Latest news with #UTN-sponsored
Bangkok Post
16-07-2025
- Politics
- Bangkok Post
MPs back amnesty bills
The House has passed three amnesty bills but rejected two versions submitted by civil society groups and the former Move Forward Party during their first readings. The three bills, also known as the "Promote Peaceful Society Bill", were proposed by different parties. The first was put forward by United Thai Nation (UTN) MP Wichai Sutsawat. This was accepted by 299 MPs with 172 abstentions. The second bill sponsored by Klatham Party MP Preeda Boonplerng, formerly from Khru Thai Party, was approved by 311 MPs with 158 abstentions. The third, backed by Bhumjaithai Party (BJT) leader Anutin Charnvirakul, passed with 311 votes of support, three against and 147 abstentions. The two that did not pass were the People's Party's "Amnesty for Political Offences Bill" and the "People's Amnesty Bill", which was backed by 36,723 signatories and Poonsuk Poonsukcharoen. The PP's bill was rejected by 319 MPs, accepted by 147, with six abstentions while the civil society network-sponsored bill was rejected by 306 votes and accepted by 149, with 20 abstentions. A 32-member committee was set up to study the three approved bills, with the UTN-sponsored one being used as the primary version for further deliberation. A source close to the matter said all three shared a key principle that they offer no amnesty for offenders of the lese majeste law, or Section 112 of the Criminal Code, while the rejected bills were viewed as potentially offering amnesty to those charged under Section 112. Before the vote, Wichai Sudsawat, a UTN MP for Chumphon, insisted the party-backed bill was not aimed at benefiting the People's Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) as some critics claimed, but was designed to foster national unity. The party was widely seen as being connected to the now-dissolved group whose mass demonstrations against the former Yingluck Shinawatra administration led to the 2014 coup. Yingcheep Atchanont, manager of the Internet Law Reform Dialogue (iLaw), criticised the exclusion of lese majeste offences, saying the law had been abused to silence dissent. "Passing an amnesty law for one's group while labelling others for life doesn't build a peaceful society," he said. Paradorn Prisnanantakul, a BJT MP for Ang Thong, said many lese majeste defendants were repeat offenders and granting them amnesty could spark more confrontations. "We believe these offenders can seek a pardon. And when the House has different views on the matter, including the lese majeste offence may reignite conflict and unrest," he said. PP leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut said the party would continue to push for the adoption of a broad amnesty bill despite the House of Representatives rejecting the two drafts submitted by the party and the network of civil society groups. The party will use the scrutiny process to advocate for an inclusive bill. He said the PP MPs would work in the committee to prevent any discriminatory laws, and if the final version of the amnesty bill fails to cover all sides, the party would not support it. Mr Natthaphong said an amnesty bill could pass its third and final reading despite speculation of an early House dissolution, adding the main opposition party is prepared to propose key bills regardless. Sasinan Thamnithinan, a PP MP for Bangkok, defended the party's bill, saying it did not contradict the core principles of the others and did not automatically grant amnesty to lese majeste offenders. She urged MPs under pressure not to reject the bill but to abstain to allow further discussion. Progressive Movement member Pannika Wanich wrote on Facebook that for the PP to push a broad political amnesty, it must secure at least 250 House seats in the next election. "I'll remember this day. Amnesty is meant to resolve political conflict, not to grant pardons only to PDRC and yellow-shirt demonstrators.
Bangkok Post
11-07-2025
- Politics
- Bangkok Post
Piyabutr slams MPs over S112 amnesty
Piyabutr Saengkanokkul, secretary-general of the Progressive Movement, criticised politicians for not backing an amnesty for lese majeste offences as the House of Representatives began deliberating five bills aimed at fostering reconciliation and granting amnesty for political offences. On his Facebook account, Mr Piyabutr wrote on Friday that politicians were reluctant to support an amnesty for political expression, including cases involving Section 112 of the Criminal Code, or the lese majeste law, because they did not have "permission". He said these politicians were concerned about being stripped of permission to be in government or the opportunity to become the government. He suggested that had they been given the green light, many would have reversed their stance. Mr Piyabutr said one of the responsibilities of MPs is to make laws, which raises the question as to who these MPs represent if his assumption is true. He said that politicians in this day and age were more "cowardly" than those in the past. His criticism drew a strong backlash from Thanakorn Wangboonkongchana, a list-MP from the United Thai Nation (UTN) Party, which also proposed a reconciliation bill called the "Promote Peaceful Society Bill". He accused Mr Piyabutr of distorting facts and stirring divisiveness, saying political legitimacy was given by the people who selected the MPs to represent them in the House, so any amnesty bill must be thoroughly examined. Mr Thanakorn defended the UTN-sponsored bill, which was criticised by People's Party (PP) list-MP Rangsiman Rome during the debate as being selective and tailored to certain groups. He said the party's version sought to grant amnesty to general political offences that were non-violent in nature and that an independent committee would be appointed to screen amnesty cases to ensure fairness. He said that lese majeste offences were a national security issue and granting amnesty could encourage more violations. He urged Mr Piyabutr and Mr Rangsiman to stop using radicalism to deepen divisiveness. "Stop throwing tantrums when things don't go your way. Change your mindset to be in line with constitutional principles. Don't see every case as a political case," he said. Phai Lik, secretary-general of the Klatham Party, said the party did not support any amnesty for lese majeste offences. Its "Promote Peaceful Society Bill" was among the five bills being examined.
