logo
#

Latest news with #SecuritiesExchangeActof1934

INVESTOR DEADLINE: Robbins Geller Announces that Organon & Co. (OGN) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Class Action Lawsuit
INVESTOR DEADLINE: Robbins Geller Announces that Organon & Co. (OGN) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Class Action Lawsuit

Business Upturn

time9 hours ago

  • Business
  • Business Upturn

INVESTOR DEADLINE: Robbins Geller Announces that Organon & Co. (OGN) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Class Action Lawsuit

SAN DIEGO, June 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that the Organon class action lawsuit – captioned Hauser v. Organon & Co. , No. 25-cv-05322 (D.N.J.) – seeks to represent purchasers or acquirers of Organon & Co. (NYSE: OGN) securities and charges Organon as well as certain of Organon's top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Organon class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Lead plaintiff motions for the Organon class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than Tuesday, July 22, 2025. CASE ALLEGATIONS: Organon develops and delivers health solutions through prescription therapies and medical devices. The Organon class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the class period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) defendants concealed material information pertaining to Organon's capital allocation priorities, particularly the future of the quarterly dividend payout; (ii) in truth, Organon's optimistic reports of the dividend payout as Organon's 'number one priority' were offset by Organon's newly implemented debt reduction strategy, thus, leading to a drastic decrease – over 70% – of the quarterly dividend; and (iii) Organon planned to prioritize debt reduction following Organon's acquisition of Dermavant Sciences Ltd. The Organon class action lawsuit further alleges that on May 1, 2025, Organon reported first quarter 2025 financial results and announced that management reset Organon's dividend payout from $0.28 to $0.02. On this news, the price of Organon stock fell more than 27%, according to the complaint. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Organon securities during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Organon class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Organon class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Organon class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Organon class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. Contact: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal 655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101 800-449-4900 [email protected]

SRPT INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead the Sarepta Class Action Lawsuit
SRPT INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead the Sarepta Class Action Lawsuit

Business Wire

time20 hours ago

  • Business
  • Business Wire

SRPT INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead the Sarepta Class Action Lawsuit

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Sarepta class action lawsuit. Captioned Dolgicer v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., No. 25-cv-05317 (S.D.N.Y.), the Sarepta class action lawsuit charges Sarepta and certain of Sarepta's top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Sarepta class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: CASE ALLEGATIONS: Sarepta is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company. According to the complaint, during the Class Period, Sarepta was engaged in the development of therapies to treat Duchenne muscular dystrophy ('Duchenne'), including ELEVIDYS (a prescription gene therapy intended for a limited category of people with Duchenne). The Sarepta Therapeutics class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) ELEVIDYS posed significant safety risks to patients; (ii) ELEVIDYS trial regimes and protocols failed to detect severe side effects; and (iii) the severity of adverse events from ELEVIDYS treatment would cause Sarepta to halt recruitment and dosing in ELEVIDYS trials, attract regulatory scrutiny, and create greater risk around the therapy's present and expanded approvals. The Sarepta class action lawsuit further alleges that on March 18, 2025, Sarepta revealed that a patient treated with ELEVIDYS suffered acute liver failure leading to death, which represented 'a severity of acute liver injury not previously reported for ELEVIDYS.' On this news, the price of Sarepta stock fell more than 27%, according to the complaint. Then, on April 4, 2025, the Sarepta class action lawsuit further alleges that Sarepta disclosed that European Union member country authorities had requested that the independent data monitoring committee meet to review the death announced on March 18, 2025, resulting in Sarepta halting recruitment and dosing in some of the ELEVIDYS clinical studies. On this news, the price of Sarepta stock fell more than 7%, according to the complaint. Thereafter, on June 15, 2025, Sarepta disclosed that a second patient had died of acute liver failure following treatment with ELEVIDYS, leading to Sarepta suspending shipment of ELEVIDYS for non-ambulatory patients and pausing dosing of ELEVIDYS in the ENVISION clinical study to evaluate the protocol in accordance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ('FDA'), according to the complaint. The Sarepta class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of Sarepta stock fell more than 42%. Finally, the Sarepta class action lawsuit further alleges that on June 24, 2025, the FDA issued a Safety Communication announcing it had received reports of two deaths and was investigating the risk of acute liver failure with serious outcomes following treatment with ELEVIDYS. On this news, the price of Sarepta stock fell more than 8%, according to the complaint. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Sarepta securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Sarepta class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Sarepta class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Sarepta class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Sarepta class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.

