Latest news with #PremierePro
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Metadata From the "Raw" Epstein Video Shows Something Extremely Sketchy
When reviewing the metadata on newly-released "full raw" security camera footage from outside the cell where billionaire sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein spent his last day alive, experts found something very odd: that it appears to have been manipulated. As Wired reports, the allegedly "raw" video that the Justice Department just released — in tandem with the repeated claim that Epstein died by suicide, and a bizarre insistence that he did not have a "client list" — may add fuel to the conspiracy fire surrounding his death. The 11-hour "full raw" surveillance video from the night Epstein died in New York's Metropolitan Correctional Center back in 2019 is, notably, missing the key minute where the notorious financier purportedly killed himself. In the footage that was just released, there is no evidence that anyone entered or exited the cell where he died. After Wired reporters and independent experts reviewed its metadata, however, a more complicated story emerged: that the video appears to have been modified from its initial form, likely using Adobe's Premiere Pro video editing software. Specifically, those experts tell Wired that the DOJ's "full raw" video from Epstein's last half-day alive seems to have been assembled from two separate clips, and the whole file itself was saved multiple times before being exported and uploaded to the DOJ website. As sketchy as those metadata modifications may be, Wired cautions that there's nothing contained within them to prove that the video was manipulated maliciously. But that's unlikely to stop certain conspiracy theorists from growing even more skeptical. Take, for instance, Dan Bongino, the former Fox News talking head and longtime Epstein conspiracist who now serves as the deputy director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Earlier this week, NBC reported based on insider sources that Bongino is "out of control furious" and threatening to resign from his post and "torch" attorney general Pam Bondi over the way the DOJ has handled the case. To be fair, those conspiracists have quite a lot to work with. Trump himself purportedly had a deep friendship with Epstein, who back in 2002 he called a "terrific guy" who "likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." The two were photographed partying with at his Mar-a-Lago mansion in 2000. As the icing on the cake, Trump was also named in formerly-redacted files about the billionaire pedophile that a judge unsealed last year. There's also a glaring question of hypocrisy. Trump repeatedly vowed on the campaign trail last year to declassify the so-called "Epstein Files," but has since taken to stridently defending Bondi and the DOJ's claims since the jail cell footage was released. "Whatever your flavor of Epstein conspiracy is, the video will help bolster it," explained extremism researcher Mike Rothschild when speaking to the magazine. According to Hany Farid, a digital forensics and misinformation researcher at the University of California, Berkeley who reviewed the footage for Wired, the apparent changes also open the DOJ up to new questions and potential legal implications. As Farid told the website, the video's seemingly manipulated metadata suggests problems with its chain of custody — the complex evidence-handling procedures that law enforcement are required by law to painstakingly document. "If a lawyer brought me this file and asked if it was suitable for court, I'd say no. Go back to the source. Do it right," the forensic expert said. "Do a direct export from the original system — no monkey business." Thus far, neither Donald Trump's administration nor attorney general Pam Bondi, who oversaw the Epstein footage investigation, have responded directly to the concerns raised by Wired's reporting. In a tweet about the article, however, Hawaii senator Brian Schatz flagged the strangeness of the allegations. "I am probably among the least conspiracy minded people you would ever meet," the Hawaii Democrat wrote, "but this is getting pretty nearly impossible to explain." More on Trump: We're Speechless at Who Trump Just Appointed Head of NASA
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Epstein Files: Was the US DOJ's Jeffrey Epstein prison cell video edited or tampered with? Technical details explained
