Latest news with #Regulation)Act
Time of India
5 days ago
- Health
- Time of India
Illegal IVF & surrogacy centre busted in Gurgaon; first FIR in Haryana, says CMO
Gurgaon: A fertility clinic that ran an illegal surrogacy and IVF (test tube baby) business in the city has been busted. A team from the health department found the clinic in Sushant Lok 1 was operating a "full-scale IVF and surrogacy setup without following the rules". The clinic, running without proper registration, charged up to Rs 3 lakh for the procedures and arrangements, health officials said. During the inspection, the team seized several registers that listed frozen embryos, egg donations and semen storage. The records showed the clinic was using a large number of egg donors and surrogates, many of them from poor backgrounds. An FIR was lodged at DLF 1 police station on Thursday. Chief medical officer Alka Singh said, "This is the first FIR in Haryana against an IVF centre. We have formed a six-member team of doctors. The team is investigating all such centres in Gurgaon. In this particular case, we received mail from an anonymous source about illegal activities being conducted at the centre. We informed DG (health) and district authorities and carried out a raid. We found several violations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo First, the centre was not registered. Second, there was evidence of ongoing IVF, IUI and egg donation procedures being carried out without requisite approvals. We also found 84 embryos." You Can Also Check: Gurgaon AQI | Weather in Gurgaon | Bank Holidays in Gurgaon | Public Holidays in Gurgaon According to the FIR, "During the inspection, Manju Sharma, the clinic's owner, admitted in a signed statement over 80 embryos were being stored at the centre and IVF procedures were being conducted since April-May 2025. She named another partner, Dr Nidhi, and confirmed that the clinic took over operations from the previously known Joyce IVF Centre." "The inquiry found evidence of at least 68 semen samples frozen between April and June 2025, with entries including names of foreign nationals such as Carlus Danielle, Andrew Charles and an Australian couple," the FIR stated. Officials said the clinic violated the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 and the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.
The Hindu
28-06-2025
- Health
- The Hindu
Bombay High Court orders fertility clinic to preserve deceased man's sperm in landmark ART Act case
In a case that could set a key precedent for posthumous reproductive rights in India, the Bombay High Court has directed the interim preservation of a deceased 21-year-old unmarried man's frozen semen sample. Justice Manish Pitale, presiding over a Single Bench, was hearing a petition filed by the man's mother and noted that the matter raised 'important questions' regarding the interpretation and application of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 (ART Act). The petitioner moved the High Court after the fertility clinic refused to release her son's semen. She is seeking access to the sample to continue the family lineage, arguing that her son was the sole legal heir. Justice Pitale observed, 'This petition gives rise to important questions with regard to the manner in which the semen/gamete of a person is to be preserved after death, under the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 and the Rules framed thereunder. This becomes particularly significant in the present case, for the reason that the deceased, being the son of the petitioner, was unmarried at the time of his death.' The Court said that the petition requires detailed consideration but cautioned that if the semen is discarded during the pendency of the matter, the very purpose of the petition would be defeated. 'In view of the above, list for further consideration on July 30, 2025, High on Board. In the meanwhile, as an interim direction, the respondent No.2 (the clinic) is directed to ensure safe-keeping and storage of the frozen semen sample of the deceased, during the pendency of the present petition.' According to the mother, her son was diagnosed in 2023 with Ewing Sarcoma, a rare form of cancer affecting bones. Before beginning chemotherapy, his oncologist had advised him to freeze his semen due to the potential impact on fertility. He subsequently deposited his sample at a fertility clinic in Mumbai. The consent form, the mother claims, gave only two options: discard upon death or hand over to a spouse. The son signed it without consulting his family. As he died unmarried and without a will on February 16, 2025, the clinic refused to release the sample. The mother requested that it be transferred to a Gujarat-based clinic but was informed that a court order was needed. She first approached the Maharashtra Public Health Department in March but received no response. She then appealed to the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on April 28. On May 6, her grievance was formally rejected, prompting her to approach the High Court. The petition notes that there are no surviving male members in the family, as the father and uncles had passed away young. It also cites a dying wish conveyed by the son to his aunt — that his sperm be used to create children who could look after his mother and family. The petition asserts that 'the sperm constitutes property' and that 'parents are the legal heirs of their deceased son.'
