logo
ENFRع
#

Latest news with #TasmanianElection

Rockliff promise of 'world's tallest chocolate fountain' came out of nowhere, but documents show years of grants and lobbying
Rockliff promise of 'world's tallest chocolate fountain' came out of nowhere, but documents show years of grants and lobbying

ABC News

time06-07-2025

  • Business
  • ABC News

Rockliff promise of 'world's tallest chocolate fountain' came out of nowhere, but documents show years of grants and lobbying

When it comes to eye-catching election promises, it's hard to look past "the world's tallest chocolate fountain". It was midway through the Tasmanian election campaign last year when Premier Jeremy Rockliff strode into the Cadbury factory in Hobart to make the announcement, alongside tourism developer Simon Currant. And it wasn't just a chocolate fountain; it was pitched as an entire "chocolate experience". There would be a "bespoke chocolate studio", a chocolate lounge, an "immersion into chocolate making" and even an arboretum. "This will be MONA-esque," Mr Rockliff told the media. Then came the public funding. Mr Rockliff promised $2 million for planning, designs and approvals, then another $2 million for public site works and a further $8 million for the precinct. It seemed to come out of the blue. But it turns out, it had been bouncing around with Tasmanian public servants for over two years. Internal communications and reports — obtained under right to information — show undisclosed grants to help the developer gauge demand and no available detailed business case or economic impact study when Mr Rockliff promised the funds. And before he made the promise, documents show public servants were under the impression that the developer was already funding the first $2 million themselves. They also wrote advice that the developers would ultimately seek one-third funding for the entire construction cost, but this has since been ruled out. Mr Currant has a list of successful tourism ventures across Tasmania, from Strahan Village on the west coast, to Pumphouse Point in the wilderness world heritage area. His next venture — the "chocolate experience" proposal — made its way through the doors at the Department of State Growth in February 2022, when Mr Currant asked for funds for a demand study. The department was happy to oblige, it just needed a bit more information about what the project actually was. "As discussed please see attached as a very quickly put together overview," Mr Currant wrote to the department's deputy secretary. Having looked over the 15-page project summary, the department recommended providing a $79,800 grant to Simon Currant and Associates (SCA) for the study, matched by Cadbury parent company, Mondelez International. A funding pathway for the grant was "identified" — it would come from a tourism hospitality stream. It was not publicly disclosed and was one of the only grants in the stream to go to a private tourism developer outside of established grant programs. The demand study was created, based on an online survey of 827 people to gauge interest in the chocolate experience. Only 12 out of 44 pages of the publicly funded document were released to the ABC showing generic information like population and tourism visitor data, the rest was redacted as commercial in confidence. A month later, the developers asked for more funds from State Growth for a feasibility study, using the demand study to show the project's "potential contributions to the Tasmanian visitor economy". A letter from Mondelez backing the idea was also provided. The department approved this funding request, so another $70,000 grant was provided to help the developers update financial figures and develop a public relations strategy and a corporate strategy. This second grant was also placed under the tourism hospitality funding stream, and not publicly disclosed. State Growth's tourism and hospitality team seemed a little uncertain on some of the details, well before Mr Rockliff made his funding promise. With ministers set to face questioning in budget estimates, they sent part of the minister's brief to Mr Currant for his feedback, in case it came up. An internal departmental email noted that some details in the funding agreement were "unclear". "The paperwork we have access to does lack some context given that we came to the administration of the (grant) deeds later," it reads. Mr Currant and business partner David Inches were pleased with progress, with Mondelez "excited by and supportive of" the project. Mr Currant took the project to the Office of the Co-ordinator General, and it started to appear in the office's fortnightly briefings with Mr Rockliff. State Growth deputy secretary Mark Bowles also kept the premier up to date. "I've verbally updated the premier and he's keen to show what support he can for the project," Mr Bowles told Mr Currant in an email. The department started preparing a brief for Mr Rockliff in mid-2023 and asked for updated information from Mr Currant, who sent a document intended for investors, requesting state servants sign non-disclosure agreements. A brief was completed in November, saying the demand study had "ambitiously" projected the project would bring 34,000 additional visitors to Tasmania, and that the department was reviewing all the information. "It is felt that further questions may emerge from this review, and these will need to be resolved by the developer prior to any further advice being provided to government," it reads. While State Growth appeared to have some questions, it was full steam ahead with the Office of the Co-ordinator General — an office that works to attract investment in Tasmania. It started to prepare a case for the developers to apply for government funds through the Tasmanian Development Board, with Tourism Tasmania supporting it as filling a gap for the 'young families' tourism market. A meeting was arranged between Mr Currant, Mr Inches and Mr Rockliff on February 9, 2024, during which the developers brought a paper to update him on. It's unclear what was in this paper. However, a meeting brief by State Growth appeared to advise some caution. "While the project is innovative and could deliver good outcomes for the Tasmanian economy … the request is very significant and will require a detailed commercial review," it reads. "(Simon Currant and Associates) will need to provide a detailed proposal and make all project information available for verification and analysis to feed into a business case for government support. "Given the scale of the request, State Growth may consider funding an independent analysis of the proposal to verify its economic and social benefit to Tasmania." A few days later, more State Growth advice was written for the premier. It stated that the developers had requested one-third of the total construction cost for project, on top of the planning costs — a government contribution that, at that stage, could be a further $25 million to $30 million. A month later — on March 10, 2024 — Mr Rockliff walked into the Cadbury factory with Mr Currant to make a funding promise. The first $2 million of the promise was for "planning, designs, approvals", which Simon Currant and Associates describe as phase two. But advice to the premier a month earlier stated that the developers were already funding this. "SCA has indicated it is independently funding Phase 2 … costing $2 million," it reads. A spokesperson for SCA said the total cost of the planning and design phase is "significantly higher" than what was known at that time, and the remaining costs were privately funded. The project also involved two electric ferries to transport visitors to and from the Chocolate Experience site, requiring upgrades to the Brooke Street pier on the Hobart waterfront — originally described as an extension. But the SCA spokesperson said the pier would not be extended. SCA is yet to access the second $2 million in funding, which is largely for public site works. It plans to submit a development application with Glenorchy council later this year. A spokesperson says it has provided a business case to the government. The government is yet to formalise the process for the final $8 million — or determine what the funding will be spent on. SCA says the total project cost is now $155 million. "SCA will not be seeking any further grant funding from the government," a spokesperson said. When asked if Mr Currant will be an equity partner in the project, giving him a stake in its profits and losses — as noted in a government document, seen by the ABC — SCA responded that "the community will benefit through increased investment, more jobs through construction". SCA said Mondelez International — one of the world's largest confectionary companies — has "no financial stake in the project", but is providing land lease and access to Cadbury branding. The last Cadbury factory tours in Hobart closed in 2010. Tours also ended at the Cadbury factory in Dunedin, New Zealand, in 2017, and Mr Currant told the department he had "brought back together" the team from that venture. Part of the feasibility study involved a "study tour" to the Lindt experience in Switzerland, which could be similar to the scale of the tour planned in Hobart. An SCA spokesperson said the new Chocolate Experience in Hobart would target more modern tourism demands. "What SCA is proposing is not comparable to the previous tours," they said. The partly government-funded demand analysis estimated it could add $104 million to the annual spending by tourists. This week, Mr Rockliff said it would be a major contributor to the state's tourism economy. "One in six Tasmanians are employed in the tourism and hospitality sector," he said. "We have backed this project with a $12 million investment to get the project shovel-ready and commence initial site works, including public walkways, cycleways and headworks, subject to agreed milestones." The ABC asked Mr Rockliff what level of detailed business case and economic analysis he had access to when he made the $12 million funding promise, and if the $2 million was already privately funded, but this was not clear in the response.

