Latest news with #SpaceshipEarth
Yahoo
09-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Dreaming of a Disney Wedding? Discover 10 Spots to Marry in the Most Magical Place on Earth! See All the Photos
Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings & Honeymoons offers magical wedding venues at Disney destinations around the globe PEOPLE has rounded up 10 top wedding venues across four Disney destinations — Walt Disney World Resort, Disneyland Resort, Disney Cruise Line and Aulani, a Disney Resort & Spa in Hawaii From breathtaking beaches to iconic castles, couples can say "I do" at enchanting venues that accommodate both small and big weddingsDisney is the destination for couples wanting to tie the knot in true storybook style. For those dreaming of an enchanting wedding celebration, Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings & Honeymoons is ready to deliver the magic. With more than 100 venues at Disney destinations around the globe, couples can find their happily ever after at iconic castles, intimate courtyards, beachfront settings and beyond. Whether it's by the glow of EPCOT's Spaceship Earth at World Celebration Gardens in Florida or underneath the striking chandelier inside the Grand Hall on a Disney Cruise Line ship overseas, bride and grooms may say "I do" any day all year long, apart from Thanksgiving and Christmas Day. Countless stunning indoor and outdoor ceremony options are available. Times vary from morning until night depending on the location, according to Disney. Most couples getting married at the park opt for either early in the morning (before the park opens) or later in the evening (after the park closes). Pricing depends on several factors, including: wedding guest count, location, time of day and reception selections. The Walt Disney World Resort wedding minimum begins at $15,000, which can include elements such as ceremony, reception, food and beverage, décor and photography. "Wedding events are held to an event minimum expenditure. The event minimum is determined by ceremony venue, day of week and time of day," Disney said. "The ceremony venue fee and any or all of the following Disney weddings service elements can be used toward an event minimum." For more details, check with a Disney wedding consultant. Here are our picks for 10 top wedding venues across four Disney destinations: Walt Disney World Resort, Disneyland Resort, Disney Cruise Line and Aulani, a Disney Resort & Spa in Hawaii. The most popular wedding venue at Walt Disney World Resort is its Wedding Pavilion, which hosts 10 to 250 guests. This Victorian chapel near Disney's Grand Floridian Resort & Spa in the Magic Kingdom area is nestled on the shores of Seven Seas Lagoon on its own private island. As guests enter by footbridge, they'll pass by a lush and tranquil garden. Inside, they'll admire airy vaulted ceilings and a wall of arched stained-glass windows as they walk down the aisle. Behind the altar is a charming view of Cinderella Castle. Although Oak Manor Lawn is located in Florida, its towering oak trees, charming walkways and an enchanting river recreates the serenity of the Louisiana Bayou. This intimate outdoor venue with a waterfront view at Disney's Port Orleans Resort – Riverside can accommodate 10 to 150 guests. Want to get married in Paris without the hassle of traveling abroad? If so, Place de Remy at EPCOT is the perfect spot. Nestled in a romantic Parisian setting, couples can tie the knot alongside up to 100 guests surrounded by a cityscape of mansard roofs, casement windows and clustered chimneystacks. The outdoor courtyard features a replica of the Eiffel Tower, a bubbling fountain and Paris-themed vignettes perfect for wedding photos. Down cobblestone streets at a central square lined with quaint shops is Germany Courtyard in EPCOT. Couples and up to 50 guests don't have to travel all the way to Europe to exchange vows in a colorful and lively Bavarian village. This location captures the folk charm and romance of Germany's medieval architecture, having been inspired by architectural styles from northern Germany, Bavaria, the Rhineland and Black Forest, ranging in era from the 12th to 17th centuries. Tucked inside Disney's Animal Kingdom Theme Park is the Tree of Life, a gigantic, gorgeous tree wrapped with sculptured detail and surrounded by lush greenery and wildlife. The iconic centerpiece allows for a truly immersive ceremony, especially at night as bright lights and sparkling stars illuminate the breathtaking nature scene. Ask a Disney wedding consultant for guest size allowance. EPCOT's World Celebration Gardens is hard to miss. Set underneath the glow of Spaceship Earth and custom-themed lights, couples can exchange vows in the heart of World Celebration. Between 10 and 150 guests will also be wowed by the area's beautiful backdrop of towering trees and other greenery. For large weddings, Rose Court Garden is the way to go. Disneyland Resort couples can exchange their vows at the secluded white gazebo surrounded by up to 350 loved ones and more than 500 seasonally blooming rose bushes. Wedding bliss begins in the Bahamas. Up to 75 guests on