Latest news with #ProvisionalIRA
RTÉ News
5 days ago
- Politics
- RTÉ News
'Dissident republicans' continue to pose a threat, Dáil told
So-called 'dissident republicans', who have their origins in the Provisional IRA and the INLA, continue to pose a threat, the Dáil has heard. The Minister for Justice said that despite the progress towards peace made over the years, they continue to seek to return to the fruitless violence of the past. Minister Jim O'Callaghan was speaking in the Dáil ahead of a vote on the renewal of the Offences against the State Act. "They have remained resolute in their opposition to democracy and rule of law and all that the Good Friday Agreement stands for; and they remain wedded to brutality and criminality," Minister O'Callaghan said. He said that it is also important not to lose sight of the threat from violent extremism and international terrorism. The Minister added that terrorism - particularly jihadist and lone actor attacks - remains a key risk to the EU's internal security. Ireland is not immune from the threats arising in this changed security environment, and the country must have the capability to deal with them, the Minister said.
Irish Times
23-06-2025
- Politics
- Irish Times
We like to romanticise Ireland's past, but too much remembering could be bad for us
There is no comparison between the Provisional IRA and the Irish Volunteers who staged the Easter Rising in 1916. Patrick Pearse's generation of republicans never set off bombs in crowded pubs or on shopping streets , indiscriminately murdering civilians. They never pulled people out of vehicles and shot them dead because they were Protestants . But there is one parallel that Gerry Adams was able to point to at his successful defamation case against the BBC : the Rising had no democratic legitimacy. When the issue of the Provisional movement's lack of electoral mandate for 'atrocities' was mentioned in court, Adams replied : 'Pádraig Pearse. James Connolly. The men and women who went out in 1916, they had no mandate for what they were doing.' Adams has a point, but it doesn't reflect well on the IRA of which he has always denied being a part. It reflects poorly on an ill-thought-out insurrection that the State now publicly reveres above any other episode in Ireland's journey to independence. Twenty years ago, then-taoiseach Bertie Ahern announced the reinstatement of an Easter Monday military parade at the General Post Office in Dublin. He said there was a need to 'reclaim' 1916 from hardline nationalists. But two decades on, has the move backfired? READ MORE Fr Séamus Murphy, who teaches philosophy at Loyola University Chicago, believes so. 'I don't demand that the State disown the men of 1916. But it has to stop praising them and calling their action the foundation of the State,' Murphy says. The Jesuit priest explores the question further in a new book Confronting the Irish Past: The 1912-1923 Decade in Light of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement. It is an unusual work in that it tries to bring philosophical insights to bear on Irish history. Murphy, who has written extensively on just war theory and Irish neutrality, asks some deep questions about the ethics of commemoration: What duties do we have to our ancestors? How much commemoration is too much? Is there a hierarchy of 'emotional hurt' from historical events? Murphy examines the work of the German Jewish political philosopher Hannah Arendt , who believed history 'needed not so much to be explained as to be confronted'. This meant, among other things, acknowledging the 'ongoing impact' of events – and how political violence leaves a scar on society that can be unpicked in the future. Too much remembering can have negative effects on a population. In Northern Ireland , people were horrified at the recent clashes with police officers during street protests. But the thuggery was not entirely surprising in a province where two communities have been glorifying acts of violence for decades. Elsewhere in the world, commemoration of historical victimhood can be weaponised to commit crimes against humanity. 'It's a human thing. We remember our people's sufferings, while being indifferent to those of others, including the sufferings our tribe or nation inflict on the others. In the latter case, we can be inclined to say: they had it coming, they deserved it,' says Murphy. Ultimately, the question arises: who is history meant to serve – the living or the dead? 'It is bad for us to behave in the present as if our ancestors, dead grandparents, etc, no longer mattered in any sense. It would be treating them with contempt. Same goes for how we behave in the present with respect to how it would likely affect future generations,' says Murphy. But we should not be afraid to adapt history 'for the needs of the living'. That includes foregrounding the celebration of those events that pave the way for the future we wish to see. 