Latest news with #SenateChamber
UPI
5 days ago
- Politics
- UPI
Senate Committee approves Bove, Pirro; Democrats walk out
1 of 3 | Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-IA, walks to the Senate Chamber to vote at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. on June 4. The Senate Judiciary Committee just approved the judicial nominations of Emil Bove and Jeannine Pirro. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo July 17 (UPI) -- The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee approved two of President Donald Trump's nominees for judicial offices Thursday, despite objections from Democrats who left a business meeting after debate was halted. Emil Bove, a former member of Trump's criminal defense team in his fraud case in New York, is the Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General of the United States. Trump nominated him for Third Circuit Court of Appeals judge in Philadelphia, a lifetime appointment. Jeanine Pirro is a former county judge and Fox News host. She was confirmed as a nominee for U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C. A whistleblower provided documents last week saying that Bove is the person who gave the Trump administration the directive to ignore a court order to stop flights taking migrants to a Salvadoran prison. Bove allegedly said to prepare to tell the courts "f- you." Bove told Congress he doesn't remember using the F-word and sidestepped other questions about the incident. Bove was behind the firings of prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases. He also pushed for the dismissal of bribery charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams. This caused a surge of resignations. Yesterday, more than 900 Justice Department employees signed a letter urging the committee to reject Bove's nomination. In the committee meeting, Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., tried to convince Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, to allow debate. Grassley did not allow Democrats to speak on the Bove nomination. "You are a good man. You are a decent man, why are you doing this? What is Donald Trump saying to you that are making you do something which is violating the decorum of this committee, the rules of this committee, the decency and the respect that we have each other to at least hear each other out?" The Hill reported Booker said. "This is unjust. This is wrong. It is the further deterioration of this committee's integrity with a person like this. What are you afraid of?" Booker then left the meeting with the other Democrats. Grassley said the accusations present no scandal. "Even if you accept most of the claims as true, there's no scandal here." Grassley said. "Government lawyers aggressively litigating and interpreting court orders isn't misconduct - it's what lawyers do." The whistleblower is Erez Reuveni, who was fired from his job as the acting deputy director for the Office of Immigration Litigation after he disclosed that Kilmar Abrego Garcia was deported in error. He worked for the Department of Justice for 15 years. Bove will now face a vote from the full Senate.
Newsweek
26-06-2025
- Politics
- Newsweek
Medicaid Ruling by Senate Parliamentarian Sparks Republican Outrage
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Some Republican lawmakers are calling for the Senate parliamentarian to be immediately relieved of her duties after ruling against GOP-introduced health care provisions on programs like Medicaid. Why It Matters President Donald Trump's touted One Big Beautiful Bill Act intends to deliver on myriad priorities including additional funding for border security and immigration enforcement. Critics have scrutinized the bill and contained Medicaid cuts for negatively affecting Americans while simulatenously providing tax cuts for wealthy Americans. What To Know On Thursday, several Republicans reacted strongly to Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough rejected provisions deemed by Republicans to be integral to the bill's success and future tax cuts—including one measure affiliated with Medicaid that would be stricter with states that have developed methods to obtain more federal Medicaid funding. Another measure prohibits adults and children from federally participating in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) if their citizenship, nationality or immigration status cannot be verified—overriding a current 90-day "reasonable opportunity period" in effect that allows running verification in states. "The WOKE Senate Parliamentarian, who was appointed by Harry Reid and advised Al Gore, just STRUCK DOWN a provision BANNING illegals from stealing Medicaid from American citizens," Republican Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama posted on X. "This is a perfect example of why Americans hate THE SWAMP." The same post called for MacDonough to be "fired ASAP," referring to her as an "unelected bureaucrat" who thinks she knows better than duly elected members of Congress. U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) talks to reporters as he walks to the Senate Chamber at the U.S. Capitol on June 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) talks to reporters as he walks to the Senate Chamber at the U.S. Capitol on June 25, 2025 in Washington, Representative Greg Steube echoed Tuberville's response, also referring to MacDonough as part of the "swamp." "How is it that an unelected swamp bureaucrat, who was appointed by Harry Reid over a decade ago, gets to decide what can and cannot go in President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill?" Steube