Latest news with #TheNewYork
CNET
5 hours ago
- Entertainment
- CNET
Today's NYT Wordle Hints, Answer and Help for July 30 #1502
Looking for the most recent Wordle answer? Click here for today's Wordle hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands puzzles. Today's Wordle puzzle is exceptionally tough, I thought. It's a word I don't ever use, and it has some repeated letters and unusual letter placement. If there's any day when you shouldn't feel at all bad about needing some hints, today is that day. If you need a new starter word, check out our list of which letters show up the most in English words. If you need hints and the answer, read on. Today's Wordle hints Before we show you today's Wordle answer, we'll give you some hints. If you don't want a spoiler, look away now. Wordle hint No. 1: Repeats Today's Wordle answer has two separate repeated letters. Wordle hint No. 2: Vowels Today's Wordle answer has one vowel that is repeated, so you will see it twice, plus one sometimes vowel. Wordle hint No. 3: First letter Today's Wordle answer begins with A. Wordle hint No. 4: Ending Today's Wordle answer ends with a sometimes vowel. Wordle hint No. 5: Meaning Today's Wordle answer can refer to testing metal or ore to determine its ingredients and quality. TODAY'S WORDLE ANSWER Today's Wordle answer is ASSAY. Yesterday's Wordle answer Yesterday's Wordle answer, July 29, No. 1501 was OMEGA. Recent Wordle answers July 25, No. 1497: GOFER July 26: No. 1498: HAUNT July 27, No. 1499: WHOLE July 28, No. 1500: SAVVY
Economic Times
30-06-2025
- Health
- Economic Times
The silent disease affecting millions of men, and 4 powerful ways to fight it off
This silent disease weakens men's bones, leading to fractures. Around 2 million men in the US have it. Another 16 million have early bone loss. Experts advise men to discuss testosterone levels with doctors. Weight-bearing exercise, lifestyle changes, and bone density tests are crucial. Treatments like Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty exist for spinal fractures. Early action is key for strong bones. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why it's dangerous 4 strong ways to fight osteoporosis - Dr. Paul Lewis Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What if you already have it? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Osteoporosis is called a 'silent disease' because it develops slowly and shows no signs until a bone breaks, says Dr. Paul Lewis, Wexner Medical Center. It makes your bones weak and brittle, so even a small fall can cause serious injury. Around 2 million men in the U.S. have osteoporosis according to the National Spine Health 16 million men have osteopenia, which is like an early stage of bone loss. Most men don't even care about it — only 1% are worried about low bone density as per a survey by Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. But they should care — falls are the number one cause of injuries and deaths for people over 65, as stated by The New York are no warning signs until a fracture happens, says Dr. Paul Lewis. Even a small fall can cause a bone to break if your bones are weak. Losing bone mass makes your whole body more fragile, especially as you age, as per the talking to your doctor about testosterone by age 30. Testosterone levels go down with age, which weakens bones and increases your weight-bearing workouts like, walking, hiking, climbing stairs, lifting weights or resistance bands, yoga or balance exercises. Some fun sports help too like pickleball or movement to your everyday life: walk the golf course instead of riding the cart, take stairs instead of the elevator, or play actively with kids or pets, as mentioned in the report by The New Not exercising with proper form or doing too much can cause injury. You can lose up to 3% of bone mass every year without resistance trainingHabits such as smoking, drinking more than 2 alcoholic drinks a day, not moving enough, poor diet, ripping hazards in your home, or muscle or nerve-related issues can increase the risk of weak your doctor about a DEXA scan — it's a low-dose X-ray that checks your bone density. It helps doctors spot osteoporosis you already have osteoporosis and get spinal fractures, treatments exist such as Kyphoplasty: A balloon is inflated in the fractured vertebra to make space. Then bone cement is injected. Vertebroplasty: Bone cement is injected directly into the fractured vertebra, as mentioned in the report by The New is a condition where men's bones become weak and brittle, making them easy to 2 million men in the U.S. have osteoporosis, and 16 million have early-stage bone loss.