The US Justice Department this week released over 11 hours of surveillance footage from the hallway outside Jeffrey Epstein's prison cell, taken the night before he was found dead. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It was meant to settle once and for all the long-running rumours that Epstein didn't die by suicide. But instead of putting the theories to rest, the release has only added fuel to the fire. Why? Because despite the Department calling it 'full raw footage,' a deeper look into the file's metadata reveals something else entirely. The video was processed through editing software, exported years after the event, and contains signs that it was stitched together. That doesn't mean it was faked—but it does mean it wasn't truly 'raw.' What the Video Shows The footage comes from a single hallway camera mounted outside Epstein's cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The video begins at 8:00 PM on August 9, 2019, and runs until around 7:00 AM the next morning. Over the course of 11 hours, you see staff passing by, routine movements, and long stretches of nothing happening. There's nothing dramatic. No obvious foul play. No shadowy figures entering the cell. Just grainy footage of a poorly lit corridor. So what's the problem? The Metadata Tells a Different Story Behind every digital file is metadata—a layer of hidden technical information that records when a file was created, how it was processed, and what software touched it. Experts examining this file found several red flags: 1. It Was Edited in Premiere Pro The file's metadata shows it was processed using Adobe Premiere Pro, a popular video editing programme. This alone means the video isn't 'raw.' Raw footage comes straight from the source—uncompressed and untouched by editing software. 2. Export Date Is From 2025 The metadata says the video was exported on July 4, 2025—almost six years after the footage was recorded. That's just days before the DOJ released it to the public. This shows that someone went into the original files, reassembled or converted them, and saved a new version before sharing it. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 3. Timecodes Have Gaps When analysts looked closer at the timecode (the internal clock embedded in video), they saw inconsistencies. Some segments had slight breaks or resets. That suggests the video may have been stitched together from several files, which could happen if the original recording was split into chunks—or if something was removed. 4. No Watermark or Camera ID Prison security footage usually contains watermarks or camera IDs burned into the video to prove authenticity and prevent tampering. This video has none. That makes it impossible to verify whether all frames are present or if the footage is in its original format. What the DOJ Says Officials have insisted the footage is complete. Speaking to WIRED, a senior DOJ source said: 'This isn't about hiding anything. The original recordings were in a proprietary prison system that had to be converted to a playable format. The video content was not altered, but yes, it was processed to make it public-friendly.' That explanation is technically plausible—but it doesn't match the language used in DOJ press statements. Calling it 'raw' when it was clearly re-exported and possibly reassembled is misleading. In a case with such intense public scrutiny, precision matters. Why It Fuels More Suspicion Jeffrey Epstein's death in 2019 has always been viewed with scepticism. A billionaire with connections to princes, presidents, and CEOs. A sex offender in a high-security federal facility. Guards who fell asleep. Two cameras that malfunctioned. A cellmate mysteriously transferred just hours before. In this context, releasing video that appears to be edited—no matter how innocently—will always raise eyebrows. Even former Trump allies are frustrated. FBI Director Kash Patel, who once led investigations into Epstein's network, has reportedly clashed with Attorney General Pam Bondi over the lack of transparency. Patel initially claimed there would be a 'client list' or further disclosures. Instead, the DOJ's July 7 memo confirmed Epstein died by suicide and stated no such list exists. Bondi, under pressure, released the hallway footage hoping it would calm the storm. But releasing a file with visible editing markers without fully explaining the technical steps taken has done the opposite. Final Thoughts There's no evidence—at least not yet—that the footage was intentionally manipulated to hide wrongdoing. But calling something 'raw' when it clearly isn't only makes things worse. In the digital age, truth is as much about how information is shared as what it contains. If the DOJ wants to rebuild trust, it must go beyond vague assurances. That means releasing the full unprocessed files, explaining every step of the video conversion process, and allowing independent forensic experts to review the source material. Until then, the question will remain unanswered—not just 'what happened to Jeffrey Epstein?' but 'why can't the government get the story straight?'
