Latest news with #SwethaSridhar
Scoop
4 days ago
- Business
- Scoop
Remove Systemic Blockers To Enable Access For Women To Economic And Labour Markets
Unless we remove systemic discrimination, disadvantages and patriarchal barriers, how would we ensure that women and gender diverse peoples in all their diversities are equitably and justly able to access economic markets and labour markets? Economic justice is critical cog-in-the-wheel for development justice. At the recently concluded intergovernmental meet on financing for development, the outcome document mentions about the importance of "access of women to economic markets, labour markets and the importance of women for the potential benefit that they can bring to the economy, but it does not address the systemic discrimination and disadvantages that women and girls face when trying to access the labour markets and economic markets. These goals cannot be realised unless the principles of decent work and safeguards for fundamental human rights at workplaces of girls, women and gender diverse peoples are not assured," said Zainab Shumail of Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD). "The outcome document does mention to increasing investment in the care economy and equitably redistribute the disproportionate share of unpaid care and domestic work done by women, the reference itself does not meet the most progressive existing standards in terms of language on care which the UN's International Labour Organization (ILO) has set out. For example, the outcome document calls on governments to 'recognise, value and equitably redistribute' whereas the ILO calls to 'recognise, redistribute, reduce reward and represent unpaid care and domestic work'. This shows a missed opportunity for governments to advance normative frameworks and commitments to care economy within the text of outcome document," said Swetha Sridhar, Senior Global Policy Research Officer at Fos Feminista. Let us not forget that the linkage between gender equality, human rights and SDGs is especially critical in the context of achieving SDGs in the next 5 years. We need gender equality, sexual and reproductive health, rights and justice, and bodily autonomy to be reflected in conversations on development and development financing urgently. And as Swetha Sridhar pointed out, without major reforms and restructuring of the international financial architecture, the implementation of the outcome document of fourth financing for development meet, will continue to advance the current problematic financial norms, while economic, gender, and reproductive justice will remain unattainable for women, girls, and gender diverse individuals. Unless we go for structural reforms, stop privatisation of public services – so that public health, education and social support are fully funded – how will we deliver on SDGs where no one is left behind? Governments say yes to UHC but no mention of reproductive health and bodily autonomy? While the document commits to increasing investment in universal health coverage and inclusive, equitable, affordable, quality and resilient health systems, there is no mention of sexual and reproductive health and rights or how this idea of universal health coverage will be rolled out in the context of increased spending on militarisation, added Swetha Sridhar. Mabel Bianco, senior physician activist from Latin America and Founding President of FEIM re-echoed that "if we are not having sexual and reproductive health and rights recognised - including access to safe abortion- it is not possible to reach development." Thirty years ago, world leaders made a promise at the Fourth World Conference on Women for achieving equal rights, opportunities, power, and safety for women and girls everywhere. The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action also enshrined that promise to achieve equal rights of ALL women and girls. And yet where are we today? The outcome document of fourth financing for development meet is a setback to these promises made decades ago - and also - fails to deliver on feminist agenda. Widening funding gap for SDGs Based on the current trend developing countries are falling short by an estimated USD 420 billion a year to achieve gender equality as envisioned in the Sustainable Development Goals. According to UN Women, this shortfall is rooted in chronic underfunding, ineffective tracking of spending and inequitable global financing rules that divert resources away from the world's poorest countries, where most low-income women live. Reducing gender inequalities and guaranteeing the human rights of women and groups suffering exclusion and discrimination requires a transformative fiscal policy, both nationally and globally. But the outcome document of financing for development meet this year failed on various fronts to address these global challenges. It falls short of ushering in an economic system rooted in care, justice, and equality, says Misun Woo, Regional Coordinator, APWLD. It is also silent on safeguards, corporate abuses and preventing