Latest news with #Science-BasedTargets
TECHx
3 days ago
- Business
- TECHx
NETSCOUT Reveals Energy-Efficient InfiniStreamNG Design
Home » Emerging technologies » Cyber Security » NETSCOUT Reveals Energy-Efficient InfiniStreamNG Design NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC. (NASDAQ: NTCT), a provider of observability, AIOps, cybersecurity, and DDoS protection solutions, announced improvements to its InfiniStreamNG platform that enhance energy efficiency and support IT sustainability. The company revealed that the intentionally efficient design and architecture of InfiniStreamNG reduces operational costs while improving sustainability outcomes. NETSCOUT reported that data center energy use is rising rapidly due to digital transformation and AI advancements. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global data center electricity use may more than double by 2030. U.S. data centers alone could consume more electricity than all energy-intensive industries combined. NETSCOUT's InfiniStreamNG and nGeniusONE solutions are built to deliver deep network visibility and analytics. Unlike multi-appliance systems, the InfiniStreamNG probe centralizes functionality, leading to a streamlined and energy-efficient setup. Key findings include:• A 23% average electricity reduction across 500+ InfiniStreamNG devices without compromising performance• Lower energy usage through reduced rack space and simplified deployments • Intelligent data processing that minimizes compute and storage needs Ray Jones, senior director of platform product management at NETSCOUT, said the company optimized the InfiniStreamNG platform to lower energy and operational costs while maintaining essential visibility in complex environments. The company also reaffirmed its commitment to sustainability. It has set science-based emissions reduction targets, aiming to cut absolute Scope 1 emissions by 57.4% and Scope 2 emissions by 42% by FY2030 from an FY2022 baseline. These targets have been validated by the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). NETSCOUT stated that it is already making measurable progress or exceeding these environmental goals.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Automotive
- Time of India
Not just electric: Auto sector needs cleaner steel & power to really put the brakes on emissions, says study
India's automobile sector—the third-largest in the world—could slash its manufacturing-related emissions by a staggering 87% by 2050, not just by building more electric vehicles (EVs), but by cleaning up how all vehicles—ICEs, hybrids, and EVs—are made. That's the central finding of a new report released Wednesday by the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW), which stresses that green electricity, low-carbon steel, and cleaner supply chains—not just EVs—are essential to decarbonising the industry. In recent years, top automakers such as Tata Motors , Mahindra & Mahindra, TVS Motors , Ford, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Toyota have set ambitious emission reduction targets and joined the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). Many have expanded electric and hybrid offerings—but the study urges the sector to go further by addressing Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including those from suppliers. 'To lead in a low-carbon global economy, we must decarbonise not just the vehicles we drive, but the industrial processes that build them,' said Dr Arunabha Ghosh, CEO of CEEW. 'Automakers must clean up what powers their factories and how suppliers produce critical materials like steel and rubber.' The Delhi-based think tank's study shows that while production could quadruple to 96 million vehicles by 2050, emissions from manufacturing can be capped—or even dramatically cut—if the sector shifts to 100% green electricity, adopts hydrogen-based and scrap-intensive steelmaking, and makes low-carbon procurement the norm. Today, Scope 3 emissions—mostly from materials like coal-heavy steel and rubber—account for 83% of the industry's carbon footprint in India. Simply electrifying vehicles without addressing these upstream emissions will leave most of the climate problem intact. Hybrids are a temporary bridge CEEW also modelled a 'high-hybrid' scenario, where hybrids dominate before EVs become widespread. While this reduces some energy demand, emissions remain higher than a direct EV transition due to continued combustion engine use. 'Hybrid vehicles may offer short-term efficiency gains, but they're not a substitute for a zero-carbon mobility future,' the report notes. Green manufacturing: Real game changer The report urges OEMs to treat green manufacturing as a strategic lever—not just for climate goals, but for long-term competitiveness. With global supply chains tightening sustainability standards, Indian manufacturers who decarbonise early will have a distinct edge. 'Indian automakers must secure green steel, power factories with renewables, and demand cleaner inputs from suppliers,' said Dr Vaibhav Chaturvedi, Senior Fellow at CEEW. 'Without this, EVs alone won't be enough to meet net-zero goals.' The study calls for a two-pronged strategy: accelerate EV adoption and decarbonise the manufacturing value chain. If done right, it says, the Indian auto sector could become a 'force multiplier' in the country's broader transition to net-zero.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 days ago
- Automotive
- Business Standard
Switch to green power, steel to cut India's auto sector emissions: CEEW
