 million, which increased [its] income tax expense during the period,' according to the complaint. Open Lending additionally announced that it had appointed a new CEO as well as a new COO, effective immediately, both of whom would be replacing defendant Charles D. Jehl, who had been operating as Open Lending's CEO, COO, and CFO simultaneously, the complaint further alleges. The Open Lending class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of Open Lending stock fell nearly 58%. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Open Lending securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Open Lending class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Open Lending class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Open Lending class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Open Lending class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. Contact: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLPJ.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101800-449-4900info@
