logo
#

Latest news with #RMIT

OptiCrop lands first deal for ClearVue's ag-tech
OptiCrop lands first deal for ClearVue's ag-tech

Herald Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Business
  • Herald Sun

OptiCrop lands first deal for ClearVue's ag-tech

Don't miss out on the headlines from Stockhead. Followed categories will be added to My News. Special Report: ClearVue's OptiCrop has scored its first deal, in Israel, rolling out root-zone cooling for smarter, low-energy farming. Backed by a $5m RMIT hub, it's now chasing a future of off-grid, solar-powered greenhouses. ClearVue's OptiCrop lands first ag-tech deal Off-grid farming vision starts taking root RMIT joins $5m push for off-grid farming For a company that's made a name turning windows into smart solar panels, branching into agriculture might seem like a left turn. But for ClearVue Technologies (ASX:CPV), it's all part of a bigger plan and it's starting to bear fruit. In June, ClearVue's Israeli ag-tech subsidiary, OptiCrop, secured its very first commercial project: an $80,000 root-zone cooling installation for a new one-acre greenhouse. And while that might seem like a modest deal on paper, it's a big milestone for ClearVue's push into protected cropping and sustainable agriculture. OptiCrop was born out of ClearVue's late-2024 acquisition of the once ASX-listed ROOTS Sustainable Agricultural Technologies' IP. That included a suite of clever climate control tools for greenhouses – systems designed not just to grow food, but to grow it smarter, with less water, less energy and less reliance on the grid. This first project will deploy OptiCrop's ground-source heat exchange (GSHE) system beneath a commercial greenhouse in Israel. The system passively regulates the temperature of nutrient-rich water that feeds plant roots, using stable underground temperatures to warm or cool the liquid as needed. This means no high-powered aircon or heating bills required. 'This first sale for OptiCrop is a significant milestone for our ag-tech division, and demonstrates early commercial traction in the protected cropping space,' said ClearVue Global CEO, Martin Deil. 'It validates our strategic direction following the acquisition of ROOTS and underlines the strong market potential for integrated solar greenhouses and sustainable climate-control solutions.' A simple idea that solves a tricky problem Anyone who's grown tomatoes in summer or spinach in winter knows that plant roots are fussy. Even if you nail the air temperature, roots that get too hot or too cold can go into shutdown mode, stopping nutrient uptake and halting growth. This is where OptiCrop's GSHE system helps. By circulating the nutrient fluid through underground coils, it brings the solution to a 'Goldilocks' temperature zone before it even touches the roots. The result: a stable root environment, better plant health, and improved yield consistency, especially in greenhouses battling desert heat or winter chills. It's designed to keep the root zone locked in at roughly 16 °C – 28 °C year-round, using buried sensors to switch the pump on or off as temperatures drift. Trials on crops from lettuce to capsicums have logged yield bumps ranging anywhere from 20% to 250% versus un-cooled controls, all while cutting heating-and-cooling energy use by up to 80% compared with traditional air conditioning. This first installation is being built in collaboration with a global ag-tech giant that operates in over 110 countries and supports more than two million farmers. For OptiCrop to land this deal straight out of the gate says a lot about the direction the company is heading. 'We are excited to see the OptiCrop team hit the ground running and deliver early revenue,' said Deil. 'This order demonstrates the demand for our technologies in the market.' Teaming up for the future of food OptiCrop's ambitions go well beyond this first project. The company's expanding toolbox includes irrigation-by-condensation systems that don't require grid water, as well as cooling tech for vertical farming setups. The company has also built smart modular kits that let farmers turn their greenhouses into energy-efficient machines. This includes real-time temperature sensors, hybrid GSHE-heat pump models for extreme climates, and mobile app integration to help farmers keep tabs on root conditions from anywhere. OptiCrop's vision is to build greenhouses that not only grow food more efficiently but do it off-grid and in places where traditional agriculture just doesn't work. All this fits snugly into ClearVue's broader tech play: turning buildings, and now greenhouses, into solar-powered ecosystems. The ClearVue IGU (integrated glazing unit) is already proving itself in the built environment, turning window panels into discreet, energy-generating surfaces. Read later: Could ClearVue's solar glass tech have spared Spain some pain? And in agriculture, that tech has been adapted into solar glass for greenhouses: panels that let in 90% of the light plants need, while harvesting solar power from the rest. When combined with OptiCrop's climate control tools, the result is a self-sustaining greenhouse – one that generates power, manages temperature, and cuts water use, all while improving yields. ClearVue teams up with RMIT Backing all this is some serious academic horsepower. ClearVue is a partner in the new $5 million ARC Research Hub for Intelligent Energy Efficiency in Future Protected Cropping, which is led by RMIT University with Professor Tianyi Ma as a principal investigator. The initiative will see a purpose-built solar-integrated greenhouse constructed at RMIT's Melbourne campus. ClearVue will provide PV window panels and performance testing as part of the project. The aim is to fuse renewable energy systems with intelligent greenhouse controls, the kind of setup that's squarely in OptiCrop's wheelhouse. The project also explores AI-powered farming decisions, more efficient plant quality tracking, and greenhouse self-sufficiency. The big picture Food security, climate adaptation, energy efficiency – they're no longer buzzwords but urgent priorities. And OptiCrop is positioning itself to solve for all three at once. From the Israeli desert to the rooftops of urban greenhouses, the goal is clear: make growing food less wasteful, more productive and better adapted to a changing climate. As Deil puts it: 'We've clearly laid out a roadmap, and we're delivering to that roadmap.' And while there's still a long way to go, the first commercial sale shows that OptiCrop's roots are taking hold. It's early days, but sometimes all it takes is one well-placed seed. This article was developed in collaboration with ClearVue Technologies, a Stockhead advertiser at the time of publishing. This article does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions. Originally published as ClearVue's ag-tech seed takes root with OptiCrop's first sale