Time of India
11-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Time of India
Wordle today #1453: Get hints and answer to today's puzzle June 11, 2025
Wordle Puzzle for June 11: Here are hints and answer to solve the Sunday challenge with ease Wordle is a popular word puzzle game that challenges players to guess a five-letter word within six attempts. Developed by Josh Wardle, this simple yet addictive game has taken the world by storm with its easy-to-understand rules and daily challenges. Each guess provides feedback with colored tiles: green indicates the correct letter in the correct spot, yellow signals the correct letter in the wrong spot, and gray means the letter isn't in the word. Wordle's mix of logic and vocabulary makes it a daily brain teaser loved by millions worldwide. The game's minimalist design and once-a-day format have contributed to its viral success. It also fosters friendly competition, as players often share their results on social media without giving away the answer. The Wordle puzzle can be tricky to solve, which is likely why you've found yourself here, struggling to crack today's challenge. As always, today's NYT Wordle was full of surprises, but don't worry—we're here to help. Below, you'll find some helpful clues for today's Wordle answer , and if those don't do the trick, keep reading to discover the solution directly. Sometimes the word includes uncommon letters or double letters that throw players off. Wordle hints and answers today Poll How often do you play Wordle? Rarely or never Occasionally A few times a week Every day by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Today's Wordle promises a puzzle that tests your linguistic skills, likely to be decoded by many participants. To assist you in solving the puzzle, we've curated a fresh array of hints and clues for today's Wordle challenge. Wordle hints and clues for June 11 The word starts with the letter 'P'. It contains two vowels. The word ends with letter 'D'. The word has no repeating letter. Today's Wordle is a pattern of crossed lines and squares of different colours and widths made on a type of thick woolen cloth. Wordle, June 11, 2025: Word of the day Whether you have cracked the code or are still working with the hints, it is now time to reveal the answer. Drumroll please, as we unveil the answer for Wordle. Today's Wordle word is 'PLAID'. How did Wordle originate Wordle was initially developed by engineer Josh Wardle as a thoughtful gift for his partner. However, it quickly gained massive popularity, turning into a global sensation with thousands of players engaging daily. The game's success inspired fans to create various spin-offs, such as the battle royale-style Squabble, the music identification game Heardle, and multi-word challenges like Dordle and Quordle. Its simplicity, paired with daily novelty, made it a part of many people's morning routine. The viral appeal also sparked academic interest in its psychological and linguistic impact. As its popularity soared, The New York Times acquired Wordle, and it became a hit on social media platforms like TikTok, where creators even livestream their gameplay sessions. Where can you play Wordle Wordle isn't available as an app; it can only be played through a web browser. To play, simply visit the New York Times Games website. Originally hosted on its own site and created by Josh Wardle, Wordle was acquired by the New York Times in February of this year. One of the great aspects of Wordle is that it's ad-free, allowing you to fully concentrate on the word-guessing game. How to play Wordle To play Wordle, visit the link and begin guessing words. Wordle FAQs Can I play past Wordle puzzles? No, Wordle is designed as a daily game with a unique puzzle each day. While you can't play past puzzles on the official site, there are unofficial Wordle archives available where you can play previous games. How do the color-coded tiles work in Wordle? Green means the letter is correct and in the correct position. Yellow means the letter is correct but in the wrong position. Gray means the letter is not in the word at all. How many guesses do I get in Wordle? You have six chances to guess the correct five-letter word. After each guess, you receive feedback to help guide your next attempt. Can I play Wordle more than once per day? Wordle is designed as a daily puzzle, so you can only play one puzzle per day. The word of the day is the same for everyone globally, and once you complete it, you'll have to wait until the next day for a new puzzle. Can letters repeat in Wordle? Yes, repeated letters can appear in Wordle answers. Words containing duplicate letters can present more of a challenge when solving. Is Wordle available in other languages? Yes, there are multiple versions of Wordle available in various languages, including Spanish, French, and German. You can switch to a different language by finding the corresponding version of the game online. Also Read| Roblox Haze Piece codes | Roblox Grand Piece Online codes AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Boston Globe
25-05-2025
- Politics
- Boston Globe
Susan Brownmiller, who reshaped views about rape, dies at 90
