Latest news with #familyLaw
CBC
06-07-2025
- CBC
Man charged with second-degree murder after 'highly visible and tragic event': RCMP
Police in Kelowna, B.C., say a man arrested after a "highly visible and tragic event" in the city Friday has now been charged with second-degree murder. Kelowna RCMP say James Edward Plover has been in custody since he was arrested after a brief pursuit by officers who responded to reports of a "motor vehicle incident" and an alleged assault with a weapon involving two female victims. Mounties say one of the victims succumbed to her injuries and the second victim is still in hospital with serious but non-life-threatening injuries. The suspect was known to the deceased victim, according to police. Kelowna RCMP say the murder charge was approved by the BC Prosecution Service today and Plover is due in court on July 10. Insp. Chris Goebel with Kelowna RCMP says the assault has had a "profound impact" on many people in the community, and first responders acted swiftly and professionally during the high-risk situation. Online court records show Plover was charged with uttering threats and assault by choking last year, but the charges were stayed, and he and the victim are involved in active family law litigation and also face foreclosure proceedings launched by two separate banks.
BBC News
15-06-2025
- Politics
- BBC News
Sweeping changes to 'archaic' Jersey family laws urged
Jersey deputies are being urged not to have a "knee-jerk reaction" to updating the island's parenting Colley, a legal assistant in family law at Viberts, said a "wholesale review" of parenting laws was needed to remove "outdated" Affairs Minister Deputy Mary Le Hegarat proposed changing Jersey's parenting laws so children born out of wedlock were no longer considered "illegitimate".Several islanders considered illegitimate by law told the BBC they were unaware of the legal status. Ms Colley said a strategic review was needed to prevent further changes being introduced in the future and, if changes were made to the Legitimacy (Jersey) Law 1973, it would have to be "done carefully"."In practical terms I do not think that the change in the law will have any real impact on families," she said."However, the concept of an illegitimate child is very outdated and there does need to be a wholesale review of all the legislation that makes reference to this term."There are laws currently that even mean that if a child is born to a couple who are still married and the husband is not the biological father of the child, it is still the case that the child is his child until that child is illegitimised, for example. "This has probably been an outdated legal concept for decades and has never been reviewed by legislators."In the UK, the Family Reform Act 1987 removed all remaining legal distinctions between children born to married and unmarried parents. 'Modernise the laws' Ms Colley said there were also issues with children born to unmarried parents prior to the law change in 2016."The fathers of these children do not have parental responsibility for their child, even if they subsequently marry the child's mother," she said."This is why it is important not just to have a quick knee-jerk reaction to this issue and take time to properly modernise the laws relating to the island's children."The BBC spoke to many islanders about the proposal who were unaware of their legal status. 'Archaic concept' Dylan Rawlinson said it had not affected him but added the law was "a very archaic concept".Other islanders who did not want to be named said they had experienced some said people thought her surname was her father's, not her mother's, which she took at said their parent's had "a nightmare" when trying to change their surname "when they did eventually get married" - saying it "cost thousands".One mother said her children had "never once been referred to as illegitimate on anything or [by] anyone since they were born". Proposing the changes, Le Hegarat had said Jersey's law was "out of step with policy developments over the last few decades"."The option of abolishing the status of legitimacy is strongly preferable, as it is no longer reflective of modern family life," she said."Only children whose parents are married and in a mixed-sex relationship are currently provided with the status of being 'legitimate' at birth."
BBC News
12-06-2025
- Politics
- BBC News
Legal win for son tricked into moving to Africa by parents
A teenager who was tricked into going to boarding school in Africa has won a significant legal victory against his own 14-year-old boy, who cannot be identified, was taken from London to Ghana in March 2024 after being told a relative was ill. In fact, his parents wanted to get him out of London as they feared he was being drawn into criminal and homesick in Ghana, the boy found lawyers and brought a case against his parents to the High Court in London, which ruled against him in February. On Thursday, he won his appeal, so the case will be reheard. The most senior judge in the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, said there had been confusion in the previous decision."We have become more and more concerned as to the exercise the judge undertook," he added."For those reasons - we are agreed remittal should be allowed."He urged the family to find a solution through constructive dialogue. At the hearing, the boy's barrister, Deirdre Fottrell KC, said he is "desperate" to return to the UK."He is culturally displaced and alienated," she said."He considers himself abandoned by his family. He feels he is a British boy, a London boy."The boy remains in Ghana and has been attending a day school there. His solicitor, James Netto, described the appeal ruling as a "hugely significant" decision that would "resonate across international family law." He said: "We are very pleased indeed that the Court of Appeal has allowed our client's appeal, and has recognised the critical importance of listening to and assessing the voices of young people at the heart of legal proceedings that profoundly affect their lives."The parents' barrister, Rebecca Foulkes, said that staying in Ghana was the "least harmful" option for the boy."The parents found themselves in a wholly invidious decision when they made the decision they made," she said. "Ghana provided a safe haven, separate from those who exposed him to risk."The least harmful option is for him to remain in Ghana."The case centres on the question of parental responsibility, and whether the parents acted unlawfully by sending their son to boarding school without his boy previously told the court that he felt like he was "living in hell". He said he was "mocked" at the school in Ghana and "could also barely understand what was going on".During the previous judgement, High Court judge Mr Justice Hayden said the parents' wish for their son to move to Ghana was "driven by their deep, obvious and unconditional love".He found that the boy, who had lived in the UK since birth, was at risk of suffering greater harm by returning to said that the boy's parents believe "and in my judgement with reason" that their son has "at very least peripheral involvement with gang culture and has exhibited an unhealthy interest in knives".Sir Andrew said the case will now be reheard by a different judge, with the next hearing planned to take place in the next few weeks.A full decision will be given in writing at a later date.