Disney Cruise Line Bahamian and Caribbean cruise vacations have the opportunity to enjoy Castaway Cay Beach. This private port-of-call paradise offers white sand, swaying palm tress and crystal-blue waters. Also known as The Atrium, the Grand Hall aboard the Disney Cruise Line ships features a magnificent staircase and awe-inspiring chandelier. Just because this venue is only for small weddings, with a maximum of 40 guests, doesn't mean it's any less grand. It's elegant royal blue and gold color palette makes for a ceremony fit for royals. The 'AMA 'AMA Patio at Aulani, A Disney Resort & Spa in Hawaii, is a beach lover's dream come true. With westward views of the shimmering Pacific Ocean and a white-sand beach dotted with palm trees, this open-air space space is an easy and natural choice for couples seeking a tranquil, scenic ceremony. Up to 60 guests may enjoy the gentle breezes and views of Ko Olina's lagoon. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Additional magical ceremony and reception options are available online at Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings & Honeymoons. Read the original article on People
BBC News
05-07-2025
- Science
- BBC News
How the Biosphere 2 experiment changed our understanding of the Earth
In the early 1990s, a small team tried to survive in a hermetically sealed space containing replicas of Earth's ecosystems. Their trials and discoveries still have repercussions today. Glittering in the vast expanses of the Arizona desert lies a structure that seems torn straight out of the pages of science fiction. Inside a massive complex of glass pyramids, domes and towers, spread across three acres (1.2 hectares), stands a tropical rainforest topped by a 25ft (7.6m) waterfall, a savannah and a fog desert. They sit alongside a mangrove-studded wetland and an ocean larger than an Olympic swimming pool which includes its own living coral reef. It's seemingly a little capsule of Earth, which is why the structure is called Biosphere 2 – named after our own planet, Biosphere 1. The desolate landscape forms the perfect backdrop for the futuristic experiment that once took place here. In the early 1990s, eight people locked themselves inside, sealed off from the outside world for two years, to explore the challenges of living in a self-contained system – a prerequisite for building colonies in outer space. They fed themselves from the crops they grew, they recycled their own wastewater and they tended to the plants that produced their oxygen. In terms of sustaining human life, the experiment did not go well. As one commentator put it in the 2020 documentary Spaceship Earth, "everything that could go wrong went wrong". Oxygen levels plummeted, making the inhabitants sick, while carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increased. Countless animals died, including the pollinators the plants needed to reproduce. And although the "biospherians" did survive on their homegrown food, they lost weight to the point where they became a case study for calorie restriction. When supplementary oxygen needed to be brought in, commentators decried the project as a failure, calling it a "flop" and "new-age drivel masquerading as science". In recent years, however, many experts have come to see the Biosphere 2 experiment in a new light, with valuable lessons about ecology, atmospheric science and importantly, the irreplaceability of our own planet. Lisa Rand, a historian of science at the California Institute of Technology, argues that these lessons are especially worth revisiting today as billionaires advance private space programmes and float the idea of space colonies while our own planet is increasingly suffering from climate change and other man-made problems. And to environmental scientists, the Biosphere 2 experiment also demonstrates the value of bold experiments to better understand how the natural world works. In fact, today, the facility is bustling with scientists testing the effects of climate change on its living ecosystems. Far from helping humans escape Earth, Biosphere 2 seems to have become one of our best tools to understand Biosphere 1. "It wasn't a failure," Rand says. "I think it was actually ahead of its time." Though the Biosphere 2 experiment is often described as a test run of a future space colony on the Moon or Mars, the project in fact had deep environmental roots, says Mark Nelson, one of the eight biospherians and a founding director of the non-profit Institute of Ecotechnics. The idea for Biosphere 2 came from a group of people – including Nelson – living in an ecovillage on a New Mexico ranch who spent their time organic farming and doing performance art and carpentry. The group's founder, John Allen, dreamed of building a self-contained system to better understand Earth's complexities and find ways of using technology to more peacefully exist with the natural world, Nelson says. The project was bankrolled by billionaire Ed Bass, who put about $150m towards Biosphere 2 (equivalent to $440m today, or £330m). Under Allen's leadership, building began in 1984. It was – and remains – the largest building of its kind to be nearly