Gladstone Commercial Announces Industrial Acquisition in Harrison Township, Michigan
Gladstone Commercial Announces Industrial Acquisition in Harrison Township, Michigan

Miami Herald

timea day ago

  • Business
  • Miami Herald

Gladstone Commercial Announces Industrial Acquisition in Harrison Township, Michigan

MCLEAN, VA / ACCESS Newswire / June 26, 2025 / Gladstone Commercial Corporation (Nasdaq:GOOD) ("Gladstone Commercial") is pleased to announce the acquisition of a 215,102 square foot, crane-served industrial manufacturing, distribution, and warehouse facility located in Harrison Township, Michigan. The property was acquired for $16.25 million at a weighted average GAAP capitalization rate of 9.59%. The facility is 100% leased to Yanfeng International Automotive Technology US, a U.S.-based subsidiary of Yanfeng International Automotive Technology Co., Ltd, a global investment-grade automotive supplier specializing in interiors, exteriors, seating, cockpit electronics, and passive safety systems. This acquisition aligns with Gladstone Commercial's strategy of acquiring mission-critical, high-quality industrial assets leased to strong credit tenants in growth markets. "We are excited to expand our industrial portfolio with a well-located, mission-critical facility leased to a world-class tenant. This acquisition strengthens our existing relationship with Yanfeng, adds synergies across our portfolio, and supports our long-term strategy of acquiring functional assets with strong tenant credit and long-term upside," stated Ryan Carter, Executive Vice President of Gladstone Commercial. "This addition further advances our strategy of expanding our industrial footprint in core U.S. manufacturing markets. The facility is leased long-term to a creditworthy tenant and is strategically located in the Detroit metro area, which continues to benefit from strong demand tied to domestic manufacturing. The acquisition is immediately accretive, extends our weighted average lease term, and reinforces our focus on durable cash flows and industrial growth," said Buzz Cooper, President of Gladstone Commercial. About Gladstone Commercial (Nasdaq: GOOD) Gladstone Commercial is a real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning and operating net leased industrial and office properties across the United States. As of March 31, 2025, Gladstone Commercial's real estate portfolio consisted of 141 properties located in 27 states, totaling approximately 17.3 million square feet. For additional information, please visit For Broker Submittals: Investor or Media Inquiries: All statements contained in this press release, other than historical facts, may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties as they relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events, or trends concerning matters that are not historical facts and may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. Forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future events, including, without limitation, those relating to the discussion and analysis of Gladstone Commercial's business, financial condition, results of operations, and our strategic plans and objectives. Words such as "may," "might," "believe," "will," "anticipate," "future," "could," "growth," "plan," "intend," "expect," "should," "would," "if," "seek," "possible," "potential," "likely" and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those included within or contemplated by such statements, including, but not limited to, the description of risks and uncertainties in "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, as filed with the SEC on February 18, 2025, and certain other filings made with the SEC. Gladstone Commercial cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date made. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. For further information: Gladstone Commercial Corporation, (703) 287-5893 For Investor Relations inquiries related to any of the monthly dividend paying Gladstone funds, please visit SOURCE: Gladstone Commercial Corporation

HIMS INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Hims & Hers Health, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
HIMS INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Hims & Hers Health, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit

Business Wire

timea day ago

  • Business
  • Business Wire

HIMS INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Hims & Hers Health, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Hims & Hers class action lawsuit. Captioned Sookdeo v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc., No. 25-cv-05315 (N.D. Cal.), the Hims & Hers class action lawsuit charges Hims & Hers and certain of Hims & Hers' top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A subsequently filed complaint is captioned Yaghsizian v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc., No. 25-cv-05321 (N.D. Cal.). If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Hims & Hers class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at info@ CASE ALLEGATIONS: Hims & Hers is a telehealth company that provides prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, and personal care products. According to the complaint, on April 29, 2025, Hims & Hers announced a long-term collaboration with Novo Nordisk A/S, starting with the immediate sale of 'a bundled offering of Novo Nordisk's FDA-approved Wegovy® on the Hims & Hers platform.' The Hims & Hers class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Hims & Hers was engaged in the 'deceptive promotion and selling of illegitimate, knockoff versions of Wegovy® that put patient safety at risk'; and (ii) as a result, there was a substantial risk that Hims & Hers' collaboration with Novo Nordisk would be terminated. The Hims & Hers class action lawsuit further alleges that on June 23, 2025, Novo Nordisk issued a press release announcing that it was terminating its partnership with Hims & Hers 'based on Hims & Hers deceptive promotion and selling of illegitimate, knockoff versions of Wegovy® that put patient safety at risk.' On this news, the price of Hims & Hers stock fell more than 34%, according to the complaint. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Hims & Hers securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Hims & Hers class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Hims & Hers class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Hims & Hers class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Hims & Hers class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.

SRPT Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm
SRPT Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm

Business Wire

time2 days ago

  • Business
  • Business Wire

SRPT Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. ('Sarepta' or 'the Company') (NASDAQ: SRPT) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors who purchased the Company's securities between June 22, 2023 and June 24, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), are encouraged to contact the firm before August 25, 2025. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate. We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at or by email at bschall@ The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Sarepta led investors to believe that its ELEVIDYS therapy was both safe and had potential for approval in wider applications. The Company misled the market about its revenue outlook on ELEVIDYS. The Company positioned the therapy as having strong growth potential due to a lack of hindrances to broader use. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Sarepta, investors suffered damages. Join the case to recover your losses. The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store