Grim underwater find prompts calls to make $43.9 million change in Aussie waters
Grim underwater find prompts calls to make $43.9 million change in Aussie waters

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Science
  • Yahoo

Grim underwater find prompts calls to make $43.9 million change in Aussie waters

Sea urchins are being found in alarming numbers in waters surrounding one of Australia's largest cities, but researchers believe culling them could create $92 million in benefits. A team from RMIT believe multiple industries could benefit if Port Phillip Bay's kelp forests they're destroying, are allowed to recover. Sea urchins are native to waters around Melbourne and feed on kelp, but warming waters and changing ocean currents have caused their numbers to reach 'unsustainable population levels', and pictures taken by RMIT divers show things are looking grim in many parts of the ocean. Kelp coverage in the greater region has declined by up to 98 per cent in the region over the last 40 years. Because the changing ocean conditions that favour the urchins are caused by climate change, their numbers aren't expected to naturally correct themselves, which is why the researchers argue intervention is needed. The study found that reducing urchin numbers and allowing the kelp forests to recover would reduce nitrogen and phosphorus in the water. Carrying out the plan would be expensive, with an investment of $43.9 million needed to create $92.1 million in benefits. But the study's lead author, Dr Paul Carnell, argues the plan would be a 'smart economic investment' for government. 'This approach can be targeted to specific areas of the bay, so we can get the greatest bang for our buck,' he said. 🪨 Inventor's valuable secret hidden beneath pile of rocks in outback 📸 Rare colour footage of extinct Australian animal seen again after 90 years 📍 Huge change to multi-million dollar block of land in busy suburb The plan could see the tourism sector profit as kelp forests are a drawcard for divers and snorkellers. Fish stocks would also likely improve, aiding both commercial and recreational fishers. But the biggest beneficiary would likely be the wider environment, as kept forests play an important role in water purification and carbon sequestering, a major cause of global warming. In Victoria, the collection of urchins is regulated, and there is a bag limit of 40. While they're in problematic numbers, they are actually a valuable resource and considered a delicacy in some Asian cultures. In Australia, some premium urchin roe can retail for almost $700 for 120 grams, but there are cheaper alternatives for as little as $60 per 100 grams. The study has been published in the journal published in Ecosystem Services. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.

