Latest news with #Panchkula
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
Nat'l Insurance Co wins appeal in car robbery claim
Panchkula: The Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Panchkula) has overturned a previous district court ruling that had directed National Insurance Company Ltd. to pay Rs 3.17 lakh to a complainant whose insured vehicle was allegedly stolen. In its order pronounced on June 13, the Commission allowed the insurer's appeal while dismissing a cross-appeal filed by the complainant seeking enhanced compensation. The case involved Mahipal Singh Rana, a resident of Sector 32, Kurukshetra, who claimed that his car (No. HR-26U-0018), insured with National Insurance from May 2012 to May 2013, was snatched at gunpoint on Dec 6, 2012. According to the complaint, he was forcibly thrown out of the car by two unknown assailants after being threatened with death. He claimed the robbers also stole two mobile phones, Rs 9,000 in cash, identity documents, bank cheques, and important car papers. Mahipal lodged a police complaint the same day, resulting in the registration of an FIR (no. 279) under IPC sections 382, 365, 392 and 34. However, the insurer repudiated the claim, alleging non-cooperation and delay in informing them. The district consumer forum had earlier directed National Insurance to pay the insured value of the vehicle within 60 days, prompting the company to challenge the decision. In its judgment, the state commission held that Mahipal's conduct cast serious doubts on his claim. It noted that while the incident occurred in Dec 2012, the insurer was only formally informed in Dec 2015 — an "inexplicable and inordinate delay" that severely undermined the credibility of the claim. Moreover, the commission highlighted Mahipal's contradictory conduct during criminal proceedings. Though he had earlier identified the accused during police investigation, he refused to recognise them during trial, resulting in their acquittal by a Delhi court in June 2015. This clearly indicates the complainant had not only failed to cooperate with the insurer's investigation, as mandated by the policy, but also actively undermined the prosecution, as observed by the Commission. Insurance is a contract, and its terms are binding. Breach of cooperation and unexplained delay are fatal to the claim. The Commission, therefore, allowed the insurer's first appeal (no. 355 of 2018) and set aside the district court's order dated Jan 17, 2018. In consequence, Mahipal Singh Rana's cross-appeal (F.A. no. 879 of 2018) seeking additional compensation for mental agony, litigation costs, and interest was also dismissed. The Commission also ordered that the statutory deposit of ₹25,000 made by National Insurance at the time of filing the appeal be refunded, subject to verification. This ruling highlights the importance of timely reporting and full cooperation in insurance claim processes and is expected to serve as a precedent in similar cases of delayed intimation and alleged claimant misconduct. BOX UNRAVELLING THE CASE Who is the owner of the car? Mahipal Singh Rana, a resident of Sec 32, Kurukshetra What was his claim? He claimed that his car, insured with National Insurance from May 2012 to May 2013, was snatched at gunpoint on Dec 6, 2012. According to the complaint, he was forcibly thrown out of the car by two unknown assailants after being threatened with death. He claimed the robbers also stole two mobile phones, ₹9,000 in cash, identity documents, bank cheques, and important car papers. Mahipal lodged a police complaint the same day, resulting in the registration of an FIR under IPC sections 382, 365, 392 and 34 Why did the insurer reject his claim? The insurer repudiated the claim, alleging non-cooperation and delay in informing them. The district consumer forum had earlier directed National Insurance to pay the insured value of the vehicle within 60 days, prompting the company to challenge the decision What discrepancies did the state consumer forum find? It noted that while the incident occurred in Dec 2012, the insurer was only formally informed in Dec 2015 — an "inexplicable and inordinate delay" that severely undermined the credibility of the claim. Besides, though he had earlier identified the accused during police investigation, he refused to recognise them during trial, resulting in their acquittal by a Delhi court in June 2015 Panchkula: The Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Panchkula) has overturned a previous district court ruling that had directed National Insurance Company Ltd. to pay Rs 3.17 lakh to a complainant whose insured vehicle was allegedly stolen. In its order pronounced on June 13, the Commission allowed the insurer's appeal while dismissing a cross-appeal filed by the complainant seeking enhanced compensation. The case involved Mahipal Singh Rana, a resident of Sector 32, Kurukshetra, who claimed that his car (No. HR-26U-0018), insured with National