Edinburgh Reporter
4 days ago
- Business
- Edinburgh Reporter
Adobe Licensing Explained for Enterprise IT Managers
For enterprise IT managers, managing software licences is more than just a purchasing decision—it's a critical responsibility that impacts productivity, security, and budget efficiency. Among the many tools used across large organisations, Adobe Creative Cloud remains a staple, powering design, marketing, content creation, and document workflows. But unlike traditional one-time software purchases, Adobe's licensing model has evolved significantly in recent years, moving to a subscription-based approach with multiple plans and features tailored for business environments. Understanding the ins and outs of Adobe licensing is essential for IT managers looking to streamline procurement, ensure compliance, and support team collaboration effectively. That's where expert partners like Adepteq come in—offering strategic guidance and ongoing support to help enterprises optimise their Adobe software investment. Photo by Emily Bernal on Unsplash Why Adobe Licensing Matters More Than Ever Adobe's suite of applications—including Photoshop, Illustrator, Premiere Pro, Acrobat Pro, and InDesign—is mission-critical for many departments, especially creative, marketing, design, and communications teams. However, managing these tools at scale is no small task. Here's why licensing decisions matter: Cost Control: Subscribing to unnecessary apps or maintaining unused licences leads to waste. Compliance: Incorrect deployment or licence sharing violates Adobe's terms and can result in audits or penalties. Security: Proper licence management ensures only authorised users access sensitive creative assets and documents. Scalability: As teams grow, projects evolve, or new regions are added, flexible licensing keeps software delivery seamless and compliant. Types of Adobe Licensing Available Adobe offers several licensing models, each designed for different types of users and organisations. Understanding the differences is key to making the right choice. 1. Individual Licensing (Not Recommended for Enterprises) This is the standard Adobe Creative Cloud plan targeted at freelancers or single users. Licences are tied to personal Adobe IDs and are not manageable by IT administrators. This model is not suitable for organisations due to: Lack of centralised user control No volume discounting No admin dashboard for provisioning 2. Creative Cloud for Teams Creative Cloud for Teams is Adobe's entry-level business offering, ideal for small to mid-sized businesses. Each licence is still assigned to an individual user, but IT admins gain access to a centralised Admin Console. Key Features: Per-user licence management Immediate licence reassignment Shared cloud storage (1 TB per user) Admin Console for tracking usage Basic support included Best For: Marketing departments, design agencies, or creative teams with fewer than 50 users. 3. Creative Cloud for Enterprise (CCE) This is Adobe's most advanced offering, built for large organisations requiring secure, scalable, and flexible access to Adobe tools across multiple departments or regions. Key Features: SSO integration with enterprise identity providers Admin Console with granular control Centralised deployment via named or shared device licences Advanced 24/7 enterprise support Usage analytics and activity logs Compliance tools and eDiscovery Best For: IT departments managing licences across multiple business units, campuses, or global offices. 4. Adobe Acrobat Enterprise Licensing For companies whose primary need is document management—signatures, PDFs, forms, and workflows—Adobe offers standalone enterprise plans for Acrobat Pro. Ideal Use Cases: Legal and compliance departments HR and finance teams handling contracts and forms Organisations standardising digital workflows Adobe Acrobat plans can be purchased individually or bundled into Creative Cloud for Teams or Enterprise. Device vs User Licensing Adobe offers two primary deployment methods: Named User Licensing: Licences are assigned to a specific person with an Adobe ID. Ideal for employees who require access across multiple devices. Shared Device Licensing: Licences are tied to machines instead of individuals. Best suited for shared labs or studios, such as educational institutions or video editing suites. Enterprise IT managers must assess their deployment environments carefully to determine which licensing type aligns best with their use case. Top Licensing Features IT Managers Should Understand 1. Admin Console Both Teams and Enterprise plans offer access to the Admin Console—a web-based interface where IT admins can: Add or remove users Assign or reassign licences instantly Monitor usage Set permission controls Access support resources The Admin Console simplifies central management and improves governance. 2. Single Sign-On (SSO) Available on enterprise plans, SSO allows users to log in using their corporate credentials. This improves security and user experience by eliminating the need for separate Adobe IDs and passwords. 3. Federated IDs With enterprise licencing, IT managers can control Adobe access via federated identities linked to Azure AD, Okta, or other identity providers. You maintain control over user accounts even after an employee leaves. 4. Advanced Security and Compliance Enterprise agreements include: Region-specific data hosting Encrypted data transmission Role-based access control Audit trails and logs This level of control is vital for industries with strict data protection regulations. 