'The nationalist side – our people – has to acknowledge that, just as Sinn Féin /IRA's political enemy in Northern Ireland from the 1970s to today was the SDLP – or any other party with a significant nationalist following – so the political target of the 1916 Rising was not the British government or the Ulster unionists but the Home Rule party,' says Murphy. ' John Redmond and the Home Rule party were moving, slowly, to doing a Bertie Ahern and signing a Good Friday Agreement, recognising that unionists couldn't be compelled into a united Ireland. The Rising is the scream of rage against that. We can't – without engaging in massive pretence – claim to endorse the Rising and the Good Friday Agreement with no qualification: they contradict each other at several points.' Here lies a test for all of us. To create a shared future on this island, and internationally, we must move beyond uncritically celebrating the actions of any particular tribe. Standing in our way is an imagined moral duty to people who are long dead and who had their own flaws. Surely our overriding moral duty is for the living? [ How Tuam, synonymous with a dark side of Irish history, can finally 'do the right thing' Opens in new window ] WB Yeats 's line 'Was it for this ... that all that blood was shed?' has an emotional force in debates on Ireland's future. But, says Murphy, 'just as you shouldn't feel compelled by your dead parents' wish that you should become a neurosurgeon – or a priest – so a political agenda of a previous generation cannot compel today's political action. Your parents have no right to say – adapting Yeats – to you, if you choose to be a journalist rather than what they wanted: was it for this that we made all those sacrifices?'
Belfast Telegraph
16-06-2025
- Politics
- Belfast Telegraph
Priest who admitted role in IRA bombings and arms dealing dies aged 95
Fr Patrick Ryan had been accused of involvement in Provisional IRA activity in 1988 and had been the subject of two unsuccessful extradition attempts at a time when Mrs Thatcher called him 'a very dangerous man'. Fr Ryan, who was a native of Rossmore, Co Tipperary, died in Dublin on Sunday at the age of 95 following a short illness. He had been ordained as a priest in 1954 at the Pallottine College in Thurles and later served in Tanzania and London. In January 1990, he was dismissed from the Pallottine Fathers. He no longer had permission to say Mass or administer the sacraments. Becoming known as 'The Padre', he spent decades denying accusations, claiming he had raised money both inside and outside Europe for victims on the nationalist side in the Troubles but had 'never bought explosives for the IRA or anybody else' and had never been requested by the paramilitary group to do so. But the priest had allegedly become the main contact for many years between the IRA and one of its main sources of weaponry and finance — Muammar Gaddafi's Libyan regime. His meetings with Gaddafi were documented in journalist Jennifer O'Leary's book The Padre: The True Story of the Irish Priest Who Armed the IRA with Gaddafi's Money. Ryan was also the first priest to contest an election in Ireland, when he ran in the 1989 European Parliament election in the Munster constituency as an Independent with Sinn Fein support. He failed to be elected but received more than 30,000 votes. But it was his alleged role in supplying arms for the IRA that brought him under most scrutiny and caused a political storm between the UK, Belgium and the Republic of Ireland. He had been arrested in Belgium in 1988. Following the killing of three off-duty British servicemen in the Netherlands, a tip-off led Belgian police to an IRA sympathiser's home and to Ryan's arrest. He was believed to be the quartermaster of an active IRA unit in Belgium, a crucial logistical figure. Bomb-making equipment, manuals and a large sum of foreign currency were seized. Repatriated to Ireland, after going on hunger strike as the UK sought to bring him to trial, the country then refused to extradite him to the UK believing he would not receive a fair trial. PSNI say Portadown riots had 'more co-ordination' as mutual aid to be deployed this weekend Mrs Thatcher once described the cleric as having an 'expert knowledge of bombing' and, in 2019, in an interview for BBC's Spotlight on The Troubles: A Secret History, he was asked if he was involved in any of the incidents of which Mrs Thatcher had accused him, to which he responded: 'I would say most of them. One way or another, yes, I had a hand in most of them. Yes, she was right.' Asked if the PM was right to connect him to events such as the Brighton bomb, he replied: 'One hundred per cent.' Five people died when, on October 12, 1984, an IRA bomb exploded inside the Grand Hotel, where Margaret Thatcher's ruling Conservative Party was holding its annual conference. As the programme explored his key role in IRA arms shipments from Libya, he went on to take credit for introducing the organisation to a type of timer unit it used to set off bombs which he had discovered while in Switzerland. Asked if he had any regrets, Mr Ryan said: 'I regret that I wasn't even more effective, absolutely. I would have liked to have been much more effective, but we didn't do too badly.'