Insurance from May 2012 to May 2013, was snatched at gunpoint on Dec 6, 2012. According to the complaint, he was forcibly thrown out of the car by two unknown assailants after being threatened with death. He claimed the robbers also stole two mobile phones, Rs 9,000 in cash, identity documents, bank cheques, and important car papers. Mahipal lodged a police complaint the same day, resulting in the registration of an FIR (no. 279) under IPC sections 382, 365, 392 and 34. However, the insurer repudiated the claim, alleging non-cooperation and delay in informing them. The district consumer forum had earlier directed National Insurance to pay the insured value of the vehicle within 60 days, prompting the company to challenge the decision. In its judgment, the state commission held that Mahipal's conduct cast serious doubts on his claim. It noted that while the incident occurred in Dec 2012, the insurer was only formally informed in Dec 2015 — an "inexplicable and inordinate delay" that severely undermined the credibility of the claim. Moreover, the commission highlighted Mahipal's contradictory conduct during criminal proceedings. Though he had earlier identified the accused during police investigation, he refused to recognise them during trial, resulting in their acquittal by a Delhi court in June 2015. This clearly indicates the complainant had not only failed to cooperate with the insurer's investigation, as mandated by the policy, but also actively undermined the prosecution, as observed by the Commission. Insurance is a contract, and its terms are binding. Breach of cooperation and unexplained delay are fatal to the claim. The Commission, therefore, allowed the insurer's first appeal (no. 355 of 2018) and set aside the district court's order dated Jan 17, 2018. In consequence, Mahipal Singh Rana's cross-appeal (F.A. no. 879 of 2018) seeking additional compensation for mental agony, litigation costs, and interest was also dismissed. The Commission also ordered that the statutory deposit of ₹25,000 made by National Insurance at the time of filing the appeal be refunded, subject to verification. This ruling highlights the importance of timely reporting and full cooperation in insurance claim processes and is expected to serve as a precedent in similar cases of delayed intimation and alleged claimant misconduct. BOX UNRAVELLING THE CASE Who is the owner of the car? Mahipal Singh Rana, a resident of Sec 32, Kurukshetra What was his claim? He claimed that his car, insured with National Insurance from May 2012 to May 2013, was snatched at gunpoint on Dec 6, 2012. According to the complaint, he was forcibly thrown out of the car by two unknown assailants after being threatened with death. He claimed the robbers also stole two mobile phones, ₹9,000 in cash, identity documents, bank cheques, and important car papers. Mahipal lodged a police complaint the same day, resulting in the registration of an FIR under IPC sections 382, 365, 392 and 34 Why did the insurer reject his claim? The insurer repudiated the claim, alleging non-cooperation and delay in informing them. The district consumer forum had earlier directed National Insurance to pay the insured value of the vehicle within 60 days, prompting the company to challenge the decision What discrepancies did the state consumer forum find? It noted that while the incident occurred in Dec 2012, the insurer was only formally informed in Dec 2015 — an "inexplicable and inordinate delay" that severely undermined the credibility of the claim. Besides, though he had earlier identified the accused during police investigation, he refused to recognise them during trial, resulting in their acquittal by a Delhi court in June 2015
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Firing on mining officials in Panchkula: Court rejects bail plea of 20-yr-old accused
In a notable ruling, additional sessions judge Neeru Kamboj on Wednesday rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Aarish, a 20-year-old resident of Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh. Aarish was booked by the Raipur Rani police station on May 20 in connection with a firing incident that occurred during an alleged attack on mining department officials. In its order, the court emphasised that custodial interrogation of the applicant/accused in the present case assumes significance for proper investigation and discovery of facts. (HT photo for representation) Aarish had sought pre-arrest bail after an FIR was registered against him on May 20 under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and Section 25 of the Arms Act. The prosecution's case stems from a statement by SPO Harwinder Singh of the mining department, Panchkula. Singh reported that he and other officials were on duty, fixing barricades to prevent illegal mining at the crusher zone in Raipur Rani on the night of May 19-20. He alleged that around 3-3.30 am on May 20, a group of six to seven young boys approached