5. Enterprise Support and Onboarding Adobe Enterprise customers benefit from: 24/7 technical support Dedicated onboarding specialists Migration assistance Admin training With partners like Adepteq facilitating onboarding, your IT team can focus on strategic projects while experts manage deployment. Cost Considerations and Licensing Strategy Adobe doesn't offer a one-size-fits-all pricing model for enterprise customers. Instead, licences are negotiated under the Value Incentive Plan (VIP) or Enterprise Term Licensing Agreement (ETLA). VIP (Value Incentive Plan) Flexible annual subscription Volume discounts based on user count Automatic renewal options Scalable licensing ETLA (Enterprise Term Licensing Agreement) Custom 3-year agreement Predictable annual costs Locked pricing and terms Strategic support and customisation options When choosing between VIP and ETLA, consider user volume, budget predictability, and growth trajectory. Adepteq can help you analyse these factors and choose the best route. Common Adobe Licensing Mistakes IT Managers Should Avoid Using personal accounts for business licences This causes loss of control and creates risk when employees leave. Underestimating licence needs Many teams forget to include contract staff or third-party collaborators. Over-licensing inactive users Without regular audits, companies often pay for licences no one uses. Purchasing through consumer channels Buying via Adobe's retail website may lead to higher costs and lack of enterprise features. Ignoring support and compliance tools Enterprise plans offer valuable extras that improve ROI—don't overlook them. How Adepteq Simplifies Adobe Licensing for Enterprises As a trusted UK-based Microsoft and software solutions partner, Adepteq helps enterprises optimise their Adobe licensing strategy through: Needs assessment and licensing consultation Understand which departments need which tools and how often. Procurement and volume pricing Access Adobe's business and enterprise discounts through authorised channels. Deployment and user management Configure user groups, assign licences, and integrate SSO with ease. Ongoing support Their experts assist with renewals, troubleshooting, and user education. Audit preparation Avoid fines and disruptions by ensuring full compliance with Adobe terms. Adepteq's knowledge of both Microsoft and Adobe licensing ensures you can consolidate your software procurement under one strategic partner, saving time, cost, and complexity. Final Thoughts For enterprise IT managers, understanding Adobe licensing is critical to maintaining operational control, staying compliant, and maximising the value of creative and productivity tools. From Creative Cloud to Acrobat Pro, Adobe offers flexible solutions for organisations of all sizes—but without proper planning, it's easy to overspend or expose your business to risk. Whether you're deploying tools to a creative department, enabling secure document workflows, or managing licences across global teams, working with an expert partner like Adepteq ensures your Adobe licensing strategy is tailored, efficient, and future-proof. Like this: Like Related
The Hindu
16-06-2025
- Business
- The Hindu
Adobe shares slide as investors skeptical of quicker AI-adoption returns
Adobe's shares dropped 7% in early trading on Friday as investors' concern that the company's AI adoption into its software tools could take longer to fetch returns, overshadowed a raised annual revenue forecast. "(We see) increasing concerns surrounding competitive pressures and a longer time horizon to reach notable AI monetization," said Angelo Zino, senior equity analyst at CFRA Research. The San Jose, California-based creative software veteran is relied on by creatives for its tools including Photoshop and Premiere Pro. The company said in April that it would add AI models from OpenAI and Google to Firefly, its generative AI tool. The tool allows users to create and edit images and videos for commercial purposes through basic text prompts without facing copyright challenges. "While guidance was raised and management remains positive around demand generation, it feels like it will take more time to prove out these (AI) initiatives and quiet concerns of competition around GenAI," RBC analysts said in a note. Adobe now expects full-year 2025 revenue between $23.50 billion and $23.60 billion, up from its prior estimates of $23.30 billion to $23.55 billion. At least five brokerages cut their price target on the Adobe stock following the second-quarter results. Including session's losses, the stock has fallen around 13% so far this year. The company's 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio stands at 18.88, compared with Autodesk's 29.16.
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Adobe shares fall, investors skeptical of quicker AI-adoption returns
STORY: Shares of Adobe dropped as much as 7% Friday on concerns over when the software company will start seeing a boost to its business from new artificial intelligence features. That overshadowed its higher annual revenue forecast, which sent shares up after it reported results late Thursday. An analyst from CFRA Research said, "(We see) increasing concerns surrounding competitive pressures and a longer time horizon to reach notable AI monetization.' The maker of Photoshop and Premiere Pro video editing software said in April that it would add AI models from OpenAI and Google to its generative AI tool. The tool - called Firefly - allows users to create and edit images and videos for commercial purposes through basic text prompts without facing copyright challenges Analysts from RBC said in a note that 'it feels like it will take more time to prove out these (AI) initiatives and quiet concerns of competition around GenAI.' At least five brokerages cut their price target on Adobe's stock following the second-quarter results. Shares have dropped about 12% so far in 2025. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