The Journal
03-06-2025
- Entertainment
- The Journal
Say Nothing wins prestigious Peabody Award
SAY NOTHING HAS won a prestigious Peabody Award in the Entertainment category. The nine-part series, based on the best-selling book of the same title by author Patrick Radden Keefe, focuses on the disappearance of Jean McConville. Nobody has ever been charged with McConville's killing, who was taken from her home in west Belfast in December 1972 and murdered by the Provisional IRA. Her remains were found by a walker in August 2003 on a beach in Co Louth. The Peabody Awards celebrate storytelling that reflects the social issues and the emerging voices of our day. Established in 1940, the Peabody Award was originally created to honour excellence in radio broadcasting and was the radio industry's equivalent of the Pulitzer Prizes. However, it was later expanded to include television and now includes podcasts, social media videos and streaming media. Advertisement The Board of the Peabody Award said it seeks 'excellence on its own terms' and 'stories that matter' and that it awards storytelling rather than popularity or commercial success. (L-R) Brad Simpson, Michael Lennox, Monica Levinson, Joshua Zetumer, Anthony Boyle, Lola Petticrew, Hazel Doupe, Nina Jacobson and Maxine Peake, winners of the Peabody Award for Say Nothing Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Say Nothing was among the scripted series winners in the Entertainment category, alongside Netflix's Baby Reindeer. The Board remarked that Say Nothing was successful because it explores 'the social power of radical political belief, the code of silence that bound believers to secrecy, and the haunting emotional and psychological consequences of extreme violence on the lives and families of those who were lost and those who survived'. At the awards ceremony, Joshua Zetumer, creator and executive producer of Say Nothing, said: 'When bad things happen – and believe me they're happening right now – the most dangerous thing we can do is stay silent.' Speaking to ABC on the read carpet before the 85 th annual Peabody Awards, Lola Petticrew said it was 'amazing' to be at the ceremony. Petticrew plays a young Dolours Price in Say Nothing. She said that 'everything the Peabody Awards stand for is something that really resonates with me'. 'The reason why I want to tell stories and to be an artist is to tell the stories that are meaningful.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
31-05-2025
- Business
- Irish Times
Gerry Adams bet big, won big. What does the libel victory over the BBC mean for his legacy?
