Latest news with #US200
AU Financial Review
7 days ago
- Business
- AU Financial Review
Columbia University agrees to pay $300m to settle White House fight
Washington | Columbia University has reached a landmark deal with the Trump administration to restore federal funding for research, easing a crisis that has rattled the school's finances and upended its leadership. The Ivy League school will pay a $US200 million ($302.3 million) penalty over three years to resolve multiple civil rights investigations, clearing the way for the reinstatement of the majority of more than $US400 million in cancelled grants and contracts, as well as access to billions of dollars in future grants.
Sydney Morning Herald
17-07-2025
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘MechaHitler': Why Elon Musk's chatbot is at the centre of an Australian legal dispute
Australia's online safety watchdog is back in court this week, battling Elon Musk's X over issues of AI, free speech and who is ultimately responsible for detecting and removing violent online content. What is Grok AI, and why has it been controversial? Elon Musk's AI chatbot, dubbed Grok, is embedded in X (formerly Twitter) and has made headlines for numerous controversies – as well as for winning a $US200 million ($300 million) contract with the Pentagon. It's arguably more capable at present than ChatGPT and Gemini, but has proven much more unpredictable too. Last week, Grok declared itself a super-Nazi, referring to itself as 'MechaHitler', and made racist, sexist and antisemitic posts that its parent company, xAI, later deleted. Musk has said he wants Grok to 'not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect', and this seems to be the result. Then, just days later, xAI launched a girlfriend chatbot that is available to 12-year-olds, despite being programmed to engage in sexual conversation. Loading The sexualised AI chatbot, named Ani, communicates with emojis and flirtatious messages and can appear dressed in lingerie. It's designed to act as if it is 'crazy in love' and 'extremely jealous', according to programming instructions posted on social media. Despite all this, xAI announced it had won a contract worth up to $US200 million to develop artificial intelligence tools for the US Department of Defence. If the chaos proves anything, it's that AI chatbots such as Grok are moving incredibly quickly, and regulators and governments are racing to catch up.
Sydney Morning Herald
17-07-2025
- Sydney Morning Herald
Why are X and the eSafety Commissioner back in court?
Australia's online safety watchdog is back in court this week, battling Elon Musk's X over issues of AI, free speech and who is ultimately responsible for detecting and removing violent online content. What is Grok AI, and why has it been controversial? Elon Musk's AI chatbot, dubbed Grok, is embedded in X (formerly Twitter) and has made headlines for numerous controversies – as well as for winning a $US200 million ($300 million) contract with the Pentagon. It's arguably more capable at present than ChatGPT and Gemini, but has proven much more unpredictable too. Last week, Grok declared itself a super-Nazi, referring to itself as 'MechaHitler', and made racist, sexist and antisemitic posts that its parent company, xAI, later deleted. Musk has said he wants Grok to 'not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect', and this seems to be the result. Then, just days later, xAI launched a girlfriend chatbot that is available to 12-year-olds, despite being programmed to engage in sexual conversation. Loading The sexualised AI chatbot, named Ani, communicates with emojis and flirtatious messages and can appear dressed in lingerie. It's designed to act as if it is 'crazy in love' and 'extremely jealous', according to programming instructions posted on social media. Despite all this, xAI announced it had won a contract worth up to $US200 million to develop artificial intelligence tools for the US Department of Defence. If the chaos proves anything, it's that AI chatbots such as Grok are moving incredibly quickly, and regulators and governments are racing to catch up.
The Age
17-07-2025
- The Age
Why are X and the eSafety Commissioner back in court?
