01-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Time of India
'JSK' controversy: 'We're moving backwards', says actor Vinu Mohan
(Picture Courtesy: Facebook)
Amid 'JSK' censorship issues, actor
Vinu Mohan
recently opened up about the shifting tides of societal acceptance and creative freedom in Indian cinema.
As reported by On Manorama, speaking at a protest organized by leading film associations, Vinu was questioned whether a film like Nivedyam, directed by the late Lohithadas, would survive in today's socio-political climate.
'There's a sequence I acted in that film and if the film was released today, I fear I could have invited some issues," he said.
Citing the iconic film 'Nirmalyam', where a scene involving spitting on an idol was once accepted as part of artistic vision, he lamented the fading maturity with which audiences once received such bold narratives. 'There was a time when art was valued as a form of expression. Sadly, we now seem to be heading towards a mindset where it's more likely to be seen as offensive," he added.
'That's why we're protesting"
Vinu's statements come amid the ongoing controversy surrounding the film 'Janaki vs State of Kerala' (JSK), which has been asked by the
Central Board of Film Certification
(CBFC) to change its title and character name. He fears that such censorship could become the norm. 'That's why we're protesting — to ensure these incidents don't become a pattern,' he said.
Suresh Gopi and Gokul Suresh in Lelam 2
He also mentioned past struggles faced by director M.B. Padmakumar, pointing out that this isn't an isolated issue but a recurring threat to the creative community.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya
IC Markets
Mendaftar
Undo
Kerala High Court brings hope
In a relief to the makers of 'JSK', the Kerala High Court recently questioned the CBFC's objection to the title 'Janaki,' noting that films named after deities have been common in Indian cinema. The court also questioned why the teaser had been cleared if the content was objectionable, and it has now directed the Deputy Solicitor General to file a detailed explanation by July 2.