fully sealed off from the atmosphere, Nelson says. Though none of its ecosystems was a perfect model of its real-world counterpart, each one was designed with similar kinds of vegetation, along with a selection of insects, fish, and birds, says John Adams, the current deputy director of Biosphere 2. A patch of farmland was included to grow crops. An underground system of piping and pumps controlled everything from temperature to humidity. Other systems recycled wastewater for crop irrigation and harvested drinking water from condensation in the air conditioning units. Biosphere 2 was intended to operate for a century, but when the biospherians entered the facility in September of 1991, "it was such a vast experiment that none of the eight of us had any certainty we could last one way or another for two years in there," Nelson recalls. Nelson and Adams see the events that unfolded inside not as failures, but as the outcomes of an experiment, as would occur in any other scientific study. "In science, there's no such thing as a failed experiment," Adams says. The most pressing issue for the biospherians was the decline in oxygen levels, which dropped from normal levels – roughly 21% of the atmosphere – to about 14% after 16 months. That's equivalent to oxygen levels at about 3,350m (11,000ft) above sea level. Until supplementary oxygen was brought in, the biospherians grew tired and weak from altitude sickness, making farming and other work arduous, Nelson recalls. These and other problems took scientists a while to figure out, says David Tilman of the University of Minnesota Twin Cities, who was part of a committee of ecologists that reviewed the experiment after it concluded. "It was very clear to us that the problem was much more complex than you might imagine at first," he says. Experts worked out that the cause was the extremely rich, young soils that had been introduced to fuel rapid growth of crops and other vegetation. This created a lot of food for bacteria and fungi, which, like us, consume oxygen and emit CO2. The trees and shrubs in the new ecosystems – which take up CO2 and release oxygen – were too young and too outnumbered by microbes to counterbalance this effect. "I think that was a really important lesson to learn: that that [soil] microbiome, even though we can't see it, is extremely influential," Adams says. Fortunately, the rise in CO2 – a greenhouse gas that heats up the atmosphere – was buffered by the fact that much of it got soaked up by the facility's concrete surfaces. The biospherians also did their best to stem the rise as well as boost oxygen levels. They cut dead grasses in the savannah and trimmed fast-growing rainforest species to stimulate new growth – storing the cut vegetation in dry conditions to slow down its decomposition, a process that releases CO2, Nelson says. They also planted fast-growing plants like sugarcane and created a bed of algae in the basement – but oxygen levels still waned. While some "extinctions" within the ecosystems were expected as they settled into an equilibrium, the vanishing of pollinating insects was an unexpected problem for plant life. Nelson attributes this to an explosion in the population of longhorn crazy ants that prey on pollinators, while ecologist Brian McGill of the University of Maine suggests they may have died off because the glass enclosing Biosphere 2 blocked ultraviolet light, which the insects needed to find flowers. "Bees in particular see in the UV spectrum," he says. The issue wasn't urgent as most of the ecosystems' flowering plants were long-lived, but some biospherians pollinated a few species by hand, brushing pollen into flowers so seeds could form, Nelson says. The long-term plan was to control the ant populations and introduce new pollinators from the outside world. Scientists made other interesting observations. Some trees, they realised, became weak and more prone to breaking, likely because of the lack of wind, which triggers trees to produce "stress wood" that strengthens them, McGill says. Marine biologist and geoscientist Diane Thompson, who now directs marine research at the facility, says that scientists also learned a lot about the kinds of light that corals need to thrive in captivity. But the most important lesson from the biospherians' experience, experts agree, is the realisation of how difficult it would be to live anywhere else than on Earth. Humans can't exist in isolation; they come in "biospheric packages", as Nelson puts it, and recreating these complex systems is no easy task. While Tilman reckons that some of the problems may have been solvable, it was clear during his visit to the facility that it was a long way away from being able to sustain human life. "It really impacted me when I saw that, because… my initial guess was that you would probably make it work," he says. Now, "I firmly believe that this really is our only planet ever". By extension, the experiment therefore deeply underscored the need to protect our planet in an intact state. Consider the immense technological costs – not to mention the hard physical work by the biospherians – to keep the atmosphere and life