logo
#

Latest news with #culturewar

The war on hot women: Why the woke mob hates Sydney Sweeney
The war on hot women: Why the woke mob hates Sydney Sweeney

Fox News

time20 hours ago

  • Entertainment
  • Fox News

The war on hot women: Why the woke mob hates Sydney Sweeney

Let's cut the nonsense: liberal women aren't mad at Sydney Sweeney because she's "setting women back." That's just the excuse they're throwing around because they don't want to admit the truth. They're mad because she's young, hot, white, and blonde. And they're mad that corporations are finally waking up to the truth: that the American people are done with woke! If she were 300 pounds and identified as gender-fluid, she'd be hailed as a revolutionary. If she threw her pronouns into every interview, wore a "FEMINIST" crop top to the red carpet, and spouted progressive talking points on cue, they'd be tripping over themselves to give her a GLAAD Award. But because Sydney Sweeney simply exists - confident, traditionally feminine, and not bending the knee to the woke agenda, she's a target. This isn't about feminism. It's about envy. It's about a cultural movement that now punishes beauty, shames femininity, and exalts victimhood as the highest form of virtue. And the hypocrisy? It's off the charts. Where was all this feminist outrage when Dylan Mulvaney, a biological male, was handed women's brand endorsements by Nike, Bud Light, and Maybelline for "celebrating womanhood"? Where were these voices when Mulvaney mocked the female experience with Barbie cosplay and tampon tutorials? Nowhere. In fact, they were applauding. Because in today's woke dystopia, a man pretending to be a woman gets more respect than an actual woman who dares to look like one. Where were these self-proclaimed champions of women's rights when actual female athletes were getting steamrolled by biological males in their own sports? When Lia Thomas was shoving real women off the podium, where was the outrage? Crickets. Because defending the rights of actual women doesn't fit the narrative. It's not politically useful. That's why they loathe women like Sydney Sweeney. She doesn't play along. She's not trying to be edgy. She's not rewriting what it means to be a woman but instead, she's embodying it. Beautifully, confidently, and unapologetically. That's the real threat. The truth is, the modern Left has declared war on hot women. Because hot women don't need to play the victim. Hot women don't need to be coddled or redefined. They don't need to pretend that beauty is a social construct or that femininity is oppressive. They just live it. And that drives the gender-studies crowd insane. Sydney Sweeney represents everything the woke mob hates: effortlessness, elegance, and the refusal to apologize for qualities that used to be admired. In a culture obsessed with "smashing beauty standards," she reminds us that some standards were never the problem. Our culture's new obsession with woke-fueled mediocrity is. This isn't to say that beauty makes someone better but it certainly shouldn't make them worse in the eyes of the media or the public. We've gone from celebrating women for being empowered in their femininity to vilifying them for being conventionally attractive. Feminism, as the Left now defines it, has nothing to do with empowering women. It's about enforcing ideological conformity. If you don't submit to the narrative—whether it's on gender, politics, race, or body positivity—you get attacked. So let's stop pretending this is about Sydney Sweeney. It's not. It's about a movement that tells women they should be anything but what she is: attractive, traditional, proud, and free. Sydney Sweeney didn't set women back. She triggered the insecurities of those who've built their identity on grievance rather than grace. And for that? More power to her.

Florida's New Attorney General, a DeSantis Appointee, Is Making Waves
Florida's New Attorney General, a DeSantis Appointee, Is Making Waves

