Latest news with #Qualys
TECHx
23-07-2025
- Business
- TECHx
Qualys Report Reveals Gaps in Cyber Risk Management
Home » Top stories » Qualys Report Reveals Gaps in Cyber Risk Management Qualys has revealed key findings from its 2025 State of Cyber-risk Assessment report, highlighting major gaps in cybersecurity risk management despite rising investments. The research, conducted by Dark Reading and commissioned by Qualys, shows that most organizations still struggle with aligning cyber risk programs to business priorities. While 49% of surveyed organizations report having a formal cyber risk management program, only 18% use integrated risk scenarios that quantify business impact, including insurance risk transfer. The report notes that 30% align risk programs with business objectives, while 43% of programs are less than two years old. An additional 19% are still in the planning stage. Cybersecurity investments are growing, but 71% of organizations believe cyber risk levels are either increasing or unchanged: 51% report increasing cyber risk exposure 20% say risk remains steady Only 6% have seen a decrease Asset visibility remains a key challenge. Although 83% perform regular inventories, only 13% do so continuously. Furthermore, 47% rely on manual processes, and 41% cite incomplete inventories as a top barrier. Risk prioritization also lacks maturity. Only 68% use integrated risk scoring methods, while 19% still rely solely on CVSS scores. Just 18% update asset risk profiles monthly. While 90% report cyber-risk findings to the board, only 14% include financial quantification, and just 22% involve finance teams. Business stakeholders are included less than half the time. Mayuresh Ektare, Vice President of Product Management at Qualys, stated that current approaches fail to reduce cyber risk effectively. He emphasized adopting a Risk Operations Center (ROC) model that integrates vulnerability, asset, and threat data for a unified view. The report recommends organizations: Understand and prioritize risks based on business-critical assets Use diverse risk signals beyond vulnerability scans Transition from reactive incident response to proactive risk reduction Ektare added that integrating business-impacting risk scenarios will lead to more effective board-level communication and better-informed decision-making.
Yahoo
22-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Qualys to Report Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on August 5, 2025
FOSTER CITY, Calif., July 22, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Qualys, Inc. (NASDAQ: QLYS), a pioneer and leading provider of disruptive cloud-based IT, security and compliance solutions, today announced that the company will report its financial results for the second quarter 2025 after the market closes on Tuesday, August 5, 2025. Qualys will host a conference call and live webcast to discuss its second quarter 2025 financial results at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (2:00 p.m. Pacific Time) on Tuesday, August 5, 2025. To access the conference call, please register here. A live webcast of the earnings conference call, investor presentation, and prepared remarks can be accessed at A replay of the conference call will be available through the same webcast link following the end of the call. About QualysQualys, Inc. (NASDAQ: QLYS) is a pioneer and leading provider of disruptive cloud-based Security, Compliance and IT solutions with more than 10,000 subscription customers worldwide, including a majority of the Forbes Global 100 and Fortune 100. Qualys helps organizations streamline and automate their security and compliance solutions onto a single platform for greater agility, better business outcomes, and substantial cost savings. The Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Platform leverages a single agent to continuously deliver critical security intelligence while enabling enterprises to automate the full spectrum of vulnerability detection, compliance, and protection for IT systems, workloads and web applications across on premises, endpoints, servers, public and private clouds, containers, and mobile devices. Founded in 1999 as one of the first SaaS security companies, Qualys has strategic partnerships and seamlessly integrates its vulnerability management capabilities into security offerings from cloud service providers, including Amazon Web Services, the Google Cloud Platform and Microsoft Azure, along with a number of leading managed service providers and global consulting organizations. For more information, please visit Qualys and the Qualys logo are proprietary trademarks of Qualys, Inc. All other products or names may be trademarks of their respective companies. Investor ContactBlair KingSenior Vice President, Investor Relations, Financial Planning & Analysis(650) 538-2088ir@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Qualys, Inc. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
22-07-2025
- Business
- Business Insider
Qualys (QLYS) Receives a Rating Update from a Top Analyst
In a report released yesterday, Matthew Hedberg from RBC Capital maintained a Hold rating on Qualys, with a price target of $140.00. The company's shares closed yesterday at $139.51. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. According to TipRanks, Hedberg is a top 100 analyst with an average return of 21.8% and a 70.00% success rate. Hedberg covers the Technology sector, focusing on stocks such as Gitlab, ServiceNow, and Snowflake. In addition to RBC Capital, Qualys also received a Hold from TD Cowen's Shaul Eyal in a report issued on July 14. However, on July 18, TR | OpenAI – 4o reiterated a Buy rating on Qualys (NASDAQ: QLYS). Based on Qualys' latest earnings release for the quarter ending March 31, the company reported a quarterly revenue of $159.9 million and a net profit of $47.53 million. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of $145.81 million and had a net profit of $39.73 million
Channel Post MEA
21-07-2025
- Business
- Channel Post MEA
Business Context Missing In Most Cyber Risk Programs: Qualys
