logo
#

Latest news with #digitaldetox

I was a Gen Z screen addict. Then I took drastic action
I was a Gen Z screen addict. Then I took drastic action

Times

timea day ago

  • Health
  • Times

I was a Gen Z screen addict. Then I took drastic action

A lot can happen in seven hours. You could fly from London to Dubai, get through a full school day or enjoy a luxurious night's sleep. Me? I used to spend seven hours a day staring at my phone screen. Now I average less than one. I'm 22 and I've spent an alarming percentage of my life glued to my phone. It was everything — my entertainment, my social lifeline, my procrastination tool, my 3am therapist. I'm far from alone. Data shows that Generation Z's daily screen time is on average more than nine hours a day, which is more than any other generation. That's about 136 days a year spent staring at a screen. Meanwhile, the NHS reports a steep rise in mental health disorders among young people, which tracks closely with the explosion in digital device use.

Life Without Screens: This Camp Is a Teen's Worst Nightmare
Life Without Screens: This Camp Is a Teen's Worst Nightmare

WIRED

time21-07-2025

  • Entertainment
  • WIRED

Life Without Screens: This Camp Is a Teen's Worst Nightmare

Jul 21, 2025 6:00 AM Hidden burner phones. Hunger strikes. Runaways. The director of a digital detox program for kids spills about how hard it is to tear kids away from their devices. PHOTO-ILLUSTRATION: JOHANNA GOODMAN; GETTY IMAGES Summer. For teens not at work, it's hot, it's boring, and it's an ideal time to close the door and spend about every waking moment watching, playing, texting, streaming—anything but talking—on the phone. With almost half of teenagers in the US saying they're online almost constantly, the adults in their lives are growing more desperate to drag them off. Families are establishing screen-free zones in their homes, states are banning phones in schools, and a new kind of summer camp has emerged: digital detox camps, which can cost around $2,000 a week, and promise to wean attendees off screens by going cold turkey for the summer. WIRED spoke to the founder and director of one such organization. Taking a cue from your average summer camp, the program forces kids to swap their phones and gaming systems for some good old-fashioned social interaction. But in other ways, it's anything but traditional: It's staffed with onsite therapists equipped to handle screen addiction, the kids take financial literacy courses, and nearly all campers are completely miserable when they arrive. Most of the kids who come to our program are very socially stunted. They don't communicate very well. Everything is in abbreviations. They don't make eye contact. They can't finish a full sentence. Everything is mumbled. They don't want to have an in-person dialog. They would rather do it online or do it through text. Our camp is about 70 percent boys, 30 percent girls, from ages 13 to 17. Most of the boys are gamers. Most of the girls are addicted to social media—influencer wannabes. None of them want to be there. One kid ran away, and he actually made it down to the freeway, which was very unusual because we're not close to the freeway. He was picked up by the local highway patrol and brought back. He then went on a hunger strike for three days, and we actually ended up sending him to the hospital because he needed to eat. And then his mom did come and pick him up. When the kids arrive, we have them unpack to make sure they brought everything they were supposed to bring and that they didn't bring things they weren't supposed to bring. Like phones. One kid showed up with three cell phones: When he arrived, he turned in one. We found another cell phone in his bag. And then about three days later his roommate outed him, and we found the third phone. He thought it was funny that he got away with it for that long. That's most of our kids—if they can stick it to the man, then they're winning. Most of the kids are not aggressive, they're not acting out. More often, they're moping. But once they come out of their dorm room, we lock the doors. I say, 'Sitting in your dorm room moping is not a camp activity.' Their sleeping and eating habits are horrible. Most kids, especially the online gamers, are up until 2 or 3 in the morning. They don't get up until noon or later. It's a disaster. And their eating habits, they're equally horrible—Doritos and Gatorade, just horrible snack food. So we have them on a very specific schedule. They're in their dorm rooms by 9:30 and have their lights out by 10. And then we wake them up at 6:30. I always tell my staff, 'Plan on not sleeping much the first week.' They have one or two roommates in their dorm rooms. Typically, they are not happy about that. Most kids who come to our program have their own room at home. But what's funny is that it creates this us-against-them mentality, because they don't want to be there, and their roommate doesn't want to be there. They hate us, they hate their parents for sending them there, so they kind of bond without meaning to right off the bat. We do all the traditional summer camp activities. We take them to the beach once a week. It's not that much torture. During one of the first years, we had a kid who walked away from the beach day. And he didn't walk far, but he approached a couple who were taking a selfie and asked if he could use their phone. He ended up calling his mom, saying, 'Get me out of here.' His mom did not come and pick him up: The next year, she sent his little brother to camp too. We had more staff members come to beach day after that. We also do educational programs and a financial literacy class. We have to break it to these kids that tech companies don't care about their fun and enjoyment; they're after their time and their money. We've had several kids who have been given credit cards that they then charge up, buying in-app activities or 'skins' in games like Fortnite . And then when they can't spend any more on that card, they'll use their friend's card, their mom's card. We had one kid use their friend's grandmother's card. But we never tell a kid, 'Never play a video game again, never be online again, never check your email again.' That's just not the reality of the world we live in. When we started this program, we didn't really expect to have returning campers. We figured we'd get you cured, and then next summer you go to surf camp or sail camp or horseback camp or something. But every year we have one or two kids who want to come back—not because they've gone back to the dark side of tech addiction; it's because they want to help the next batch of campers. They want to say to a mopey new camper, 'I was you last year. I was exactly where you are, and I turned out OK.' —As told to Elana Klein