New York Times

time3 days ago

  • Politics
  • New York Times

Florida's New Attorney General, a DeSantis Appointee, Is Making Waves

As chief of staff to Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, James Uthmeier worked behind the scenes to cement the Republican governor's national reputation as a culture warrior. Mr. DeSantis rewarded him this year by appointing him attorney general. It was Mr. Uthmeier who announced last month that the state was opening its own immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades. He made international headlines by referring to the swampy, remote location as 'Alligator Alcatraz.' The detention center's first weeks have been chaotic, and something of a mystery. But it has amounted to a political coup for Mr. Uthmeier. President Trump visited before it opened and praised the attorney general. 'You do a very good job,' Mr. Trump told him during a visit to the center early this month. Then, referring to Mr. Uthmeier, Mr. Trump remarked to others in attendance, 'He's even a good-looking guy. The guy's got a future.' The moment offered Mr. Uthmeier hope that Mr. Trump might consider endorsing him when he runs for a full term as attorney general next year, despite Mr. Uthmeier's close ties to Mr. DeSantis, who ran against Mr. Trump in last year's presidential primary. And it raised the profile of Mr. Uthmeier, a 37-year-old lawyer who has never been on a ballot, just as the term-limited Mr. DeSantis's power wanes. Florida Republicans have speculated that primary races in next year's midterms could pit a slate of Trump-backed candidates against a slate backed by Mr. DeSantis. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Labor and Liberals facing internal fault lines over Gaza, net zero, and Welcomes to Country
Labor and Liberals facing internal fault lines over Gaza, net zero, and Welcomes to Country

ABC News

time3 days ago

  • Politics
  • ABC News

Labor and Liberals facing internal fault lines over Gaza, net zero, and Welcomes to Country

It's one of the most enduring political rules — never fight the last election at the next one. But the Liberals are already showing signs of missing this important memo in the new political term. Over the weekend, the WA Liberal Party supported a motion to abandon a target of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, heaping more pressure on federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley to dump the policy. Delegates at the WA Liberal State Council also approved a motion to get rid of the Indigenous and Torres Strait Islands flags behind the prime minister at press conferences and cut back on Welcome to Country ceremonies. It is understood that both motions were carried with an overwhelming show of support when they were read out and without needing to go to a ballot. The behind-closed-doors meeting was held at a hotel in federal MP Andrew Hastie's electorate of Canning, and Hastie, a future leadership contender and rival to current leader Sussan Ley, said the motion was about sending a "clear signal" to Australians. But what is that clear signal? The most obvious signal is that the "sensible centre" Liberal Party that Ley seeks to lead and portray exists as nothing more than an illusion. While Ley sat on the fence on net zero when asked where she stood last week — a dangerous place for any leader to sit — she was positive about the importance of the Welcome to Country ceremony opening the parliament. It puts her at odds with many in her party who want to continue the culture war that derailed the last week of Peter Dutton's campaign. I say derailed because voters were looking for a clear economic narrative and vision from the opposition leader. Instead, they got served more of the same. The fact that these two issues — net zero and Welcome to Country — are becoming the defining fault lines inside the Liberal Party is all the evidence you need that the wars of the past are being fought again, instead of the party engaging with the issues that are defining the future. Labor, for its part, will tackle its level of commitment to Indigenous issues of treaty and truth, and criminal justice when its First Nations caucus meets this week in Canberra. There's a strong feeling in the party that they must not squander the thumping majority they have been delivered, with many believing that advancing Aboriginal rights issues needs to be revisited. A sign of Labor confidence after week one of the 48th parliament is a debate going on about whether the five Labor MPs who have been seated on the opposition benches because the party's numbers are too big have got the rough end of the deal or a sweet blessing. One told me it provides a "fresh perspective" on the house. They are now working on a name for their group of five Labor members. Latest contenders are "the Happy Bench" or "the CrossReds." Either way, it's a good problem to have. The issue many Labor MPs are thinking of as we enter week two of the first sitting fortnight is what more Australia should be doing to denounce the humanitarian horror unfolding in Gaza. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese released a strong statement about the worsening humanitarian crisis, calling on Israel to end its blockade of aid and immediately comply with its obligations under international law. The opposition said the statement was "one-sided" and ignored Hamas's role in blocking aid. But France's plan to recognise Palestinian statehood is changing the direction many think the government needs to take. Former foreign minister Bob Carr and Labor backbencher Ed Husic think it's time to change course. These prominent Labor figures are urging Albanese's government to join French President Emmanuel Macron in recognising a Palestinian state at a United Nations summit in September, in a bid to create momentum for a two-state solution. Yesterday, on Insiders, the PM poured cold water on the prospect of following France. But Labor insiders still hold hope that this position could shift if there is movement from like-minded countries, like the UK, before that September meeting. Albanese told Insiders a decision by the Israeli government to allow some aid into Gaza was "just a start" and more needs to be done. Albanese pointed to images of a starving one-year-old boy, saying, "It breaks your heart". "A one-year-old boy is not a Hamas fighter. The civilian casualties and deaths in Gaza is completely unacceptable. It's completely indefensible. My government has been very consistent in calling for a ceasefire," he said. "We have been consistent in calling out the terrorists in Hamas and saying that the hostages should be released. But we have rules of engagement, and they are there for a reason. They are to stop innocent lives being lost, and that is what we have seen." Albanese said he had been moved by the images of this "innocent young boy". "For anyone with any sense of humanity, you have to be moved by that. And you have to acknowledge that every innocent life matters — whether they be Israeli or Palestinian." The PM said, "we need to move to a longer-term" solution and he called for a two-state solution. Albanese previously said he had spoken to Israeli President Isaac Herzog to tell him Israel was losing support. "What I have said [to him] is that what sometimes friends have to say to their other friends when they are losing support," he said. "Israel is, I think, when you look at internationally, the statements that have been made by, including this week, more than two dozen nations combining to call out the lack of aid being allowed into Gaza, is that they need to recognise — they need to operate within international law. The message is clear: Israel is on notice from its traditional friends. The images of starving children in Gaza have crossed the Rubicon. Australians will not accept this. Patricia Karvelas is host of ABC News Afternoon Briefing at 4pm weekdays on ABC News Channel, co-host of the weekly Party Room podcast with Fran Kelly, and host of politics and news podcast Politics Now.