Australians losing billions in savings due to poor management of appliance efficiency scheme, audit finds
Australians losing billions in savings due to poor management of appliance efficiency scheme, audit finds

The Guardian

time20-06-2025

  • Business
  • The Guardian

Australians losing billions in savings due to poor management of appliance efficiency scheme, audit finds

Australian households and businesses are missing out on billions of dollars of power bill savings, an expert has warned, after a scathing audit found the department in charge of the efficiency scheme for appliances has failed to properly administer it. The poor administration of the program has left consumers worse off, said Alan Pears, a senior fellow at RMIT and Melbourne University, who helped develop appliance energy standards in Victoria. Pears warned the program needs a wider rethink, including strengthening 'weak' minimum standards which are preventing people getting access to or buying the most efficient appliances, leading to higher energy bills. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The Greenhouse and Energy Minimum Standards (Gems) Act ensures products meet minimum energy performance standards and energy rating label requirements. The labelling requirement includes the energy efficiency star-rating stickers often seen on refrigerators or dishwashers. But the National Audit Office (ANAO) report found the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water is not measuring the program's impact on reducing emissions. The report said the department 'is not measuring the program's impact on reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions and so cannot demonstrate whether the program is achieving its intended purpose'. Issues flagged in the ANAO report and could negatively impact its credibility, Pears said. Pears said the energy rating stickers 'have a lot of credibility with people' and is 'relied upon' by consumers. 'The issue we face now is, if the program is not being properly administered – and clearly it hasn't been – then the government and the energy sector too are at risk of … losing credibility with consumers.' The department has said the scheme has saved households and businesses between $12bn and $18bn in energy costs since the Act was legislated in 2012. Between 2021 and 2022, it said consumers saved between $1.3bn to $2bn, and greenhouse gas emissions were reduced between 4.1m and 6.3m tonnes. But Pears said the broad gap in estimated figures suggests the scheme isn't working as intended. 'The fact that there's such a wide band reflects the fact that they have some idea but not a very precise idea of what the benefits are,' he said. Pears said that beyond the administrative gaps, the current minimum standards are 'weak' compared to best-practice regions like the European Union or China. For example, the EU began enforcing a new rule this year for the energy consumption of electrical appliances in standby or off-mode, which it says will save consumers up to $950m between now and 2030. If Australia were to raise its standards, Pears said every household or business could save 'thousands' of dollars over the lifetime of each appliance. 'Because our standards are quite weak, we don't necessarily get the most efficient products,' Pears said. Under the legislation, companies test their appliances in approved laboratories according to the minimum standards. Thedata is sent to the climate change department for review. If compliant, the appliance is approved for sale in Australia. The department can perform a 'check test' on products to independently to ensure they are compliant. The audit said the number of check tests has been decreasing over recent years, and haven't targeted areas with the 'greatest risk of non-compliance'. In the financial year 2013-2014 the department conducted 188 check tests, according to the ANAO, but in 2021-22 just 61 models were checked. The department told the ANAO it aims to test between 60 and 70 products annually. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Pears said this can allow some bad actors to get away with subpar testing. Pears said an effective testing program is similar to speed cameras on the road. 'If you think you might get caught for speeding, you'll obey the speed limit. With any regulatory system like appliance efficiency, if you think you might be caught, you're much more likely to do things properly.' Since the program was established in 2012, the department has issued just four infringement notices, none which were paid or enforced. The audit office report said this could 'limit the department's ability to effectively encourage compliance and deter non-compliance'. ANAO's report also found that, in many cases, the same person within the climate change department was in charge of assessing and approving or rejecting a product. 'Without effective segregation of duties, there is risk that products that do not meet the requirements of the relevant Gems determination may be approved for registration. This also increases the risk of human error or corruption,' the report said. Pears also believed information on appliance efficiency stickers should be improved. He wants the government to spend more money to improve consumers' understanding of the rating system, and ensure the system is fit for purpose. 'You have to be careful because the star rating is based on the size of the appliance, not necessarily on its actual energy use. So if you've got a seven-star enormous television, that can still be using a lot more energy than a much smaller TV that's got a low star rating.' The department responded to the audit, accepting all of its nine recommendations, and said work is already under way to improve the program. ANAO recommended check testing be targeted to areas with the greatest risk of non-compliance. It also recommended the department develop performance measures to assess the effectiveness of the program in achieving its outcomes. In a statement, the department confirmed it has established a taskforce to improve the program, and has begun 'expanding the availability of check facilities' to encourage better compliance.

