Latest news with #USNINews
Newsweek
08-07-2025
- Business
- Newsweek
New US Aircraft Carrier Hit by Significant Delays
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The USS John F. Kennedy, the second ship in the new Ford class of U.S. Navy aircraft carriers, could be delayed by up to two years, according to a new report. Why It Matters Many U.S. Navy shipbuilding projects have been plagued by setbacks and ballooning costs, including the USS Gerald R. Ford, the first Ford-class aircraft carrier. The Gerald R. Ford was commissioned, or formally marked as in active service, by President Donald Trump during his first term in office. What To Know The USS John F. Kennedy, also known as the CVN-79, was expected to be handed over to the U.S. military in July this year, but will instead be ready in March 2027, according to U.S. Navy budget documents for the coming year. The delay was first reported by the USNI News outlet attached to the Naval Institute non-profit on Monday. The USS Gerald R. Ford heads to the Norfolk, Virginia naval station on April 14, 2017 after almost a week of trials during which the ship's systems were tested. The USS Gerald R. Ford heads to the Norfolk, Virginia naval station on April 14, 2017 after almost a week of trials during which the ship's systems were tested. Bill Tiernan/The Virginian-Pilot via AP The USS John F. Kennedy is the second of the new Ford-class aircraft carriers, replacing the decades-old Nimitz-class. The third aircraft carrier in the class, the USS Enterprise, will be delivered in July 2030, rather than September 2029, according to the U.S. Navy budget documents. The delay was chalked up to issues getting hold of materials for the vessel, and hold-ups with industry and supply chains. The delay in delivery of the USS John F. Kennedy is "not surprising," bearing in mind the changes it needed after its initial building phase and "challenges throughout the U.S. shipbuilding industry," said Robert Murrett, a retired U.S. Navy vice admiral who is now a professor of practice of public administration and international affairs at Syracuse University. The USS John F. Kennedy needs to take on board the lessons from the first of the new class of aircraft carriers, Murrett told Newsweek. It also needs to build in new technology, like updated radars, and equipment for F-35C fighter jets, Murrett said. Although the U.S. Navy's fleet of operational carriers will hit just 10 for a year, he added, "this can be mitigated with careful management of existing CVNs' maintenance and overhaul schedules, as well as equally careful management of longer deployments for our carrier sailors, which is already an issue." CVN is shorthand for nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. A Navy spokesperson told USNI News that the military was "exploring opportunities for preliminary acceptance of the vessel prior to formal delivery and is coordinating closely with stakeholders to ensure the fastest possible transition to fleet operations and a combat-capable carrier." Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. Navy for comment via email. The Navy budget documents put the delay to the USS John F. Kennedy down to the Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) for the ship and Advanced Weapons Elevator work. AAG is a new system for the second and third Ford-class aircraft carriers, according to the military. It is designed to make sure aircraft landing on the carriers slow down quickly and safely. Advanced Weapons Elevators help move weapons and ammunition around a ship. What People Are Saying The U.S. military has hailed the USS John F. Kennedy as "the most agile and lethal combat platform globally," kitted out with "improved systems" that link the carrier up more closely with other forces.
