Latest news with #ProbationofOffendersAct
Hindustan Times
6 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Yupia court sentences man to life for rape and robbery in 2016 case
Itanagar: The district and sessions court in Arunachal Pradesh's Yupia has sentenced a 44-year-old man to life imprisonment for raping a woman and robbing her of ₹ 35,000 in 2016, and said that the severity of the crime and the convict's past criminal record left no room for leniency (Representative photo) Sessions judge Hirendra Kashyap on Thursday awarded life sentence to Aftab Sheikh, a resident of Ambiri Village in Assam's Sonitpur district, along with a fine of ₹ 20,000. The court was hearing a 2016 case in which Sheikh allegedly offered a lift to the woman at night and took her to an isolated location, where he raped her and attempted to orchestrate a gang-rape by summoning an accomplice. The attempt was foiled after the woman's family members arrived at the spot. Before fleeing the scene, Sheikh reportedly robbed the victim of ₹ 35,000 — her earnings from selling traditional ornaments that day. Rejecting the defence plea for leniency on the grounds of his wife's ill health, the court said that the convict's conduct demonstrated 'involvement in organised crime' and a tendency to 'change identity to mislead investigations.' Sheikh was absconding during trial proceedings in the current case and was arrested after repeated non-bailable warrants were issued. The court said that Sheikh, who also went by the alias Aryan Sharma, was acquitted in a separate bike theft case only on benefit of doubt due to lack of CCTV evidence. He was also found involved in another pending sessions case related to alleged conspiracy for a bank robbery. 'The conduct of the convict does not inspire this court for any leniency in sentencing,' the judge observed, ruling out any relief under Section 360 Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) or the Probation of Offenders Act. The court also ordered that the period of nearly 3 years and 11 months already spent in custody during investigation and trial be set off from the sentence under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). Additionally, the case has been referred to the district legal services authority for providing compensation to the woman under the Arunachal Pradesh Victim Compensation Scheme, 2011.
Sunday World
13-06-2025
- Sunday World
Insurance man spared jail after triggering smoke alarm on Ryanair flight to Dublin
Garda Sandip Shrestha said he charged the accused with offensive behaviour on the fight and setting off the smoke alarm, and the accused replied, 'You are chatting s**t' An insurance broker who triggered a smoke alarm on a London Stansted – Dublin flight after aggressively ignoring cabin crew just before take-off has been spared jail and a criminal record. Father of two, William Horn, 29, of Stone Rings Lane, Harrowgate, England, pleaded guilty on June 2 to charges under the Air Navigation and Transport Act following his arrest the previous day at Terminal 1, Dublin Airport. Judge John Brennan had said that if Horn donated €500 to a Dublin charity which has assisted people affected by homelessness and addiction, he would be spared a criminal record. The judge warned that failure to pay would result in recorded convictions and fines totalling €800. William Horn. Photo: Tom Tuite Horn was released on €300 bail and excused from attending when the case resumed today. Judge John King noted his colleague's order and was shown a receipt of payment by defence solicitor Edward Bradbury. He applied the Probation of Offenders Act. Earlier, airport-based Garda Sandip Shrestha said he charged the accused with offensive behaviour on the Ryanair flight and setting off the smoke alarm, and the accused replied, 'You are chatting s**t'. Judge John Brennan heard that Horn came to Ireland for a birthday party which he missed by being held for the night in Garda custody before his court hearing. William Horn. Photo: Tom Tuite Today's News in 90 Seconds - June 13 2025 Garda Shreshta said on June 1, he received a call from cabin crew about 'a disruptive passenger' on the flight. Garda Shreshta learned that Horn was in the toilet, and 'a plume of smoke set off the smoke alarm inside the plane'. The captain also confirmed to the garda that the alarm was also activated in the cockpit. Judge Brennan heard that it started in Stansted when the aircraft was taxiing to the runway. The seatbelts signs were activated but Horn 'ignored the cabin crew's instructions and went to the toilet, and walked by the cabin crew in an aggressive manner'. Defence solicitor Edward Bradbury told the court his client, who remained silent during the hearing, was pleading guilty and from his perspective, it had been 'somewhat an ordeal and in his own mind a misunderstanding'. The garda agreed with Mr Bradbury that the aircraft was about to take off when Horn decided to go to the toilet. The accused had no prior convictions in Ireland. Mr Bradbury said his client has been 'chastened' by this ordeal. The court heard there was no evidence of intoxication, and Horn insisted he was not smoking in the toilet. However, the solicitor acknowledged that, at the very least, the issue had a smattering of recklessness all over it. The solicitor said it happened when the aircraft was taxiing for take-off, which was aggravating circumstances for the flight attendants. Judge Brennan had said it happened in a confined environment where people were vulnerable, but on the scale of these offences, it ranked at the lower end.
