Latest news with #Tetra4
IOL News
09-07-2025
- Business
- IOL News
Renergen disputes MGE's exercise of put option
Renergen has issued a statement in response to Mahlako Gas Energy's (MGE) notice regarding its purported exercise of the Put Option related to its investment in Renergen's subsidiary, Tetra4. Image: Supplied Renergen has issued a statement in response to Mahlako Gas Energy's (MGE) notice regarding its purported exercise of the Put Option related to its investment in Renergen's subsidiary, Tetra4. Tetra4 holds South Africa's first and only onshore petroleum production right issued by the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy. As previously announced on December 27, 2023, Renergen entered into a transaction agreement with MGE for an investment in Tetra4 through a sale, subscription, and shareholders agreement, which was initially classified as a category 2 transaction in terms of the JSE Listings Requirements. However, MGE has now notified Renergen of its intention to exercise the Put Option, which it claims has been triggered by a so-called "Put Option Event." A put option is a contract that gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying asset (like a stock) at a specific price. Renergen said, "Renergen categorically disputes that the Put Option has been lawfully or validly exercised and that it has consequently given rise to the aforementioned share transaction. Further to this, and resulting from the invalidity of the exercise of the Put Option, Renergen also disputes that the Option Transaction Agreement has validly come into existence and will be challenging same." Renergen further said that MGE's actions, which the Company believes are premature and unsupported by the terms of the agreement, lack legal merit. Renergen has stated that the dispute will be resolved via the dispute resolution mechanisms outlined in the Transaction Agreement, although the process may take time. Renergen said it is confident that the matter will be settled according to the prescribed procedures and has assured shareholders that its core business operations and strategic direction remain unaffected by this ongoing dispute. The company will continue to focus on the development of the Tetra4 project and will keep shareholders informed of any material developments requiring further disclosure. BUSINESS REPORT
IOL News
09-07-2025
- Business
- IOL News
Renergen disputes MGE's exercise of put option
Renergen has issued a statement in response to Mahlako Gas Energy's (MGE) notice regarding its purported exercise of the Put Option related to its investment in Renergen's subsidiary, Tetra4. Image: Supplied Renergen has issued a statement in response to Mahlako Gas Energy's (MGE) notice regarding its purported exercise of the Put Option related to its investment in Renergen's subsidiary, Tetra4. Tetra4 holds South Africa's first and only onshore petroleum production right issued by the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy. As previously announced on December 27, 2023, Renergen entered into a transaction agreement with MGE for an investment in Tetra4 through a sale, subscription, and shareholders agreement, which was initially classified as a category 2 transaction in terms of the JSE Listings Requirements. However, MGE has now notified Renergen of its intention to exercise the Put Option, which it claims has been triggered by a so-called "Put Option Event." A put option is a contract that gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying asset (like a stock) at a specific price. Renergen said, "Renergen categorically disputes that the Put Option has been lawfully or validly exercised and that it has consequently given rise to the aforementioned share transaction. Further to this, and resulting from the invalidity of the exercise of the Put Option, Renergen also disputes that the Option Transaction Agreement has validly come into existence and will be challenging same." Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Renergen further said that MGE's actions, which the Company believes are premature and unsupported by the terms of the agreement, lack legal merit. Renergen has stated that the dispute will be resolved via the dispute resolution mechanisms outlined in the Transaction Agreement, although the process may take time. Renergen said it is confident that the matter will be settled according to the prescribed procedures and has assured shareholders that its core business operations and strategic direction remain unaffected by this ongoing dispute. The company will continue to focus on the development of the Tetra4 project and will keep shareholders informed of any material developments requiring further disclosure. BUSINESS REPORT
Daily Maverick
06-05-2025
- Business
- Daily Maverick
Renergen defends its financial position against wild social media claims
