Latest news with #ScotWingo
Axios
3 days ago
- Business
- Axios
Here are the Triangle's largest "unicorn" startups
When Durham-based sports software company Teamworks revealed last month it had gained a valuation of more than $1 billion, it became the Triangle's first tech startup to join the " unicorn" club — startups surpassing a $1 billion valuation — in more than three years. Why it matters: While the early pandemic years saw an influx of cash go to startups due to low interest rates, raising money has grown significantly more difficult over the past two years. But there are signs that such investments could be picking back up, Scot Wingo, a local investor, told Axios. What they're saying: "It's whipsawing around," Wingo said of investments into startups, noting investment companies seem less concerned now about tariffs. "There is a lot of private equity deals going on, and there have been a couple high-profile IPOs that have gone well," he added. "It definitely feels like directionally we are going in the right way." Between the lines: It's been years since the Triangle had a startup go public on a stock exchange, and startups valued at more than $1 billion represent some of the region's best chances of hitting that mark. An IPO could potentially provide financial windfalls for some local employees and investors that could flow back through the local economy. Wingo said many people are watching to see how well Figma's potential IPO fares, as an encouragement for local startups like Pendo or SAS. Zoom in: There are more than 1,200 startups around the world valued at $1 billion or more, according to CB Insights. Five of them are located in the Triangle, according to data from CB Insights, Pitchbook and Crunchbase. Here are the startups in the Triangle that have fetched "unicorn" valuations: 🕹️ Epic Games: The Cary-based video game maker has a valuation of $22 billion, according to CB Insights, after raising $1.5 billion from Disney last year. The company is the 13th most valuable startup in the world, according to CB Insights, and is so large that Axios' Dan Primack suggested referring to startups of its size as "dragons" rather than unicorns. Locally, the company has a large presence in Cary, with more than 3,000 employees. However, it has withdrawn plans to build a new headquarters on the former site of Cary Towne Center. 🖥️ Pendo: The Raleigh software startup has a valuation of $2.6 billion, according to Pitchbook, and has long held ambitions of going public. The company has conducted layoffs in recent years, but remains one of the largest tech firms in Raleigh and became profitable for the first time last year. 🏈 Teamworks: Founded by a former Duke football player, Durham-based Teamworks runs a software platform that helps sports teams manage their players' schedules, nutrition and even their online brand — a feature that has become popular in the era of NIL. The company now has a valuation of $1.2 billion, according to Pitchbook, and its customers include every NFL team, most Division I college athletic departments and 90% of MLB teams. 🔐 JupiterOne: Morrisville-based JupiterOne, a maker of cybersecurity tools, has a valuation of $1 billion, according to Pitchbook. The company's founder, N.C. State grad Erkang Zheng, stepped down as CEO last year. But he is now raising money for a new AI startup, though details on the company have not yet been revealed.
Forbes
08-04-2025
- Business
- Forbes
Amazon ‘Buy For Me' Is The Latest Entrant In The AI Shopping Agent Race
GERMANY - 2025/04/06: In this photo illustration, logo is seen displayed on a monitor. ... More (Photo Illustration by Igor Golovniov/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Amazon's new "Buy For Me" feature represents a stunning departure from the company's decades-long strategy of keeping customers within its walled garden. By enabling AI agents to purchase products directly from brand websites when items aren't available on Amazon, the retail giant is sacrificing short-term transaction revenue to maintain its position as consumers' first stop in an increasingly AI-driven shopping landscape. The feature, announced last week, is in beta for select U.S. customers, helps shoppers "discover and seamlessly purchase select products from other brands' sites if those items are not currently sold in Amazon's store," according to Amazon's announcement. What makes this particularly remarkable is how it contradicts Amazon's traditional approach to e-commerce. Scot Wingo, co-founder and CEO of ecommerce tech startup ReFiBuy and former CEO of ChannelAdvisor, called the initiative 'bonkers,' saying that Amazon has spent 31 years building a 'fortress' – a meticulously constructed a walled garden designed to keep shoppers within its ecosystem. Wingo points to the key elements of Amazon's competitive retail moat, being the Prime membership program, Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA), its own payment processing, and countless other features specifically to ensure transactions flow through Amazon's platform, generating fees and valuable data. While "Buy For Me" keeps users firmly within the Amazon app interface throughout the entire process (as I explain with my own experience with the beta program below) it also abandons almost all