logo
#

Latest news with #RichardYoung

i-80 Gold Announces Voting Results From its 2025 Meeting of Shareholders
i-80 Gold Announces Voting Results From its 2025 Meeting of Shareholders

Yahoo

time17-06-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

i-80 Gold Announces Voting Results From its 2025 Meeting of Shareholders

RENO, Nev., June 17, 2025 /PRNewswire/ - i-80 GOLD CORP. (TSX: IAU) (NYSE: IAUX) ("i-80" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the results of its 2025 annual and special meeting of shareholders (the "Meeting") held on June 17, 2025. A total of 235,438,321 common shares, representing approximately 53.1% of the Company's outstanding common shares as at the April 23, 2025 record date, were voted by proxy at the Meeting. A summary of the results are as follows: 1. Number for Directors At the Meeting, shareholders approved setting the number of directors of the Company at seven. 2. Election of Directors All director nominees listed in the Company's management information circular dated April 29, 2025 were elected as directors of the Company on a vote held by ballot. Director Vote Type Number of Votes Percentage of Votes (%) Ron Clayton For 166,403,289 94.6 % Withheld 9,435,085 5.4 % Richard Young For 169,960,265 96.7 % Withheld 5,878,110 3.3 % Eva Bellissimo For 143,483,907 81.6 % Withheld 32,354,466 18.4 % John Begeman For 148,867,932 84.7 % Withheld 26,970,442 15.3 % John Seaman For 138,514,480 78.8 % Withheld 37,323,893 21.2 % Arthur Einav For 147,774,404 84.0 % Withheld 28,063,970 16.0 % Cassandra Joseph For 162,123,576 92.2 % Withheld 13,714,797 7.8 % 3. Appointment of Auditor Shareholders approved the reappointment of Grant Thornton LLP (USA), Chartered Professional Accountants as the Company's auditors and authorized the directors of the Company to fix their remuneration. 4. Advance Notice Policy Shareholders approved the Company's Advance Notice Policy outlining the procedures and requirements for nominating individual directors to the board of the Company. The voting results with respect to all matters voted upon at the Meeting will be filed on SEDAR+ at and on EDGAR at About i-80 Gold Corp. i-80 Gold Corp. is a Nevada-focused mining company committed to building a mid-tier gold producer through a new development plan to advance its high-quality asset portfolio. The Company is the fourth largest gold mineral resource holder in the state with a pipeline of high-grade exploration projects advancing towards feasibility and one operating project ramping-up toward steady state, all strategically located in Nevada's most prolific gold-producing trends. Leveraging its fully permitted central processing facility following an anticipated refurbishment, i-80 Gold is executing a hub-and-spoke regional mining and processing strategy to maximize efficiency and growth. i-80 Gold's shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX:IAU) and the NYSE American (NYSE:IAUX). For more information, visit View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE i-80 Gold Corp Sign in to access your portfolio

Historian trying to solve mystery of old cricket club
Historian trying to solve mystery of old cricket club

Yahoo

time17-06-2025

  • Sport
  • Yahoo

Historian trying to solve mystery of old cricket club

A historian is trying to solve a mystery involving an old cricket club. Richard Young, author of "The History of Wrelton," is appealing for information about the now-defunct Wrelton Cricket Club. Advertisement The club, which folded in 1976 due to a lack of players, had once awarded the Wrelton Cup for a local second XI competition. 1920's Wrelton Cricket team (Image: Supplied) Mr Young, who has records of the club's existence dating back to 1857, is keen to discover the whereabouts of the missing trophy. Despite contacting Pickering Cricket Club, the Yorkshire Premier League, the Pickering Evening League, and the Ryedale Becket League, Mr Young has not been able to trace the cup. 1910's Wrelton Cricket club (Image: Supplied) He is now appealing for any information from the public that could help locate the missing piece of history. Anyone with relevant information is asked to get in touch.

Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment
Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment

Indianapolis Star

time30-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Indianapolis Star

Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment

An Indiana University policy enacted in response to pro-Palestinian protests will be paused after a federal judge ruled the policy may be violating students' First Amendment rights. IU revised its "expressive activity" policy in mid-2024 to ban overnight camping and use of structures, such as tents, without approval — hallmarks of the pro-Palestine protest movement. In response, the Indiana Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit challenging the policy last August. In its complaint, the ACLU alleged the university policy violates the First Amendment and is overly broad. Judge Richard Young of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana agreed and granted a preliminary injunction May 29. "The Policy likely burdens substantially more speech than necessary to further the University's interest in public safety and thus lacks narrow tailoring," the preliminary injunction reads. "The Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Policy violates the First Amendment." During the 2024 spring semester, protesters established an encampment in Dunn Meadow for several months. The protests drew national attention, resulted in dozens of arrests and required 'extensive repairs' of the area. Under the now-halted section of the policy, students, faculty and staff could not engage in protests and other expressive activities from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. without permission. If violated, one could face a range of disciplinary actions, including suspension, expulsion, loss of university employment and a responsibility to pay for damages. "While IU supports everyone's right to protest, camping or using any item to create a shelter is not a permitted form of expressive activity," the university said in paid content published in the Herald-Times last fall. "This ensures campus safety and accessibility for all community members." IU did not provide a reaction to the injunction since the university does not comment on pending litigation, spokesperson Mark Bode said. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.

Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment
Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment

Yahoo

time29-05-2025

  • General
  • Yahoo

Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment

An Indiana University policy enacted in response to pro-Palestinian protests will be paused after a federal judge ruled the policy may be violating students' First Amendment rights. IU revised its "expressive activity" policy in mid-2024 to ban overnight camping and use of structures, such as tents, without approval — hallmarks of the pro-Palestine protest movement. In response, the Indiana Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit challenging the policy last August. In its complaint, the ACLU alleged the university policy violates the First Amendment and is overly broad. Judge Richard Young of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana agreed and granted a preliminary injunction May 29. "The Policy likely burdens substantially more speech than necessary to further the University's interest in public safety and thus lacks narrow tailoring," the preliminary injunction reads. "The Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Policy violates the First Amendment." During the 2024 spring semester, protesters established an encampment in Dunn Meadow for several months. The protests drew national attention, resulted in dozens of arrests and required 'extensive repairs' of the area. Under the now-halted section of the policy, students, faculty and staff could not engage in protests and other expressive activities from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. without permission. If violated, one could face a range of disciplinary actions, including suspension, expulsion, loss of university employment and a responsibility to pay for damages. "While IU supports everyone's right to protest, camping or using any item to create a shelter is not a permitted form of expressive activity," the university said in paid content published in the Herald-Times last fall. "This ensures campus safety and accessibility for all community members." IU did not provide a reaction to the injunction since the university does not comment on pending litigation, spokesperson Mark Bode said. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Have a story to tell? Reach Cate Charron by email at ccharron@ or message her on Signal at @ This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates 1st Amendment

Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment
Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment

Indianapolis Star

time29-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Indianapolis Star

Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment

An Indiana University policy enacted in response to pro-Palestinian protests will be paused after a federal judge ruled the policy may be violating students' First Amendment rights. IU revised its "expressive activity" policy in mid-2024 to ban overnight camping and use of structures, such as tents, without approval — hallmarks of the pro-Palestine protest movement. In response, the Indiana Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit challenging the policy last August. In its complaint, the ACLU alleged the university policy violates the First Amendment and is overly broad. Judge Richard Young of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana agreed and granted a preliminary injunction May 29. "The Policy likely burdens substantially more speech than necessary to further the University's interest in public safety and thus lacks narrow tailoring," the preliminary injunction reads. "The Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Policy violates the First Amendment." During the 2024 spring semester, protesters established an encampment in Dunn Meadow for several months. The protests drew national attention, resulted in dozens of arrests and required 'extensive repairs' of the area. Under the now-halted section of the policy, students, faculty and staff could not engage in protests and other expressive activities from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. without permission. If violated, one could face a range of disciplinary actions, including suspension, expulsion, loss of university employment and a responsibility to pay for damages. "While IU supports everyone's right to protest, camping or using any item to create a shelter is not a permitted form of expressive activity," the university said in paid content published in the Herald-Times last fall. "This ensures campus safety and accessibility for all community members." IU did not provide a reaction to the injunction since the university does not comment on pending litigation, spokesperson Mark Bode said. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store