Does a school smartphone ban make a difference?
Does a school smartphone ban make a difference?

BBC News

time21-07-2025

  • Entertainment
  • BBC News

Does a school smartphone ban make a difference?

Smart phones are part of modern life but the amount they are used can be a battleground, with parents and schools often on one side and young people on the other. So what would the effects be if children gave up their phones – even if just for a short time?Meghan was interested in ditching her device, but said her friends thought the idea of being without a smartphone – and the myriad apps within – was "ridiculous".The 15-year-old is one of 32 pupils who took part in a project at school to swap their high-tech handheld items for 'brick' phones, which can deal with calls but not be on the the doubts expressed by Meghan's peer group, she decided to hand over her phone as part of the three-week project at Ecclesfield Secondary School in South Yorkshire."I wanted to do it because I feel like the older I get the more I realised what you see on your phone can be harmful, so coming away from it could be nice," she well as pupils, four staff gave up their smart devices as part of the scheme, which was a collaboration between the school, Sheffield Hallam University, Mitie and Career Meghan manage to survive without her internet and social media-connected phone for the project?She said it had been "easier" than she initially feared. The time away from scrolling meant there had been more opportunities to do other things, Meghan said."I got more homework done but talking to my family more was my favourite thing," she said."Before if I was upset I'd go to my room and scroll on TikTok, but now I didn't have my phone so I chatted much more to my mum."The idea for the project came from Liz Hunter, who teaches Personal, Social, Health and Citizenship Education at Ecclesfield."You don't have to work in education to see the growing impact that modern mobile phones increasingly have on our children," she Hunter said those who took part in the project had reported "so many positives, things like less anxiety, better friendships, better sleep, and more time to engage in other activities".Earlier this year, a Parliamentary bill that had suggested banning smartphones in schools and addictive algorithms aimed at young teenagers was watered down to gain government teacher Richard Walkden, who has been in charge for eight years as smartphone use has become a greater talking point across the UK, said he was proud of the students and staff who took part."My role is to protect childhood," he said."We banned mobile phones from school many years ago. They terrify me. They make kids grow up quicker." A 14-minute film entitled Why Don't You?, made by firm Revealing Reality, which tracked the pupils' progress was premiered on 14 July in the main hall of the pupils the BBC spoke to also said they had found the phone break 12, said the project had given him more time to help his dad working with wood."It was quite nice," he said. "I couldn't do the dangerous stuff but my dad helped me get involved and work with the resin."After receiving his phone back, he said he did not feel he had "missed out"."I just had a bunch of messages from my form groupchat full of stickers," he 13, took up fishing during the project using his grandad's kit."I went out almost every day," he the teenager did confess to "missing" his phone when he caught a fish and wanted to "celebrate" with a picture. Olivia said she had found the experience "quite freeing".The 15-year-old said: "I found it quite nice to not have the burden of replying to every message."But did the short project create long-term change?Olivia was in two admitted that although she now used her smartphone less, she had felt herself "slipping into old habits".Ofcom, the online safety regulator, reported in February 2024 that 99% of children spend time online and nine in 10 children own a mobile phone by the time they reach the age of 11. They also found three in five secondary school-aged children had been contacted online in a way that potentially made them feel Hunter said the school were now looking at how they could spread the message to encourage their children to live "less of their lives online."She said: "We're looking at our school policies for mobiles. We're wanting to do more work with parents, and we're also looking to work with our local primary schools to try and capture the children at a younger age and get them thinking about their phone use." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North

UAE: Can digital detox be the new norm with Gen-Z?
UAE: Can digital detox be the new norm with Gen-Z?

Khaleej Times

time17-07-2025

  • Khaleej Times

UAE: Can digital detox be the new norm with Gen-Z?