AllAfrica
17-06-2025
- Politics
- AllAfrica
Philippine naval upgrade more spectacle than strategy
As tensions rise with China in the South China Sea, the Philippines may be advancing a naval modernization strategy centered more on signaling and alignment than actual deterrence. This month, USNI News reported that the Philippine Navy (PN) launched its first Rajah Solayman-class offshore patrol vessel (OPV) in Ulsan, South Korea, marking a significant step in its maritime modernization. Named after a 16th-century Filipino hero, BRP Rajah Solayman (PS20) is the first of six ships procured from South Korea's Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI) under a 2022 contract aimed at reinforcing the country's overstretched fleet. Initially designed as a 1,500-ton vessel, the OPV was later expanded to 2,400 tons under HHI's HDP-2200+ design, which enhanced its range and endurance for extended patrols. Armed with an Oto Melara 76-millimeter main gun and Aselsan SMASH 30-millimeter remote-controlled weapon systems, the ship is built for maritime security operations amid increasing tensions in the South China Sea. Philippine military officials have emphasized that the six-vessel program will replace aging patrol assets, supplement forces in critical maritime areas and enhance the country's sovereignty defense posture. The ship's 5,500 nautical mile range and 30-day endurance ensure prolonged operational capability. While production is slated to conclude by 2028, South Korea is already positioning itself for further defense contracts in the 2030s, including potential frigate and corvette programs under the Philippines' next phase of military modernization. Yet, beneath these moves is a crucial strategic question: Are they aimed at real deterrence, or are they crafted more for show, particularly to China? In line with the Philippines' de facto 'assertive transparency' strategy to name and shame China's assertive actions in the South China Sea and galvanize international support for its cause, Manila requires high-profile, high-visibility assets, such as frigates, OPVs, and light combat aircraft, to effectively respond to China's gray zone challenges. However, the survivability of such assets in the event of escalating tensions with China may be questionable. As seen in Taiwan's case, high-visibility platforms, such as surface warships and fighter jets, are vulnerable to rapid destruction in a Chinese first strike, prompting substantial investment in asymmetric warfare assets, including submarines. But with Philippine submarine procurement still in the early planning phase, the Brahmos missile system has become the centerpiece of the country's asymmetric deterrent posture. However, as Ashley Tellis notes in a July 2024 article for The Print, without supporting Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) infrastructure for dynamic targeting, these missiles will remain largely symbolic. Tellis says those deficiencies mean the missiles will be useful only against fixed, nearby targets, such as the contested Scarborough Shoal, and are not credible tools for flexible or long-range deterrence. Furthermore, China could easily repair or replace damaged or destroyed warships, given its massive shipbuilding capabilities. Underscoring this capability, a 2025 US Congressional Research Service (CRS) report states that China's shipbuilding capacity is 230 times that of the US. If the Philippines truly recognized the urgency of building asymmetric capabilities, it might be willing to make more difficult defense trade-offs. For example, Felix Chang mentions in a November 2019 Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI) article that Vietnam, a similarly challenged maritime neighbor, acquired six Kilo-class submarines from Russia in 2009 at a cost of US$2 billion, equivalent to half its defense budget. While Vietnam's proximity to China and history of conflict justify such investment, the Philippines has not demonstrated the same urgency or strategic commitment to undersea deterrence. Yet, such stealth investments appear to be mismatched with the Philippines' budget constraints and its current emphasis on diplomatic visibility through multilateral defense engagement. In line with this, the Philippines has been signing military access agreements with 'like-minded' countries, such as Japan, Australia and New Zealand, with the possible goal of maintaining a high tempo of high-publicity multinational naval exercises in the South China Sea. 'We have noted a marked decrease in the illegal and coercive actions of the PLA each time there is a multilateral or bilateral maritime cooperative activity… No PLA Navy, Coast Guard, or maritime militia noted within proximity,' says Philippine Navy spokesperson Admiral Roy Trinidad, as quoted by Defense Post in a February 2025 article. Still, when push comes to shove in the South China Sea, it is unclear whether the Philippines' 'alternative' defense partners will come to its aid. Even the US, its most capable and only treaty partner, has more than once prioritized its broader strategic interests over Philippine concerns during past incidents with China. At the political level, multinational naval exercises may also serve as part of Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr's broader effort to claim legitimacy among wealthy liberal democracies, thereby securing economic assistance and political support despite the historical controversies associated with the Marcos dynasty. Moreover, since the US has indefinitely stationed the Typhon and NMESIS missile systems in the Philippines, nominally for training purposes, it provides Marcos Jr with a strategic buffer that reinforces his domestic position. Typhon is armed with Tomahawk cruise missiles that can reach mainland China from the Philippines, while NMESIS is an anti-ship system that could hit Chinese warships transiting the Bashi Channel. The 2022 US National Defense Strategy prioritizes Taiwan and the broader Indo-Pacific region, while accepting a higher risk in theaters such as Europe. This focus gives Marcos Jr room to rely on US support to enhance his security credentials and consolidate domestic legitimacy. According to a February 2025 Social Weather Station (SWS) survey, 78% of Philippine respondents support political candidates who assert sovereign rights against China's aggressive actions in the South China Sea. With such strong public sentiment, Marcos Jr could frame his administration as resolute on sovereignty, even with limited military muscle. However, the Philippines does not face any existential threat on the level of Taiwan, Ukraine, Israel and South Korea, as no country since World War II has threatened its destruction. The country's primary threats are internal, including poverty, political instability, insurgency and terrorism. While China has been a troublesome neighbor for the Philippines, it does not seek the destruction of the Philippine state, making China more of a challenge to be managed than a threat to be dealt with. Even if Philippine policymakers understand that nuance, and Marcos Jr courts Chinese investment while under rising economic pressure, his previous hardline stance and the Philippines' longstanding dependency on US politico-military ties may prevent anything substantial from happening in the near term. But as long as Philippine defense planning is shaped by external validation rather than internal resolve, its military buildup risks remaining more symbolic than strategic.