Almost 70% of top Australian universities tumble in global ranking amid Trump-era attacks and international student cuts
Almost 70% of top Australian universities tumble in global ranking amid Trump-era attacks and international student cuts

The Guardian

time18-06-2025

  • Business
  • The Guardian

Almost 70% of top Australian universities tumble in global ranking amid Trump-era attacks and international student cuts

Dozens of Australia's top universities have tumbled down in a global ranking amid a 'turbulent year' for higher education, as attacks from Donald Trump's second administration exacerbated years of disruption for the embattled sector. The University of Melbourne, Australia's highest performer, dropped seven places to 19th in the QS World University Rankings, run by the global higher education specialist Quacquarelli Symonds, while the University of Sydney dropped from 18th in the world to 25th. The University of New South Wales, the nation's second best performer, dropped from 19th to 20th. The rankings, released on Thursday, drew from millions of academic papers and insights from 127,041 academics across 1,501 universities in 106 countries. Overall, 25 of Australia's 36 ranked universities (69%) declined in this year's results and just seven moved up, amid the rise of competitors in the Asia-Pacific region. It was the third biggest percentage drop in the world behind Austria (88%) and Russia (85%), at the same time as the US continued to perform the best among the traditional big four study destinations, which include Australia, the UK and Canada. Angel Calderon, the director of strategic insights at RMIT and a member of the rankings advisory board, said recent federal government discussions on limiting the number of international students coupled with financial constraints had not helped universities. 'Over the past five years, we have seen the reputation of Australian universities gradually decreasing,' he said. 'Organisational restructuring, staff movements, operational deficits, and any kind of disruption are likely to influence institutional perceptions elsewhere.' The categories rank universities based upon their reputation, teaching and learning, research impact, internationalisation and, since 2022, sustainability. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Australia was particularly hard hit in its academic and employer reputation, with 20 and 30 universities declining in rank respectively in those categories. However, it continued to perform strongly in its citations per faculty and global engagement, including international faculty members. Calderon said the poor performance came at the same time universities in Asian countries were 'rapidly improving' because of increased government or private sector investment in education and research. Mainland China and India had particularly strong upward trends, with more than 40% of their universities rising in the rankings, while four of New Zealand's eight universities also improved compared with last year. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology retained the top position for the 14th consecutive year, followed by Imperial College London and Stanford University. 'The inconvenient truth is that reputation is an issue which continues to adversely impact Australian universities' performance in global rankings,' Calderon said. 'The relative decline in standing for both the academic and employer reputation measures has been in the making for several years. Here lies a key opportunity for the collective of Australian universities to ensure learners are better supported. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The results are a wake-up call to Australia … our universities must adapt by providing quality education to the communities they serve if they want to remain competitive, relevant, and boost national productivity.' Despite the dire overall picture, Australia still ranked fifth globally for the proportion of universities ranked in the world's top 100, with 25% making the list, behind Hong Kong and Singapore (56% and 50% respectively). Nine Australian universities were ranked in the top 100. But of those, five of the high performing Group of Eight (Go8) sandstones moved down. The CEO of QS, Jessica Turner, said there were 'areas of concern' for Australia's higher education system, pointing to the reputation dip coupled with a government crackdown on international students. Since 2023, the commonwealth has introduced a range of migration reforms to 'restore integrity' to the international education sector, including higher visa fees and English language requirements and slowed visa processing for some 'high risk' countries. 'International students have been drawn into a wider national debate in Australia around migration and housing, where they are sometimes perceived as contributing to systemic pressures,' she said. 'In what has been a turbulent year for Australian higher education, universities are calling for sustainable research funding models and greater policy certainty around international education. 'These are critical to safeguarding and strengthening one of Australia's greatest national assets, particularly as the country faces growing competition from across the APAC region.' At least seven Australian universities have had research programs temporarily suspended by the Trump administration this year, while a dozen universities were sent a questionnaire asking to confirm whether they aligned with US government interests. The chief executive of the Go8, Vicki Thomson, said the results came against a backdrop of global uncertainty and 'mixed messaging' from Australia's largest research partner, the US. 'This … threatens our very capacity to deliver on our mission of education and research,' she said. 'And yet despite these headwinds, Australia continues to punch above its weight … that we have two Go8 members ranked in the top 20 and six in the world's top 50, is an outstanding result and must not be taken for granted but rather leveraged in these contested times.'

Marilyn Monroe did it, so did Chappell Roan – but what is the point of a stage name?
Marilyn Monroe did it, so did Chappell Roan – but what is the point of a stage name?

Sydney Morning Herald

time11-06-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Sydney Morning Herald

Marilyn Monroe did it, so did Chappell Roan – but what is the point of a stage name?

