Latest news with #Volgoneft239
Yahoo
11-03-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
A Black Sea resort town is suing Russian ship companies after 10,000 people had to shovel spilled oil off its beaches
The Russian sea resort town of Anapa is suing to cover its cleanup bill from a huge oil spill. It's seeking 211 million rubles from the owner and operator of two tankers that breached last year. The resulting massive spill has underscored concerns about aging ships carrying oil and gas for Russia. The Russian summer resort town of Anapa is suing two shipping companies for $2.4 million after an oil spill devastated its local beaches. The office of the town's mayor, Vasiliy Shvets, announced on Monday that it was seeking 211 million rubles from Volgatransneft and Kama Shipping, citing clean-up costs. These firms owned and operated two tankers that breached near Anapa during a heavy storm in December. State media reported that the Volgoneft 212 and Volgoneft 239 carried 9,000 metric tons of low-grade fuel, more than half of which emptied into the Kerch Strait. The Black Sea area sits between Russia and the occupied Crimean peninsula. Anapa, a popular holiday town of some 80,000 people, was hard hit by the spill, which contaminated over 30 miles of beach. Authorities said the cleanup involved 10,000 people shoveling and scooping blackened sand and polluted water. Moscow declared a federal state of emergency in mid-January, as the oil continued to spread nearly a month after the tankers were breached. The spill drew international attention amid concerns that Russia's sanctioned energy industry is using a "shadow fleet" of commercial ships to ferry oil and gas to foreign customers. Many such vessels are aging tankers pulled back into service that often prove difficult to track, prompting fears of further spillage and a lack of mechanisms to contain the damage. The Volgoneft 212 — which split into two — and the Volgoneft 239 were both over 50 years old. Most major Western oil companies typically use tankers that have seen 15 years of service or fewer. The grey-area status of Russia's dark vessels also underscores concern that they might not be properly insured to cover oil spills, leaving communities hit by such disasters to shoulder cleaning costs. For Anapa, a popular holiday town of some 80,000 people, the $2.4 million is an incomplete tally of the money "already paid under contracts" to deal with the December spill, the mayor's office said. "This amount is not final, and in the future, the administration intends to increase the claims," it added. Per Russia's federal statistics agency, the average monthly salary in the Russian economy was 87,952 rubles, or about $1,000, in 2024. Municipal filings for the arbitration court of the Krasnodar region show that Anapa submitted its lawsuit on Friday. Judge Irina Bondarenko is listed as overseeing the case. Meanwhile, the town said on Saturday that it had begun testing its beaches for contamination, publishing footage of excavators and bulldozers cleaning up the seaside. The long-term environmental impact of the spill remains to be seen. In January, environmental advocacy group Greenpeace said the oil could sink to the bottom of the deep sea, poisoning fish and vegetation there. "The impact of the ecological disaster could persist for decades," it wrote in a statement about the spill. Volgatransneft did not respond to a request for comment sent by Business Insider outside regular business hours, and Kama Shipping did not return calls from BI. Read the original article on Business Insider
Washington Post
27-01-2025
- Science
- Washington Post
As Russian oil spill fouls beaches, locals fume over official response
Over the past month, the popular Black Sea resort beaches of Russia's Krasnodar region have been transformed into a scene out of a dystopian sci-fi film, with thousands of workers in white hazmat suits swarming the blackened coast amid dead birds and dolphins. The workers' task is grueling and repetitive: manually sifting tons of sand and bagging large clumps of contaminated soil to remove the toxic black sludge from the beaches. Waves bring fresh deposits of the tar-like substance, and the work begins again. This Sisyphean cleanup is a result of a mid-December incident in which two aging oil tankers were caught in a storm and broke in half in the Kerch Strait, spilling 2,500 to 4,500 tons of fuel oil into the Black Sea, according to Greenpeace. An estimated 40 miles of Krasnodar's coastline has been affected, with the oil also washing up across the strait in Crimea. Even as volunteers from across Russia flooded in to help, the crisis was at first largely ignored by local and federal officials, highlighting a pervasive lack of official concern over the numerous environmental disasters in the country often resulting from negligence, according to Russian scientists and environmental activists. 'It is an unprecedented event,' Viktor Danilov-Danilyan, chief scientist at the Institute of Water Problems at the Russian Academy of Sciences, told broadcaster RBC. 'This is the most serious environmental disaster in Russia since the beginning of the 21st century.' He estimated that without extensive human intervention, it would take 15 to 20 years for the ecosystem to restore itself. During the accident, the tanker Volgoneft 212 sank, while the other vessel, the Volgoneft 239, was stranded at Cape Panagia, a few hundred feet from the shore, still filled with fuel oil. Greenpeace has estimated the size of the area affected to be about 400 square miles, but with much of the oil underwater, it is difficult to determine. While the spill is not as large as some more-notorious incidents — the Exxon Valdez, which ran aground in 1989 off Alaska, was carrying 35,000 tons of crude oil, though that's lighter than fuel oil — it is one of the biggest for Russia and more than double the size of a spill in the same region in 2007. Local environmentalists immediately rang alarm bells, setting up Telegram group chats to coordinate efforts and find accommodations for people flocking in from other regions to help. These activists handled most of the on-site cleanup efforts in the first week after the incident, according to volunteers interviewed by The Washington Post and scientists quoted by Russian media. The regional authorities of Krasnodar initially did not request federal help, even though each tanker was loaded with about 4,500 tons of fuel. 