Yahoo
21-03-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Trump sends second aircraft carrier to Middle East in ramp up against Houthis
The United States is sending a second aircraft carrier to the Middle East, a rare and provocative move as the Trump administration intensifies its bombing campaign against Houthi fighters in Yemen. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the USS Harry S. Truman carrier strike group — currently operating in the Red Sea — to extend its deployment by at least a month, according to two defense officials, who requested anonymity to discuss ongoing operations. The USS Carl Vinson and its accompanying destroyers will join the ship as escorts in the coming weeks. The Vinson has been conducting exercises in the East China Sea with the Japanese and South Koreans. USNI News first reported the extended deployment. Vinson's arrival will mark the second time in the last six months that the U.S. has had two carrier strike groups in the Middle East, but the first under the Trump administration. The two carriers signal a major allocation of resources to the Middle East at a time when the White House and Pentagon insist Asia is where U.S. ships and aircraft should reside. The extension and double deployment will also have knock-on effects for ship repairs, which will need maintenance at already overstretched Navy shipyards. Since the new campaign against the Houthis began last week, the U.S. has hit dozens of sites in Yemen. Defense officials said they are focusing on missile launch and storage sites, as well as Houthi leadership. President Trump said Wednesday on his Truth Social account that the Iran-backed Houthis would be 'completely annihilated' by U.S. airstrikes and warned Tehran to 'immediately' stop supplying them with military equipment.
Politico
21-03-2025
- Politics
- Politico
Trump sends second aircraft carrier to Middle East in ramp up against Houthis
The United States is sending a second aircraft carrier to the Middle East, a rare and provocative move as the Trump administration intensifies its bombing campaign against Houthi fighters in Yemen. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the USS Harry S. Truman carrier strike group — currently operating in the Red Sea — to extend its deployment by at least a month, according to two defense officials, who requested anonymity to discuss ongoing operations. The USS Carl Vinson and its accompanying destroyers will join the ship as escorts in the coming weeks. The Vinson has been conducting exercises in the East China Sea with the Japanese and South Koreans. USNI News first reported the extended deployment. Vinson's arrival will mark the second time in the last six months that the U.S. has had two carrier strike groups in the Middle East, but the first under the Trump administration. The two carriers signal a major allocation of resources to the Middle East at a time when the White House and Pentagon insist Asia is where U.S. ships and aircraft should reside. The extension and double deployment will also have knock-on effects for ship repairs, which will need maintenance at already overstretched Navy shipyards. Since the new campaign against the Houthis began last week, the U.S. has hit dozens of sites in Yemen. Defense officials said they are focusing on missile launch and storage sites, as well as Houthi leadership. President Trump said Wednesday on his Truth Social account that the Iran-backed Houthis would be 'completely annihilated' by U.S. airstrikes and warned Tehran to 'immediately' stop supplying them with military equipment.
