Latest news with #Post-Assad
See - Sada Elbalad
20-07-2025
- Politics
- See - Sada Elbalad
Israel's Expanding Footprint: From Gaza to Suwayda : A Strategy of Sectarian Division and Strategic Dominance
Monica William Recently, the Middle East has witnessed a dangerous escalation in Israeli military actions, most notably in Syria's Suwayda province and the Gaza Strip. These seemingly distinct flashpoints are deeply interconnected, reflecting a broader Israeli strategy aimed at reshaping the regional order along sectarian and ethnic lines to solidify long-term strategic dominance. Post-Assad developments reveal a sensitive phase in which Israeli security calculations overlap with Syrian political transformations. Despite the pretext of security concerns, Israeli military intervention threatens to ignite a wider conflict and complicate the chances for stability, especially with the entry of Turkey and perhaps other countries on the front line. Suwayda, a predominantly Druze province in southern Syria, has become the epicenter of a new internal conflict between local Druze militias and Sunni Bedouin tribes. Following clashes sparked by a personal incident, the Syrian government deployed forces to stabilize the area. This move, however, was swiftly met with Israeli airstrikes, with Prime Minister Netanyahu declaring that Israel would not tolerate the presence of any 'Islamist-oriented' government forces in Suwayda. the Israeli airstrikes targeting Syrian military positions near Suwayda and even in Damascus appear to be in response to immediate security concerns namely, Israel's stated intention to 'protect the Druze community' in Syria from both government forces and militias. But beneath the rhetoric lies a deeper political calculus. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu framed the strikes as a moral necessity to protect the Druze community in Suwayda from the encroachment of a radical Syrian administration, which can be seen as a Humanitarian Cover for Strategic influence. His language was deliberate, evoking memories of October 7th in Gaza and presenting the Druze crisis as a mirror image. But analysts and regional actors saw a different picture: one in which Israel was not merely responding to violence but actively shaping Syria's post-war map. Yet Netanyahu's government appears unmoved. In fact, some Israeli commentators suggest the strikes are designed not just to 'protect' the Druze but to provoke Syria into overreaction, justifying deeper Israeli entrenchment in the south. Meanwhile, the Syrian government's partial withdrawal from Suwayda under the terms of a fragile ceasefire raises questions: was this a retreat in the face of Israeli pressure, or a tactical pause in a broader struggle for sovereignty? This also raises a critical question: Why is Israel becoming entangled in the unrest in Suwayda, a province whose Druze population makes up just 3% of Syria's total? The reasons behind Israel's involvement seems to depend on three main objectives. First, to prevent Syrian government forces from reestablishing a firm presence in Suwayda and across southern Syria areas considered critical due to their proximity to the Israeli border. Second, to strengthen Syria's Druze community as a potential ally or buffer zone against Iranian-backed militias and other hostile factions operating near Israel's northern frontier. Third, to respond to domestic political pressure from Israel's own Druze minority, which has called on the government to act in defense of their Syrian kin. These motivations combine strategic calculations with identity politics, illustrating how Israel's regional interventions often serve multiple overlapping agendas. Then, what's happening in Suwayda cannot be seen in isolation. At the same time, Gaza remains under siege, with its infrastructure devastated, its leadership fragmented, and its people trapped in cycles of war and temporary ceasefires. The connection between these fronts lies not in shared borders but in shared Israeli strategy: weaken unified national identities, empower local actors with specific sectarian loyalties, and maintain a fractured region incapable of coordinated resistance. Hence, political logic is simple: a fragmented enemy cannot pose an existential threat. For instance, in Syria, this strategy translates into supporting or at least tolerating Druze autonomy even as it undermines the central government. In Gaza, it involves ensuring Hamas remains isolated from the Palestinian Authority. What Israel is executing is not merely military doctrine , it is the unfolding of a broader geopolitical project. Echoing the 1980 Bernard Lewis plan, which envisioned the fragmentation of the Middle East along sectarian and ethnic lines, this strategy seeks to redraw the region not through diplomacy, but through targeted airstrikes, calculated proxy alliances, and the deliberate weakening of central states. Its logic thrives on sustained instability creating minority enclaves, autonomous zones, and national capitals too fractured to assert real sovereignty or regional influence. Yet such fragmentation rarely ends in peace. It creates vacuums, invites radicalization, and punishes civilian populations trapped between competing agendas. As in Iraq and Libya, internal conflict brings not stability but collapse. Already, signs of this are visible: tensions between Druze leaders, Sunni backlash in nearby provinces, and international scrutiny of Israeli motives. Briefly , From Suwayda's embattled hills to Gaza's shattered neighborhoods, Israel's expanding influence is reshaping the regional chessboard. But it is a dangerous game. In seeking to divide and dominate, Israel may indeed secure tactical victories. Yet the long-term consequences which include regional chaos, diplomatic isolation, and moral erosion could outweigh the gains. What the region needs is not another airstrike, but a coherent vision one grounded in respect for sovereignty, inclusive dialogue, and a shared framework for collective security. Without this, the cycle of violence will persist, and the map of the Middle East will continue to be not merely redrawn, but burned into fragments by the division and fear. read more Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why? Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria? Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits? Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election? Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed? Opinion & Analysis Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers Opinion & Analysis Analysis: What Happens After Brexit? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra! News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Sports Get to Know 2025 WWE Evolution Results News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks
Morocco World
17-05-2025
- Politics
- Morocco World
Morocco to Reopen Embassy in Syria After 13-Year Closure
Rabat — In a significant diplomatic move, King Mohammed VI announced the reopening of Morocco's embassy in Damascus, which had been closed since 2012. Reopening the country's embassy in Syria, after a nearly 13-year closure due to fundamental disagreements with the Assad regime, is a step that 'will open broader perspectives in the historical relations between our two countries and our two peoples,' the King explained. Amid the Middle Eastern transitional phase, King Mohammed VI's decision to reopen the embassy reflects Morocco's support for promising reconciliation processes that would contribute to peace and stability in the region. The decision is also aimed at helping Syria rebound from the civil war that devastated most of the country. In his speech to the 34th Arab Summit, held today in Baghdad, the King also reaffirmed the country's 'unwavering historical position' on Syria. He expressed support for 'the Syrian brotherly people in their quest for freedom, security, and stability' while stressing the importance of preserving Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity. As countries continue to reconsider their Syria policies, Morocco has been following the developments in the war-torn country. In February, Bourita said that Morocco was 'closely following the developments in Syria.' Read also: A New Page for Syria's Post-Assad Era: al-Sharaa Forms Inclusive Cabinet Following Syria's rebel coalition, led by the Sunni Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the overthrow of the Assad regime on December 8, 2024, the North African country has been hoping for positive developments in the country. Days after the rebel coalition took over Damascus, marking Syria's freedom from a 50-year dictatorship, Morocco and Syria's transitional government had reportedly already started discussing the reopening of the Moroccan embassy. Today, Rabat confirmed the reports in a move to contribute to the transitional phase in Syria, which is rebounding from the devastating civil war that damaged the country's economy, infrastructure, and people. The over ten-year civil war broke out in Syria following the pro-democracy protests that took place all over the country in 2011, calling for respect of human rights and meeting people's needs. The intervention of internal power dynamics, regional influences, and international involvement exacerbated the long war in Syria, resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths and displacing millions. Tags: Morocco SyriaMorocco-Syria relationsMorocco's embassy in SyriaSyria