Among other considerations, it offered the first comprehensive history of rape across the centuries, starting with ancient Babylon, and examined its use as a wartime military tactic to further subjugate the losing side. Advertisement The book's publication -- along with real-time reports of mass rape in war-ravaged Bangladesh -- joined a tide of events that were reshaping society's attitude toward rape. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The ascendant women's movement was already opening the public's eyes about sexual violence. Anti-rape groups had started to form in the early 1970s. Groundbreaking works including 'Our Bodies, Ourselves' (1971) were empowering women to take control of their bodies and their sexuality. When 'Against Our Will' arrived, the country seemed ready to grapple with its implications. Numerous rape-crisis centers were opened, self-defense classes gained new popularity, and several states rewrote their laws to make it easier to prosecute rapists. Rape within marriage became a crime. Many jurisdictions abolished the 'corroborating witness rule,' which required the testimony of bystanders for a rape conviction. Advertisement But it was the personal feminist ideology suffusing 'Against Our Will' that catapulted the book to the top of bestseller lists and simultaneously infuriated critics, on the left as well as the right, who called it an anti-male polemic. As a young, liberal intellectual in New York, Ms. Brownmiller believed she knew all about rape -- that it happened to women who behaved badly and that the men accused of it, often Black, were usually framed. But after she talked with friends who had been raped, her perspective changed. She saw sexual violence through a feminist lens and understood it to be the ultimate tool of male oppression. Her book upended several male-generated myths. No, she wrote, women did not secretly wish to be sexually assaulted, and, yes, it was physically possible to be raped against one's will. 'Chilling and monumental,' lawyer Mary Ellen Gale wrote in The New York Times Book Review. Time magazine said, 'The most rigorous and provocative piece of scholarship that has yet emerged from the feminist movement.' While she had never been raped herself, Ms. Brownmiller realized that she had been profoundly affected by the threat of it simply by being a woman. That led her to some startling pronouncements. 'Man's discovery that his genitalia could serve as a weapon to generate fear must rank as one of the most important discoveries of prehistoric times,' she wrote, equating that revelation with the discovery of fire. The book's most famous -- and disputed -- assertion was this: Rape 'is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear." (Italics hers.) Advertisement The early praise soon gave way to outrage over the book's feminist dogma. Even admirers squirmed at her assertion that 'all men' threatened 'all women' with sexual violence; the statement led to her being harassed on the lecture circuit for years. One of her harshest critics on the left was Angela Davis, a Black militant and avowed communist. In a scathing analysis, Davis said that Ms. Brownmiller had misinterpreted historic cases involving Black men and white women (especially the cases of the Scottsboro Nine and Emmett Till) and had concluded, wrongly, that the Black men were at fault. 'In choosing to take sides with white women, regardless of the circumstances,' Davis wrote, 'Brownmiller herself capitulates to racism.' On the right, Joseph Sobran, writing in National Review, mocked Brownmiller's premise. 'What she is engaged in, really,' he wrote, 'is not scholarship but henpecking -- that conscious process of intimidation by which all women keep all men in terror.' In 2015, on the 40th anniversary of the publication of 'Against Our Will,' the news media caught up with Ms. Brownmiller. Then 80, she stood by her book but was highly critical of contemporary young women who, she said, seemed to think they could drink as much alcohol as men and dress provocatively but not take responsibility if they were sexually assaulted. She expanded on that view in an interview with Al Jazeera, saying that women were 'in denial' about what they could and could not do. 'They don't want to feel that special restrictions apply to them,' she said. When her interviewer said women might be surprised to hear her say that, because they want to feel empowered and believe they can do what they want, she responded: 'Women have a false sense of empowerment because the truth is, they can't do everything men can do. Because there are predators out there.' Advertisement She was born Susan Warhaftig in Brooklyn, N.Y., on Feb. 15, 1935, to Samuel and Mae Warhaftig. Her mother was a secretary, her father a sales clerk at Macy's. She attended Hebrew school, and although she never emphasized her Jewish heritage in her writings, she acknowledged its influence. 'My chosen path -- to fight against physical harm, specifically the terror of violence against women -- had its origins in what I had learned in Hebrew school about the pogroms and the Holocaust,' she wrote. She attended Cornell University for two years and returned to New York City to pursue what was then her passion, stage acting. Brownmiller became her stage name in the mid-1950s while she was taking acting lessons. She started writing under the name Brownmiller and adopted it legally in 1961. Her auditions rarely led to roles and she found the rejections intolerable. She soon abandoned the theater for full-time magazine writing. Ms. Brownmiller's career included stints as a researcher at Newsweek, a staff writer for The Village Voice, and a news writer for ABC-TV. But at heart she was an activist; her passions were politics and civil rights. In sympathy with the sit-ins to desegregate lunch counters in the South, she organized a picket line at a Woolworth store in New York. She registered Black voters in Harlem and in Meridian, Miss. She spearheaded feminist gatherings and helped coordinate an infamous 1970 sit-in at Ladies' Home Journal to protest the magazine's focus on beauty and housework and the dearth of women on its editorial staff. Advertisement 'I have always considered myself a strong woman, although I understand that the strength I possess is a matter of style and, secretly, of theatrical bravura,' Ms. Brownmiller wrote in the introduction to 'Against Our Will.' Ms. Brownmiller leaves no immediate survivors. Over the years, she lived with three different men, but she never wanted children, she said, and never married. She once said that she believed in 'romance and partnership' and