According to new research commissioned by Qualys and conducted by Dark Reading, despite rising investments, evolving frameworks, and more vocal boardroom interest, most organizations remain immature in their risk management programs. Nearly half of organizations (49%) surveyed for Qualys' 2025 State of Cyber-risk Assessment report, today have a formal business-focused cybersecurity risk management program. However, just 18% of organizations use integrated risk scenarios that focus on business-impacting processes, showing how investments manage the likelihood and impact of risk quantitatively, including risk transfer to insurance. This is a key deficiency, as business stakeholders expect the CISO to focus on business risk. Key findings from the research include: Formal Risk Programs are Expanding, But Business Context is Still Missing 49% of surveyed organizations report having a formal cyber risk program in place which looks like a promising statistic on the surface. But dig deeper, and the data shows otherwise: Business Alignment Gaps: Only 30% report that their risk management programs are prioritized based on business objectives Recent Implementations: 43% of existing programs have been in place for less than two years, indicating a nascent stage of maturity Future Plans: An additional 19% are still in the planning phase More Investment ≠ Less Risk: Why the Cyber ROI isn't Adding Up Cybersecurity spending has continued to grow. Yet one of the most revealing insights from the study is that a vast majority (71%) of organizations believe that their cyber risk levels are rising or holding steady. 51% say their overall cyber risk exposure is increasing 20% say it remains unchanged Only 6% have seen risk levels decrease The Missing Metric: Business Relevance in Asset Intelligence Visibility in cyber risk management is about a principle that hasn't changed in 20 years: you can't protect what you can't see. Yet even in 2025, asset visibility remains one of the biggest blind spots: 83% of organizations perform regular asset inventories, but only 13% can do so continuously 47% still rely on manual processes 41% say incomplete asset inventories are among their top barriers to managing cyber risk Risk Prioritization Needs to be a Business Conversation, Not a Technical One Another illusion that persists is the idea that all risks can and should be patched. The longstanding practice of prioritizing vulnerabilities based solely on severity is no longer sufficient. The industry looks to be grasping the fact that risk prioritization needs to go beyond single scoring methods like CVSS alone, with 68% of respondents using integrated risk scoring combining threat intelligence or using cyber risk quantification with forecasted loss estimates to prioritize risk mitigation actions. However, these next data points show that the industry still has some way to go: Nearly one in five (19%) of organizations continue to rank vulnerabilities using a single score like CVSS alone Just 18% update asset risk profiles monthly Reporting Risk in Business Terms, Not Security Jargon Executives do not want to hear how many vulnerabilities have been patched. They want to understand what the organization stands to lose, and what's being done to protect it. Yet the study finds that while 90% of organizations report cyber-risk findings to the board: Only 18% use integrated risk scenarios Just 14% tie risk reports to financial quantification Business stakeholders are only involved less than half the time (43%) And only 22% include finance teams in cyber risk discussions 'The key takeaway from the research isn't just that cyber risk is rising. It's that current methods are not effectively reducing that risk by prioritizing the actions that would make the greatest impact to risk reduction, tailored to the business. Every business is unique; hence, each risk profile and risk management program should also look unique to the organization. Static assessments, siloed telemetry, and CVSS-based prioritization have reached their limit,' commented Mayuresh Ektare, Vice President, Product Management, Enterprise TruRisk Management, Qualys. 'To address this, forward-leaning teams are adopting a Risk Operations Center (ROC) model: a technical framework that continuously correlates vulnerability data, asset context, and threat exposure under a single operational view. The ROC model provides a proven path forward for organizations ready to manage cyber risk the way the business understands it and expects it to be managed,' Ektare continued. Below are some recommendations to help businesses better align cybersecurity risk with business priorities: Business risk is all about context. In order to have a good understanding of organizational risk, a business first needs to understand what their business-critical assets are, then understand their risk factors or threats as it relates to those crown jewel assets. Without this context, vulnerabilities or threats are just information. If everything is critical, nothing is. Prioritizing risks is paramount as organizations do not have unlimited resources. In order to be capitally efficient, companies need to spend as little as possible to avoid the largest possible amount of risk. Whatever is not mitigated through technology represents risk that needs to be accepted, or transferred to cyber insurance. To get a good read of the cyber-risks across the enterprise, organizations need a diverse telemetry of risk signals. Organizations can't rely on just one — such as scanning for vulnerabilities — instead, companies need visibility into their application security, identity security stack, and more, every part of the enterprise that is exposing your attack surface. Instead of focusing on reactive incident response — for example with a SIEM or a SOC — organizations need a better system that proactively looks to predict risks and works to reduce the likelihood of an event happening by implementing a Risk Operations Center (ROC). This approach to risk management helps leaders make better, more informed decisions based on their unique business context. Organizations need to overhaul the way they are communicating cyber-risk to the board. Integrated risk scenarios that focus on business-impacting processes, such as how investments and insurance impact risk, will be the future of 'business-oriented' risk reporting, and much more effective at the purpose of communicating to board members.