Energy company Renergen has responded to Daily Maverick queries and directly denied social media claims suggesting the company lost control of assets due to a default on its Standard Bank loan. 'There has never been property ownership through the Standard Bank financing,' Renergen said via email, describing the claim as misinformation circulating online. 'The SBSA Loan is secured by a third-ranking pledge of Tetra4's assets and shares held by Renergen in Tetra4, and further by Mr Nicholas Mitchell and Mr Stefano Marani pledging shares in Renergen as security.' There is truth to claims that Renergen breached several loan covenants as at 28 February 2025, involving facilities from the Development Finance Corporation (DFC), Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), and Standard Bank South Africa (SBSA). However, as Renergen pointed out in a response to Daily Maverick, these defaults were temporary and resolved shortly after the reporting period. As detailed in its preliminary financial statements released on 30 April 2025: note eight of the report discloses that Renergen 'did not meet certain loan covenants as at 29 February 2024', which included the required asset cover ratio for a key loan facility. Although the company did not consider these breaches to have a material impact on its going concern status, it noted that the lenders 'have provided waivers subsequent to period end,' which is confirmed in note 18. Importantly, Renergen stresses that these waivers 'effectively addressed the immediate concern', and no creditors have called in loans or taken possession of assets. Proof is in the production pudding Contrary to claims that the company is far off its production goals, Renergen's figures show significant progress: Liquefied natural gas (LNG) production rose 70% year-on-year to 4,885 tonnes. LNG sales increased 74.2% to 4,633 tonnes. Liquid helium (LHe) commissioning was completed in the second quarter of the current financial year. Liquid helium sales began on 14 March 2025, shortly after the reporting period. Despite this, costs associated with commissioning the helium train – without immediate helium revenue – contributed to a deeper annual loss. Renergen reported a R236-million loss after tax and a gross loss of R28-million, down from a R10-million gross profit the year before. Revenue, however, increased by 79.7% to R52-million, largely due to LNG sales. The company chalks the larger loss up to high depreciation, rising input costs and the timing mismatch of helium revenue recognition. Litigation risk not imminent Concerns also remain around the unresolved litigation with Molopo Energy, which alleges that Renergen's sale of a 5.5% stake in Tetra4 triggered a loan acceleration. The company disputes this, saying that even in a worst-case scenario, the liability would be limited to a R50-million repayment. Looking ahead, Renergen is banking on additional funding. It has secured a $10-million inflow in April 2025 from an undisclosed third party, with the potential for a further $20-million. It is also pursuing a Nasdaq IPO aimed at raising R2.9-billion ($150-million) and expects to finalise a $795-million loan package from the DFC and SBSA – part of which will refinance existing debt. Strained, not sinking Renergen is under pressure, there's no denying that. Losses have widened, debt covenant breaches legitimately occurred, and the success of its financial restructuring is wholly reliant on external funding and market confidence. But the bright spots of its operational progress and continued lender support suggest a company navigating the turbulence typical of complex energy infrastructure roll-outs. The narrative of 'serious trouble' may overstate the case. Investors would do better to track helium and LNG output in the months ahead – as well as progress toward the planned IPO – to assess whether Renergen can turn the corner from startup stress to stable operation. DM
IOL News
06-05-2025
- Business
- IOL News
High Court ruling clarifies Renergen's operations in South Africa's gas sector
CEO Stefano Marani at the helium and liquid natural gas production facility in Virginia, Free State. The company has won a High Court ruling that clarifies the regulatory framework for upstream gas sector. Image: supplied JSE-listed Renergen has won a "legal victory" that frees its onshore helium and natura gas production from operating under National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) regulations, and the ruling adds regulatory clarity to South Africa's petroleum sector. The High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, did, on May 2, 2025, rule in favour of Renergen's owned subsidiary Tetra4's request for a declarator that the Gas Act of 2001 does not apply to production and incidental activities related to upstream petroleum activities, including a requirement for licensing of trading, construction, and operation of liquefaction facilities outside the piped gas industry. "This judgment is a landmark win for Tetra4 and the entire upstream gas industry. It affirms that upstream gas production and related activities, including on-site liquefaction, are outside the scope of the Gas Act and NERSA's licensing regime, provided they do not supply the regulated piped gas industry,' Renergen CEO Stefano Marani said. In December 2021, Tetra4 initiated High Court motion proceedings to seek clarification on the jurisdiction of NERSA regarding certain operational activities. 'This order shows these activities fall under the regulatory purview of the Production Right granted in accordance with the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 and resolves ambiguity and potential contradictions arising from disparate sets of legislation affecting Tetra4,' said Marani. Notably, the court found Tetra4 did not require a NERSA license for trading in gas (such as methane and helium) when such trading occurs outside the piped gas industry, and not involving the national pipeline grid or downstream market regulated by NERSA.