The President Has Forgotten How to Talk Football
The President Has Forgotten How to Talk Football

Bloomberg

time5 days ago

  • Politics
  • Bloomberg

The President Has Forgotten How to Talk Football

When President Donald Trump demanded that the Washington Commanders change their name back to the Redskins — a slur that the team dropped as a moniker in 2020 — it should have surprised no one. Not only because he's shown that he can't resist a culture war skirmish, but because for decades, the nation's most popular sport has been leveraged by presidents to bolster their standings. During his first term, Trump knew the play. He ran it successfully against NFL players who knelt during the National Anthem.

Redskins and Indians and Obama (Oh, my): How Trump is deflecting from his Epstein Files bungle using MAGA greatest hits
Redskins and Indians and Obama (Oh, my): How Trump is deflecting from his Epstein Files bungle using MAGA greatest hits

Yahoo

time21-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Redskins and Indians and Obama (Oh, my): How Trump is deflecting from his Epstein Files bungle using MAGA greatest hits

Donald Trump's efforts to shift his base's focus away from the so-called Epstein Files fallout continued over the weekend as the president dove headfirst back into the culture war and leaned into his own favorite topic: the supposed Deep State's efforts to persecute him. Ahead of a trip to Scotland this week, Trump is desperate to move the news cycle off of accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and a declaration by the Justice Department that a list of the convicted pedophile's co-conspirators did not exist within the files of the DOJ's investigation — despite his dutiful Attorney General Pam Bondi having said she had such files 'sitting on my desk.' What happened next was a wildfire that engulfed the president's online MAGA base and even spread into the broader podcasting 'manosphere.' As explanations from his supporters ranged from confusion to outright accusations of a cover-up, the president fumed privately and in a since-deleted Truth Social post that his 'PAST' supporters refused to move on from the issue. Epstein was known to cultivate relationships with powerful men and institutions, and speculation has swirled online for years around whether any of those men (including Trump, former President Bill Clinton and Britain's Prince Andrew) knew of his crimes or participated themselves during excursions to his private island or other properties. Donald Trump reignited battles with Barack Obama, Rosie O'Donnell and the Washington Commanders to distract from his Epstein files flop (AFP via Getty Images) No public evidence exists definitively linking anyone besides Epstein and his society-girl lover Ghislaine Maxwell to the crimes, though evidence of his close friendships with Trump and others is extensive. Epstein's death was ruled a suicide after he was found in a New York City jail cell on Aug. 10, 2019, sparking further cries in MAGA circles of a mass conspiracy. On Thursday, the picture of that relationship between the president and a man who would later be found hanged in his jail cell awaiting trial for sex trafficking of minors and women changed considerably. The Wall Street Journal, a Rupert Murdoch-owned publication, published an article revealing the stomach-churning contents of a supposed 50th birthday card Maxwell curated for her boyfriend in 2003. The card included messages from friends of Epstein including, according to the WSJ, Donald Trump. The paper reports that Maxwell 'collected' a letter from Trump for the card, which alluded to a hidden 'secret' shared by the two men, concluding with Trump allegedly wishing Epstein a happy birthday — all done on top of a marker-drawn bawdy image of a naked woman. The White House and the president directly denied all parts of the Journal's report, including the authenticity of the note. But the president also redoubled his efforts at misdirection, and launched a slew of new efforts to that aim. Trial evidence image shows British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and financier