gender-based violence in the workplace and only offers band-aid solutions that perpetuate the violence of capitalism. Lidy Nacpil, Coordinator of Asian People's Movement on Debt and Development (APMDD), rued that the FfD4 outcome document was a 'done deal' as it had already been finalised at least two weeks before the meet began, and governments did not make any major decisions that changed the text that had been already negotiated even before the governments began the in-person meet. Lidy said that there was a lack of transparency throughout the whole negotiation process at this meet. Its outcome document was influenced and shaped by the Global North countries - the 'blockers' of any real progress. According to her, absence of accountability and restrictions of civil society participation were major impediments. With no civil society space at this intergovernmental meet, feminists and other civil society activists were forced to mobilise and stage historical actions inside the meeting venue. "Meeting outcomes failed to make any meaningful progress on establishing a global financing framework that was centred on human rights and upheld the principle of CBDR (Common But Differentiated Responsibilities). The outcome document failed to make meaningful progress on environmental harm caused by colonialism, patriarchy, slavery, and resource extraction from the Global South. Outcome document also failed to prioritise public financing for high quality essential services and move beyond an over reliance on private finance to fill in development financing gaps. It failed to address the equity for income distribution. And it failed to call for reparations for the economic and environmental harm caused by colonialism, patriarchy, slavery, and resource extraction from the global south. The outcome document did not take on ecological and climate breakdown as cross-cutting issues. It did not clearly acknowledge the need to phase out fossil fuels', said Lidy. Shereen Talaat, Founder and Director of Middle East and North Africa Feminist Movement for Economic, Development and Ecological Justice, lamented that gender equality financing dropped to 42% of official development assistance in 2022 and only 4% of it had gender as a primary objective and less than 1% reached feminist and women rights organisations. Meanwhile, conflict-related sexual violence is up by 50%, as women face war and displacements. Shereen reiterated that the outcome document of fourth financing for development does not matter for people, especially those from the Global South. It only matters for existing global economic and capitalist systems. These issues were discussed at a SHE & Rights (Sexual Health with Equity & Rights) session co-hosted by International Conference on Family Planning (ICFP) 2025, Family Planning News Network (FPNN), Global Center for Health Diplomacy and Inclusion (CeHDI), International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW), Women's Global Network for Reproductive Rights (WGNRR), Asia Pacific Media Alliance for Health and Development (APCAT Media) and CNS. There was a general consensus among the speakers that overall the outcome document of fourth financing for development meet lacks genuine ambition for systemic transformation. It is painfully clear that a gender and human rights approach to financing was not mainstreamed in the text and the idea of feminist values were completely missing. There is a long way ahead for feminist restructuring of the global financial architecture. Top down decision making has to be replaced with women, girls, and all gender diverse peoples becoming co-creators and co-leaders of a gender-just and rights-based economic future. The global financial architecture should be based on care, human rights, justice and reparations. It should replace the current colonial financial architecture that continues to use unsustainable and illegitimate debt as a tool of oppression, and undermines peace. Also, as the Political Declaration of the Feminist Forum organised ahead of the fourth financing for development meet had rightly said, no real financing justice can be reached without an urgent end to escalating wars, territorial invasions and genocides. Let us make frustration our energy We must heed Mabel Bianco's request to not be frustrated and think that we lost (at fourth financing for development meet): 'We lose when we stop fighting. Our challenge is to make the frustration our energy so that we can go on and continue fighting for gender equality and human rights. Most importantly we need to multiply manifold in order to fight at national level to ensure gender equality becomes a reality where no one is left behind." Shobha Shukla – CNS (Citizen News Service) (Shobha Shukla is a feminist, health and development justice advocate, and an award-winning founding Managing Editor and Executive Director of CNS (Citizen News Service). She was also the Lead Discussant for SDG-3 at United Nations High Level Political Forum (HLPF 2025). She is a former senior Physics faculty of prestigious Loreto Convent College; current President of Asia Pacific Regional Media Alliance for Health and Development (APCAT Media); Chairperson of Global AMR Media Alliance (GAMA received AMR One Health Emerging Leaders and Outstanding Talents Award 2024); and coordinator of SHE & Rights (Sexual Health with Equity & Rights). Follow her on Twitter/X @shobha1shukla or read her writings here