Zawya
21-07-2025
- Business
- Zawya
Most organizations miss business context when assessing cyber risk, finds new research from Qualys
According to new research commissioned by Qualys and conducted by Dark Reading, despite rising investments, evolving frameworks, and more vocal boardroom interest, most organizations remain immature in their risk management programs. Nearly half of organizations (49%) surveyed for Qualys' 2025 State of Cyber-risk Assessment report, today have a formal business-focused cybersecurity risk management program. However, just 18% of organizations use integrated risk scenarios that focus on business-impacting processes, showing how investments manage the likelihood and impact of risk quantitatively, including risk transfer to insurance. This is a key deficiency, as business stakeholders expect the CISO to focus on business risk. Key findings from the research include: Formal Risk Programs are Expanding, But Business Context is Still Missing 49% of surveyed organizations report having a formal cyber risk program in place which looks like a promising statistic on the surface. But dig deeper, and the data shows otherwise: Business Alignment Gaps: Only 30% report that their risk management programs are prioritized based on business objectives Recent Implementations: 43% of existing programs have been in place for less than two years, indicating a nascent stage of maturity Future Plans: An additional 19% are still in the planning phase More Investment ≠ Less Risk: Why the Cyber ROI isn't Adding Up Cybersecurity spending has continued to grow. Yet one of the most revealing insights from the study is that a vast majority (71%) of organizations believe that their cyber risk levels are rising or holding steady. 51% say their overall cyber risk exposure is increasing 20% say it remains unchanged Only 6% have seen risk levels decrease The Missing Metric: Business Relevance in Asset Intelligence Visibility in cyber risk management is about a principle that hasn't changed in 20 years: you can't protect what you can't see. Yet even in 2025, asset visibility remains one of the biggest blind spots: 83% of organizations perform regular asset inventories, but only 13% can do so continuously 47% still rely on manual processes 41% say incomplete asset inventories are among their top barriers to managing cyber risk Risk Prioritization Needs to be a Business Conversation, Not a Technical One Another illusion that persists is the idea that all risks can and should be patched. The longstanding practice of prioritizing vulnerabilities based solely on severity is no longer sufficient. The industry looks to be grasping the fact that risk prioritization needs to go beyond single scoring methods like CVSS alone, with 68% of respondents using integrated risk scoring combining threat intelligence or using cyber risk quantification with forecasted loss estimates to prioritize risk mitigation actions. However, these next data points show that the industry still has some way to go: Nearly one in five (19%) of organizations continue to rank vulnerabilities using a single score like CVSS alone Just 18% update asset risk profiles monthly Reporting Risk in Business Terms, Not Security Jargon Executives do not want to hear how many vulnerabilities have been patched. They want to understand what the organization stands to lose, and what's being done to protect it. Yet the study finds that while 90% of organizations report cyber-risk findings to the board: Only 18% use integrated risk scenarios Just 14% tie risk reports to financial quantification Business stakeholders are only involved less than half the time (43%) And only 22% include finance teams in cyber risk discussions 'The key takeaway from the research isn't just that cyber risk is rising. It's that current methods are not effectively reducing that risk by prioritizing the actions that would make the greatest impact to risk reduction, tailored to the business. Every business is unique; hence, each risk profile and risk management program should also look unique to the organization. Static assessments, siloed telemetry, and CVSS-based prioritization have reached their limit,' commented Mayuresh Ektare, Vice President, Product Management, Enterprise TruRisk Management, Qualys. 'To address this, forward-leaning teams are adopting a Risk Operations Center (ROC) model: a technical framework that continuously correlates vulnerability data, asset context, and threat exposure under a single operational view. The ROC model provides a proven path forward for organizations ready to manage cyber risk the way the business understands it and expects it to be managed,' Ektare continued. Below are some recommendations to help businesses better align cybersecurity risk with business priorities: Business risk is all about context. In order to have a good understanding of organizational risk, a business first needs to understand what their business-critical assets are, then understand their risk factors or threats as it relates to those crown jewel assets. Without this context, vulnerabilities or threats are just information. If everything is critical, nothing is. Prioritizing risks is paramount as organizations do not have unlimited resources. In order to be capitally efficient, companies need to spend as little as possible to avoid the largest possible amount of risk. Whatever is not mitigated through technology represents risk that needs to be accepted, or transferred to cyber insurance. To get a good read of the cyber-risks across the enterprise, organizations need a diverse telemetry of risk signals. Organizations can't rely on just one — such as scanning for vulnerabilities — instead, companies need visibility into their application security, identity security stack, and more, every part of the enterprise that is exposing your attack surface. Instead of focusing on reactive incident response — for example with a SIEM or a SOC — organizations need a better system that proactively looks to predict risks and works to reduce the likelihood of an event happening by implementing a Risk Operations Center (ROC). This approach to risk management helps leaders make better, more informed decisions based on their unique business context. Organizations need to overhaul the way they are communicating cyber-risk to the board. Integrated risk scenarios that focus on business-impacting processes, such as how investments and insurance impact risk, will be the future of 'business-oriented' risk reporting, and much more effective at the purpose of communicating to board members.