'This is absurd as this is a large-scale disaster,' Dmitry Shevchenko, an activist from the Krasnodar region, told RBC at the end of December. 'It was necessary to immediately involve federal forces while it had not yet reached such a scale.' In a statement on Dec. 25, Gov. Veniamin Kondratyev said the oil was still washing ashore and 'has dragged on and does not stop' despite assurances from scientists that it would sink to the bottom. He upgraded the spill from a municipal to a regional emergency, describing the situation as 'tense.' The regional government did not respond to questions about why it took so long to bring in federal authorities. Meanwhile, the volunteers quickly ran into a resource issue — a lack of protective gear to keep people from being sickened by the toxic fumes. The bags of sand they collected also remained at the beach as local authorities lacked the capacity to take them away for processing. Residents began to record video addresses to the Kremlin urging it to send reinforcements. At least 60 dead dolphins have been found off Novorossiysk, Anapa and Taman since the spill, and an additional 34 dead animals turned up on Crimea and near its city of Sevastopol, areas Russia illegally annexed from Ukraine in 2014. Ivan Rusev, a biologist and head of the research department at Tuzlovski Limany National Park, estimates the spill also killed thousands of birds. 'I think that 15,000 to 20,000 were found dead, but this is just the tip of the iceberg,' he told Radio Free Europe. 'There are still a lot of birds floundering in the sea. They are under stress and will soon be [washing up] on the shore.' In his interview with RBC, scientist Danilov-Danilyan attributed the disaster to systematic negligence and disregard for safety measures, a pervasive problem across Russian institutions. The tankers were built in 1969 and 1973 and lacked proper permits, casting their seaworthiness into doubt. Russia's Investigative Committee has launched a probe into the operator, which local media reported had already faced legal checks over safety violations in recent years. 'At the very least, they should not have been using vessels that should have been written off 20 years ago. In principle, river-sea vessels should not be released for winter sea navigation,' he said. 'It is impossible to avoid catastrophic consequences with such an attitude — sooner or later it would have occurred. And serious work to eliminate the consequences began only on the ninth or 10th day after the accident.' Nearly a month after the accident, on Jan. 9, the Kremlin stepped in. During a government meeting, President Vladimir Putin issued orders to establish a nationwide response team and scolded local officials for failing to do 'enough' to mitigate damage from the spill. The following day, a new leak began on the stranded Volgoneft 239, but it was 10 more days before the fuel removal from that vessel began, according to state news agency Tass. 'I would give the actions of authorities in terms of removing the sunken part and especially the stranded tanker a solid F,' said Dmitry Lisitsyn, an environmentalist who once worked on Russia's Pacific island of Sakhalin before the Kremlin branded him a foreign agent, forcing him out of the country. 'It is a mystery why they waited until the tanker started leaking again to begin pumping the fuel.' It appears that public outrage and the sight of thousands of volunteers arriving over the New Year's holiday may have been instrumental in spurring the federal government to action. Karina Shahparonova and a few of her friends took time off work and drove to the Krasnodar region from Moscow this month. 'It is very difficult to clean it up because this fuel is a bit like mercury — it splits and disintegrates into small little pieces, small cakes, occasionally somewhat large, all over the beach,' she said. 'So we have to gather it all. Some comb the sand with rakes, some with sieves, some with gloves, some with shovels.' Shahparonova said she had no experience as a volunteer but was moved by the photos and videos emerging from the affected zones. She praised the government efforts in organizing lodging and equipment for the volunteers, but was puzzled as to why it took the authorities so long to isolate the tankers. Lisitsyn, the environmentalist, argued that swifter government action could have prevented leaks that kept damaging the environment. Russia's Transportation Ministry has described the spill as 'the world's first accident involving 'heavy' M100 fuel oil' and said it would be extremely difficult to collect it from the water because it does not float to the surface. As the oil sinks, it kills all living things, poisoning fish, dolphins, mollusks and plankton. Undercurrents spread the spill and can bring oil to the surface, where it traps birds. About 5,000 tons of fuel oil are still lying on the seabed, officials say. Lisitsyn said the situation will worsen toward the summer as temperatures rise, when the remaining fuel, under heat, will release more toxic particles. 'The 2025 holiday seasons there will certainly be ruined because, despite the truly heroic efforts, it is impossible to remove all fuel oil from the beach,' he said. 'Therefore, people who go to this beach will breathe in harmful, very toxic, volatile compounds that are just not that volatile now.' The sunken tanker, meanwhile, remains 20 meters underwater, and its fuel oil continues to seep into the water. According to the Telegram coordination chats, there is now also a shortage of workers as the influx of cleanup volunteers has subsided.
