Latest news with #andConformance
Time Business News
15-06-2025
- Business
- Time Business News
DMARC Report vs. Valimail: Which One Should You Choose?
In the evolving world of email authentication and domain security, choosing the right DMARC monitoring tool is crucial. Two of the most prominent names in this space are DMARC Report and Valimail. Each platform offers robust features aimed at helping organizations implement and monitor Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) policies. However, when evaluating a Valimail alternative, many users look for platforms that offer ease of use, affordability, and comprehensive analytics. This article aims to provide a detailed comparison between DMARC Report and Valimail, helping you make an informed decision. We'll cover core features, usability, pricing, support, and value to help you decide which platform is best suited to protect your email domain and improve deliverability. DMARC plays a critical role in preventing phishing, spoofing, and impersonation attacks. By aligning SPF and DKIM records and setting policies for failed authentication, it allows domain owners to control email flow and receive reports. Choosing the right tool for DMARC monitoring ensures consistent email authentication and better domain reputation. It allows organizations to visualize data, interpret complex reports, and fine-tune policies for maximum protection. The DMARC Report is designed to make DMARC monitoring accessible to everyone—from small businesses to large enterprises. It offers a clean interface, real-time analytics, and simplified onboarding, which makes it one of the most appealing tools for those looking for a Valimail alternative. The platform excels in offering actionable insights with a minimal learning curve. Features such as guided setup, customizable reports, and email alerts make it easy to stay ahead of potential threats. You can also compare with the DMARC report to see where it stands against competitors. Valimail has been a longstanding player in the DMARC space, often used by large enterprises for its robust infrastructure and extensive integration options. It focuses on identity-based email authentication and includes tools for automation and scalability. However, Valimail may present a steep learning curve for smaller organizations or those without a dedicated IT team. It's also priced at a premium, which can be a barrier for startups and small businesses exploring a Valimail alternative. When it comes to features, both tools offer comprehensive DMARC monitoring, reporting, and policy management. However, DMARC Report shines with features like instant domain validation, auto-configuration assistance, and a visually intuitive dashboard. Valimail, on the other hand, offers deeper integrations with enterprise platforms and a wider range of automated capabilities. But these features can be overkill for smaller teams and harder to configure without support. DMARC Report provides a seamless, user-friendly experience. Its interface is designed with simplicity in mind, making it easy for non-technical users to navigate and understand DMARC analytics. Valimail's interface is more complex, which may appeal to advanced users but can be overwhelming for newcomers. Organizations seeking a straightforward Valimail alternative will likely find DMARC Report to be the more approachable option. One of the biggest differentiators between the two platforms is pricing. DMARC Report offers flexible pricing plans, including a robust free tier that gives users access to essential DMARC features. This makes it an ideal choice for budget-conscious businesses. Valimail, by contrast, is typically priced higher and often targets enterprise clients with custom pricing models. Smaller companies may find the cost prohibitive when evaluating it as a Valimail alternative. DMARC Report is known for its responsive and personalized customer support. Users have access to comprehensive documentation, live chat, and direct support channels to resolve issues quickly. Valimail also provides solid support, but it may be more structured and less accessible for smaller clients. When comparing the two, those seeking hands-on assistance may prefer the approachability of DMARC Report. Deployment speed and integration ease are important factors when choosing a DMARC tool. DMARC Report enables users to set up and start receiving reports within minutes, thanks to automated configuration tools and guided onboarding. Valimail's deployment process is more complex, involving manual steps and detailed configuration. While powerful, this can be a barrier for teams looking for a plug-and-play Valimail alternative. Customization is another area where DMARC Report leads. Users can tailor their dashboards, export data in multiple formats, and set thresholds for alerts. This level of control helps fine-tune monitoring to specific organizational needs. Valimail does offer customizable reports, but the process may be more rigid. Users often need deeper technical knowledge to fully leverage its reporting features. DMARC Report focuses on converting complex data into actionable insights. Visual charts, trend analysis, and domain-level breakdowns make it easy to spot problems and apply solutions. Valimail's dashboards are detailed but may require more interpretation. Users without a background in cybersecurity or DNS management might find it less intuitive compared to the Compare with DMARC Report experience. DMARC Report enjoys high ratings for its transparency, simplicity, and effectiveness. It's particularly popular among small to mid-sized businesses that need enterprise-grade protection without the complexity. Valimail is also trusted by many, especially large corporations. However, its enterprise focus sometimes leads smaller users to seek a more tailored Valimail alternative. DMARC Report has shown a consistent commitment to improvement, regularly