The digital detox is coming, and I know it both anecdotally and personally. Personally, it sucks. Social media, staring at a screen for most of my work and entertainment, or dealing with some AI nonsense. Whatever it may be, the time is coming where the wide use of cell phones and digital networks overall will decline. Maybe it's that large language models and so-called AI are already messing with peoples' heads by delivering them delusions of grandeur and false information that perpetuates all sorts of stereotypes, prejudices, racism and inhumane thinking, but I struggle to believe this globalised society, less than 200 years after the industrial revolution, has at all contended with what all this tech is doing to humanity. From our collective well-being to our individual health, it seems as if though we never moved on from the economic boom-seeking culture of the 1980s, we did our utmost to hold up the enthusiasm for ever-more complex gadgets and systems. On the surface, and in many early cases, these advancements were good; cell phones and personal computers freed us of work, the internet showed us we could build a truly global society, and advancements in AI offered a glimpse at a post-work, post-scarcity society. Unfettered by race, religion, culture and even our own bodies, what was to stop us? The Gutenberg press was a similar revolution; a wine press, some stamps, some ink and paper – and Europe and Christianity were changed forever. Are we as flawed for believing our species and society could remain the same after so many advancements in such a short period of time, or is it new, 21st century hubris for believing we were better than our ancestors? We fight the same wars, commit the same genocides, and rob the same people of liberty and opportunity when it's someone else's turn at the top of the geopolitical wheel? I don't know the solution, just that it needs to start with pulling back. Healthy use of all technology is not at all on peoples' radars, and I accept that, I'm no Luddite. But as a species we have to contend with living in a world where billionaires can ride rockets like space cowboys, while children are starved to death in Gaza. When I think about it, I shut off. Outside of work, I'm cursing myself if I go on social media, I'm annoyed if I open a streaming service, and I'm uncomfortable when I have to write another form email to ask the same query of a person weathering 1,001 questions from people just like me. Now, I don't subscribe to the theories which proclaim anxiety, depression and suicide are on the rise only because of social media – I'm convinced this is a case of correlation not equalling causation and gathering data on mental health is just easier as the stigma declines – but we do know for certain that how false information spreads and can be manipulated or suppressed by those in the control seat. I am still looking, but we all must find a way to split the difference between those community 'it takes a village'-type ties, and broader solidarity around the world that travels by respecting other cultures while not giving ground where it matters most.

Sage iPhone for children review: ‘Would it make me want to divorce my parents?'
Sage iPhone for children review: ‘Would it make me want to divorce my parents?'

The Guardian

time16-07-2025

  • The Guardian

Sage iPhone for children review: ‘Would it make me want to divorce my parents?'

I was intrigued to find out how this would work but a bit freaked out too. I use my iPhone non-stop: four hours each day during school terms; eight during holidays. Snapchat matters most, but I'm often following friends on TikTok and Instagram. The prospect of not having access to any apps or the internet was just 'ugh'. Part of me wanted to scream at the thought of being cut off by this Sage phone. Would it make me want to divorce my parents? I knew I was going to miss out. The Sage phone came loaded only with Google Maps, Spotify, Monzo, Uber, a calendar and the TfL Go transport app. None of that gave me much to do. There was messaging, but no one really uses messages and I can't remember the last time I made a phone call to a friend. Let's start with the positives. Because the phone was so boring, I didn't want to use it, [I] put it down and chatted more with my family. I spent less time in my room and was more productive – I even wrote this piece! The people at Sage said it could take a month to get used to the limitations, but I don't have that long to test it. I can already tell you that if you are a teenager you are going to feel disconnected from all of your friends and the rest of the world and that feels unfair. Having TikTok and Instagram is the way the world is wired now. If you take them away then it's quite hard to stay in the loop. If I stayed with this phone I would also end up feeling left out when speaking in real life to my friends as this is where so many of our sayings and jokes come from. Social media is the way we know what everyone is up to and without it I felt I would be left out of the goings-on. We know social media is distracting, but it's important to our social world now. During GCSEs some of my friends deleted apps, but they all ended up redownloading them within two days. I'm not as worried about the harms as many adults are. I made some of my closest friends through playing Roblox during the Covid lockdown and that's not allowed on this phone. I wasn't addicted to it. It was just fun. I have lots of friends from other schools who I might not text or talk to for weeks at a time, but through Snap I can stay in contact with them, see what they are up to and exchange things like videos that keep our relationships going in a way that wouldn't happen with just phones. It has become a social glue and without it our networks might fall apart. It's true that there are people who are negatively affected by exposure to TikTok accounts promoting a particular image of beauty. So this limited phone could prevent that and reduce the risk of people struggling with body image. And if your parents insist on you having a 'dumb' phone, I think this could be an effective way to eliminate the shame of having a 'brick' phone. If you were out with your friends and people were checking their phones it would be really weird to pull out a Nokia or not get a phone out. Overall, I understand the intentions and the appeal to parents, but unless everyone switched to Sage, I would miss out on too much.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store