Gerry Adams gambled big and won big . Not quite as big as he wanted but big. He was seeking more than €200,000 in damages but €100,000 is a statement he will feel vindicates his reputation. 'Peacemaker' or 'peacetaker'? That was the question the Dublin jury had to decide about Adams in his libel case against the BBC . Mr Justice Alexander Owens may have framed the questions differently, but that is what it boiled down to. READ MORE In the end, the jury saw peace processor above paramilitary in a man who has always denied ever being a member of the Provisional IRA . Days before the jury retired to consider its judgment, one senior Belfast lawyer said he felt it was 'complete lunacy' that the former Sinn Féin president took such a case. 'He is taking a huge risk,' he believed. Most of the audience for the BBC Northern Ireland Spotlight programme that carried the allegation that Adams sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson was in the North but the King's Counsel (KC) wasn't surprised that Adams's legal team pursued the claim for defamation in Dublin's High Court because it would have been a much bigger risk taking the case in the North. And then the KC began to reconsider. But this was a Southern jury with a different experience and perhaps a different perspective. The predominantly younger age profile of the jury – aged 25 to 35 – suggests that they may have had no real contemporaneous memory of the death, misery and horror the IRA inflicted with Adams, allegedly, as one of its senior leaders. The same lawyer, reflecting a bit more, then took note of how among Adams's legal team was Paul Tweed, solicitor to international film and rock stars and celebrities. He has represented the likes of Hollywood stars Harrison Ford and Liam Neeson and singers Jennifer Lopez and Britney Spears, and is viewed as one of the most feared defamation lawyers in the business. 'Paul Tweed wouldn't have taken this case on unless he thought he had a reasonable crack at winning it,' mused the KC, having second thoughts. And so it proved. Adams bet the house and grabbed the pot. Writer and broadcaster Malachi O'Doherty, author of an unauthorised biography of Adams, said this victory would satisfy Adams's large ego and vanity. [ Book review: Gerry Adams – An Unauthorised Life by Malachi O'Doherty Opens in new window ] 'He will feel morally vindicated by the result. He will feel good about himself,' he said. O'Doherty, who last year had a libel case brought against him by Sinn Féin MLA Gerry Kelly thrown out by the High Court as 'scandalous, frivolous and vexatious' , also suspected that it 'would inject confidence back into the whole Sinn Féin strategy of using the defamation laws' against the media. Entering Adams's twilight zone Gerry Adams outside Dublin's High Court on May 21st. Photograph: Brian Lawless/PA Wire When dealing with Adams, there is often that sense of entering a twilight zone where truth and reality are blurred. He took the libel case against the BBC because, as he said, the Spotlight current affairs programme broadcast a lie in alleging he sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. Yet, in giving his evidence he swore an oath that he would tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. And soon into his cross-examination we were back into his again denying that he was in the IRA or that for many years he served on its ruling army council. Whatever about south of the Border, there is hardly a person in Belfast, or indeed in Northern Ireland – or indeed any republican living on or off the Falls Road who lends credence to that claim. For Sinn Féin and IRA supporters generally, they just shrug their shoulders and say that if Adams feels that his denial of IRA membership is something he must persist with, then so be it. 'Gerry knows best,' tends to be the response of the faithful. Some regular challenges to his claim he was never in the IRA were raised by counsel for the BBC. They include how in 1972 he was released from internment so he could be part of a delegation flown to London to discuss with senior British government representatives how to end the IRA campaign of violence. As usual, he said he was in London representing the Sinn Féin leadership and not the IRA. He has issued so many such denials over the years that repeating them would have been a cakewalk for Adams in the witness box. But still, surely inwardly, he bridled at the manner in which former minister of justice and attorney general Michael McDowell dealt with these denials when called to give evidence on behalf of the BBC. In cross-examination John Kerr, a barrister for Adams, put it to McDowell that he made no secret of his hatred of Sinn Féin. 