support systems intact. Tilman estimates that, if future space colonies are anything like Biosphere 2, they'd cost $82,500 (£61,000) per person a month to live in, and even that would be no guarantee of sustaining human life. "It's incredibly expensive to try to replace the services that the Earth's ecosystems provide for free to humanity," Tilman says. To Nelson, realising that his own survival was entirely dependent on the health of the ecosystems around him was transformative, as he wrote in his book Life Under Glass. Being a biospherian meant living as sustainably as possible – using the gentlest of farming practices, avoiding pollution anywhere inside Biosphere 2, and respecting every oxygen-producing plant. "Just being in a small system where you see that reality – that you're part of that system, and that system is your life support – changes the way you think at a very deep level," Nelson says. When the experiment concluded in 1993, these messages were largely overshadowed by the negative media coverage around the project, Rand says. In her view, this was because of how it appeared to clash with widely-held views at the time. Many experts had rigid views of how science should be done and didn't consider it a legitimate experiment. It had been funded by a wealthy individual rather than a government and conducted by self-taught science generalists rather than scientists with PhDs from academic institutions. Rand believes this would be far less controversial today. Meanwhile, because the public saw the project as a "glass ark" or a model of a future space colony, the biospherians were seen to be "cheating" when one of them was taken to hospital due to a finger severed in a rice-hulling machine, or when they installed the oxygen pump, Rand says. "I think it's fair to speculate that the events that were perceived by journalists [and the public] as failures might have been seen as normal, valid experimental results if the project took place now," she says. The negative media perception – as well as disagreement around how to manage Biosphere 2 after the original experiment ended – created challenges for those overseeing the project, Adams says. In 1996, Ed Bass handed over management of the facility to Columbia University and eventually gifted it to the University of Arizona. Scientists at those institutions saw the unique opportunity that Biosphere 2 provided, says Adams. Ecologists who study how living systems work usually do so by analysing what happens in the aftermath of vicissitudes like heatwaves or drought, McGill says. But in order to predict how climate change, for instance, will alter Earth's ecosystems in the future, they need to recreate future conditions and see how living beings respond. Like a time machine, Biosphere 2 allows them to do just that. From its very first experiment, "Biosphere 2 was just a really cool and vivid stake in the ground about the need for ecology to be predictive," McGill says. Today, Biosphere 2's rainforest is the stage for experiments testing how its real-world counterparts might fare under global warming. One study dialled up the temperature and found the forests to be surprisingly resilient to heat; rather, it's the drought associated with warming that hurt them. More recently, the ecologist Christiane Werner from the University of Freiburg, Germany, and her colleagues exposed the forest to a 70-day drought. They learned how some trees survive by tapping into deep, moist soil layers and that drought-stressed trees release more compounds called monoterpenes, which form airborne particles that could potentially serve as seeds for much-needed rain clouds. Thanks to Biosphere 2, "you can send a whole grown forest into a drought and then monitor all these processes along the way", she says. The coral reef, meanwhile, was the site of one of the first experiments to show that as the oceans become more acidic – which happens when they absorb CO2 – this makes it harder for corals to grow and thrive. Now, scientists are simulating severe heatwaves in Biosphere 2's mini-ocean, and plan to test whether probiotics or exposing corals to heat before transplanting them onto the reef can make them more resilient. "If we warm the ocean," Thompson asks, "will those solutions work – not just now, but decades into the future?" Adams says he hopes that Biosphere 2 can do for ecologists what the Large Hadron Collider is doing to improve physicists' understanding of particle physics, and what the James Webb Telescope is doing for astronomers striving for deeper glimpses into the universe. But ecology's mega-experiment doesn't only help us better understand the intricacies of the living world and how it's changing amid planetary upheaval. Its story, Nelson says, should also inspire and help every one of us to take better care of our only life-sustaining planet, Biosphere 1. Ultimately, we are all biospherians. -- For essential climate news and hopeful developments to your inbox, sign up to the Future Earth newsletter, while The Essential List delivers a handpicked selection of features and insights twice a week. For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.