India's automobile industry—the third-largest in the world—could cut its manufacturing emissions by as much as 87 per cent by 2050 through a shift to green electricity and low-carbon steel, according to a new independent study released on Wednesday by the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW). The study comes as several leading automakers—such as Mahindra & Mahindra, Tata Motors, TVS Motors, Ford, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Toyota—have, over the past two years, ramped up electric and hybrid vehicle production while simultaneously setting ambitious emission reduction targets. These automakers have also committed to the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi), aligning with global definitions of net-zero that require full value-chain decarbonisation by 2050. For large Indian auto manufacturers, cleaning up supply chains will not just lower emissions; it will enhance long-term cost competitiveness and position them as preferred international suppliers. While many of these targets focus on direct factory emissions (Scope 1 and 2) and downstream use-phase emissions, upstream supply chain emissions remain largely overlooked, despite contributing the majority of the sector's carbon footprint. The CEEW study tracks emissions across three scopes: direct emissions from vehicle manufacturing (Scope 1), indirect emissions from electricity use (Scope 2), and upstream supply chain emissions (Scope 3). Scope 3 emissions currently make up over 83 per cent of the auto industry's emissions in India, largely due to the use of coal-intensive steel and rubber in vehicle manufacturing. 'India's auto industry stands at a turning point. To lead in a low-carbon global economy, we must decarbonise not just the vehicles we drive but the industrial processes that build them. Automakers must clean up how their vehicles are made, what powers their factories, and how their suppliers produce critical inputs like steel and rubber. This is not new—promisingly, most major manufacturers in India are already thinking about these shifts,' said Arunabha Ghosh, chief executive officer, CEEW. 'Now, the push must be to create demand for green materials at scale, lower costs, and deploy cleaner technologies rapidly. The auto sector can emerge as a force multiplier for economy-wide net-zero transitions—but only through collective foresight, investment and innovation,' he added. The CEEW study uses a custom version of the Global Change Analysis Model to project emissions from India's vehicle manufacturing sector under various pathways. It finds that if current business-as-usual (BAU) trends continue, annual vehicle production could rise nearly four-fold—from 25 million units in 2020 to 96 million by 2050. Emissions, however, would only double, reaching 64 million tonnes of CO₂, suggesting a steady decline in emissions per vehicle. Still, the absolute rise in emissions underscores the need for accelerated action. Steel alone would remain the largest source of supply chain emissions, with suppliers expected to rely heavily on coal in this business-as-usual scenario. The study estimates that sourcing low-carbon steel could reduce emissions by nearly 38 million tonnes by 2050. If both OEMs and their suppliers were to aim for net-zero by 2050, annual emissions could fall from the projected 64 MtCO₂ (BAU) to just 9 MtCO₂—an 87 per cent reduction. This would require OEMs to shift to 100 per cent green electricity—sourced through power purchase agreements (PPAs), renewable energy certificates (RECs), or captive solar—and steel suppliers to use 56 per cent hydrogen-based energy, reducing coal's share to under 10 per cent. In addition, increasing scrap-based steel production to 48 per cent by 2050 would significantly reduce emissions and resource intensity. The CEEW study also highlights that rubber suppliers must transition to green electricity to clean up Scope 2 emissions. 'To align India's automobile sector—central to GDP, jobs, and industrial growth—with a net-zero future, we must go beyond electrifying vehicles. We must decarbonise manufacturing itself. Leading OEMs are already making corporate decisions to stay ahead by decarbonising their operations and supply chains. What's needed now is strong procurement intent, especially through advanced market commitments to secure green steel and other low-carbon materials,' said Vaibhav Chaturvedi, Senior Fellow, CEEW. 'The policy landscape may be evolving, but major markets are still pushing hard on green through corporate and investor action. Indian automakers must treat clean manufacturing as a strategic lever—not just for cost control, but to stay competitive in global supply chains,' Chaturvedi added. The CEEW study also examines a high-hybrid scenario, where hybrids dominate in the near term before EVs take off. While this reduces energy demand among component suppliers by 7 per cent, emissions remain slightly higher than in a BAU shift to EVs due to continued reliance on combustion engines. Ultimately, hybrid vehicles are at best a bridge and will need to be reduced to make way for zero-carbon vehicles. To align the automobile sector with a 2050 net-zero pathway, the CEEW study recommends a two-pronged strategy: accelerate the transition to electric vehicles and decarbonise the full manufacturing value chain. Since 65–80 per cent of a vehicle's lifetime emissions come from its use phase, shifting to EVs remains the most effective way to cut end-use emissions. But deep reductions will only be possible if EVs are manufactured using clean energy and low-carbon materials. This requires coordinated action across OEMs and suppliers—supported by long-term procurement commitments and policy signals that encourage investments.