wrote on X. "The Senate Parliamentarian is not elected. She is not accountable to the American people. Yet she holds veto power over legislation supported by millions of voters. It is time for our elected leaders to take back control." He called for Vice President JD Vance to overrule MacDonough, described as "some staffer hiding behind Senate procedure." Senate Majority Leader John Thune, however, said he has no plans to attempt to overrule MacDonough with a simple majority vote, calling the development a "speed bump," according to The Hill. Republican Senator John Kennedy said MacDonough's ruling should not lead to action towards her by lawmakers. "We all have respect for the parliamentarian," Kennedy said, per The Hill. "I think that she's very fair, and I don't think that she should be fired nor do I think she will be fired." What People Are Saying Republican Representative Mary Miller: "We need to be a force against evil, against bad ideas, and against the Parliamentarian or whoever is trying to take a wrecking ball to the big, beautiful bill." Republican Representative Dan Crenshaw on X: "I don't think it's good strategy to die on every hill, but THIS is a hill we should fight for." Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene on X: "I love President Trump and I really want to vote to pass his agenda in the Big Beautiful Bill when it comes back to the House from the Senate, but between the far left Senate Parliamentarian stripping out many of our good provisions and the special interest lobbyists sneaking in dirty poison pills like 10 year state moratoriums on AI, I'm currently a NO." What Happens Next Thune, who said Republicans tried to pack in as much savings as they could in the bill, plans to keep major provisions in and rework them. "There are things that we can do," Thune said. "There are other ways of getting to that same outcome."
Newsweek
02-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Newsweek
King Charles Mocked by Jimmy Kimmel Amid Trump Threat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. King Charles III was roasted by Jimmy Kimmel for a speech billed as a moment of support for Canada in the face of annexation threats from President Donald Trump. The British monarch, 76, is the king not only of Britain, but also Canada and opened the Canadian Parliament on May 27 for the first time during his reign. Queen Elizabeth II last undertook the ceremony in 1977, some 48 years ago. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney made clear the timing was no coincidence after Trump's recent talk of making the country America's 51st state. However, Kimmel roasted Charles with suggestions his speech may not have been quite so impactful after all. King Charles III sits on the throne in the Senate Chamber for the State Opening of Parliament, in Ottawa, Ontario, during an official visit to Canada on May 27, 2025. King Charles III sits on the throne in the Senate Chamber for the State Opening of Parliament, in Ottawa, Ontario, during an official visit to Canada on May 27, 2025. Chris Jackson - Pool/Getty Images What Kimmel Said About Charles' Canada Visit Kimmel mocked the king's Canada visit saying: "Trump isn't the only elder statesman with a friend in need, King Charles was in Canada today to show his support for the commonwealth during this difficult time. The king gave an uncharacteristically fiery speech this morning in front of the Canadian Parliament." Charles was then shown struggling for around 17 seconds to turn the pages on the booklet seemingly containing the words to his speech. "Won't someone please come lick the royal thumb?" Kimmel continued. "Next I want him try to open a Capri Sun. So then once he was able to pry the manilla envelope pages apart the king spoke not only with power, but also with grace." Jimmy Kimmel Live! then played footage of Charles' speech in which he said: "Every time I come to Canada, a little more of Canada seeps into my bloodstream and from there straight to my heart." "Gross," Kimmel said. Trump as Backdrop to Charles' Visit Carney recently told Sky News that Canada's invitation to Charles to open Parliament was not a coincidence in light of Trump's annexation threats: "All issues around Canada's sovereignty have been accentuated by the president. So, no, it's not coincidental, but it is also a reaffirming moment for Canadians." Meanwhile, many news outlets reported on Charles' speech as sending a message about the importance of Canadian sovereignty. ABC News, for example, ran the online headline: "King Charles III defends Canada's sovereignty in speech to open parliament." And NBC News went with: "Canada is at 'critical moment,' King Charles tells Parliament amid Trump annexation threats." The king told Canada's Parliament: "Many Canadians are feeling anxious and worried about the drastically changing world around them. Fundamental change is always unsettling. "Yet, this moment is also an incredible opportunity, an opportunity for renewal, an opportunity to think big and to act bigger; an opportunity for Canada to embark on the largest transformation of its economy since the Second World War." "A confident Canada, which has welcomed new Canadians, including from some of the most tragic, global conflict zones, can seize this opportunity by recognizing that all Canadians give themselves far more than any foreign power on any continent can ever take away," Charles added. Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page. Do you have a question about Charles and Queen Camilla, Prince William and Princess Kate, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@ We'd love to hear from you.