of these sacred cows which are central to its core retail business. The question is: why would Amazon seemingly kill its golden goose? The answer likely lies in Amazon's growing concern about AI shopping assistants potentially disrupting product discovery and purchase patterns – both of which are critical not only for its core business of selling physical products, but also for its ancillary but much more lucrative business of selling media space. I recently wrote about in my Forbes article on Amazon's patent for Alexa+, the company is racing to transform how consumers discover products through conversational AI, both within the web and app experience using its Rufus AI shopping assistant, and its nascent Alexa+ voice assistant. Amazon says that Amazon Nova and Anthropic's Claude models support the Amazon Shopping app's agentic capabilities to complete the purchase from start to finish on a customer's behalf. In my analysis of Amazon's 'Nova Act', I highlighted how Amazon is battling with OpenAI and others to control the future of AI-driven shopping agents, like Operator. I argue that the company that owns the AI assistant consumers trust to handle their shopping will dominate retail's future. "Buy For Me" represents another strategic move in this battle. By allowing its AI to complete purchases across the web, Amazon positions itself as the front door for all shopping journeys – even those that end on other websites. I was able to try the feature with footwear brand Rothy's, which began selling on Amazon as a third-party seller just a year ago. After searching for "Rothy's," I found the Buy For Me widget a couple of lines down on the search results page. What I discovered was particularly interesting: the variants in the Buy For Me widget appeared to be styles that aren't sold on Amazon by the brand (The Casual Clog, Rothy's Mens' Clog, The Loafer Mule). This suggests the feature helps brands show their full assortment to Amazon customers without making all variants available there. Screenshot from Amazon app showing how eligible products display in the "Buy For Me" experience. The experience of using Buy For Me was seamless, if not a little cold and joyless – I selected my size, clicked the button to buy, and received an order confirmation, all within the Amazon app without being taken elsewhere. The prices matched those on Rothy's website. Once I placed an order, it appeared in a separate section from my regular Amazon orders. In the workflow, Amazon also references a different feature that quietly appeared a few weeks ago: the ability to show customers products not available on when they search for a specific brand. Amazon said that the experience was designed to continue making shopping on Amazon convenient for customers. 'We're testing bringing more selection and brands into our search results to help customers find even more of what they want and further improve our shopping experience for customers,' Rajiv Mehta, VP of Search and Conversational Shopping at Amazon said. These two initiatives, when placed side-by-side, demonstrate that Amazon is prepared to take a hit on its core retail business in order to continue being the primary destination for consumers in their shopping journey. While Amazon seemingly sacrifices gross merchandise volume and merchant fees (at least while the program is in beta), the data collected through off-platform purchases provides the retail giant with increased visibility into consumer preferences. Every data point that Amazon collect on what a user's interests, preferences, and behaviors are enables more sophisticated targeting options for advertisers and also informs Amazon's own merchandising decisions. Some industry experts commenting on LinkedIn believe this is primarily a data and advertising play. As Jason Goldberg, Chief Commerce Strategy Officer at Publicis noted, "The bigger share of a customer wallet they see, the better they can target ads. They also squeeze out other digital wallets. Get early signals and new products sales velocity, etc." This theory makes sense given Amazon's growing emphasis on its advertising business, which has consistently outpaced its retail sales growth. By capturing data about purchases made on other websites, Amazon expands its ability to provide targeted advertising – potentially charging brands to influence which products are suggested through the Buy For Me feature. For brands, Buy For Me creates an interesting opportunity. It potentially allows them to maintain direct customer relationships while leveraging Amazon's massive traffic. Retailers using the feature can display their complete product assortment without providing their entire catalog on Amazon. Amazon is clearly taking an "innovator's dilemma" approach – focusing on aggregating shopper demand and delivering it, regardless of whether they own the inventory or collect the same merchant fees. One thing is certain: in the battle for AI shopping dominance, Amazon has just made a bold, unexpected move that signals how seriously they're taking the threat – and opportunity – of agentic AI in retail. The company appears willing to sacrifice some of its most cherished principles to ensure it remains the starting point for consumer shopping journeys, no matter where those journeys end.