'Hatred is one way of putting it,' McDowell said in agreement. McDowell allowed that Adams played a 'central role' in achieving the 1998 Belfast Agreement, as did others, but said that he 'represented himself entirely falsely in my view as a go-between between the IRA and the political process, whereas in fact he was the dominant character in the IRA at that time'. McDowell couldn't resist another dig in granting Adams 'the credit of common sense' of recognising that the IRA had been defeated. That would have irked Adams who holds to the line the IRA was never defeated. Now, Adams will likely feel, following that joust with McDowell, that he who laughs last laughs longest. A damaging blow for the BBC BBC Spotlight reporter Jennifer O'Leary speaking to the media after the High Court found the broacaster defamed Gerry Adams. Photograph: Collins Courts The BBC, and its flagship investigative programme Spotlight have been hit a damaging blow and will have a lot to consider this weekend. Adams has succeeded, as he said during the trial, in 'putting manners' on them. Spotlight reporter Jennifer O'Leary pursued the story when contacts told her the IRA had murdered Donaldson and 'let dissidents make the claim of responsibility', with Adams allegedly sanctioning the murder that was carried out near Glenties in Co Donegal in 2006. It wasn't until 2009 that the Real IRA said it was responsible for the killing of Donaldson who – while secretly working for MI5, the RUC and later the Police Service of Northern Ireland - ran the Sinn Féin office at Stormont where he worked shoulder to shoulder with Adams and Martin McGuinness. It is worth mentioning that the judge decided against permitting evidence from three witnesses the BBC wanted to put forward to assist its case. One of them was Jane Donaldson, daughter of Denis Donaldson. In the absence of the jury, she said that the family had an 'open mind' on who killed her father and did not believe the claim by the Real IRA that it was responsible. She said that 'bogus claim of responsibility' by a single Real IRA source in 2009 three years after the killing lacked all credibility. The detail in the admission 'didn't correlate with an awful lot of the sensitive and confidential information we'd gathered from the gardaí', she said. The judge, however, found that this evidence wasn't 'terribly relevant' to the issues to be decided by the jury so she did not get to make these points with the jury present in the courtroom. Personality always has served Adams well, as has his sense of humour. For some during the bloody years of the Troubles, he and the late McGuinness, another leader who disavowed much of his IRA past, were characterised as romanticised Fidel Castro- and Che Guevara-type figures. Adams's courtroom tactics that triggered laughter Since handing over the leadership to Mary Lou McDonald, Adams has morphed into more of an avuncular sometimes whimsical person but also a grand venerable of the republican movement. In court that was how he was portrayed and how he portrayed himself. The BBC lawyers, in playing to the IRA leadership allegation, also referred to Adams in the early 1970s shouldering the coffin of an old republican while wearing the black beret associated with IRA membership. Adams said he did not recognise this as 'effectively' the IRA's uniform, as it was put to him. He then reflected that from the picture he looked like the ineffectual Frank Spencer character in the old TV comedy Some Mothers Do 'Ave 'Em. That triggered laughter in court. Adams deployed the same tactic when asked about the Disney series Say Nothing by New Yorker journalist Patrick Radden Keefe. No, he hadn't seen it. [ Say Nothing: Bingeable yet sober-minded eulogy for the tragedy of the Troubles Opens in new window ] 'Life's too short to watch Disney, especially when it is dealing with serious issues,' he replied. That too seemed to go down well with some members of the jury. It also may have deflected them from the serious allegation in Say Nothing that he was a pivotal figure in the decision to abduct, murder and secretly bury or disappear Jean McConville, the widowed mother of 10 children, an allegation that he has always rejected. [ Family of Jean McConville criticise 'hurtful' Disney+ dramatisation Opens in new window ] His gentle canter through his life story at the outset of the hearing also allowed him to play to his theatrical strengths. He seemed to impress the jury with the stories of discrimination, Ian Paisley, the civil rights movement, the actions of the B-Specials, and so on. Here too he could present himself as just a regular-type guy whose 'biggest ambition was to win an All-Ireland with the Antrim hurling team'. Former US congressman Bruce Morrison gave evidence for Adams via video link from near Washington, DC, describing him as an 'elder statesman' and a 'serious man on a serious mission' to achieve peace. Singer and friend Christy Moore spent a couple of hours in the court on one of the days and took time to chat with him outside the court, which allowed photographers grab some useful pictures. 'Peacemaker' or 'peacetaker'? The BBC, as well as McDowell, offered their own witnesses with a different take on the life and times of Adams. Ann Travers, whose sister was shot dead and her father seriously wounded by the IRA, as they were leaving Mass in south Belfast in 1984 described Adams as a 'warmonger' who was 'heavily involved' in the murder of innocent people. Adams, she said, had 'cast a long and dark shadow' over her life. She 'would even have a fear of him', she added. Former Ireland rugby international and solicitor Trevor Ringland said Adams had a reputation as a 'peacetaker' rather than a 'peacemaker'. In the end, the 'peacemaker' argument took precedence with the jury, it seems. There are many who will have different views, but that will hardly bother Adams this weekend. The stakes were huge and he carried the day. The jury's verdict will boost his legacy and his vanity. A win is a win is a win.