USA Today
04-07-2025
- Entertainment
- USA Today
When are Disney July 4 fireworks? Where to see epic shows at Florida theme parks.
The Fourth of July is here, with Florida expecting to see a surge of travelers looking to take advantage of the holiday for a quick trip. If they're visiting Florida, there's probably a theme park on the itinerary. AAA projects 72.2 million people will travel at least 50 miles or more from home over the Independence Day holiday alone, with Orlando being one of the top destinations. Who wouldn't want to grab a patriotic treat while in the "happiest place on earth," or catch a themed fireworks display steps away from Diagon Alley? Here's what five of Florida's theme parks are planning for the Fourth of July holiday. What day is July 4th, 2025? The July 4 holiday falls on a Friday this year. It is one of the 11 federal holidays in the U.S. Walt Disney World Resorts Two of Disney World's theme parks will host nighttime fireworks shows: Spaceship Earth will be illuminated in red, white and blue at night on July 4. Additionally, DJ entertainment will occur throughout the night at Magic Kingdom on July 3 and 4 in Frontierland, near Cinderella Castle and Tomorrowland. Celebrate the USA's 250th birthday aboard this once-in-a-lifetime patriotic cruise Universal Orlando Resort Universal Orlando will celebrate the Fourth of July with special entertainment at its theme park and Universal CityWalk. According to officials, the event features live music, themed performers, a DJ, character meet-and-greets, and an in-park nighttime pyrotechnics display within Universal Studios. The celebration kicks off at 5 p.m. in CityWalk and 5:15 p.m. in Universal Studios, where guests can also enjoy attractions and entertainment, including CineSational: A Symphonic Spectacular. SeaWorld Orlando SeaWorld Orlando will hold its Fourth of July fireworks display on Friday, July 4, and Saturday, July 5, as announced on its website. It adds that the fireworks are synchronized to patriotic music. "Enjoy a firework & drone show spectacular on SeaWorld's large central lake with inspiring music synced to beautiful fireworks in celebration of America. View from areas like Bayside Stadium or find a spot along the water," its website states. Legoland Orlando LEGOLAND Florida is bringing back its "Red, White & Boom" party for July 4 through July 5, with star-spangled activities, DJ Dance parties, and a fireworks show. The park will extend its usual hours for the show. For its fireworks, officials note that it is extra special to view with 3D viewing glasses, which transform the sparks into exploding Lego bricks. To make things even sweeter, the park will offer a limited-time patriotic paleta, which features "layers of tangy blueberry yogurt, creamy vanilla yogurt, and juicy fresh strawberries." Busch Gardens Tampa Bay Guests at Busch Gardens Tampa Bay will enjoy an extended patriotic fireworks finale to its "Wild Skies: The Summer Nights" drone show from July 4 through July 6. The show takes place close to the Festival Field.
South Wales Argus
17-06-2025
- Politics
- South Wales Argus
Energy consumption and temperatures rising quickly
I remain half-convinced that certain wits at the Argus make up his letters as a clever satire on the typical Daily Mail reader. Viz magazine runs a regular column with the same worthy aim, but your version is funnier. The climate crisis is dire. Energy consumption - and temperatures - are rising at a far greater rate than emissions cuts and a recent UN report predicts that global fossil fuel production in 2030 is set to be more than double the level deemed consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees. Renewable energy sources aren't profitable enough for capitalist corporations to spend on them in the amounts required to make a serious difference. Money speaks loudest in our world, and so Spaceship Earth remains on an uncertain trajectory. The world's dependence on fossil fuels is increasing, despite many governments' commitments to decarbonise. However, even where small efforts ARE being made - wind and solar farms, etc. - buffoons like Greenhalgh are ready to condemn them for spoiling the view from the ramparts of their cosy little castles! Clearly, this man Greenhalgh is no intellectual, but surely to God he can do better than this! Does he not embarrass himself? The hot air he generates is only making matters worse. Lyndon Morgans, Blackwood.