Scoop
20-07-2025
- Business
- Scoop
No Health, Gender And Economic Justice Without Ending Wars, Invasions And Genocides
While health, gender and other sustainable development goals are reeling under severe funding cuts, governments of richer nations are increasing defence budgets. More shocking is that same governments who are raising spending on militarisation, are the ones committing to 'peace' at a global meet on financing for development and refusing on debt cancellation for the Global South nations. In June 2025, a meeting of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and its allies was held which pledged to increase defence spending to 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2035. 'Yet these same countries - the same NATO countries - during negotiations of 4th Financing for Development Conference of the UN (FfD4), refused to include a reference to debt cancellation for the Global South. This increased commitment to militarisation without relieving the persistent debt crisis remains a major gap in the FfD4 process,' said Swetha Sridhar, Senior Global Policy Research Officer at Fos Feminista. "This is the money (5% rise in budgets for militarisation) they are taking off from programmes on gender equality and human rights (including human right to health),' said Mabel Bianco, physician activist from Latin America and founding president of FEIM (foundation for studies and research on women). A Feminist Forum was organised right before the FfD4 began. 'Feminist Forum's Political Declaration importantly called for deescalating wars and ending territorial invasions and genocide - nothing less from this is acceptable,' said Sai Jyothirmai Racherla, Deputy Executive Director of ARROW (Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women). Agrees Lidy Nacpil, coordinator of Asian People's Movement on Debt and Development (APMDD): 'I would echo what Political Declaration of Feminist Forum organised before FfD4 said that no real financing justice can be reached without an urgent end to escalating wars, territorial invasions and genocides, in Gaza, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo and other places.' 'There is growing realisation of debt. Global North has plundered Global South for centuries. Systematic accountability for the historical role of the Global North in causing and perpetuating the debt crises in the Global South, along with reparations and non-debt creating finance are central demands for a feminist transformation of the existing international financial architecture,' responded Zainab Shumail of Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD). Global South is reeling under perennial debt and debt servicing. But governments at FfD4 shy away from addressing this issue. Unless we go for structural reforms, stop privatisation of public services – so that public health, education and social support are fully funded – how will we deliver on SDGs where no one is left behind? The global financing architecture must be geared towards the realisation of a gender-just economy in which financing for development will result in equitable outcomes and fair distribution of resources that promotes social, economic, and environmental justice, instead of just providing lip service. This was being discussed at a SHE & Rights (Sexual Health with Equity & Rights) session co-hosted by International Conference on Family Planning (ICFP) 2025, Family Planning News Network (FPNN), Global Center for Health Diplomacy and Inclusion (CeHDI), International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW), Women's Global Network for Reproductive Rights (WGNRR), Asia Pacific Media Alliance for Health and Development (APCAT Media) and CNS. FfD4 failed to deliver on feminist agenda 'Feminist agenda refers to a gender transformative economic system that is based on rights to justice, care, and equality for everyone urgently. This was central to the Political Declaration of Feminist Forum held before the FfD4 in Seville, Spain. But FfD4 failed to deliver on gender equality and feminist agenda,' said Sai Jyothirmai Racherla. 'FfD4 compromised on the ambition that was warranted as per the urgency of our current times, and lack of political will which is required to embrace the much-needed bold reforms,' said Lidy Nacpil. 