'A celebrity's name is fundamentally part of who they are. When movies use names like Margot Robbie or Quentin Tarantino, it instantly boosts its perceived value before we even see the trailer. Names carry associations. They've got specific prestige, tones, they set certain expectations.' Loading Much of this star power doesn't come from the name itself, but the persona behind it. However, some believe that to develop such a star persona, one must begin with the right label. For example, singer Alicia Keys changed her surname to represent her love of music. 'Names are an instrument utilised for identity management. They're a form of strategic branding or even intentional rebranding,' Burgess says.'It could allow for a creative rebirth, helping people enter a different area of specialisation and offering them more legitimacy.' Certain names can expose stars to new audiences, says RMIT music industry and pop culture lecturer Kat Nelligan. David Bowie (David Robert Jones) not only used a pseudonym, but also a string of other personas including Ziggy Stardust and Aladdin Sane, all of which allowed different demographics to engage with him on various levels. 'Lady Gaga embodied a male alter ego, Jo Calderone, at the 2011 MTV Music Video Awards,' Nelligan says. 'That persona was a way for Gaga to not only express herself artistically, but to also reach queer audiences. It's a way to explore artistry, and to toy with different identities.' Pseudonyms can also operate as a boundary, she adds. Chappell Roan's name represents her more confident self, and also separates her public and private lives, something the singer has made clear is critical to her. 'In that way, pseudonyms could be tied to mental health and preserving the self,' Nelligan says. Is it just a Hollywood thing? No. Pseudonyms are common in other entertainment industries too, including Bollywood and K-Pop. 'It can be quite common for Bollywood actors trying to crack into a Western market. You start to see some of that colonial influence,' Burgess says. 'Stars may anglicize or simplify names to avoid marginalisation. Or perhaps they just want their name to be more memorable, to stand out on a more global level.' Meanwhile, in the K-Pop realm, Nelligan says adopting a stage name is often part of the transparently commercial process producers and studios go through to create pop stars. Examples include Suga from BTS, whose real name is Min Yoong, and Rosé from Blackpink (Park Chaeyoung). 'K-Pop is an industry built on this idea of a machine. It's curated and very strategic in how a K-Pop star is produced, so it makes sense that pseudonyms are used in that context.' Sean Redmond, associate dean of media, writing and publishing at RMIT, says many female authors used male pen-names during the 19th century due to misogynistic gender norms. 'George Elliot used a male pseudonym because of gender prejudice in publishing, and because she lived an 'unconventional life' – Mary Ann Evans lived with a man, but they weren't married,' Redmond says. Similarly, some male actors used pseudonyms to appear more masculine. 'John Wayne was born Marion Robert Morrison, a name deemed too feminine, or even too Italian, for American viewers. The director Raoul Walsh chose the name Wayne, inspired by revolutionary war hero Mad Anthony Wayne.' Some American-Jewish actors changed their names because of concerns around antisemitism, Redmond adds. For example, Edward G. Robinson's real name was Emanuel Goldenberg, while Kirk Douglas' real name was Issur Danielovitch. Others may even use a pseudonym to protect themselves from the law, such as Banksy, the street artist whose anonymity is a significant part of their appeal. Authentic or phoney? Loading Pseudonyms do not diminish a person's craft, Nelligan says – stage names are often forms of artistic expression. 'People are generally more concerned with whether an entertainer is staying true to their values. Let's say there's an artist who sings about climate change, but then they don't walk that talk. Audiences feel more duped by that … The pseudonym is neither here nor there in that sense. 'The view that a person's real self needs to be embedded in the music or literature is outdated … We still want to trace it to a person, but it doesn't matter if they use a pseudonym.' Although a lack of transparency around a public figure's name can generate engagement and intrigue, Nelligan says it can also leave fans with nowhere to channel that fascination. Burgess agrees, noting some pseudonyms could even appear deceptive. For instance, record producer Dr Luke, who was embroiled in a now-resolved legal battle against Kesha, went by the name Tyson Trax on Doja Cat's 2020 song Say So. 'You might see some negativity there because some people may not have supported the work if they had known he was involved. The name carries a lot of weight,' Burgess says. 'Consumers demand transparency and authenticity, but we also have to remember there are people behind these pseudonyms who obviously want some degree of privacy, and often it's not for sinister or deceptive reasons.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store