Associated Press
09-06-2025
- Business
- Associated Press
KSTM Promotes Eric Saar to Partner
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jun 9, 2025-- Krauss Shaknes Tallentire & Messeri LLP announced today that Eric Saar, a skilled litigator newly licensed to practice in New Jersey, has been promoted to partner. 'Eric has a wealth of expertise in matrimonial and family law, and his talent as a negotiator, writer, and litigator make him a valuable asset to his clients and colleagues at our firm,' said KSTM founding partner Caroline Krauss. 'Now barred in New Jersey as well as New York, he has expanded the reach of his practice and allowed KSTM to serve clients in New Jersey seamlessly.' Saar's experience in matrimonial and family law matters includes the division of complex assets, highly intricate custody matters, spousal and child support issues, and the preparation and negotiation of pre- and post-nuptial agreements. He is an active member of the New York City Bar Association's Matrimonial Law Committee and previously served as co-chair of the Legislative Affairs subcommittee. Saar is also a member of the New York State Bar Association's Family Law Section. Saar will play a key role as KSTM expands its presence and capabilities in New Jersey. His recent admission to the New Jersey Bar allows the firm to practice in the state without the need for local co-counsel. 'I am honored to join KSTM's partnership and to play a role in expanding the firm's presence into New Jersey,' said Saar. 'I look forward to bringing our empathetic, client-focused approach to individuals and families throughout the state, and to continuing to guide our clients through some of life's most challenging moments with clarity, compassion, and an unwavering commitment to their goals.' Saar's professional honors include being named a New York Super Lawyer in Family Law (2024-25) and Rising Star in Family Law (2020-23), and a Best Lawyers' One to Watch for Family Law in New York (2024). Before joining KSTM, Saar was an associate at Greenspoon Marder LLP. He has focused on matrimonial law since prior to his graduation from the University of Illinois Chicago John Marshall Law School, serving as a law clerk for the largest law firm in the country that practices matrimonial law exclusively. About Krauss Shaknes Tallentire & Messeri LLP Krauss Shaknes Tallentire & Messeri LLP ( ) provides counsel to clients in the full range of matrimonial and family law matters, including pre- and post-nuptial agreements, divorces, paternity matters, custody, access, and support issues, and other family law matters. We have offices in New York City, New Jersey, and Greenwich, Connecticut. View source version on CONTACT: Kelsey Dellovo [email protected] 339.223.0961 KEYWORD: UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA NEW YORK NEW JERSEY INDUSTRY KEYWORD: OTHER CONSUMER LEGAL ADVERTISING COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUSINESS FAMILY LIFESTYLE CONSUMER OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOURCE: Krauss Shaknes Tallentire & Messeri LLP Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 06/09/2025 09:30 AM/DISC: 06/09/2025 09:28 AM
BreakingNews.ie
06-06-2025
- BreakingNews.ie
Dublin granny's death wish on kids triggers restraining order
A judge imposed a three-year restraining order on a Dublin grandmother, barring her from posting online about her daughter after allegedly harassing her and wishing death on her grandchildren. The young woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, resorted to using anti-stalking laws and applied for the order at Dublin District Court. Advertisement However, her estranged mother did not attend the scheduled hearing to contest the claims against her. "My mother is harassing me," her adult daughter told Judge Anthony Halpin, adding that she had been subjected to online abuse, including "she hopes my kids die". Asked why this happened, the woman, in her twenties, explained that she had been taken into care when she was young and there had been a fractured relationship since. She told the court that the posts started nine weeks ago after five years of no contact. Advertisement The woman believed her mother was "retaliating for having no contact with or access to her grandchildren". On reviewing printouts of the posts, Judge Halpin stated he was satisfied the woman had made a reasonable case for a civil restraining order barring unwanted contact and online posts about the applicant. He held that it was appropriate to compel the respondent from harassing or placing her daughter in fear. Judge Halpin said gardaí would serve the order on the grandmother, and the court had a wide range of sanctions available if she broke the terms. Ireland Businessman fired for 'old school' methods of meet... Read More Breaching them can result in the subject of the order being brought to court, jailed for up to a year and a maximum €4,000 fine. The restraining orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2023 as a remedy for people seeking protection. The District Court may issue an order to prevent the respondent from violence or threats, stalking, harassing or approaching the applicant's home, work, or school. It can run for up to five years but may be shorter depending on the presiding judge's assessment.