rolling out new features based on user feedback. This responsiveness makes it a reliable tool for organizations with evolving security needs. While Valimail also innovates, its pace is typically aligned with enterprise requirements, which may delay certain updates or improvements desired by smaller users. Ultimately, the best DMARC tool depends on your organization's size, technical capacity, and budget. If you're a small to mid-sized business looking for a flexible, affordable, and user-friendly Valimail alternative, DMARC Report is an excellent choice. Enterprises with dedicated security teams and large-scale infrastructure may benefit from Valimail's deep integrations and automation features. But for most users, especially those getting started, Compare with DMARC Report to experience greater ease and faster results. In the battle of DMARC Report vs. Valimail, your decision should come down to usability, cost, and organizational fit. DMARC Report stands out as a powerful Valimail alternative that doesn't compromise on features or performance. Whether you're aiming for full compliance or just getting started with email security, tools like DMARC Report offer a smoother journey. Take the time to Compare with DMARC Report and see how it measures up for your needs. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Techday NZ
30-05-2025
- Business
- Techday NZ
Most high-traffic email domains still vulnerable to phishing
New research from EasyDMARC has found that 92% of the world's top 1.8 million email domains lack adequate protection against phishing attacks. The EasyDMARC 2025 DMARC Adoption Report has revealed that only 7.7% of these domains are fully protected using the strictest DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) policy, known as 'p=reject'. This policy is designed to actively block malicious emails from being delivered to inboxes. DMARC is an email authentication protocol that builds on existing standards such as SPF and DKIM, allowing domain owners to specify how they want mail servers to handle emails that fail authentication checks. The protocol also enables domain owners to receive reports on emails sent under their domain name, providing vital records of authentication attempts and potential abuse. EasyDMARC's analysis demonstrates that although there has been a noticeable increase in DMARC adoption since 2023 — largely due to regulatory initiatives and mandates from major providers including Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft — most organisations opt for the weakest available configuration, 'p=none'. This setting only monitors for threats, rather than thwarting attacks by blocking illegitimate emails. The report, which reviewed security practices across the most-visited websites globally as well as Fortune 500 and Inc. 5000 companies, shows a continued gap between DMARC adoption and meaningful implementation. More than half (52.2%) of the surveyed domains have not implemented DMARC at any level, leaving them exposed to phishing and spoofing risks. Among domains that do have a DMARC record, most have not configured enforcement policies or reporting mechanisms necessary for full protection. The research also found that over 40% of the domains with a DMARC record did not include any reporting tags. This omission means these organisations have little to no visibility into authentication failures or an understanding of who might be sending emails on their behalf. Gerasim Hovhannisyan, Chief Executive Officer of EasyDMARC, addressed the misconception surrounding DMARC adoption: "There's a growing perception that simply publishing a DMARC record is enough. But adoption without enforcement creates a dangerous illusion of security. In reality, most organisations are leaving the door wide open to attacks targeting customers, partners, or even employees." Mandates have had a measurable effect. In the United States, where regulatory enforcement is strong, the proportion of phishing emails accepted dropped from 68.8% in 2023 to just 14.2% in 2025. Similar progress was noted in the UK and the Czech Republic, countries that also enforce DMARC usage. However, countries without strict requirements, such as the Netherlands and Qatar, showed minimal improvement in reducing phishing acceptance rates. Recent high-profile cyber attacks, including those targeting retailers such as M&S and Co-op, serve as a backdrop for the report's release. In these incidents, attackers exploited weaknesses in email security through social engineering, costing affected businesses hundreds of thousands in losses. According to EasyDMARC, the increasing sophistication of phishing, partly driven by the use of AI, magnifies the risks for organisations that are inadequately protected. Hovhannisyan further commented: "Misconfigurations, missing reporting, and passive DMARC policies are like installing a security system without ever turning it on. Phishing remains one of the oldest and most effective forms of cyberattack, and without proper enforcement, organisations are effectively handing attackers the keys to their business. As threats grow more sophisticated and compliance pressures mount, stopping halfway with DMARC enforcement is no longer an option." The report methodology combined public DNS data with proprietary data collected through EasyDMARC's platform. It involved the review of aggregate DMARC reports from major mailbox providers and included a survey of 980 IT professionals across the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and the Netherlands. This allowed for insights into regional differences in phishing trends, adoption challenges, and the varying influence of regulatory mandates. The research concludes that while DMARC adoption has increased, genuine protection against phishing relies on both enforcement and visibility — elements still missing for the vast majority of high-traffic domains worldwide.