Yahoo
02-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
3 Dates for Disney Investors to Circle in June After the Stock's 24% Jump in May
GEO-82 gives Epcot foodies a new upscale lounge with a view. Pixar's "Elio" hopes to build on the momentum of two strong theatrical releases in May. Marvel's "Ironheart" on Disney+ gives a key character from "Black Panther: Wakanda Forever" her own show on the streaming platform. 10 stocks we like better than Walt Disney › Shares of Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS) had a May to remember. The stock soared 24% last month, fueled initially by a blowout quarterly report and unexpected news about a new international theme park in the works. The media giant has now fully recovered from the downticks that it experienced during the market correction earlier this year. Where does Disney go from here? There isn't another quarterly report coming out until August, but it doesn't mean that Disney will be standing still. There is new content coming to entertain folks at the local multiplex as well as fans streaming from home. Let's take a closer look at some dates that Disney investors will be watching in June. Disney rolled out new shows and experiences at Disney World and Disneyland in May. The original resort in California will have some more debuts in July as it picks up the tempo on its milestone of turning 70 this summer. June will be quieter than the bookend months, but it doesn't mean that something new isn't on the way. Disney World is opening GEO-82 at its Epcot theme park on Wednesday. The new lounge located in the rear of the iconic Spaceship Earth attraction will serve up a wide range of handcrafted beverages along with a thin but artisan menu of food offerings. It also offers a great view of the park's World Showcase, a feature that will come in handy as a way to serve up a premium viewing experience for the nightly festivities. A new posh watering hole may not move the needle, but GEO-82 is a hot attraction before it even officially opens. The first 60 days of reservation availability have been quickly gobbled up. It's not just Disney stock entering the month of June with momentum. Its movie studio is also on a roll. Disney's live-action reboot of Lilo & Stitch has been the top draw at theaters in back-to-back weekends. It is now the country's second-highest-grossing theatrical release this year, behind A Minecraft Movie. Marvel's Thunderbolts also debuted earlier in May. The two films are among three Disney releases currently in the top five biggest moneymakers in 2025. Disney has another potential winner coming out this month. Elio is the latest computer-animated release from Disney's Pixar hit factory. Expectations are low despite Pixar's pedigree. Industry watchers are modeling $35 million to $45 million in domestic ticket sales during its non-holiday opening weekend. This is less than last year's Inside Out 2 or Moana 2 rang up in box office receipts in a single day, but those were sequels to established properties. Mufasa: The Lion King opened with just $35 million domestically for its premiere weekend late last year. It wound up topping $254 million by the time it was done with its multiplex run, collecting another $468 million in admissions outside of the U.S. market. If Elio is able to score strong initial reviews, the film could have a long tail at theaters. Disney+ has now been profitable for the past year. Can it use the platform's scalability to build on its bottom line? A new series hits the premium streaming service in three weeks. Marvel's Ironheart is spinning off a character from the successful Black Panther movie franchise, giving Dominique Thorne a chance to reprise her role as Riri Williams in the new show. Riri is the genius inventor who created her own high-tech armor in the film. In the new series, Riri will have to contend with no longer having Wakandan technology on her side. As successful as Disney+ has been with a vault of iconic talent for younger viewers -- including the recent win to become the exclusive streaming home for Cocomelon -- it also needs magnetic content for teens and adults. The media giant has already leaned on its Marvel arm to feed hit shows to the platform including Loki and WandaVision. If Ironheart is the next hit on Disney+, it will help with retention on the service. Profitability in the cutthroat streaming space is something that even Disney can't take for granted. Before you buy stock in Walt Disney, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Walt Disney wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Rick Munarriz has positions in Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Dates for Disney Investors to Circle in June After the Stock's 24% Jump in May was originally published by The Motley Fool
