logo
#

Latest news with #SanFranciscoBay

Port of Oakland attempts another airport renaming to "Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport"
Port of Oakland attempts another airport renaming to "Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport"

CBS News

time7 hours ago

  • Business
  • CBS News

Port of Oakland attempts another airport renaming to "Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport"

SF seeks to stop Oakland airport from using new "San Francisco Bay" name SF seeks to stop Oakland airport from using new "San Francisco Bay" name SF seeks to stop Oakland airport from using new "San Francisco Bay" name The Port of Oakland is taking another stab at incorporating "San Francisco Bay" into the official name of Oakland's airport after a court blocked its previous attempt. On Friday, the port announced it would seek to adopt the name "Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport," which it said in a press release "reflects its strong Oakland and East Bay identity and its convenient role as a gateway to the entire San Francisco Bay Area." The port said the airport renaming is part of an effort to increase air travel and boost economic activity within Oakland and the East Bay region. Oakland International Airport KPIX In April 2024, the port announced it would change the name of "Metropolitan Oakland International Airport" to "San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport," noting at the time that many out-of-town passengers were not aware of Oakland's location in relation to the rest of the Bay Area. The San Francisco city attorney filed suit over the name change, arguing that it infringed on the San Francisco International Airport/SFO trademark. The port filed a countersuit, saying San Francisco's lawsuit was "prematurely" filed. In September 2024, San Francisco sought an injunction against the renaming, arguing the change had caused confusion among visitors. A month later, a judge blocked Oakland's use of "San Francisco Bay" in its name in advertising, marketing, or other airport services until the lawsuit between the two cities was resolved. The port said the new name configuration now places "Oakland" at the forefront of the OAK brand while informing travelers that Oakland can be a logical starting point for travelers to the region. "We are proud to be a central gateway to the Bay Area, and we're proud to embrace a name that reflects both our local roots and regional reach," said Craig Simon, the Port of Oakland's director of aviation. "'Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport' does both, putting Oakland first and highlighting our central location in the Bay Area for all visitors." On Friday, a spokesperson for the San Francisco City Attorney's Office said the office was considering its response to the new renaming. "We are just learning about this development and will assess any next steps to ensure San Francisco International Airport's trademark is protected," spokesperson Jen Kwart said. The Board of Port Commissioners will consider adopting the new name at its July 10 meeting. As in the previous renaming attempt, the airport's three-letter OAK code and "I Fly OAK" branding would remain the same.

"Forever chemicals" found in fish caught in San Francisco Bay, report warns
"Forever chemicals" found in fish caught in San Francisco Bay, report warns

CBS News

time11-06-2025

  • Health
  • CBS News

"Forever chemicals" found in fish caught in San Francisco Bay, report warns

A warning to anglers who eat their catch from the San Francisco Bay, fish pulled from the waters may contain dangerous levels of so-called "forever chemicals." In a recent report by the San Francisco Estuary Institute, scientists detected 20 types of polyfluoroalkyl substances, known as PFAS in fish caught in the bay. Their research and testing of fish began in 2009, and a revised study was published in the American Chemical Society this past March. "PFAS have been known to harm us in a variety of different ways, they've been known to cause cancer," said Miguel Mendez, the lead author of the SFEI study. "It affects us in variety of different organs, including the liver, and over time can cause some severe health effects." Along the docks of San Francisco's Embarcadero, one will find a variety of fisherman who are there for sport or relaxation, but a number of people fish the docks for food. "I think for communities, especially those that are eating every day from the Bay, that is a huge concern and likely leading to a higher load of PFAS and other contaminants, for these populations," said Mendez. Along Pier One, longtime anglers Danny Tran and Nick Hayden were posted up on a sunny afternoon, and both say while they love to fish, they are careful about how much of their catch they consume. "I don't eat too much fish, so I'm okay with it," said Tran. "I probably eat once a month, twice a month and that's about it." "You have to choose what you eat, the smaller (younger) the better, because there's less chemicals in them," said Hayden. "The bigger ones have higher levels of mercury, or whatever they have inside of them." Currently there are no specific state guidelines on the consumption of fish in relation to PFAS. But since 2011 the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessments has offered recommendations on 18 fish species on which types of fish to avoid, which fish are safe to eat, and how many servings are recommended per week, along with gender and age advisories. They updated their recommendations in April of 2023, and have posted signs along local docks. Where anglers catch their fish, can also determine the level of "forever chemicals." SFEI conducted tests in 12 different locations and found higher levels of PFAS in the South Bay. "The South Bay is a hotspot for PFAS, but that doesn't mean that the North Bay is the immune or doesn't have PFAS at all, because fish can swim for location to location," said Mendez. "To those who may have a seafood heavy diet, you should really think about where is my seafood coming from."