Toronto Sun
28-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Toronto Sun
LILLEY UNLEASHED: Why did Trudeau rock the green sneakers during throne speech?
OTTAWA, ONTARIO - MAY 27: A view of Former Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau's Addidas shoes as he arrives ahead of an appearance by King Charles III and Queen Camilla at the Senate Chamber for the State Opening of Parliament during an official visit to Canada on May 27, 2025 in Ottawa, Ontario. It is The King's 20th and Queen's 5th tour of Canada, with their previous visit being in 2022. (Photo by Chris Jackson - Pool/Getty Images) WATCH: Sun political columnist Brian Lilley on the juvenile, attention seeking nature of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. What do YOU think? Tell us your thoughts in the comment section below or send us a Letter to the Editor for possible publication to . Letters must be 250 words or less and signed. And don't forget to subscribe to our YouTube Channel. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Canada Music NHL Golf Tennis
Yahoo
20-05-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
GOP proposal seeks to require EpiPens in New Hampshire schools
Some lawmakers expressed concerns about creating a mandate without establishing a funding source in the budget and relying on outside programs to provide the epinephrine for free. (Photo of state Senate Chamber/New Hampshire Bulletin file) The New Hampshire Senate is set to vote Thursday on a bill to require that schools maintain a supply of epinephrine, which is used to treat allergic reactions. House Bill 677 requires New Hampshire schools to have epinephrine injectors, commonly known by the brand name EpiPen, or nasal epinephrine spray, and it requires that a nurse or at least one 'assistive personnel' be on site to administer the epinephrine at the school during school hours. The bill gives nurses and school staff five days to replace the epinephrine after it's used. Rep. Mike Drago, the Raymond Republican who sponsored the bill, said there are at least two programs that offer epinephrine to schools for free. Epinephrine manufacturers Viatris and ARS Pharmaceuticals both advertise such programs on their websites. Lawmakers plan to rely on these programs to make this proposal possible. 'In reality, we're putting EpiPens in every single school at no cost,' Drago, who has a child with a nut allergy, said in an April Senate hearing. 'And potentially saving lives.' Under state law, schools are allowed to maintain a supply of and use epinephrine. This bill, if enacted, would require them to do so. The House previously approved the legislation in an April voice vote, and it received the unanimous recommendation of the Senate Education Committee earlier this month. The bill is co-sponsored by a group of mostly Republicans but has bipartisan support. Some lawmakers expressed concerns about creating a mandate without establishing a funding source in the budget and relying on outside programs to provide the epinephrine for free. Sen. Debra Altschiller, a Stratham Democrat, commended Drago at the April hearing for raising the issue, but said she's concerned 'the state would rely on a program that's at the discretion of a pharmaceutical company.' 'It exists today,' Altschiller said. 'It might not exist tomorrow. And to require a specific product be carried in the school at the expense of the school is where I have significant problems.' She noted epinephrine is 'wildly expensive' and called this an 'unfunded mandate.' Drago said he doubts these programs will ever disappear. Still, to address these concerns, the Senate Education Committee proposed an amendment that establishes a state fund to help schools pay for epinephrine. Though it doesn't appropriate any money to that fund, the amendment creates a mechanism for the state to accept gifts from organizations besides the pharmaceutical companies.