the barricade. One of them fired a pistol shot, which narrowly missed the officials. The group then allegedly overpowered the three officials, seized their phones, and assaulted them. Identifying each other by names Rajeev, Happy, Tunda, and Ankit Rana, the miscreants severely beat the officials. Praveen Yadav, one of the officials, was left 'half-dead'. The attackers fled in two cars after threatening the officials and their families. Investigation led to the arrest of the accused Rajeev Kumar, Gurdeep alias Tunda, and Ankit Rana on May 21 based on secret information. Their disclosure statements resulted in the recovery of a car used in the incident and a country-made pistol with two live cartridges. Aarish's name surfaced through the disclosure statement of co-accused Ankit Rana, leading to his pending arrest. The public prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application, arguing Aarish's direct involvement and presence at the scene. It was also contended that Aarish had allegedly purchased the firearm used, making his custodial interrogation crucial to trace the weapon's origin and apprehend the vendor. The prosecution further highlighted another Arms Act case against Aarish, describing him as a 'habitual offender', and feared that granting bail could impede the ongoing investigation and the arrest of other accomplices. In its order, the court emphasised that custodial interrogation of the applicant/accused in the present case assumes significance for proper investigation and discovery of facts. Given the serious nature of the allegations and the offence, the court concluded that Aarish did not merit pre-arrest bail, thereby dismissing his application. The charges levelled against Aarish include Section 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), 3(5) (acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention), 109(1) (attempt to murder), 121(1) (voluntarily causing hurt to a public servant), 132 (assault or criminal force to deter a public servant from duty), 221 (obstructing a public servant), 61(2) (criminal conspiracy), and 111(4) (being a member of an organised crime syndicate).
Time of India
09-06-2025
- Business
- Time of India
Manesar land scam: Court to rule on charges against 3 more accused
Panchkula: In a significant development in the Manesar land scam, a special CBI court has opted to first decide on framing charges against three more people before consolidating the chargesheet against former Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda and 30 others. Special CBI Judge Rajiv Goyal made the ruling last Friday, following the Punjab and Haryana high court's vacation of a stay on proceedings. The three individuals facing potential charges are former IAS officer D R Dhingra and private persons Dhare Singh and Kulwant Singh Lamba. The court has scheduled July 10 for resumed arguments regarding the chargesheet against this trio. The extensive case implicates former CM Hooda, his three ex-principal secretaries – Murari Lal Tayal (also facing another trial), S S Dhillon, and Chhattar Singh – as well as various companies and their office bearers involved in the controversial land transactions. The Supreme Court has stayed proceedings against another accused bureaucrat, Rajiv Arora, who was named in the initial chargesheet. The scam revolves around 914 acres of land in Manesar, Gurugram district, originally slated for acquisition to develop an Industrial Model Township (IMT). Following the Aug 2004 notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, a rush to acquire land at low prices ensued. Builders and land mafia reportedly capitalised on residents' panic, acquiring plots at "throwaway rates". Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo In 2007, the industrial department released the land from the acquisition process. Allegations of political patronage in the builder-official-land mafia nexus led aggrieved parties to court. Ultimately, the Supreme Court directed the CBI to probe the matter, leading to the chargesheet naming former CM Hooda. MSID:: 121731795 413 |
Time of India
08-06-2025
- Lifestyle
- Time of India
Most aspirants flock to Delhi for UPSC preparation, but this 21-year-old did the exact opposite and bagged AIR 61 in first attempt