News18
27-06-2025
- Health
- News18
Mother Seeks Access To Dead Son's Semen; Bombay HC Orders Fertility Centre To Preserve Sample
Last Updated: According to the facility centre, the man had signed a consent form, stating that the sample should be discarded after his death The Bombay High Court has ordered a Mumbai-based fertility centre to preserve the frozen semen of an unmarried man who passed away earlier this year. The order came after the man's mother filed a petition seeking access to the sample to continue the family line. The mother approached the High Court after the fertility centre refused to release the semen. According to the fertility centre, the man had signed a consent form during his cancer treatment, stating that the sample should be discarded after his death. The semen had been frozen while he was undergoing chemotherapy. In an interim order issued on June 25, a bench led by Justice Manish Pitale observed that discarding the sample before hearing the petition would make the matter pointless. The court therefore asked the fertility centre to ensure the safe storage of the sample till the next hearing, scheduled for 30 July. 'In the meanwhile, as an interim direction, the fertility centre is directed to ensure safe-keeping and storage of the frozen sample of the deceased, during pendency of the petition," the court ordered. The court also said the case raises important questions about how a person's semen should be handled after death under the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021. The mother argued that her son had agreed to discard the sample without discussing it with the family. After his death in February, she requested the centre to release the semen so it could be transferred to a Gujarat-based IVF clinic for further steps. However, the fertility centre refused and insisted she obtain legal permission under the new law, which regulates and monitors ART clinics and procedures to ensure ethical use and protect the rights of those involved. First Published: June 27, 2025, 18:17 IST
The Print
27-06-2025
- Health
- The Print
Mother seeks access to dead son's semen; HC asks fertility centre to preserve frozen sample
A bench of Justice Manish Pitale on June 25 noted that if the frozen semen of the deceased man is discarded pending hearing of the plea, then it would become infructuous. The court posted the petition for further hearing on July 30. The woman moved the HC after the fertility centre refused to release the frozen semen to her as the man, in his consent forms, had sought for the sperm carrying fluid to be discarded post-death. The man had chosen to freeze his semen when he was undergoing chemotherapy, a cancer treatment. Mumbai, Jun 27 (PTI) The Bombay High Court, in an interim order, has directed a city-based fertility centre to preserve the frozen semen of a deceased unmarried man pending hearing of a petition by his mother who wants to use the fluid to continue the family line. 'In the meanwhile, as an interim direction, the fertility centre is directed to ensure safe-keeping and storage of the frozen sample of the deceased, during pendency of the petition,' the court ordered. The bench noted that the petition raises important questions with regard to the manner in which the semen of a person is to be preserved after his death under provisions of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021. The court pointed out that in the present case, the man was unmarried at the time of his death in February. The woman, in her plea, argued her son had, without consulting family members, in his consent forms agreed to have the frozen semen discarded if he dies. After his death, the mother sought the Mumbai-based fertility centre to provide access to transfer the sample to a Gujarat-based IVF centre for future course of action. The fertility centre, however, refused and asked the mother to obtain authorization from court under the new Act, which seeks to regulate and supervise assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics. The legislation also aims to ensure ethical practices, prevent misuse, and protect the rights of individuals seeking ART services. PTI SP RSY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hindustan Times
27-06-2025
- Health
- Hindustan Times
Dead man's mom in Mumbai wants his frozen semen to 'continue family line'
A unique legal battle is brewing in Mumbai, involving a mother's unexpected quest to become a grandmother, using her dead son's frozen sperm. The man's consent form, he clearly stated that the sperm should be discarded if he died. (Representational Image) The man, who was unmarried and undergoing chemotherapy, had decided to freeze his semen before starting cancer treatment. But in his consent form, he clearly stated that the sperm should be discarded if he died. Fast forward to earlier this year: the man passed away, and his grieving mother, hoping to continue the family lineage, approached the fertility centre where the sample was stored, news agency PTI reported. She requested they release the frozen semen so she could transfer it to an IVF centre in Gujarat for possible use in assisted reproduction. But there was a catch, the clinic refused. They cited the man's own instructions to discard the sample posthumously and pointed to the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, which mandates court approval in such cases to avoid ethical and legal complications, the report added. (Also Read: Indian-origin woman rants about zero veg food at US work event: 'I walked out so disappointed') Mother moves court Determined, the mother took the matter to the Bombay High Court, arguing that her son had signed the consent form without discussing it with his family. She believes the sperm shouldn't be discarded and deserves a second chance, possibly one that includes grandkids. In response, the court stepped in with an interim order on June 25, directing the fertility centre to preserve the frozen semen until the matter is heard in full on July 30. The judge also noted that the case raises important questions under the ART law, particularly around what happens to preserved genetic material after someone dies. (With PTI inputs) (Also Read: Indian-origin CEO posts about near-heart attack, internet slams him for turning hospital photo into LinkedIn content)