Will the Tasmanian election put an end to the island's parliamentary chaos?
Will the Tasmanian election put an end to the island's parliamentary chaos?

The Guardian

time05-07-2025

  • Politics
  • The Guardian

Will the Tasmanian election put an end to the island's parliamentary chaos?

The last Tasmanian state election, in March 2024, produced a very unstable situation – not just a hung parliament, but a parliament where no party was close to a majority. So the state returning to the polls on 19 July shouldn't be much of a surprise. While the parties will be hoping for a more enduring result, it's again unlikely either major party will be given a majority. A YouGov poll published on 30 June gave Labor 34% of the vote with the Liberals on 31%, Greens on 13% and other parties and independents on 22%. That outcome would represent a five-point improvement for Labor compared with the 2024 election, and would probably make it the largest party in parliament, but still without an overall majority. Tasmania's lower house is elected using the proportional Hare-Clark system. There are five electorates, each with seven members. Parties run up to seven candidates in each electorate, with candidates grouped by party. The order of the candidates' names is randomised on different ballot papers, rather than the parties deciding on the order. This produces competition between candidates in the same party, and on occasion, sitting MPs lose their seats to a member of their own party. Parties usually win a share of seats that is close to their share of the overall vote. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The 2024 election produced a parliament of 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, three Jacqui Lambie Network (JLN) members and three independent MPs. The three JLN members were largely unheard of and had not worked together before, and it was unclear what they wanted to achieve by agreeing to support the government. With 18 MPs needed for a majority in the parliament, the incumbent Liberal government continued in office after signing deals with the JLN and another member, but found it hard to work with them. The JLN members also struggled to work as a bloc, with Lambie sometimes intervening from her federal office. The JLN members split in late 2024, with Miriam Beswick and Rebekah Pentland leaving the party and continuing to support the government, while Andrew Jenner continued as a JLN member while not supporting the government. The Liberal government has continued to have trouble with the crossbench since this split. A motion of no confidence forced the deputy premier, Michael Ferguson, to resign from the ministry after losing the support of a key independent. By early 2025, it was clear that there were likely to be enough votes on the crossbench to pass a motion of no confidence if supported by Labor. But for some time Labor was reluctant to give the government the nudge it needed to collapse. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion This changed in May, after Labor's resounding victory in the federal election and in Tasmania's upper house elections. The Labor opposition moved a motion of no confidence, which passed and thus triggered a the state election. The JLN will not be contesting this time, creating a vacuum for voters who don't like the Liberal government but don't want to vote for Labor or the Greens. The National party will be hoping to fill that gap, but the position of the Nationals in a post-election negotiation is unclear, with two of the ex-JLN members who found themselves on opposing sides of that party's split now both running for the Nationals. Support for the major parties remains very low in Tasmania, which is likely to result in another hung parliament with a large crossbench. The major parties have struggled to share power and both are reluctant to do deals. Labor and the Greens have a particularly difficult relationship, which means Labor will be reluctant to take government if it would mean relying on the Greens for a majority. For Labor, the best-case scenario is probably a hung parliament where they have the choice of working with the Greens or other crossbenchers to form government and pass legislation. There is a history in Tasmania of Labor-Liberal swing voters moving towards whichever major party has the best chance of governing without requiring crossbench support. Those voters have favoured the Liberals in recent elections, but Labor will be hoping to gain them this time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store