wanted to be 'in close association with a man whose work I respect,' but that she was 'not willing to compromise.' She devoted her life to writing and taught at Pace University in Manhattan into her 80s. She wrote scores of magazine articles and half a dozen books, starting in 1970 with a children's book about Shirley Chisholm, the first Black woman elected to Congress. Her 1984 book, 'Femininity,' deconstructed the meaning of that word. Ms. Brownmiller ventured into fiction with 'Waverly Place,' a poorly received 1989 novel that sprang from her obsession with the sensational 1987 domestic violence case of Joel Steinberg, a Manhattan lawyer who savagely pummeled his partner, Hedda Nussbaum, and killed their illegally adopted daughter. Her subsequent books included 'Seeing Vietnam: Encounters of the Road and Heart' (1994) and 'In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution' (1999), an insider account of the women's movement. This article originally appeared in Advertisement
Deccan Herald
24-05-2025
- Politics
- Deccan Herald
The dog-whistles and complicit silences of New India
As I sat down to pen my monthly column, I allowed my mind to take a brief wander. I pictured a dust-filled room with three cops huddled together staring at a screen, debating whether my use of 'articles' amounts to 'double meaning' and 'dog whistling', an egregious, unpatriotic act couched in Wren and Martin grammar. I have long argued with my copy editors over the grammatical choices of where to use an 'article'. Maybe the cops can finally resolve these tiny battles, I chuckled to myself, as I returned to reality and the task of meeting my editor's deadline. But this little diversion wasn't just an idle distraction. It is the chilling reality of New India. A consequence of the Supreme Court's failure to uphold citizens' right to free speech and set new standards for what is acceptable, as it has in Ali Khan Mahmudabad vs State of Haryana. The Court, while granting bail, has stripped Khan of his rights by issuing a gag order, confiscating his passport, and then, appointing a three-person SIT. The SIT will 'holistically understand the complexity of the phraseology employed and for proper appreciation of some of the expressions used' in the academic's online has been written in the last few days on challenging the constitutionality of these orders. These are critical interventions and central to the fight for protecting rights and our democracy. But we must also zoom out and take a hard, unvarnished, look at ourselves and ask what have we become as a polity, as a society. No dog-whistling, just plain entire episode around Khan's arrest is, sadly, an inevitable consequence of the path we have chosen. As a society, we have allowed jingoistic nationalism and bigotry in our polity to set the tone. Once any society becomes a blind participant in this game, it inevitably suspends all critical reasoning, essential to a pluralistic, democratic society. Fundamental rights become subservient to the demands of jingoistic nationalism. The consequences have been in full evidence in the last weeks. Any questions about the consequence of war, or challenging bigotry and violence against Muslims, all of which are legitimate acts in a democracy, were immediately labelled anti-national. Every State institution has played a shameful role in the events surrounding Khan's arrest and the broader undermining of rights. The court's reasoning or rather lack thereof should not be surprising – it is only a reflection of what we are as a are many reasons why we got here but the elite custodians of our key professions are among the prime culprits. From media to academia, rather than fight for the integrity of their professions and challenge the bully by upholding the principle, these custodians have been all too quick to scientists and authors of How democracies die, Levitsky and Ziblatt, point out that democracy's last bastion of defence is civil society. On the eve of Trump's re-election, they wrote in The New York Times: 'When the constitutional order is under threat, influential groups and societal leaders... must speak out, reminding citizens of the red lines that democratic societies must never cross. And when politicians cross these red lines, society's most prominent voices must publicly and forcefully repudiate them'. The only bulwark against a total authoritarian slide is societal leaders standing up to the bully. We are seeing this play out in Trumpland, most visibly in Harvard University's war with the federal government. The sad truth is that in India, elites left the battlefield. Indeed, they refused to leaders have been mostly silent and the mainstream media became a willing partner. Prominent anchors have been essential to the authoritarian project, routinely using their bully pulpit to rouse jingoistic fervour and unleash bigotry. This reached a crescendo in the days of Operation Sindoor. Academia has done no better. In the Khan case, 200 prominent vice-chancellors and former vice-chancellors of Indian universities signed a 'statement of objection' condemning Khan's post. They were well within their rights to do so. However, conspicuously absent were any statements from academic functionaries, think tank leaders, and Ashoka University leadership itself, speaking for the principle of academic freedom and Khan's right to free abdication of responsibility should worry us deeply. Once institutions stop fighting for the core principles that define their profession, they begin to lose their purpose. As a society, we must demand more of our institutions. Fear and narrow ambition are stripping institutions of their purpose and the costs to society are heavy. On the upside, we may end up with rather erudite police officers, as they pour over a good professor's writing. Perhaps they will learn and find the courage to defend the principle, where most others have failed.