'FfD4 outcome document was influenced and shaped by main 'blockers' of any real progress. These 'blockers' were Global North countries, and this is not a surprising fact. There was very active undermining and opposition to the proposals for actionable mandates for the transformation of the international debt and aid architectures. This transformation is vital to address the colonial and patriarchal legacies that plague the current financial architecture. There was a lack of transparency throughout the whole FfD4 negotiation process. Accountability of the process was absent and restrictions of civil society participation which continued up to - and even worsened during the Seville FfD4 conference – were major impediments,' added Lidy Nacpil. She explained further that: 'FfD4 failed because the FFD4 outcomes failed to make meaningful progress on establishing a global financing framework that we have always demanded for many years which should be centred on human rights, promote the stability of the biosphere and brings all planetary boundaries back to a safe zone and uphold the principle of CBDR (Common But Differentiated Responsibilities). This framework should address the redistribution of care work which is predominantly done by women and acknowledges and addresses the racial dimension of SDGs.' 'FfD4 outcome document also failed to prioritise public financing for high quality essential services and move beyond an over reliance on private finance to fill in development financing gaps. It failed to address the equity for income distribution. It failed to strengthen and uphold democratic space and civic participation. And it failed to call for reparations for the economic and environmental harm caused by colonialism, patriarchy, slavery, and resource extraction from the global south,' Lidy added. FfD4 outcome document should have included a clear commitment to shift away from so-called debt resolution mechanisms which are dominated by creditors. It should have taken us steps forward for a process towards a UN Framework Convention on Sovereign Debt – which was among the strong calls given by civil society. Connect the dots: Debt, tax, trade, justice and feminist agenda 'Issues of debt, tax, trade, and justice are all deeply intertwined with a feminist agenda for sexual and reproductive health, rights and justice. For example, we know that financial autonomy translates to greater bodily autonomy. We also know that gendered impacts of poverty leave marginalised communities unable to access services for sexual and reproductive health and rights,' said Swetha Sridhar. Agrees Mabel Bianco: 'FfD4 compromise document is so weak. For example, it mentions about the access of universal health coverage but not about sexual and reproductive health. But this is what we acutely need because it is not possible to reach development if we are not having these rights recognised - including access to safe abortion.' 'Since FfD4 outcome document is so weak, we must consider that this is not the end rather it is just the beginning of our further struggles to achieve gender justice and human rights. We are also going to find strength in struggles and align with other like-minded movements advocating for rights around the UN. We are going to put in what we need. We are not resigning of our principles, ideas, or our proposals. If you read the Political Declaration of Feminist Forum held before FfD4, this is what we need. We need to continue resisting and fighting till we achieve our goals,' added Mabel Bianco. 'For the young people, especially young girls and women, we need to request them to consider and recognise that what we reached before (in terms of gender equality and rights) is not forever. We need to keep fighting to be sure that we do not lose these gains made towards gender equality – and move towards delivering on all sustainable goals and targets,' said Mabel. 'We are not going to stop until we deliver on gender equality. We will continue to do our work to demand for a right-based, environmentally-just, de-colonial, intersectional, sustainable, and person-centred economic model. We need such an economic model in current times where care, reparations, redistribution and accountability remain central. We must reform financial architecture so that it can guarantee long-term flexible, inclusive, and equitable financing for development. We also need to restructure the global economic governance because currently it is very Global North heavy. We need to have Global South parity. We need to include democratisation of the decision-making processes across the international financial institutions and the multilateral development banks,' rightly concludes Sai Jyothirmai Racherla. Shobha Shukla – CNS (Citizen News Service) (Shobha Shukla is a feminist, health and development justice advocate, and an award-winning founding Managing Editor and Executive Director of CNS (Citizen News Service). She was also the Lead Discussant for SDG-3 at United Nations High Level Political Forum (HLPF 2025). She is a former senior Physics faculty of prestigious Loreto Convent College; current President of Asia Pacific Regional Media Alliance for Health and Development (APCAT Media); Chairperson of Global AMR Media Alliance (GAMA received AMR One Health Emerging Leaders and Outstanding Talents Award 2024); and coordinator of SHE & Rights (Sexual Health with Equity & Rights). Follow her on Twitter/X @shobha1shukla or read her writings here