Time of India
6 days ago
- Business
- Time of India
Global oil and gas emissions standard put on pause after Shell, others walk away
Shell and other leading energy groups have abandoned a six-year-long attempt to define a net zero emissions strategy after being told that such a standard would require them to stop developing new oil and gas fields, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing documents seen by the newspaper. Shell, Norway's Aker BP and Canada's Enbridge have all quit the expert advisory group of Science-Based Targets initiative since late last year, the FT reported. The Science-Based Targets initiative, a leading assessor of company climate goals, confirmed it has paused development of the oil and gas standard due to "significant, resource-intensive development" it still required. "This is the sole reason behind our decision... we will return to Oil & Gas Standard development, with the precise timing to be determined as we finalise our forward work programme," a spokesperson for the group said. In March, the body had proposed new rules to better help companies set high-quality emissions-reduction plans. The companies quit the initiative as draft standards seen by the FT stated that the companies should not develop "new oil and gas fields" once they submitted a climate plan, or from the end of 2027, whichever was sooner. The initiative has "paused" work on the oil and gas standard citing "capacity considerations", but denied this was linked to the oil and gas industry departures, saying there was "no basis in reality for these claims," the FT report said. Shell said in a statement that it supports science-based methodologies and believes standards should reflect "realistic societal and economic changes" while allowing flexibility to reach net-zero goals. "In the absence of an industry-wide standard, Shell has used 1.5°C scenarios developed for the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in setting its targets, which we believe demonstrates Paris alignment," a company spokesperson said. Shell told the FT that its expert had withdrawn after seeing a draft standard that "did not reflect the industry view in any substantive way," while Aker BP told the newspaper it had left the advisory panel after finding its "ability to influence" the standard "limited." Enbridge did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment, while Aker BP could not be immediately reached.
Business Recorder
6 days ago
- Business
- Business Recorder
Global oil and gas emissions standard put on pause after Shell, others walk away, FT says
Shell and other leading energy groups have abandoned a six-year-long attempt to define a net zero emissions strategy after being told that such a standard would require them to stop developing new oil and gas fields, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing documents seen by the newspaper. Shell, Norway's Aker BP and Canada's Enbridge have all quit the expert advisory group of Science-Based Targets initiative since late last year, the FT reported. The Science-Based Targets initiative, a leading assessor of company climate goals, confirmed it has paused development of the oil and gas standard due to 'significant, resource-intensive development' it still required. 'This is the sole reason behind our decision… we will return to Oil & Gas Standard development, with the precise timing to be determined as we finalise our forward work programme,' a spokesperson for the group said. Shell says it is not considering buying BP, UK rules ban bid for 6 months In March, the body had proposed new rules to better help companies set high-quality emissions-reduction plans. The companies quit the initiative as draft standards seen by the FT stated that the companies should not develop 'new oil and gas fields' once they submitted a climate plan, or from the end of 2027, whichever was sooner. The initiative has 'paused' work on the oil and gas standard citing 'capacity considerations', but denied this was linked to the oil and gas industry departures, saying there was 'no basis in reality for these claims,' the FT report said. Shell said in a statement that it supports science-based methodologies and believes standards should reflect 'realistic societal and economic changes' while allowing flexibility to reach net-zero goals. 'In the absence of an industry-wide standard, Shell has used 1.5°C scenarios developed for the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in setting its targets, which we believe demonstrates Paris alignment,' a company spokesperson said. Shell told the FT that its expert had withdrawn after seeing a draft standard that 'did not reflect the industry view in any substantive way,' while Aker BP told the newspaper it had left the advisory panel after finding its 'ability to influence' the standard 'limited.' Enbridge did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment, while Aker BP could not be immediately reached.