Australia's online safety watchdog is back in court this week, battling Elon Musk's X over issues of AI, free speech and who is ultimately responsible for detecting and removing violent online content. What is Grok AI, and why has it been controversial? Elon Musk's AI chatbot, dubbed Grok, is embedded in X (formerly Twitter) and has made headlines for numerous controversies – as well as for winning a $US200 million ($300 million) contract with the Pentagon. It's arguably more capable at present than ChatGPT and Gemini, but has proven much more unpredictable too. Last week, Grok declared itself a super-Nazi, referring to itself as 'MechaHitler', and made racist, sexist and antisemitic posts that its parent company, xAI, later deleted. Musk has said he wants Grok to 'not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect', and this seems to be the result. Then, just days later, xAI launched a girlfriend chatbot that is available to 12-year-olds, despite being programmed to engage in sexual conversation. Loading The sexualised AI chatbot, named Ani, communicates with emojis and flirtatious messages and can appear dressed in lingerie. It's designed to act as if it is 'crazy in love' and 'extremely jealous', according to programming instructions posted on social media. Despite all this, xAI announced it had won a contract worth up to $US200 million to develop artificial intelligence tools for the US Department of Defence. If the chaos proves anything, it's that AI chatbots such as Grok are moving incredibly quickly, and regulators and governments are racing to catch up.
Sydney Morning Herald
15-07-2025
- Politics
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘The experiment is on us': Los Angeles keeps trying to defy Trump, with mixed results
In a series of interviews, Trump's border tsar, Tom Homan, a hardline former Border Patrol officer, outlined the latitude Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had to approach, detain and question someone on the street about their immigration status. Officers were not required to show 'probable cause', he said, but 'reasonable suspicion' that a person was in the US illegally. Such suspicion could be aroused by several factors, he said, including the way someone looked. 'It's the totality of the circumstances … based on the location, the occupation, their physical appearance, their actions,' Homan told Fox News. He later clarified that physical appearance could not be the sole factor that led an agent to detain someone. The dynamic playing out in LA, where a city and state are in open defiance of the federal government, is unlike anything Australians would witness at home. As a so-called sanctuary city, LA authorities do not actively assist in immigration enforcement, although they follow the law, Bass says. Since 1979, Special Order 40 has prevented LA police from questioning people for the sole purpose of determining their immigration status. Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom, both Democrats, are pushing back hard against what they frame as the Trump administration's deliberate, politically motivated targeting of liberal California. The federal government, led by the White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, views this as treason. 'Los Angeles is waging insurrection against the federal government,' he said on Friday as Bass signed an executive order to help local officials resist ICE raids at public locations such as libraries, and inform them of their rights. LA is also helping to co-ordinate cash cards for families affected by the raids, which will reportedly have about $US200 ($305) on them. The cash will not come from public coffers but from philanthropic partners. The latest raids have changed LA, where about half of the 3.8 million inhabitants are Latino. Streets in the usually bustling garment district went quiet after ICE swept through an apparel store in June. In a city where the car is king, people are having trouble getting their vehicles washed because migrant workers are scared to go to work. 'It's hard for me to believe cartels are hanging out in car washes,' Bass told MSNBC. She said masked agents without uniforms had been jumping out of unmarked cars to snatch people off the streets. 'People have been terrorised and terrified. People don't leave home.' But the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) paints an entirely different picture. It said 361 illegal aliens were arrested at the two marijuana farms alone, including criminals with convictions for rape, kidnapping, child molestation, serial burglary and hit-and-run. The raids also bring to the fore questions about the tenuous state of migrant labour, on which California and much of the US economy rely. These workplaces are typically out of sight and out of mind: farms, restaurant kitchens, textile houses in the fashion district. Where there are illegal migrants, there is often exploitation. DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said agents found 14 minors at the marijuana farms, including 10 who were unaccompanied. 'They were likely being exploited: potential slave or forced labour, potential child and human trafficking,' she told Fox News. Alanis, the man who died following one of the cannabis farm raids, was incorrectly reported dead days ago by the United Farm Workers union. At the time, he was hospitalised with severe injuries. But an update to the family's GoFundMe page confirmed he later died. It said Alanis had suffered a broken neck, fractured skull and severed artery, and described the raid as 'reckless'. McLaughlin said Alanis was not being pursued by law enforcement officers but 'climbed up to the roof of a greenhouse and fell 30 feet'. Meanwhile, the California judge's order to limit the circumstances in which ICE agents can ask for papers has reignited the White House's war against the judiciary, which had softened following a major Supreme Court victory in late June. The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, which brought the challenge, said the temporary ruling showed it was unconstitutional to stop individuals based on their skin colour, apparent race or accent. Miller said of the decision: 'A communist judge in LA has ordered ICE to report directly to her and radical left NGOs, not the president. This is another act of insurrection against the United States and its sovereign people.'