"I Had to Sit With Myself First" No Coaching, No Pressure - Just Focus From Panchkula to SRCC to Civil Services You Might Also Like: How Virat Kohli's discipline inspired a 22-year-old to crack UPSC with AIR 3 in her first attempt You Might Also Like: What are the odds? Four UPSC 2025 rank holders come from the same DU college, same department and from consecutive batches While lakhs of UPSC aspirants rush to Delhi's Mukherjee Nagar every year in search of coaching centres, shared flats, and hope, 21-year-old Aastha Singh made the bold choice to walk away from the chaos. The result? A stunning All India Rank (AIR) 61 in her very first attempt at the UPSC Civil Services Examination 2024 — without the help of any coaching story flips the script on what it means to chase the civil services dream in India. In an interview with Careerwill App, the Panchkula-born topper revealed that it wasn't the crowded classrooms or peer pressure of Delhi that helped her but a quiet decision to prepare from the comfort and clarity of her asked how she achieved what many fail to do even after years of attempts during an interview with Careerwill App, Aastha's answer was simple yet profound. 'The most important thing I did was to sit with myself and understand who I really am,' she said. She undertook a personal SWOT analysis — studying her own strengths and weaknesses with studied Economics at Delhi University's prestigious Shri Ram College of Commerce (SRCC), Aastha knew the city's distractions well. 'If I stayed in Delhi, I would spend too much time managing laundry, food, or even floods. It would be hard to maintain my mental sanity,' she said, reflecting on the little stressors that add so, instead of staying in the so-called UPSC capital, Aastha returned home, saving time, money, and peace of mind — all while building the discipline required to made another strategic move: skipping the traditional foundation courses. 'I realised I could cover the syllabus faster by tailoring my own study methods,' she shared. With no dependency on coaching centres or batchmates, her preparation was self-paced and sharply focused — helping her complete the syllabus within a year and attempt the exam with full before her UPSC result was announced, Aastha had already proved her mettle. She cleared the Haryana Public Service Commission (HPSC) exam in the same year, securing Rank 31 and serving briefly as an Additional Excise and Taxation Officer (AETO) with the Haryana Government. It was clear that her strategy worked — and and raised in Panchkula, Haryana, Aastha has been a top-performing student since her school days. With her father Brijesh Singh serving as Quality Head at a pharmaceutical company, and family roots in Jaunpur district of Uttar Pradesh, Aastha's upbringing was steeped in discipline and completing her schooling in Panchkula with Commerce, she chose to major in Economics at SRCC. While most of her peers focused on corporate placements or higher studies abroad, Aastha felt a deep pull toward the civil services — a dream she began nurturing even before rank may have made headlines, but Aastha's vision for her IAS career is rooted in ground realities. According to an interview with Zee News, she expresses a strong desire to work for women's empowerment and tackle structural issues that affect marginalised the biggest success stories are written not in crowded libraries, but in quiet rooms with deep self-awareness and discipline. At just 21, she has proved that the path to UPSC success doesn't have to follow the herd. Sometimes, taking a step back is the fastest way forward.
Time of India
07-06-2025
- General
- Time of India
HPSC admit card 2025 for Assistant Professor Screening Test in English and Geography released on hpsc.gov.in
HPSC releases screening test admit card for Assistant Professor posts in English and Geography HPSC admit card 2025: The Haryana Public Service Commission (HPSC), Panchkula, has issued the admit cards for the upcoming Screening Test for Assistant Professor (College Cadre) posts in the subjects of English and Geography. The examination is scheduled to take place on 8 June 2025. Candidates who applied for these posts are advised to download their admit cards at the earliest to avoid last-minute difficulties. The admit card is a mandatory document for all candidates and must be presented at the examination centre. It contains essential information such as the exam date, reporting time, venue, and instructions for the test day. Steps to Download the HPSC Admit Card 2025 Candidates can follow these simple steps to download their Screening Test admit card from the official HPSC website: Step 1: Visit the official Haryana Public Service Commission website at Step 2: On the homepage, look for the section titled 'Latest Updates' or 'Important Links.' Step 3: Click on the link labelled 'Download Screening Test Admit Card for Assistant Professor (English & Geography) – June 8, 2025.' Step 4: Enter your registration number and date of birth in the respective fields. Step 5: Submit the details, after which the admit card will appear on your screen. Step 6: Download and print the admit card for use on the day of the examination. Direct link to download the HPSC admit card for Assistant Professor screening test 2025 Candidates should carefully verify the details on the admit card and report any discrepancies to the HPSC authorities immediately. It is recommended to carry a valid photo ID proof along with the admit card to the exam centre. For the latest updates and notifications, candidates are encouraged to regularly check the official HPSC website. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