Jeffrey Epstein aboard his private jet. Epstein was found to have died by suicide in a New York prison in 2019 -- during Trump's first term -- after being charged with child sex trafficking. Maxwell was later convicted of those crimes and is serving 20 years in prison. (US District Court for the Southern District of New York) First came the lawsuit against Murdoch and the Journal — as well as other independent reporters who circulated the story. This was unquestionably where the president saw the most success in the immediate term: turning the issue into a Trump vs. the media fight provides a unifying bogeyman for the right. Supporters including Steve Bannon dialed back their calls for Trump to provide transparency as the reaction to the Journal's reporting clarified that Democrats and Trump's critics see the issue as a political opportunity. Second was the resumption of Trump's war with Barack Obama, who more than any other Democrat has long held the president's political focus. His entrance into national politics during the Obama era began with a racist campaign aimed at questioning the birthplace of the nation's first Black president, and after his first election victory in 2016 Trump accused his predecessor of directing the FBI to spy on his campaign. Trump reignited those accusations this week, with the aid of Tulsi Gabbard, his director of national intelligence. Gabbard published a memo accusing the Obama administration of changing intelligence assessments to support political conclusions, but the crux of her own declaration was centered around a false conflation of the intelligence community's (IC) conclusion that Russia had not attempted to hack directly into voting systems with what the IC actually did conclude: that Russia used bot farms and other means including materials stolen during the verified hack of the Democratic National Committee's servers to influence public opinion. Not satisfied with picking one old fight, Trump picked two others. On Sunday, the president declared on Truth Social that he may attempt to gum up the approval process for the Washington Commanders stadium in the nation's capital if the team did not return to its old name, abandoned for its racist connotations about Native Americans in 2020. He likely does not have any power to actually carry out that threat, given that federal funding isn't involved in the stadium deal. The same could be said about his resumption of hostilities with another nemesis: comedian Rosie O'Donnell. Trump threatened in a separate Truth Social post to strip her citizenship, something the president legally cannot do. All of this is to say: Trump is throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks in a very obvious manner. On Monday, there were signs that many on the right were still unconvinced by the bluster. Donald Trump is seen at a party with Jeffrey Epstein in 1992. (NBC News) 'So…the Democrats left all the files implicating themselves in Russia Gate but destroyed all the Epstein Files?' one conservative influencer, Kelly McCarty, snidely asked on X. A number of Democrats have rallied behind a resolution with bipartisan support aimed at forcing the release of the DOJ's entire investigation into Epstein. Those members were undeterred on Friday when Attorney General Pam Bondi moved to ask a court to unseal grand jury testimony regarding Maxwell and Epstein, which they note is just a small part of the evidence collected by federal law enforcement. It also remains the case that much of the uproar was fueled by the Trump White House itself. MAGA supporters and others in the chorus of voices calling for evidence including the 'client list' to be released point to how right-wing influencers were summoned to the White House to receive 'phase 1' of 'The Epstein Files' in February. Vice President JD Vance, before that, fueled the speculation in repeated appearances on Theo Von's podcast, including during the 2024 election. Months later, no one else has faced accountability for associations with Epstein and the extent of his crimes remains unknown to the public.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store