2 rescued from San Francisco cliff after dropping phones
2 rescued from San Francisco cliff after dropping phones

Yahoo

time09-06-2025

  • Yahoo

2 rescued from San Francisco cliff after dropping phones

SAN FRANCISCO - Two people had to be rescued after accidentally dropping their phones down a cliffside in San Francisco Saturday afternoon, officials said. The tourists were caught on the cliffside between Deadman's Point and Mile Rock Beach around 3:30 p.m. According to officials, they tried to go down the cliff to get the phones they dropped but became stuck. Crews with the San Francisco Fire Department's Cliff Rescue Unit and Heavy Rescue 1 responded to the scene to pull the pair up to safety. Neither person was injured in the ordeal, officials said. Both were cited by Park Police following the rescue. "SF Fire advises people to stay on trails and follow postage signage," officials said about the rescue.

San Francisco tourists rescued from cliffside after trying to get dropped phone
San Francisco tourists rescued from cliffside after trying to get dropped phone

CBS News

time08-06-2025

  • CBS News

San Francisco tourists rescued from cliffside after trying to get dropped phone

A pair of San Francisco tourists were rescued Saturday after getting stuck on a cliffside, the San Francisco Fire Department said. Crews were sent to the area between Deadman's and Mile Rock Beach around 3:30 p.m. for a cliffside rescue. The Fire Department said one of them dropped their cellphone, and both of them got stuck on the cliffside trying to get it back. Crews from the Cliff Rescue 14 and Heavy Rescue 1 helped with a rope-rescue operation. The pair were rescued around an hour later. Neither was injured, and they were issued a ticket by the US Park Police. The Sonoma County Sheriff's Office's Henry 1 helicopter was on standby for the rescue, but was not needed.

Researchers issue urgent warning over increasingly powerful threat to coastal communities: 'When it happens, it's going to be worse'
Researchers issue urgent warning over increasingly powerful threat to coastal communities: 'When it happens, it's going to be worse'

Yahoo

time08-06-2025

  • Science
  • Yahoo

Researchers issue urgent warning over increasingly powerful threat to coastal communities: 'When it happens, it's going to be worse'

Coastal communities are experiencing excessive flooding — a form of extreme weather — at alarming new rates, and scientists are sounding the alarm about wildly insufficient infrastructure in low-lying urban areas. Researchers from UC Santa Cruz and the United States Geological Survey teamed up to identify novel flood mitigation strategies, citing an urgent need to shore up coastlines, and their joint findings were published in the journal Scientific Reports. "By 2050, the coastal flooding from extreme storms we currently consider once-in-a-lifetime events could occur every other year due to sea level rise," said in their coverage of the study. "Further, the flooding expected today from a once-in-a-lifetime event could occur daily by the end of the century." Coastal habitats like marshes and coral reefs "have been shown to effectively mitigate flood risk," but decades of development eroded those natural protections. "We've built cities and communities and our world under the assumption that these habitats will continue to protect us," explained lead author Rae Taylor-Burns, "and yet we degrade them." Researchers explored horizontal levees to mitigate flood risk in the San Francisco Bay area and found they were up to 30% more effective than traditional levees at mitigating flood risk. Coastal flooding has always occurred, but rising temperatures have made these extreme events more frequent and more deadly. Climate tech investor and journalist Molly Wood has said that "climate isn't weather, and weather isn't climate," likening human-influenced climate impacts to "steroids for weather." "Whatever was already going to happen, like droughts, floods, fires, tornadoes, hurricanes, heat waves, snowstorms, rain — all that is still going to happen," Wood explained. "But when it happens, it's going to be worse." Echoing the study's researchers, she continued. "Also, extreme versions of what used to be normal weather are going to happen more often." Do you think your city has good air quality? Definitely Somewhat Depends on the time of year Not at all Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. According to Climate Central, the "annual frequency of high tide flooding in the U.S. has more than doubled since 2000 — and is projected to more than triple again by 2050 as sea levels continue to rise." Around 30% of Americans live near a coastline, foregrounding an imminent need to identify accessible flood mitigation strategies and make coastal communities more resilient. Actions like installing solar panels are one way to ensure your home is more resilient in the face of natural disasters that could knock out infrastructure — and EnergySage not only offers quotes from trusted local installers, but can also save consumers up to $10,000 on new solar installations. Getting your power from the sun also helps to avoid contributing to the type of pollution that leads to increasing global temperatures. At the study's conclusion, researchers cited previously published findings that supported nature-based flood defenses for both efficacy and costs. They noted that structural properties like vegetation "could reduce levee investment cost by $320 billion on a global scale," adding that previous research "suggests that restoring marsh habitat in front of seawalls" could be far less costly than raising seawalls. "Horizontal levees could be a less expensive way to reduce the risk of levee failure with climate change, as opposed to increasing the height of the levees themselves," Taylor-Burns remarked. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store