The Hindu
10-06-2025
- Politics
- The Hindu
Probation must be pillar of juvenile justice, say experts
Recognising probation as a cornerstone of child rehabilitation was the central message of the first-ever national consultation on 'Strengthening Probation in the Juvenile Justice System in India,' held recently at the capital. Organised jointly by the Resource Cell for Juvenile Justice (RCJJ), a field action project of Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), and the Department of Social Work, University of Delhi, the event brought together key stakeholders from across 20 States and one union territory. Delivering the keynote address, retired Supreme Court judge and Chairperson of the UN Internal Justice Council, Justice Madan B. Lokur, lamented the neglect of probation in India's juvenile justice system. Justice Lokur said his first contact with probation officers took place in early 2000's in Canada where he had gone for judicial education programme for two weeks. He found that every probation officer there handled 30-35 probationers. He said, in India, probation had not been given the importance it should have been given and that the Probation of Offenders Act had not been properly implemented. He commented on the understaffing in the Indian juvenile justice system, where one probation officer is responsible for 150-500 children. Bharat Parashar, Member Secretary, National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) said the system should give every child a second chance, and it should not re-traumatise them. He said NALSA was committed to this cause, and the Probation Officer could go a long way in mentoring children. Held as a satellite event to the recently concluded 5th World Congress on Justice with Children, the consultation saw active participation from principal magistrate, Juvenile Justice Boards (JJB), social work members on the JJB, probation officers, legal-cum-probation officers, deputed government officers, civil society organisations, academicians, research scholars, and a few independent lawyers. Over two days, panel discussions explored the socio-legal dimensions of juvenile justice. The sessions emphasised, 'the need for probation to be acknowledged as a pillar of rehabilitation for children in conflict with the law and strengthen it by looking at concerns like the ratio between probation and probationers, skill sets, and training required'. Prof. Bipin Jojo, Dean, School of Social Work, TISS, spoke about how the legal structure of probation in India was developed at TISS in the early 1950s, and from then to now, TISS had been committed to pioneering the cause of strengthening probation in India. Prof. Sanjoy Roy, Head, Department of Social Work, DU, emphasised that the collaboration of TISS and the Department of Social Work, DU is also historic as it has been the first time that the two colleges of social work have come together and organised this national consultation on strengthening probation.
Irish Examiner
06-06-2025
- Irish Examiner
Cork judge 'gobsmacked' at appeal by man convicted of attacking his ex in front of their children
A middle-aged man violently attacked his ex-partner in her bedroom as their two infant children tried struggled to protect her. Judge Sinead Behan said she was "gobsmacked" at Cork Circuit Appeals Court to hear that the man was hoping for a dismissal under the Probation of Offenders Act in his appeal of the five-month sentence imposed on him at the district court. After adjourning the case for further information on how matters had progressed since this occurred over two years ago, Judge Behan said that she would suspend the five-month jail term on condition that he would keep the peace for the next two years. He was also required to pay €500 compensation to his former partner for the assault. The judge warned him that if there was any further difficulty in the two-year period of the suspension then he would serve the five months in jail. Sergeant John Kelleher confirmed – after speaking to the victim of the case – that there had been no further assault since the violent incident occurred at around 11.30pm on March 18, 2023, when the woman's ex-partner entered her home and came into her bedroom. The sergeant described that incident: 'He started poking and punching her a number of times in the ribs. She briefly lost consciousness.' Her two infant children intervened and tried to protect their mother from this attack. 'They were trying to stop the assault,' the sergeant said. Eventually, she managed to break free from her ex-partner but he followed her down the stairs, pulled her by the hair to the floor and he then left the house. The injured party contacted her friend and ultimately the gardaí were alerted. Barrister Alan O'Dwyer appealed the case on behalf of the accused at Cork Circuit Appeals Court. 'It was very out of character for him. He and his former partner have a civil relationship now and they get on with each other. It is no excuse but he was drinking heavily on the night. "They are not living in the same house now. 'He has apologised to his former partner. He has apologised to his children,' Mr O'Dwyer said. Sgt Kelleher said the victim told him that she got a garbled text from her ex-partner the day after this occurred but she did not regard it as an apology. - If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this article, please click here for a list of support services.
Time of India
05-06-2025
- Time of India
Man convicted for causing death of pillion rider in 2018 case
Bhubaneswar, May 28 (IANS) The additional district and sessions judge (ADJ) court in Patnagarh, Balangir district of Odisha, on Wednesday pronounced the judgment in the sensational parcel bomb case in which a newlywed software engineer, Soumya Sekhar Sahu and his 85-year-old great-aunt, Jemamani Sahu died on February 23, 2018. Panaji: A North Goa court convicted a man in a 2018 case of rash and negligent riding that caused the death of the pillion rider. He was also fined Rs 10,000. The court, however, gave him the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act and allowed him to be released upon entering into a bond for a year and, in the meantime, maintain peace and good behaviour. The accused, aged 21, and the victim, 20, were proceeding from Panaji to Margao when the accused lost control of his scooter, went off the road, and fell along with the pillion rider, who succumbed to injuries at the GMC. The court observed that it was a self-accident due to rash and negligent riding. While the accused denied all allegations, he didn't furnish any explanation. The court held that the prosecution proved, beyond the shadow of reasonable doubt, that the man caused the accident due to his rash and negligent riding and consequently caused the death of the pillion rider. The assistant public prosecutor, S Bodke, for the state, said he deserved maximum punishment as he caused a serious accident where a young girl lost her life and that he was also in a drunken condition. The court stated that it could not accept this because there was no chemical report on record to show he was drunk at the time of the accident. It added that punishment has to be imposed focusing on the present and future prospects of the accused. 'The accused was also of a young age at the time of the accident, and in a particular state of mind, possibly he may have ridden the vehicle and lost control. His age and the way in which the accident happened are the peculiar facts to be considered in this case,' the court held. It added that he is working as a regional manager and is the sole breadwinner of the family. 'This shows that he is positive and serious towards his life prospects. Imposing severe punishment may invite a stigma of conviction that may ruin his future. The mens rea is absent in such cases. Nothing is on record to show that he has any past antecedents of the same offence,' the court held, and directed that the fine amount be paid as compensation to the kin of the victim.
